As the 51st Monte Carlo Television Awards confirmed, TV procedurals remain the world’s most popular drama format. CSI was crowned the world’s #1 television franchise at the 6th International TV Audience Awards. It pulled in 65.3 million viewers worldwide in 2010. The only other shows that came near it were CSI Miami and House. And both of those are procedurals, too. According to TV consultancy TAPE, the various CSI strands were top of the U.S. imports in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Meanwhile procedurals NCIS, Hawaii 5-0, and House were among the most popular U.S. imports in Italy. So what is it about the format that makes it so appealing to international audiences?
For a start, procedurals are the TV equivalent of comfort food. By the end of each episode, justice is done, the disease contained, order restored. They’re reassuring for viewers. Crucially for foreign audiences, the format is easy to understand. Also, there’s hardly any serial component, so shows like CSI Miami and NCIS can be viewed in any order. Go on vacation, miss a couple of episodes? No problem, nothing has changed. That’s why Blue Bloods – a show which sounds a bit dull on paper — does so well internationally compared to a critics’ darling such as Mad Men. CBS Studios International president Armando Nunez has praised Blue Bloods as “perhaps not
as sexy to talk about, but it has proven a success both on the network and in terms of global distribution”. Blue Bloods has sold around the world not just to tiny channels but to big ones like Sky Atlantic in the UK, Australia’s Network Ten, and Discovery Latin America. John Peek, director of TAPE, whose clients include ABC, NBC and cable channels A&E and TNT, says Blue Bloods’ popularity stems from mixing up a police procedural with a family drama. CBS recently tapped Law & Order veteran Ed Zuckerman to make the show even more procedural. Peek says: “The continuing trend is for procedurals because they use a predictable structure. You know what you’re getting, which makes them palatable when they’re dubbed. Shows that obey the basic rules are easier for audiences overseas to get to grips with.”
Of course U.S. TV is brutal when it comes to weeding out shows that don’t work. Of the 41 network shows and 16 cable shows shown during last month’s LA Screenings, only 25% to 30% will make it through to a whole season. Of the newer U.S. exports, TAPE predicts Hawaii 5-0, NCIS Los Angeles, and The Mentalist will have long runs. Peek says: “Hawaii 5-0 has action, it looks good and it has an exotic location. It feels like the complete package. And the show’s producers learnt from CSI the importance of having some humour.”
National broadcasters in the big five European territories pay a median of between $30,000-$400,000 per hour for a U.S procedural, according to trade magazine Television Business International. Sarah Wright, controller of entertainment acquisitions at UK pay-TV giant Sky, doesn’t see any trends with prices. There are always a few shows that two or three overseas broadcasters in each territory want and prices rise accordingly. Wright says: “I don’t see crazy pricing. There are always some shows that people want because they give a return on investment.”
So, which U.S. imports are most popular in the 5 big European territories?
France
House MD (TF1), CSI Miami (TF1), The Mentalist (TF1)
What appeals to the French about House and The Mentalist is that lead characters Dr Gregory House and Patrick Jane are irreverent, with Simon Baker’s Mentalist character often being compared to Columbo in the French press. In general, TV is frowned upon by the French middle-class mainly because the most popular shows on national TV are American imports, I’m told.
Germany
CSI (RTL), House (RTL), Desperate Housewives (Pro 7), The Mentalist (Sat 1)
German state TV does not air U.S. shows at the moment, although Thomas Bellut, ZDF’s head of programming has said he wants to show Mad Men. Bellut will become Director-General of ZDF next March. For now American series are all shown on private free-to-air channels RTL, RTL2, Vox and ProSieben. Christian Balz, vice-president of fiction production at ProSiebenSat.1, tells me that German viewers prefer procedurals because a problem is introduced and solved within the same episode. The convoluted plotlines of Lost, 24 and Damages all gradually lost viewers over the course of each series. “Our viewers prefer to watch these as DVD box sets,” he says.
Italy
Hawaii 5-0 (RAI 2), NCIS (RAI 2), Grey’s Anatomy (Italia 1), House (Italia 1)
Italian TV audiences appreciate U.S. police procedurals and hospital dramas when they are well executed. American shows look more modern than their Italian counterparts, although local drama dominates. Grey’s Anatomy has suffered in its ratings because network Italia 1 keeps moving it around the schedule.
Spain
CSI: Miami (Telecinco), CSI (Telecinco), The Mentalist (La Sexta), Bones (La Sexta)
Procedurals again top the U.S. import charts in Spain. I’m told that compared to U.S. imports, local drama looks under-budgeted by comparison. The main Spanish channels put the bulk of their money for original production into dramedy series and interminable reality shows.
