UPDATE, 12:00 PM: NBC says it paid $4.38 billion for the four Olympics matches. But the network won because NBC’s track record with the games “speaks for itself” and the company “has a clear and innovative vision of where it wants to take the broadcast of the Games between now and 2020,” International Olympics Committee President Jacques Rogge says. Investors initially appear to be satisfied with the price that Comcast authorized NBC to pay. Even if the network loses money “we continue to see the Olympics as less of a financial decision and more of a strategic and branding initiative” for NBC, Wells Fargo Securities analyst Marci Ryvicker says. Comcast expects the Olympics to help stabilize NBC, which the cable company has vowed to revive. In addition. Comcast plans to use the games to beef up its cable networks Versus and The Golf Channel.
PREVIOUS, 10:00 AM: Deadline has now confirmed that NBC has retained the U.S. Olympic television rights in a 4-games deal through 2020. The AP was first to report the news out of Lausanne where the International Olympics Committee is meeting and puts the bidding number at ”worth more than $4 billion” — which is $1 billion less than expected. The decision has not yet been officially announced by the International Olympic Committee, but NBC is acknowledging it won a 3-way bidding contest against ESPN and Fox. It will have exclusive rights to the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, Russia, the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, as well as the 2018 Winter Games and 2020 Olympics, whose sites have not yet been chosen. NBC has broadcast every Summer Olympics since 1988 and every Winter Games since 2002.
Executives from NBC, ESPN and Fox submitted sealed envelopes into a see-through plexiglass box, then left the building to let IOC officials open them and consider the offers in private for the first U.S. rights auction for the Olympics since 2003. All three networks kept emphasizing in their presentations that the Olympics would be presented live, something which NBC has come under fire for because of all the tape-delaying of the games to air during primetime in recent years. Here’s hoping that NBC changes its ways without Dick Ebersol at the helm. That said, the NBC win is going to help Comcast’s long-range plans to make its sports network into a juggernaut able to challenge both ESPN and Fox Sports.
NBC’s presentation to the IOC included new Comcast owners Steve Burke and Brian Roberts. Missing, of course, was longtime NBC sports czar Dick Ebersol who resigned last month after butting heads with Comcast. But the 17-member NBC delegation included mainstay Olympics host Bob Costas. ”My message was we’ve done it well and we’d like to do it again,” he said from Lausanne.
But ABC/ESPN and Fox pulled out all the stops as well. Reports said ESPN president George Bodenheimer cited the “unrivaled” assets of parent company Disney, its appeal to young viewers, and plans for live coverage of all events. ”We think sport should be enjoyed live by sports fans, so we would televise every minute of the Olympics live,” Bodenheimer said, adding that ABC would also broadcast taped footage in primetime. ABC dominated the Olympics broadcasts until NBC won the rights. ABC’s last Olympics was the 1988 Winter Games in Calgary.
Fox from the start made clear that it intended to bid for the four-games package. ”If you look at amortization, you have to make a major investment in technical hardware,” Fox sports chairman David Hill said after Monday’s presentation. “Anyone will tell you if you advertise that over four years rather than two years, you’re financially in a much better place.”
SUNDAY: Three things have come to define NBC since 1988: Jay Leno, Law & Order – and the Olympics. But next week the No. 4 network is in danger of losing the every-two-year sports fest as its new owner, Comcast, engages in a bidding war with Disney and News Corp that could reshape sports television. Top executives of the three companies will converge on Lausanne, Switzerland at the beginning of the week and try to persuade the International Olympic Committee to license them U.S. broadcast rights to the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, and the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. There also is an option to bid on a four-game package through 2020. It’s estimated that a winning bid for the four games could go as high as $5 billion, a step up from the $2.2 billion that NBC agreed to pay in 2003 for the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics and next year’s London Summer Olympics.
Are the games worth that much? Possibly not if you just look at the revenue they generate, mostly from ad sales. NBC reportedly lost $223 million in Vancouver. Pundits said that demonstrated former NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker and former NBC Sports & Olympics Chairman Dick Ebersol overbid, although they could not have foreseen the deep recession that trashed the ad market in 2008. Still, Comcast — which acquired a controlling stake in NBC Universal in January — has said that it won’t tolerate another big Olympics loss. It recently pushed aside Ebersol, who had championed the idea of spending lavishly to turn the Olympics into television’s most watched event. The IOC chairman was so taken aback that he called Comcast to make sure NBC was still in the running.
But it may be more complicated this time around to measure how valuable the Olympics could be to the bidders. The advertising market still hasn’t fully recovered, and economists say we’re in for a bumpy ride over the next few years. At the same time, the television audience for the games is growing older: The median age of TV viewers for the Winter Olympics rose to 53 in 2010 from 48 in 1998, and for the Summer games was up to 48 in 2008 from 39 in 1992. That may reflect the fact that young audiences in the digital age aren’t interested in waiting until primetime to see a taped replay of an event that took place hours earlier (that’s certainly the consensus among our readers, judging from reaction to Ebersol’s departure last month). There’s an eight-hour time difference between Sochi and New York, but Rio’s just one hour ahead.
