At 75, Woody Allen shows no signs of slowing down. “I’ve been very lucky over the years to be able to sustain the career I’ve had,” he recently told Cannes. As I pointed out last weekend, Midnight In Paris is Woody Allen’s biggest hit in years, looking to exceed both Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008) and Match Point (2005), both of which grossed $23+M domestic at the box office. Now it’s official. Sony Pictures Classics announced today that Woody’s latest has become his highest-grossing film in North America in 25 years, having grossed $23,330,859 to date. “This is proving to be one of the big summer pictures, and we hope to hit more major milestones in the coming weeks,” Sony Pictures Classics’ Tom Bernard and Michael Barker emailed me. The pic is on target to surpass Hannah and Her Sisters (though not adjusted for inflation and higher ticket prices) to become Woody’s top earner ever.
This also has been the widest release of Allen’s career because it’s been riding strong buzz and solid word-of-mouth beginning with its well-received world premiere at the Cannes Film Festival last month. Woody’s love letter to all things Parisian is a time-travelling comedy and his first full feature shot entirely in France. (Woody himself has said the film started basically as a deal to shoot a movie in Paris. Then he came up with the title but had no idea what the movie would be about…) It received an ovation inside the Palais.
Deadline’s awards columnist Pete Hammond even says the 21-time nominated and 3-time winner Woody could find himself again in the Original Screenplay Oscar race, where he was last nominated in 2005 for the dramatic Match Point. Given his script’s high culture bent – Owen Wilson plays a true romantic visiting Paris who finds he is transported each night at midnight to a golden age of the City of Lights, where his newfound friends include F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, Salvador Dali, Gertrude Stein and Pablo Picasso — it’s obvious awards fodder. (“I didn’t have to research much,” Woody told Cannes. “I was a big fan of these people in my adolescence. They were icons, so the script was fairly easy to write.”) His last nomination for a comedy, though, was in 1998 for Deconstructing Harry, although Vicky Cristina Barcelona picked up the Musical/Comedy Best Picture Golden Globe and Penelope Cruz won a Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 2008.
Nice to see Allen break his string of disappointments in the past decade that included last year’s Cannes player, You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger, Whatever Works, Scoop, Anything Else, and Hollywood Endings, the latter 2002 effort being his only other film to open Cannes. Wrote Hammond: “The reaction this year was decidedly warmer, with the phrase most often heard along the Croisette: ‘Woody is back in top form.’ “ This summer he ventures cinematically to Rome for the first time in a multi-segmented comedy in which he will also appear as an actor. Roberto Begnini and Penelope Cruz are among those in the cast.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


But with Owen Wilson in it… I’m still hesitant…
I hear you, but he really was great in it.
Shut up Ras. Owen Wilson rocks in this film. Drop your lame ass attitude and see the flick
Ohmigosh, same here! Hah.
I just cannot handle watching Owen in this role where he looks so much like Owen. Ever since “Wedding Crashers” with his silly, fluffy, blow dried hair and perpetually pursed lips he makes me cringe. I did enjoy him in “Darjeeling,” but mostly because his face was wrapped in a band aid. In Woody’s film…I just can’t see myself getting lost in the character.
SPEAKING OF HAIR— when did Woody get the plugs???
not a fan of Owen’s, either. but he was good. it’s just a good woody allen movie.
Owen was absolutely fabulous – he reminded me of me – just in awe of these literary icons – and being able to go back in time and talk with them. Dreams like this can come true – in the movies – and Woody Allen did this with total brilliance!
I have to say that Owen Wilson is the true delight of this film. His best performance in years by far, in a role that seems tailor made for him. Congrats to Woody and Owen both.
