Silver Spring, Maryland (June 19, 2011) —- Screen Actors Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists convened this weekend for the first, formal face-to-face discussions between the AFTRA New Union Committee and the SAG Merger Task Force at the National Labor College in Silver Spring, Maryland.
The two groups, comprised of members including actors, performers, recording artists and broadcast professionals, met together as the Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA Group for One Union (G1) to facilitate the creation of one successor union to represent all of the members of AFTRA and Screen Actors Guild.
The G1 established a series of work groups to discuss six key areas that rank-and-file members identified as important during the Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA Presidents’ Forum for One Union nationwide Listening Tour. The six workgroups are:
- Governance and Structure
- Finance and Dues
- Collective Bargaining
- Pension, Health and Retirement
- Operations and Staff
- Member Education and Outreach
The work groups will meet throughout 2011, formulate recommendations for how the successor union should address each area and bring those recommendations back to the G1 for approval. These recommendations will inform the G1’s work to create the Merger Agreement, National Constitution and uniform dues structure that each union’s National Board has required for review by January 2012.
In a joint statement, AFTRA National President Roberta Reardon and Screen Actors Guild President Ken Howard praised the unions’ inaugural meeting saying: “We applaud the members and staff of our two unions for their incredible solidarity and vision during this intense and substantive weekend. We know the members of the successor union will be well served by their diligent and hard work during the months to come.”
On Friday, June 17, AFL-CIO President Richard L. Trumka, joined by Department of Professional Employees President Paul Almeida, welcomed the members and staff of Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA. Trumka addressed the group and praised the unions’ leaderships for their commitment to solidarity and their work on the effort to unite AFTRA and SAG saying, “I encourage you to keep an open mind and base your decision not on any preconceived notions but on this measure alone: what is best for our members, our unions and our future. That’s the big picture we must all keep our eyes on. Whatever your decision the 12 million members of the AFL-CIO will support you.”
The weekend’s meetings were facilitated by Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations Professor Susan J. Schurman, and noted labor consultant Peter S. DiCicco. The next meeting of the full AFTRA and Screen Actors Guild Group for One Union is scheduled for August 27 – 28 in New York City.



They need do this fast- should have been done years ago- and ALL of the duo ( about 40,000) members are suffering because of the two unions…CHECK YOUR EGO’S AT THE DOOR AND GET IT DONE, NOW.
At its BEST this isn’t going to be an easy thing to work out. (But here’s hoping!) AFTRA has given away residual payments in order to claim more of the market. Her’s hoping the meetings work (and the end results implemented) with GAINS and not subtractions in earnings.
It’s about freaking time! Let’s get this deal done!
A no-brainer! Let’s go!
Thank the lord. Let’s just hope it doesn’t get waylaid by the idiots that tanked it last time.
What a show…..everybody is getting their payoffs for snowing the membership into this merger……Bigger is not better….Look at time Warner aol merger….. didn’t work at all….We the members of both Unions are going to take a big hit in the pocket book guys…just you wait and see…..but of course if this gets past the smell test coming up…..enjoy the reruns…….
you have NO idea what you’re talking about. if you’re a member of SAG and AFTRA, splitting your wages between two unions is the real pocket-killer. especially when it comes to medical benefits.
A wedding between a bride who’s a drunk and groom with rage issues is gonna give you a few kids with major psychological baggage.
While I fully understand and appreciate why, IN CONCEPT, this merger is a good idea, the fact of the matter is that both unions are horribly run messes that have lots of in-fighting. This doesn’t exactly bathe me in confidence that the sum will be greater than its individual parts.
And let’s not forget that fact that SAG’s membership has voted against this TWICE already.
Just watch, Bob – they’ll change the percentage requirement so that 51% vote will be enough.
That said, it won’t be necessary. AFTRA and SAGFRTA (you remember that actor’s union that used to be SAG…?) have made the merger not only inevitable but a fait accomplis.
I only hope that all actors will stand up and say “NO” to wage cuts or rollbacks of any kind, if the new union leadership and negotiators throw us to the dogs. Rollbacks aren’t necessary at all in this annual record-breaking box office bonanza for the past decade. TV up-front ad placement all gained double-digit sales increases.
If we’re gonna make a new union, let’s do it right from the start!
John V. Karavitis I’m not at all clear as to why this merger is a “good idea”, maybe someone can clear that up for me and everyone else who doesn’t know? Also, if this merger is such a good idea, why didn’t it happen decades ago? It seems as though the two groups are different, that is, movie stars who make movies versus people involved in TV. I would think they would be as different as real estate agents who sell homes versus real estate agents who deal with commercial property. Yes, the “same” business, but different enough that they can’t be lumped together. Also, has each union been such a failure on its own that a merger would solve whatever problems exist? I think it would be nice if someone explained this in this thread. John V. Karavitis
Seriously folks, why in the world would ANYONE who’s not mentally challenged see Green Lantern?? I’m so confused right now…How did that movie make over a mil at the box office?
You are definitely confused.
It will pass this time due to the substantial group of people who are the swing vote. We’ve voted “no” every time we’re presented a non-plan that says “Let’s just merge without any plan. Details? Who cares? We’ll figure them out post-merger.”
After a few more years of taking it in the rear from AFTRAsh without thowing SAG in that cauldron, we’re worn out. AFTRash is going to F us anyway, so we might as well get a bouquet of half-dead flowers in the process since they’re screwing us anyway.
Actors Equity should never have given up jurisdiction over the “new” media those many decades ago. I say dissolve SAG and AFTRA and let AEA take over where they should never have left off.
We dont need super unions we need a right to work state so we can bring business back to Hollywood. Unions have destroyed CA.
Just suck up the giveaways from the AFTRA side for the life of the current contracts. Merge gracefully and peacefully. Then down the road be positioned as the powerhouse you should already be. It won’t be pretty for a while, but with everyone’s cooperation, you’ll make it.
These people are corrupt. The leadership of both AFTRA and SAG. It’s already been proven. Why is the press silent?
I guess I’m a little worried about this merger, mainly due to the health benefits I currently enjoy through SAG. I feel that with the adoption of many people into 1 union that the requirements for health benefits will be higher than they currently are under the SAG plan. I hope I don’t lose my benefits due to this.
We should be forming a new union entirely. One that includes all performers, writers, directors, and any crew. The union will have it’s governing subdivisions for each respective category. And it will not include news reporters or dj’s because they’re not performers. Now THIS is what we SHOULD HAVE done long ago.
It’s about time! Now more than ever, in these times when the entire Union movement is under massive attack, we must stand together!
All change is bumpy.. The end will be worth it – as performing artists working in film, video, recordings, radio… new media… will be able to stand as one.