
Studios usually view Comic-Con as a venue to start momentum on projects that won’t be in theaters for up to a year. This Saturday, DreamWorks and Universal will try to turn the rabid youth demographic at Comic-Con into true believers for Cowboys & Aliens, a week before the picture opens. It’s crucially important to a movie that has a budget pegged by insiders at $163 million (whispers around town are it could be higher) big stars in Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford, and the god-fathering presence of Steven Spielberg and Imagine’s Ron Howard and Brian Grazer. It is also directed by Jon Favreau, whose Iron Man films and past Comic-Con patronage has made him a hero to that crowd.
Despite this pedigree, Cowboys & Aliens has endured a tortured development history involving more than a dozen writers. (Just five writers got screenplay credit after the Writers Guild not surprisingly held an arbitration trying to figure who did what over 14 years.) Now the movie faces even bigger challenges. It’s a mash-up of two genres that usually don’t cross paths, Westerns and science fiction. Word around town is the film has a cash break participation pool in the 35% range. In the wake of the behemoth opening of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 2, tracking has been soft, there is no 3D conversion to justify higher ticket prices, factors that could put the film into the $40 million opening weekend corridor. That’s not enough. And there is that trailer, which took a page from the Super 8 playbook in not giving away every reveal. The studio hopes audiences are so intrigued with the idea of the mash-up of Western and scifi genres that they’ll be curious even if they’re somewhat confused.
So on Saturday, Universal and DreamWorks will come out with six-guns blazing at Comic-Con, launching the film with a Civic Center premiere and a star roster that includes Harrison Ford (many Comic-Con attendees still dress as Han Solo from Star Wars, and Indiana Jones still is as iconic as it gets at the festival), Daniel Craig (those 007 suits are too formal for the Comic-Con crowd, but he’s still James Bond), Spielberg (making his first trip to the convention to promote Tintin) and Howard and Grazer. And then there’s Favreau, who offsets his talent as an event film director with an assiduous habit of courting fans through Twitter. He has become a certified Comic-Con rock star. Last year, when Favreau brought a handcuffed Ford onstage in the actor’s first Comic-Con appearance when Cowboys & Aliens was being made, the crowd went nuts.
Insiders tell me they are encouraged that tracking has picked up somewhat; awareness numbers are growing; and the strongest audience base of older males and females (who like those genres and Ford and Craig) is now being supplemented with increased awareness among young males. It is not surprising that marketing has been a challenge because nothing has been easy for a movie which has taken 14 years to get made. I actually broke the first story about the movie in 1997, when I was a (youngish) film reporter at Daily Variety at a time when studios spent lavishly on specs and pitches. This was a whopper of a deal, especially since Cowboys & Aliens was sold based on little more than an image of a cowboy on horseback, aiming his six-gun at the giant space ship (which not coincidentally looked like the Imperial Destroyer from Star Wars) that pursued him. The deal was made by WMA agents Alan Gasmer and Rob Carlson, who back then were averaging two spec and pitch sales a week.
Scott Mitchell Rosenberg, who owned Malibu Comics when that imprint sold Men in Black to Sony, met Gasmer to pitch comic ideas that would be generated by his new imprint, Platinum Studios. “He’d flip over a poster, and then another and another,” Gasmer recalled. “When he got to the third one, I said, what’s that? He said, it’s Cowboys & Aliens. I said, that’s your movie. Even though he had nothing written down, I grabbed Rob, who pitched it to his client Steve Oedekerk. Steve immediately said he was in, and that he would figure out the movie. We went out basically with an illustration and Steve, and we had five offers right away from Disney, Fox, Sony, Universal and DreamWorks until the latter two joined together and bought it. That’s how business was done back then.”
Pitched as a Western version of Independence Day, Universal and DreamWorks paid $500,000 against $1.5 million. What they really bought was a drawing that suggested a concept, and the deal included a potential payday of around $3.5 million for Oedekerk (hot after writing Ace Ventura and The Nutty Professor) to write, direct and produce. It would only take about a decade for Hollywood to figure out the proper tone for Cowboys & Aliens, which evolved from an action-comedy to the dead-serious Western (with aliens) that will open nex week.
There’s a long trail of writers who did drafts, starting at a time when Universal and DreamWorks were eager to make the film — until two years later when the bloated Wild Wild West killed the momentum for another costly high concept Western. Oedekerk, whose script mixed action with humor, gave way to scribes Jeffrey Boam and Chris Hauty. Sources tell me they were told to make the film like 3:10 to Yuma, with aliens. They brought a darker tone to the material, but the project lost steam and eventually moved on to Sony and Escape Artists. Escape Artists partner Todd Black said he didn’t read any of the early scripts — he was legally prohibited from doing so — but that development also veered from a broad comedic Men In Black tone with humor (Tom Evans and Thomas Donnelly & Joshua Oppenheimer wrote those drafts) to a dark, serious take by X-Men scribe David Hayter. Hayter told me that when he took the job in 2002, he, like Oedekerk, had only that illustration to work with, because the actual graphic novel wasn’t published until 2006. “I liked the idea that the audience knew more about the technology than the cowboys, and that these these low-tech heroes took on a hi-tech menace,” said Hayter. “After I turned in the first draft, they wanted it darker. I told them, if I do that, you won’t want to make the movie. They said, do it anyway. When I turned it in, they said, ‘this is took dark, we can’t make this.’ Being proved right is not much solace to a screen writer trying not to be buried in the pauper’s graveyard.” Black said that Hayter indeed delivered a script he wanted to make, but Sony was reticent and by then they’d spent so much money they decided to let it go.