The only way the bidders can justify a huge offer would be to show lots of popular events on cable, the center of power in sports television. Cable and satellite companies pay Disney’s ESPN an industry leading monthly fee of $4.76 per subscriber — a figure that could reach nearly $6 in 2014 — according to research firm SNL Kagan. That’s troubled Comcast for years. It has said that it
couldn’t fight ESPN’s price increases because subscribers consider it to be a must-have channel. So Comcast has a double incentive to do whatever’s necessary to land the Olympics: It needs to play defense and protect NBC. Comcast also can go on offense and use the games to turn its cable channel, Versus, into a sports power that might challenge ESPN.
Disney faces the same considerations, but in reverse: It would love to add the Olympics’ popular programming to ABC. And it will do almost anything to protect ESPN, the company’s most dependable cash cow. Indeed, CEO Bob Iger told analysts recently that before 2014 ESPN has “a number of rather large negotiations” coming to renew its contracts with pay TV providers — and he could demand a big price hike to help cover any Olympics costs. News Corp also sees sports as a key growth driver at Fox, the company’s collection of regional sports networks, and — more recently — at its cable channel FX. On Thursday, CBS chief Les Moonves said CBS would not bid on the Olympics; it would need a cable partner to make the money work, and potential teammate Turner has been lukewarm about entering the arena.
It all adds up to an open race Monday and Tuesday, when the three companies make their presentations and hand over sealed bids to the IOC (the Olympics’ top governing body could select a winner as early as Wednesday). For the first time in almost two decades, who crosses the finish line first is anybody’s guess.


Versus has a long way to go if they really want to challenge ESPN. They would need to overhaul and rebrand that channel for anyone to give it any semblance of credibility as a sports channel.
Versus is supposed to take the “NBC Sports” brand in some way by this summer. That will help in a way, but NBC Sports has been degraded badly over the past ten years…
The Olympics cannot and will not bring Versus anywhere near ESPN unless Comcast is prepared to pour more money into more mainstream sports for the network. They already woefully underpaid the NHL and could easily lose it if they ever grow its audience enough to draw interest from anywhere else (and by that I mean outside of Canada).
Please let some else get the Olympics. NBC does such a bad job.They are always a hot mess & the sob stories before every event are just too awful. And Bob Costas – ugh. I hope cable makes a bid that the regular stations can’t compete with
Yeah, Costas needs to retire. His walnut-shaded dyed hair, his smarmy know-it-all demeanor, makes you want to bully him.
The thing that Disney/ESPN would get right is the balance between live and primetime. Sporting events should be shown live not just as highlights mixed in with a thousand Bob Costas interviews.
Also, ESPN wouldn’t fall trap to the cherry picked USA medal events. A lot of people want to watch the Olympics live. These athletes train for years and some of them their whole lives and some suit over at NBC decided let’s only show “winners”. It became ridiculous the past few Olympics of only showing events where the USA scored medals.
Air EVERYTHING live on cable and network as it permits and then do wrap highlight shows at night.
i predict the Walt Disney Group, specifically ESPN, to win the rights to televise these two games. But then again my opinion doesn’t matter.
Nikki,
Did you know that none of the dollars in this deal right now actually go to pay the kids that are in the Olympics. Last go around the total revenue worldwide was 3.9 Billion. That is not to say that National Olympic Committees dont spend this money to help the sports that are in play, but as opposed to SAG/AFTRA, the kids are all considered to be independent contractors, they receive no pension or money for appearing. They are in the truest sense of the word “Reality Stars” that in some elite instances make money in endorsements, but 90% of worldwide athletes don’t make any of that.
The US Government does not fund the US Olympic Movement at all and stipends that the kids do receive which is only as high as 18,000 a year from the USOC is taxable.
It would be really nice for these kids to get some sort of pension contribution that you see with the SAG/AFTRA combination that has had that opportunity to negotiate that through the course of the years.
I am a sports agent that represents Olympic athletes in the US, Canada and Europe and really appreciate your coverage of this story.
FIVE BILLION for the Olympics? For what exactly? If NBC lost $263 million dollars on the Olympics, why do they think that the price tag should go UP? Why should there be a bidding war at all?
The IOC should be really concerned right now.
Unemployment is sky high with relief more than likely never coming. Nobody has any money anymore to buy anything except the basics, and Europe and the United States are near economic collapse.
So naturally this is a good time for the IOC to milk the networks. Even cable isn’t a “safe bet” for the IOC to go to as people are dropping their $80 cable bill and just getting Netflix and Hulu.
Wow. I haven’t watched the stiff, boring network that ESPN has become in years unless they’re showing the NFL. But even then I could do without their terrible coverage.
I think cable packages will be redesigned soon and sports fans will have to pay their own freight.
$80? Damn, Neil, where do you live? I’d love to have my bill be that low – I pay almost double that for our CommieCast system…
ESPN Primetime in February is college basketball. When the summer games air, its LLWS. They have the networks to do it, even with ABC but they also have contractual agreements to air NCAA and NBA games. NBC has the networks, too. The only sporting obligations NBC has is NHL, golf, and tennis.