Listen, I love Woody and I love to see him have this kind of success at 75 but I am COMPLETELY perplexed by this film. It has all the elements to be great – stellar cast, setting and director – yet despite a whimsical premise (that I was TOTALLY willing to buy into) the film on the whole seemed totally trite and two-dimensional and not at all in-keeping with typical Woody Allen. Some of the dialogue was just godawful…really superficial and full of exposition (I was cringing during Kathy Bates’ scenes). I really love those eras in Paris (20s and Belle Epoque) and thought the production design and music was fantastic. But At 92% fresh, I came out wondering what the hell I might have missed?? The storyline, character development and spoon-fed ending really didn’t add up. It wasn’t a horrible film or even a bad film, but I don’t understand the fanfare either…it was a pleasant diversion at best.
It’s possible you’ve become one of those people who just doesn’t like most movies anymore. You’ll grow out of it. Remember to stop breaking story in your head and just enjoy. When you do, watch this movie again — it’s a delight.
What did you miss? How about a whimsical, truly funny and original story that also manages to ask some fundamental questions about romanticizing the past rather than embracing the present (ever notice how “the movie industry is going to shit and was much better before” is the most tired mantra in LA). Add to that the use of historical figures that actually inspired me to go read more about their lives after watching the film, and I’d say it was one of his best films. I smiled the entire time.
Give it another chance. It may win you over.
agree with you 100%!! I walked out feeling the same way. I prefer MATCH POINT to this movie.
Get a brain the dialogue and social comments were as deep and diverse as ever. He reached new levels and the film was a delight – what more can you ask for in any film.
Saw it for the 2nd time today. Marion Cotillard steals the film, no surprise. Woody is discussing themes here that are fresh and interesting, loved it.
I saw it a second time last week, too. Really noticed the wonderful “set up montage,” this time, that opens the film. A thoroughly entertaining film experience.
Allen and Sony Classics deserve a great deal of credit for the success of this film.
But as SCl starts to tout this as “Allen’s biggest hit,” a reality check.
Ticket prices are several times higher than they were when Allen was most popular.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex’s grosses translate to over $70 million today.
Annie Hall’s to over $120 million.
Hannah and Her Sister’s to around $100 million.
Those films cost between $2 and 6.5 million to make.
Midnight in Paris cost around $30 million. Its US/Canada gross will be somewhere in the $40-50 million range.
But not remotely, accept by forgetting that you can’t compare apples and oranges, his biggest film.
Being pedantic, I need to point out I meant “except” not “accept” of course.
awesome movie. saw it twice. i can see where some would debate it or not like it. but like ebert said not every movie should be made for everyone
worldwide this one is already close to 50 million and is only in a few countries… will surely surpass 100 million. vicky cristina grossed 96 million worldwide
those that think his films don’t have an impact anymore are wrong… not all are hits like this and vcb and match point but it’s just that he makes so many of them we take them and him for granted…
he’s just a funny comedian who happens top be smart and learned how to direct…
he spoke to a generation in the 70′s and the fact he can still make good movies is fantastic
Fabulous! This is the best movie I have seen in eons! It is, in my opinion, one of the most perfect and complete films that has reached theaters in some time. I’m rooting for his success to continue and for him to get that Oscar nomination he so obviously deserves!
It’s charming, but I’m bored with the plot about an interesting guy trapped and misunderstood by an airhead of a wasp woman. He’s done that a lot. And that’s about all the plot there is. Lovely to drink in the images of Paris, however.
This is first Woody movie that felt like it meant anything in many many years.. I feel like I want to see it again to re-hear certain things and re-experience some of the points/teachings he’s making. This is the kind of Woody movie that made him great in the first place. Perfectly surreal and delightfully funny… and Owen Wilson is the New Woody Allen. I don’t really care for him as an actor and I really started to feel him in this role about a quarter of the way in.
Can’t wait to see it again!
It’s a cool flick. Not on Vicky Christina or (of course) Hannah’s level, for my money. I’m mostly entertained by the irony of it attracting the very pseudo-intellectuals it mocks so beautifully. “I believe that’s what they call a paradox.” – from ‘The Departed’
he should just stay in europe with Polanski.
First prize to Chris for most idiotic comment of the week!
Sure, Jack, let’s forget how disgusting Woody is because he made a movie you like!
