EXCLUSIVE: The producers of the 300 spinoff known as Xerxes have retitled their film 300: Battle of Artemisia, and they have also narrowed their focus of potential directors to two: Noam Murro and Jaume Collet-Serra. The film, a spinoff to 300, is one that the film’s original director Zack Snyder was going to direct. That was until Warner Bros and producer Chris Nolan offered him Man of Steel, and Snyder and wife and producing partner Debra Snyder put Xerxes aside and moved on to rebooting the Superman franchise because Warner Bros needed it. The Snyders have been all over this director selection process. Snyder had written a script with his 300 cohort Kurt Johnstad. Like 300, it is based on a Frank Miller graphic novel that will be shot with the kind of stylized period green-screen action visuals that became the signature of 300 and helped the film gross $456 million worldwide. Xerxes was the Persian leader seen in 300. Miller’s graphic novel told the story of how Xerxes became this peculiar god-like entity. That mythology goes back to the death of his father, Darius, from injuries sustained at the Battle of Marathon in 490 B.C. Darius had told his son not to attack the Greeks because they can only be punished by a god, and so Xerxes tried to transform himself into a deity to gain revenge. The new pic’s produced by the Snyders, Mark Canton, Gianni Nunnari, Thomas Tull and Bernie Goldmann. The prime mover on the film has been Legendary Pictures, which made the original with Warner Bros and has taken the lead on several big-ticket pictures since Tull recapitalized his producing/financing company. That includes the Guillermo del Toro-directed Pacific Rim with Charlie Hunnam and Idris Elba and the Alex Proyas-directed Paradise Lost with Bradley Cooper.
As for those directors: Murro’s sole directing credit is the Sarah Jessica Parker-starrer Smart People for Miramax, but his calling card for big-scale movie making is his commercials work on campaigns that include the Halo video game. He’s a five-time DGA-nominated commercials director, won two Golden Lions at Cannes and last year signed a deal to develop to direct the next Die Hard film at 20th Century Fox. Collet-Serra directed the sleeper hit Unknown for Warner Bros, and he’s prepping to direct Red Circle for Working Title and StudioCanal. He’s also developing the vampire tale Harker with Appian Way at Warner Bros. Both are repped by CAA and Murro is managed by 360′s Guymon Casady.
Developing…





You might want to clarify your wording regarding the comic–Frank Miller hasn’t finished it yet, and considering the precarious state of his sobriety and/or sanity, there’s no reason to expect the film will bear a lot of similarity with whatever he ends up publishing.
They better get a real Persian to play Xerxes, having a someone from South America is not going to cut it.
I am sorry to break it to you but it did already cut it the first time around. Americans are so dumb and ignorant that they buy a south american playing a persian they way they buy it when hollywood has mexicans playing spaniards and spaniards playing cubans or colombians or chinese playing japanese or anybody playing anything. They don’t know the difference and they don’t care. They will anything anybody sells to them, and the least of it is the movies. If you want to see persians, go to westwood, not to hollywood.
I don’t yet know why I am engaging someone as questionably informed as you have proven yourself to be — maybe I woke up in a bad mood…
Regardless, if Americans are “dumb” for buying a South American to play a Persian in this high octane period piece, how do you feel about the rest of the world? You know, the rest of the world that spent $245M on this film as opposed to the $210M us “dumb Americans” spent to see it?
And I’m sure you disagreed with the Academy’s nominations for a picture starring an actor of Welsh descent playing an iconic American hero that beats the crap out of the bad guys by night and spends his billions by day.
Casting a film, theoretically, isn’t about what’s right or what’s fair, it’s about who’s best and who can open (not always in that particular order).
And if you REALLY wanted to go to where the “Persians” are, you’d want to visit Brentwood, not Westwood…
a lot of mexicans have pure spanish blood, they don’t all look like george lopez.
AGREED MISS MANAGER! great point!
ok so first off. I’m excited about this movie. secondly, John Ridley is a total dreamboat. I had a general with him and they were out of water and you know what he did? he took me to the commissary for tea. fancy fancy! look, i know he looks like pacey but the guy really knows how to do his job!!! Go Ridley Go!
Just a point of clarification: while the character Xerxes is “Persian,” of course there is no such thing as a “Persian” nowadays, because the country of “Persia” hasn’t existed for about 90 years. They are now called “Iranian” (even though apparently most of the Iranians in Beverly Hills are in denial about this and identify themself as “Persian”).
So my point is just that, when you say they better cast a real Persian, what you really mean to say is that they should cast an Iranian (to play a Persian character).
Actually, the country of Iran was always named Iran by Iranians since the beginning of time.
The word “Persian” derives from “Persis” which is a region north of the Persian Gulf located in the province of “Pars” (English) otherwise known as “Fars” by Iranians (which is where the word “Farsi”, the Iranian language) derives from). Persepolis, the administrative capital of the Persian Empire founded by Cyrus, was located in Pars, and therefore “Persia” was used by emissaries of the Western World to name the entire country.
