Just how pushy is Paramount with theater owners on Transformers 3? Well, The New York Times has this interesting detail today: that Michael Bay last week called the chief executives of major theater chains to implore them to show Transformers: Dark Of The Moon in a way that burns out projector bulbs more quickly but makes 3D look brighter and sharper. That’s because there’s been a continuing problem that ”the darkness of 3D is starting to impact movie satisfaction,” media analyst Rich Greenfield tells me. “This was a key problem with Pirates 3D, with both Green Lantern and Harry Potter starting off with darker imagery and then layering on 3D glasses that darken the images further.”
Last week was also when Paramount told theaters they have to play the pic in 3D next Tuesday night for the early screenings to spread buzz or they can’t play the film at all. I hear the company line has been “Michael Bay is insisting on the Digital presentation”. Or is this really all about numbers and Paramount’s screwing Disney and Warner Bros on their 3D dates? Case in point. Paramount won’t even accept the 35mm Technicolor 3D release prints if theaters have the Digital in house. And the studio is telling theaters it’s a four-week minimum in their Digital theater. This strategy succeeds in keeping Pixar’s Cars 2 out of some digital runs, which will cut back the grosses while forcing Warner Bros’ Harry Potter And The Deathly Hollows Part 2 out of 3D dates as well.
“And watch, miraculously on July 22nd, Paramount will open those screens up to get Captain America opened on as many 3D screens as they can,” a source tells me. “Instead of working together on the 3D situation where the public is seemingly growing apathetic, Paramount takes the ‘every man for himself’ attitude. Real smart. That’s why exhibitors are going to take every opportunity to dump all over them when they can. Watch what happens in November. In a four-week span you have seven films from different studios all jockeying for 3D. Paramount’s line will be ‘Katzenberg [Puss N Boots] & Scorsese [Hugo Cabret] are insisting on Digital theaters’ and the other five will be beating their brains out to get whatever dates they can. Should be fun to watch.”
Asked for comment, Paramount Vice Chairman Rob Moore would say only this about his studio’s 3D strategy: “The best thing for 3D was Avatar giving people a spectacular 3D experience. The goodwill towards 3D lasted just over a year. Transformers 3 can give 3D the shot in the arm. That’s what would be great for 3D and the industry.” However, Greenfield points out that, despite Warner Bros marketing muscle, 2D ticket sales have been outpacing 3D ticket sales for the upcoming Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 based on the live “top sellers” data on the Pulse section of Fandango’s iPad app. Tickets went on sale recently and its 2D tickets are in the top 5, but not its 3D tickets.







The problem is no one knows how far down the 3D curve will go as a result of bad films. bad conversion, bad projection, high costs, etc.
In a sense this was like Iraq…badly planned, badly executed, badly mismanaged, far too costly, questionable results…with no exit strategy.
Less death and maiming, though.
I wish I could like the above comment. I’ll stick with just saying, “Bravo, sir.”
While I agree that bad conversions, bad movies, etc. haven’t helped, those aren’t the reasons 3D is waning.
It’s a novelty that has worn off. Plain and simple.
Won’t be long until movies are again exhibited/filmed only in 2D. 3D will again go into hibernation for 30 years or so.
Strange talk from a man who stood before an industry covention and said he would never do a 3D film because it didn’t add anything.
The action sequences in Transformers 2 was dark and blurred due to the machines, which all looked the same. In 3D, it’s going to get darker still. Almost like a pirated cam print. Enough said.
1- Bay calling the theaters to make sure his movie looks bright and good- FANTASTIC!
2- As audiences keep on proving, 3D is a choice, and they’re only paying the premium for certain products. Pirates and Green Lantern are not essential 3D experiences, Transformers is moreso.
3- I’m seeing Potter in 2D… like I saw the other 7 films.
4- Paramount being “everyman for himself.” Get over it, this is Hollywood. Everyone will be fine.
…Billy Friedkin used to call the theaters himself during EXORCIST runs to make sure both the volume was set to the right level, and that the projectionists weren’t trying to cut electricity costs by dimming the bulb (since the film was dark)
-RnsW
Is Bay or the studio also informing theatre owners that only 1/3 of the film was actually shot in 3D? Just askin’…
I hated how dark Pirates 4 was at the Grove. It sucked!
Transformers Dark of the Moon was actually shot in 3D. Not just a third of it.
I’m no MB fan, but I like the notion that he (i.e. his producers/executive assistant/production executives) worked the phones to actual theater operators (i.e. Executives of national theater chains) to ensure that the film is to be seen in the manner it was intended. I have long been saying I will not see this film… but I may be inclined to sneak into a screening out of curiosity.
Apparently Megan Fox was right after all, he does seem to think he’s Hitler.
>Apparently Megan Fox was right after all, he does seem to think he’s Hitler
Holy cow, just imagine if Megan Fox had worked for Stanley Kubrick!
And, according to legend, didn’t Kubrick often call the managers of individual theaters directly and insist they use projector masks and such that he approved of?
Is there a chance that Transformers 3 will be, say, as good as even a bad Kubrick movie?
Kubrick never made a bad movie.