First prize to Chris for the sanest comment of the week…
Woody is amazing. What other American director has made this many quality films in thirty years? Even those that aren’t up to par are far and above most films made today.
Sidney Lumet.
Woody Allen is the first director to have Ernest Hemingway in one movie and his real-life granddaughter in another. The premise and the secondary characters (the 1920′s celebrities) were more compelling than the leads (Rachel McAdams was a cardboard cutout of a rich girl – who WOULDN’T go to any decade to get away from her?)
Maybe Owen Wilson and Rachel McAdams should have gone to a French-subtitled showing of “Wedding Crashers,” where they would magically enter the film, a la “The Purple Rose of Cairo.” There they would meet Will Ferrell, who would attempt to return them to “Midnight in Paris,” but only get them as far as “Melinda and Melinda” – and then only the dramatic half.
I had reservations about Wilson, but he won me over (in this film). Allen was near the top of his game. I can’t say I feel the same way about Midnight in Paris as I do Annie Hall or Manhattan, but it certainly is way up there. Even better than Husbands & Wives, perhaps as good as Hannah and her Sisters and Crimes & Misdemeanors. Maybe not.
Thought it was dumb. Characters are ALWAYS wealthy who don’t struggle with everyday things.
Have seen these themes over and over and over with Allen over the years and am sick to death of them. Owen Wilson was charming but it was just a silly movie.
I am an old retired actor and unabashed Woody fan, but that aside this is a well-made, well thought out, well-directed film. And I am far from an Owen Wilson fan, but he his delightful in this film, most likely thanks to Woody
That’s what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age.
Now isn’t this sad? That Woody Allen is such a iconic and legendary director and his highest gross is 23 million!!! I didn’t even knew he had such low history in box-office. He is overrated too much. His only interesting and watchable film in last decades was Matchpoint. You almost couldn’t believe that he shot it. Otherwise – boring, empty, boring….
Newsflash: Illiterate internet commenter thinks Woody Allen is “overrated too much.” Film at eleven.
Uh Joe…
what other american director in workinglike this after
thirty years?
depending on your tastes…
Eastwood
Scorsese
Stallone
Craven
Wiseman
Spielberg
Lucas
etc etc
no slam on Woody, but there are a few folks still kicking ass!
That’s great that Woody’s film is doing well, but let’s keep in perspective. I’m sort of confused at how people are raving about the gross of Midnight In Paris as if other films with lesser budgets haven’t grossed a lot more money eg Blair Witch. Woody Allen’s movies don’t need to make any money (which they typically don’t) because he will ALWAYS be given ample opportunity to make more movies. The vast majority of filmmakers don’t have that luxury.
Woody Allen is overrated? That’s moronic. I think the word you are looking for is prolific. Woody could sneeze on a napkin and it would be better than 90% of the films that come out that year of the same genre.
This was a cute, whimsical little movie, a chance for Woody to slip into the shoes of some of his heroes, no doubt, and as always, it had a nice little message about life in there. Executed very well. And, might I add, the perfect date movie.
He deserves this! Good for him!
Love his films!
I took my comedy-loving 11-year-old (has seen early Woody on video). He turned to me in the middle and said he wasn’t getting all the jokes, but he was loving the movie. Easily the youngest guy in the audience, had a great time, now maybe he’ll recognize Hemingway in some future English class.
“Nice to see Allen break his string of disappointments in the past decade…”
Nikki, since you pride yourself on your venerable reporting, I’d like to just point out that Mr. Allen has said, during interviews, etc., that he considers it a failure whenever one of his movies does well among the masses. Not all movies are about the price tag.
As a huge fan of Woody Allen, I imagine Woody is a little upset this movie is doing so well, for he knows it’s an indicator of failure. Personally, Midnight is no Vicki, Christina. Midnight is a little lazy, a little too whimsical for its own good. All in all, a good movie, but not nearly as provocative as so many of his past films.
Anyway, long live Woody!!!