But Iranians always called their land “Iran” which in reality means the “land of the Aryans” that stretched across the Iranian plateau east of Mesopotamia.
Today many Iranians living outside of Iran call themselves “Persian” in the ENGLISH language. But if you ask them in FARSI what is their nationality they will say in “Irani”, not Parsi or Farsi as there is no such word in our language except to name the actual language spoken.
Our history is Persian, just because you change a name of a country does not change that. Get your facts right.
jesus, warners is really scrapping the bottom of the barrel on this one. essentially, no established filmmaker will touch this franchise for good reason: if the movie succeeds, it’ll be perceived that zack snyder set the style/tone and the new director just colored within the lines, and if it failed, he’ll be the director that destroyed a major franchise. guy ritchie was smart to pass. it’ll need to be one of these guys that wants to swing at the bleacher and get a chance at the big leagues. not to mention, the movie is guaranteed to have a bad script like the first one bc the movie has zero substance. since what made 300 a hit was its fresh look, a sequel w a similar look and a bad script is going to be big disappointed. also, it’s been over 5 years. come on wb, end on a high note with this franchise and don’t just make a cash grab and fuck it up (which everyone will).
Get Oscar Isaac from Sucker Punch! He was born to play this role…him not getting Bourne sucked…this is like the original Bourne!
Don’t know about this one… 300 enthusiasts want to see Leonidas avenged in a spinoff/sequel, not a prequel detailing the rise of the villain who killed him. Unless the stories are intertwined in some way. We need to see the graphic novel first.
Exactly what I was thinking. The character of Xerxes in “300″ was a majorly creepy. I don’t think I’d want to watch a movie about a nasty, creepy dude rising to power to kill off the protagonists that we rooted for in “300.” I’m perplexed as to why they chose this particular character and story to do a spinoff.
if they maintain the same style “stylized period green-screen action visuals”, I think its suicidal.
Had hoped that they would use the visual techniques of 300 to tell the story of Henry Kissinger in China, 1970.
I realize this movie was only “successful” because it crossed over but far too many industry types discount how important the source was. People jump on the movie for being stylized to the point of absurdity but that was almost all in very cool deference to Frank Miller’s writing and he and Varley’s compositions. By the same token saying Snyder only delivered a goofy and slavish translation is more sour grapes.
Not sticking with the Xerxes title is gutless but not surprising I guess. I’m pretty sure there will never be another modern Batman movie without the words Dark Knight in the title for example…
People discounting the import of Miller on any attempt to faithfully extend this are ridiculous.
Whenever Hollywood announces garbage sequels like this one, there seems to follow the inevitable string of anti-American epithets.. Americans are stupid, Americans don’t care if it’s an Iranian or a Spaniard playing the lead role, etc. As if an actor’s nationality matters if he can play a role credibly. Knock off the nastiness. SOME Americans have read a history book or two. Or dozens.
What I find laughable.. and I mean, above and beyond the basic concept for this film, which sounds unwatchable– is the subtitle “300: Battle of Artemisia”. Did anybody in the decision chain that greenlit this idea do the QA? There IS no “Battle of Artemisia”. There never was. Artemisia was a person– a Persian naval commander, the ONLY female Persian naval commander present at Salamis. What does this portend? A love story, of sorts, between Xerxes and his female admiral? or will it actually be about Salamis? The mind shudders.
You’re right re: Artemisia!!! A professor named Barry Strauss published a great book on the battle of Salamis in 2004 and he went into some detail on her.
Now, a sequel focusing on an ancient naval battle – THAT would be an interesting movie.
I think “Smart People” proved Mr. Murro should continue making award-winning commercials.
Xerxes? Seriously? Why don’t they make a prequel about Queen Gorgo’s early days as a girls’ softball star or Dilios’ efforts to get into Princeton when he still had both of his eyes? Lena Headey and David Wenham are available and probably cheaper than Rodrigo Santoro.
Seriously, how about a new story about something new, fresh, and interesting that’s not a reboot or prequel for once?
Xerxes Was/ Arta____ Xerxes Meaning Like god, alought, He thought He was a god I’m Macedion,76 Year old. In the Bible Xerxes, In the front of He’s Was Arta.
Macedonia gained its independence peacefully from Yugoslavia in 1991. Greece’s objection to the new state’s use of what it considered a Hellenic name …
Total Area: 25,713 sq km
Population: 2,077,328 (July 2011 est.)
Capital: Skopje
Time Difference: UTC+1
GDP: $20 billion (2010 est.)
Title-ing a movie “300: Battle of Artemisia” only makes sense if it’s a DVD. Xerxes is the expectation and if you can’t deliver then don’t waste our time. This is what is acceptable to me and my wallet;
Xerxes – mad, megalomaniac, barbarian at the gates of civilization
Blood, war, death, and destruction
Religion and it’s timeless corruption
Naked woman for the taking
Epic existential debate and conclusion
’nuff said