Any word on the supposed NBC Sports rebrand of VS and other Comcast networks?
Unfortunately they’ll pay, why? cause’ it’s the Olympics.
Oh yeah, let’s unionize amateur sports. That’s the most knuckleheaded idead I’ve heard in a long time.
re: Olympic rights pricing: the emperor has no clothes, and hasn’t for a long time. IOC expectations are completely untethered from actual value, and in the Internet-haunted world things only get worse for IOC from here. The best thing that could happen would be for Comcast to withdraw from bidding and for Disney to lowball ‘em. Only that will bring IOC to their senses.
I know someone who works at an ABC affiliate who says that if Disney wins the Olympics, ABC won’t get anything. The games would become cable-exclusive across the ESPN suite of networks.
Besides, Disney may be the only company willing to pay more (or even as much) as the $2 billion for 2014 and 2016 that NBC paid for 2010 and 2012.
In the end, I expect NBC will get the Olympics through the 2020 Summer Games, but perhaps for $3 billion for those four Games (or $750 million each), which will be a reduction from the mos6t recent rights fees.
BTW, Sochi is eight hours ahead of New York, not 11 hours. Still, I expect some skiing events, and maybe even a few hockey games, at the 2014 Winter Olympics to start at 8 A.M. local (12 Midnight in New York) so they get live coverage in the ‘States during our late-night hours (and presumably prime-time in California).
Hockey maybe, but not skiing. Most skiing events start at around 10 AM to Noon with some events starting at 9 AM. I don’t think NBC will air events such as the slalom and downhill in the wee hours of the morning. Most skiing events will likely be held 18-19 hours so they can air a few runs of Americans falling down in primetime right before they air three hours of ice dancing. We would be lucky to get the random US Hockey game and as much curling as we can consume in late night. It wouldn’t hurt the Sochi organizers to schedule Curling at 8 AM, 1 PM, and 6 PM, and Curling is a breakout sport in the United States so NBC’s late night ratings will be high.
I envision ABC/ESPN winning these rights as they have the money and the availablity to air all the evnts live on a multitude of their networs. Fox finishes second and NBC/Comcast finishes third.
After 20+ years of the games being on NBC, it’s time to bring the games back to ABC, where they belong.
They will continue to pay for the Olympics for one more generation (20 years). After that the the Olympics will be considered a novelty sporting event (like the Indianapolis 500 or any boxing match) whose glory is remembered only by the AARP and Bob Costas.
NBC won all games until 2020!!!!! Announcement from IOC later today.
Great. Four more tape-delayed Olympics.
Agree- the games have been terrible for a number of years now, mainly because of tape delays and hyper-focusing on just a few events. If they don’t change the way they broadcast these, I’ll just check twitter or ESPN to see what happened.
I hate NBC’s coverage of the olympics. Why do they only focus on 2-3 “star” athletes when there are thousands to choose from. What makes ir worse is that the “stars” are boring people with no life outside of sports.
Oh great, this means getting spoiled for EVERYTHING because of damn tape delays.
They completely overpaid for these games and stand to lose a shitload of money but I can see why they did this…to make Versus or whatever they will rename the network a possibl powerhouse against ESPN. I thought ESPN/ABC had a clear shot to win this and to freshen things up, but if NBC is promising they will show all the events live, they better adhere to their promises or else fans and executives will be teed off. Enough of the tape-delayed coverage in primetime as the Internet makes it easier to find out what happened in specific events just hours beforehand.
I just heard on NPR that Comcast does NOT plan on airing events live. Some yes, but not the premiere events. I wonder if they’ll block their internet customers from accessing things live. It wouldn’t be legal, but these things happen. I used to have Comcast and their “technical difficulties” are legion.
On its Web site npr.org quotes Mark Lazarus, NBC Sports’s chairman: “We will make every event available on one platform or another live.” Brian Roberts must realize if he screws this up Concast (sic) will pay big time; and unlike with GE the viewers will have customer-service reps to scream at. Given the company’s past contrition for its poor service I’d like to think they have a better chance at being heard.
Will GE be able to get out of NBCU completely before this $4b is sunk into the Games?
Also, congrats USA, you’ll have to watch tapes again. An expensive privilege!
Congrats for NBC’s financiers in Wall St who will earn handsome interest from funding this $4.38n bid for four more Olympics. God only knows if we’ll be watching TV in 2020!
Darren Rovell at CNBC tweeted the apparent bids:
NBC- $1.1 billion each for ’14,’16,’18,’20.
ESPN- $700 million each for ’14 and ’16 only (which is a bit shocking to me- I thought they might have gone a little higher)
Fox- $750 million each for ’14 and ’16 only, or $850 million each for ’14,’16,’18, and ’20.
So NBC offered about a billion more overall….they must have been very desperate.
Great more “stories” and not so much action.
Wish they would offer action only – either a channel or online.
You can also buy access to a proxy in the UK or Europe and watch their coverage online.
The comment about the games not being about the money… cracked me up.