Spielberg just called to say you’re fired.
Well I’m glad somebody is smacking sense into exhibitors over dim bulbs. This was a problem even before 3D. Holding on to a DLP bulb longer than it’s median lifespan (which is when it starts to dim) could potentially save a theater about 50 cents to a dollar an hour of projection time. We’re talking a penny or two per ticket, soda, and bag of popcorn. The fact that so many are willing to ruin the experience over this pittance is sad.
Paramount and Michael Bay are asking the theater chains to give audiences their money’s worth. Dark and murky 3D comes from theater owners being cheap and running their projectors at the minimum number of lamberts.
And everyone knows the 3D in Harry Potter is post converted bullshit.
If there is a shot in the arm to be had from Transformers 3D it will be from a syringe filled with cyanide.
Don’t most theaters burn their bulbs at a lower brightness to supposedly lengthen the life of the bulb? I thought that was proved as bunk. So why would showing this movie at the proper brightness levels be a big issue?
While the demands for the time frames that Transformers keeps the 3D screens are silly, demanding that the theaters show the movie in the best presentation possible is something that should be commended. If only they could figure out a way to get that without coming off like bullies.
I’m sooooooo over 3D. I won’t pay for it again.
Ditto!
Maybe if Cameron does another 200 million dollar film on Pandora, but that’s about it.
I think it’s just another way to gouge the consumer with unneeded fees. Like Comcast (or Xfinity now!) tacking on an “account management fee”.
Manage my a$$!
3D… is a huge disappointment. It does nothing to make bad films better, the glasses are annoying, it costs too much, the public isn’t clamoring for it… why push it? As so often… follow the money.
Of course Harry Potter is selling more in 2d. It’s post-converted and most fans were unhappy about it.
time to pull the plug on 3D already.
I saw Kung Fu Panda 2 in 3D at AMC Burbank and it was bright, crisp and looked great. (Really good use of 3D too.) Green Lantern in 3D at Arclight was dim. (Not even commenting on the movie but the projection.) It’s hard to justify the extra bucks for a sub par experience.
That said, there’s nothing wrong with filmmakers demanding better projection quality for their movies. But the problem with 3D isn’t just projection. It’s Hollywood’s problem for looking right past the main issue…3D alone isn’t enough. It’s how you use it that counts.
3D is a dead man walking. Get rid of it.
In America when you’re up S*** creek without a paddle, not the rest of the world where Pirates 4 just entered the 10 grossing of all time.
I thought I would never say this but HOORAY FOR MICHAEL BAY! You go girl!
I’ve been predicting Transformers 3 will open below expectations and I’m holding to that here. The second movie was so bad it’s going to drag down this one — because I’ll tell you something: the shots look exactly the same as the other movies! This 3D thing is just more bad press spin…
I had this experience with Tron – was so dark that it was easier to watch the movie blurry but without the glasses so I could see the features
Why do people continue to lie about how much of Transformers 3 was shot in 3D? Bay shot 2/3 of the movie in 3D, the rest was converted in post or entirely CGI. End of Story.
Wait a minute. Didn’t WB and Disney have dibs on these screens before Paramount set the release date for TF3? They did announce “Harry Potter 8″ and “Cars 2″ for 3D before then.
Usually when a studio books a movie for a specific date for 3D and IMAX, they would have a contract locking them in for a set amount of screens. And any movie that came out before that would have to relinquish those screens by the time their competitors’ releases come out.
Or am I confusing it with IMAX?
One dim bulb deserves another, I guess.
Its too bad that Gabriela Cedillo won’t be able to watch Transformers in 3-D, but you need both your eyes to work to see the images in 3-D. Bay and Paramount should have thought about that before they maimed her.
Bay would have better luck doing what Cameron did for Avatar, do a separate, brighter color timing for the 3D version to counteract the dimmer image (which is mostly caused by the 3D glasses).
Bay did do a separate color grade for the 3D version, and every stereo picture I’ve worked on does as well. I suspect the process was botched on Thor though, the dark scenes were almost unwatchable.
Studios need to be better partners with exhibition in lots of ways (it’s a crime there is little to no margin for GOOD exhibitors from the movies themselves) but exhibitors are absolutely killing business right now. They don’t pay for or adequately train professional/quality projectionists nor have systems in place to ensure quality control (by design or apathy). They leave policing auditoriums to toothless policy trailers and play fire and forget as soon as the house lights go down.
The business NEEDS to get people to shut off their damn PDA’s and phones when they go into a theatre. You aren’t a spy or a surgeon waiting for an organ to be delivered and if you are you shouldn’t be at a movie. If your offspring can’t survive 2 hours without you consulting a webcam you should stay at home or if you NEED to check in you NEED to leave the theatre. The absurd amount of talking and texting and phoning is completely out of control for what is supposed to be a public performance space. If people can’t be civil policies can train them to be. Paying through the nose for an experience that has no quality control is absurd and when it goes bad, regardless of the quality of the movie, it amounts to theft. Spending $100 to take 4 people to a poorly projected movie sitting with dozens of people yakking nonsensically and shining mini flashlights throughout?