
As my colleague David Lieberman pointed out this morning, Lionsgate brass crowed to Wall Street analysts about their high expectations for the four movies that will be made from Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games novels. Wait a minute, four movies? Lionsgate toppers inadvertently dropped a bit of a bombshell, because everybody thought there would be three movies, one for each book in the series. Right now, the notion of making four movies isn’t set in stone, but apparently, Lionsgate has been carefully observing predecessors who squeezed an extra film out of a book franchise. Namely Warner Bros on Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and Summit on Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn. Unlike those two examples, Lionsgate has covered itself by signing the cast to option deals that encompass all four films. By contrast, the Harry Potter kids made set-for-life fortunes when their contracts had to be changed to add another film, and so did the Twilight Saga stars. We’re talking tens of millions of dollars here in the monies paid to Jennifer Lawrence, Liam Hemsworth, Josh Hutcherson and the other cast members. Lionsgate will likely have to sweeten the cast deals if the films hit as big as everybody expects them to, but the indie studio will have the leverage. As for how the trilogy will be turned into four films, it’ll go much the way that Harry Potter and Twilight Saga did. The first two books will be the first two films. The last book will be split in half. The final installment, Mockingjay, is logistically ambitious and can be scaled up comfortably to cover two films. I believe that Gary Ross and Collins have done rewrites and already figured out how to create a satisfying ending to the third film. A fourth film will give Lionsgate brass an extra year to puff out their chests before Wall Street analysts, but enough happens in that third book that there’s a good chance that fans of the Collins trilogy will also be pleased by an extra installment. Of course, the first one has to work, because Lionsgate has only committed to a single film so far and could stop at one if it’s a flop, as unlikely as that sounds. But if they get as far as that third book, expect Ross to shoot those last two films back to back, another effective way to keep costs down.


I’m all for it as long as the films maintain the integrity of the books. Huge fan of this series, and was hoping for a two part Mockinjay. There is more then enough material for two films. Glad the cast is all locked down, cause that will be essential.
Are we sure that this means they are contemplating splitting Mockingjay into two films (the story doesn’t really warrant it)?
It seems more like a smart business contingency than an indication of actual planning. And whose to say Collins doesn’t write another book? That would seem more likely, a follow-up, by the time the third movie comes out….
For the uninitiated – do the ‘hunger games’ books play to the ‘twilight’ audience – or potentially to an older crowd as well?
The books should appeal more to the older audience than the twilight one. The Hunger Games is gritty and has none of the sappy, mushy romance. While Twilight had docile, nearly harmless vampires, The Hunger Games has kids facing off against each other to the death.
Not the Twilight audience, but perhaps the Harry Potter one.
pdway: They most definitely cater to an older crowd as well. Especially with each book, it gets darker. I was turned on to the series by a 50 year old grandmother, and her kids love the book too.
Mockingjay doesn’t need a two films, catching fire does. It’s the best book and has the most important details. I hope they only mkae one mockingjay, but I would love 2 catching fires.
How can LionsGate afford to pay so many different actors, especially for 4 films, even with the structure of the deals?
The HG books definitely appear to a larger and older audience. I’m a 33yo male and loved the books, which then got passed around to the entire family, who all loved them as well, including: three of my brothers (all in their 20s) and their girlfriends, our mom (in her 50s), and our uncle (in his 40s).
Indeed, Ross. While no one can ever question the success of the Twilight books/movies, I definitely feel these skew towards an older audience. I also feel that they did a better job of crossing the gender lines. I (as a 35 year old male) painfully made my way through the increasingly schmaltzy Twilight books at the recommendation of a Female friend. But the HG series, despite it’s female author and protagonist never felt like it was written for one gender or the other. Lost a lot of sleep, staying up way too late reading those books. I think, if Ross can maintain his quality of work from Pleasantville and Seabiscuit, Lionsgate is sitting on a goldmine here that even now they are underestimating.
I have no knowledge of these books and if they’re aimed at the same audience as Potter and Twilight then they obviously aren’t aimed at me. That said 4 films of the stunning Jennifer Lawrence rather than 3 sounds good to me. I’d watch anything with Lawrence in… anything
I am not a fan of either Twilight or HP and I lost sleep reading these books. I heard about them from 3 different people before I read them. One person was 58 years old, the other 34 years old, and the last was 16 years old.
Im not keen with Gary Ross Directing such a non-feel good book series into film or the choices for Peeta and Gale or Haymitch but as a fan i must at least see the 1st one with hopes it’s not totally ruined. not pleased at all with the casting they are turning this into a love story which it is not