UK
CSI (Five), NCIS (FX), The Mentalist (Five), CSI: NY (Five), Glee (Channel 4), Desperate Housewives (Channel 4), Walking Dead (FX), CSI: Miami (Five), Game of Thrones (Sky), Law & Order: CI (Universal Channel)
Sky has become the home of big U.S. programming at a time when other broadcasters such as the BBC and Channel 4 are pulling out of American imports. The BBC, which is facing a 16% budget cut, lost the fourth series of Mad Men to Sky. And Sky has just acquired Glee after the first two seasons aired on Channel 4. Sky is reported to be paying $800,000 per episode compared to the $161,000 Channel 4 paid. Sky’s critics say that often the pay-TV giant poaches later series of shows such as Glee and Lost once rival network TV has built audiences for them. In doing so, they end up acquiring shows which have already peaked and are on the wane. Sky denies this. Sarah Wright of Sky points to Hawaii 5-O and Modern Family as U.S. hits Sky has promoted heavily from the get-go.
As to shows Wright was excited to see during the LA Screenings, she was particularly enthused about Terra Nova (Fox), Alcatraz (Fox), Pan Am (ABC) and Charlie’s Angels (ABC). “The trend seems to be riskier ideas than procedurals,” she says. “Don’t get me wrong – procedurals are brilliant – but things seem to be getting more adventurous.”


I think you’re missing that people also like shows where they get to learn something new – they do in CSI, in House, and in many of the other procedural shows – whether hard scientific fact, or about human behaviour. But you could be right that the ‘doesn’t matter if I miss a couple of episodes’ effect also matters a lot. Not everyone schedule their lives around what’s on the telly
Sorry but procedural are not really adding to the tv medium. What happen to the option of ambitious and Authentic crime drama. The only one that I could find on broadcast was The Chicago Code. There currently only three quality one on cable. Why are the legacies of Crimestory,Hillstreet Blues, Nypd Blue, EZ streets, Robbery Homicide Division, Boomtown, and The District being ignored. Especially show like Robbery Homicide Division and Boomtown which had more evolved concepts for procedural. RHD had lot of authenticity and very organic strong episodic plots. Boomtown had a refreshing concept with the tool “Boomtown shuffle. Which allowed viewers to see the crime from several perspectives and never see the crime from the beginning or end.
1.Southland
2.Justified
3.The Closer
God, this is what’s wrong with television.
Must be why I dont like them – the seen-one-seen-them-all feel to them. If I miss one another one will come up next week just like it. I would rather watch a show that I cant miss an episode. Something with a little twist and surprise going for it. Procedurals just feel so 1950s.
As for learning something new – ask some frustrated lawyer whose jury is hooked on CSI or some overworked doctor who thinks doctors and hospitals are really like they are on House what this ‘learning’ is worth. These shows are the fakest on TV.
Hawaii 5-0′s producers put humor in their show because of CSI? Think you got your acronyms mixed up. Try NCIS. Nearly every drama series CBS has put on its schedule in the last 2-3 years is trying to capture the character/humor aspects of that show. CSI is about as stale as it gets.
@writer88
Actually, Tim Adler was right on the money. CSI debuted in 2000. With the addition of CSI:Miami, comedy elements were introduced to the franchise. NCIS debuted in 2003 long after precedent was set.
Hey the procedurals beat all the stupid reality shows anyday
Well, Hawaii 50 is losing the time slot each week on Australia, and in New Zeland is losing more than 50% of the lead in. So let’s hope for the Italians to keep watching it, because it seems they are the only ones enjoying that show.Blue Bloods is doing a little better, but not that great either.
I agree all CSI, NCSI and Mentalist are still doing good, but I think viewers are starting to get tired of so many procedurals and that is why the new ones, Hawaii 50 and Blue Bloods, are not doing great.
HBO shows seem to be getting all the buzz, Game of Thrones , True Blood , B. Empire . And AMC’s The Walking Dead.
Explains why The Killing fell from grace. A whole season to solve ONE case? No way, gimme my fast food and tell me who the baddie is in 60 minutes or less.
The humorous angle was delivered by the grand-daddy of them all “Law and Order” and most likely spoken by Jerry Orbach.
When CSI first came out it was fun to watch. Now there are just too many procedurals out there, specifically cop, lawyer, and hospital dramas. Seems like every network needs one just like they now need singing and dancing reality shows.