A study of the impact of California’s Film and Television Tax Credit program shows that it has generated more than $3.8 billion in economic output and supported 20,040 jobs — good for labor income of $1.4 billion — in the state since being enacted in 2009 to curtail runaway production. The report, released today by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp, estimates that the activity will return to state and local governments $201 million; for every tax-credit dollar allocated under the program at least $1.13 in tax revenue will be returned, total economic activity in the state would increase by $20.11 and labor income would grow by $7.41. The LAEDC used numbers from the program’s first 77 approved productions, which received credits totaling $198.8 million from expenditures totaling $970 million. They include 34 feature films, which snapped up more than three-quarters of the program’s allocated credits, 22 indie films and six new TV productions (the credit is only applicable to new — not existing — TV projects). The report is timely: California Gov. Jerry Brown has asked for major cuts in such programs to help pass a state budget that would close a $9.6 billion deficit. After a compromise with state Democrats earlier today, a new budget could be voted on as early as tonight ahead of a July 1 deadline.


I am sure the Dems will hold a press conf. soon to thank Arnold for all the money his tax credit program generated for the state of California. NOT.
First, I applaud all tax incentives which keep work in California…and, in this case, better late than never.
The facts and figures that are quoted, however, are most often quite inaccurate. There are so many different film location/production entities which represent cities, states and whatever. All these organizations are funded and must validate their worth. So, many times the numbers are inflated to justify all of the people and organizations…and the politics of incentives…and, remember, it took California forever to implement these practices.
Therefore, the overall results are certainly a good thing…but, NEVER, believe the numbers.
Good point. I’d be willing to bet that a majority of the productions who elected to take the tax credit would’ve been filmed in California anyway, even without the credit.
Wrong… shows moved in the night to other states leaving many people out of work
Um, the film and tax credit was authored, sponsored and passed by democratic lawmakers with some republican support in the legislature. Arnold just signed the damn thing. On his own, he didn’t lift a finger. And Arnold’s next movie is slated to shoot in New Mexico, BTW. With his clout, he could keep it in California. He did it for T3.
So tax cuts create jobs. Who knew!
The Film Works campaign dissection of the report was quite extensive and fair:
http://filmworksla.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/california-film-tv-tax-credit-success-undeniable/
So on credits of a dollar, 13 cents are generated? That seems a little slim. Now if the state had a monopoly marijuana business…
Hey Pierre, since when is a 13% return considered “slim”?
I don’t know how right on the numbers are, but California a.k.a. Hollywood, used to be the filming capital of the world. Now you can walk down Anytown USA, your little home town, to see a movie being filmed. Why visit California? Do what ever you can to bring filming back to LA. It’s good for everyone.
I have yet to see an article includes the amount of people put out of work when the production moved out of state after not recieving the tax credit… putting people out of work that had already been hired in California. Now that would be an interesting study.
The Film Works article includes a table from the LAEDC that shows the number of jobs lost when productions of varying sizes leaves the state. The Milken Institute report also had such data. The report library at Runaway Production Research has a ridiculous collection of reports from California, other states, Canada and the MPAA among others…. http://www.runawayproductionresearch.com
Wow… reducing tax rates generates economic activity and can increase revenues… somebody should tell Democrats, as their “fix” for the economy is to do the opposite.
Read the analysis of the report on the Film Works blog. The credit does not generate more revenue for the state (state alone, not state and local) than it costs. And its a tax credit, not a tax cut. Finally, the Democrats are the ones who authored the bill (with some Republican sponsors).
13 % IS A GREAT RETURN !! This is the land of movies, and the film credits should be expanded.
Look at N.Y. The film industry is on fire and the state is making MONEY !! When C.A. is hurting
for jobs, movies are the answer. $$$$$$$$$
This is a no-brainer. I just had a show that wasn’t able to make it into the program and thus had to move the production out of state. California lost revenue and jobs. They need to make this program larger so more than 77 projects can join in. As the saying goes, you need to spend money to make money. If you can make a 13% return and employ thousands of Californians in the process, they just have to make it happen. Any report on what the new budget has in it?
You’re either really dumb or you’re intentionally distorting facts if you think these tax rebates are anything like the tax cuts you right wingers are so obsessed with giving to billionaires.
Our TV classic MEN OF A CERTAIN AGE used the California Film/TV credit which I can say has kept 300 people employed in the county of Los Angeles. The show recently won a Peabody Award. This is just further proof that if we take care of our own runaway productions can feed and cloth thousands here in California and not Canada. Please understand it wasn’t Arnold who created this, but our great US Senator Boxer. I have a letter from her dated in 2001 showing her efforts.