Enter Imagine’s Howard, who told me during a Deadline interview to commemorate the 25th anniversary of his and Grazer’s company that he became fixated on the concept, but thought the tone in the scripts was a little too humorous.
“I found out about it four years ago,” Howard told me recently. “I looked at the cover of the comic and thought it was fantastic. I started asking questions and it had gone back and forth between Universal and DreamWorks. It was available somehow. I looked at the screenplays. They were good, but tonally it was a little bit tongue in cheek. I went back to Stacey Snider and Steven Spielberg and said I thought it was very hard to be tongue in cheek about the West because it isn’t a staple genre any more. Not like the 50s where there were 20 Westerns on TV and you could make fun the way Mel Brooks did with Blazing Saddles and have people remember. But it was a great adventure genre, and scifi, and I thought a more straightforward blending of the two could be a fresh idea. We worked on that and then Jon Favreau became interested. It was reborn and picked up a lot of momentum and a fantastic cast.”
Original suitors Universal and DreamWorks got back into it, with the latter taking the creative lead and Universal leading the marketing effort. That serious tone was shaped first by Iron Man scribes Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby, and then by Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof. They worked closely with Favreau, who originally wanted his Iron Man star Robert Downey Jr, but then moved on to the iconic teaming of Craig and Ford. All five of those writers got screen credit after the Writers Guild not surprisingly held an arbitration trying to figure who did what over 14 years. Hayter was nixed because the project moved to a different studio; and even though Oedekerk originated the movie with only an illustration to work with, he was only given Story By Credi (which he shared with Fergus & Ostby). “This is only the second time we can remember where the Guild gave source credit to an illustration, and the other one was a TV movie based on a Norman Rockwell painting,” Gasmer said.
We’ll soon find out if that high concept of cowboys vs aliens–which kept the project afloat and enticed the likes of Spielberg, Howard and Favreau– rallies in the tracking, enough to captivate the global audience needed to turn the pricey picture into a summer hit.


This movie will make Olivia Wide a movie star.
Enough. Olivia Wilde’s PR people need to stop. She is and will always be a skin girl, she started her career on Maxim and now is just being hired as a pretty face/body (see: The Change Up or the Cowboys & Aliens which teases her being nude) which will fade. She’s inexplicably cast in a million movies but is not lead in any of them. She hasn’t carried any movies or even a TV show by herself or been cast as a lead, she hasn’t gotten critical acclaim, and frankly has no IT.
I don’t even mind her as an actress, but these early prognostications are premature and annoying and you saying it over an over won’t suddenly make them true. She needs to prove herself first.
Blah blah blah. Olivia Wilde is the bomb.
I agree Peter’s comment is a major overstatement as I personally think C&A will flop due to the RIDICULOUS genre mix.
But, I REEEEALLY like Olivia Wilde! She’s obviously got some serious chops having 21 movies and 4 TV shows under her belt, and she’s educated and smart and brings that to her characters. If that ain’t impressive, I’d hate to be your kid.
And she’s only 27!
You’re right, she’s hasn’t done the groundbreaking role yet, but the potential’s there and I wouldn’t be shocked if she’s finally given the opportunity soon. I’d challenge you to list women under 30 that can really open a film anyway. (Natalie Portman’s 30, btw)
Just give her a sec, will ya?
PS. I forgot to mention she’s smoking-ass hot, and I’d cut off my left pinkie finger to spend the night with her. Maybe that, and the above mentioned, explains your “inexplixable”.
I’m just as big a comic book, movie, whatever geek as anybody else is but I just do not get the reasoning behind studios putting so much time, money and effort into Comic Con. You only get around 100,000 people there. Only a part of those people care about the movie part. Only a fraction of those people actually get into the movie panels. Yet for some reason they really think that sending the stars and showing top secret footage to hundreds or maybe thousands of people helps sell their movies to the MILLIONS of people who don’t live in San Diego or don’t have the means to drop their lives to go to a comic book convention a thousand miles away. Jon Favreau going to Comic Con isn’t going to sell a single ticket.
There’s this thing call the interweb that you typed your comment on. The troglodytes at comic con spend a lot of time on it informing their friends around the country who can’t afford to go whether they should plunk down their 12 bucks or if they should just masturbate to interweb porn. So, yes, it is important
I think they are hoping the ComicCon people will tweet or blog about it and that will generate buzz. The crowd that sees it there will be in awe of the actors and directors and thus more likely to rave about the movie.
The guys and girls at Comic-Con twitter the hell out of what they like. That’s what the studios are after.
I am excited to see how this story holds up. After such a long journey I hope the concept rocks the boat. Congrats to all and good luck!
I’d like to see this movie do well. Feels like one of the few original flicks of the summer.
By the way, nice write up of the history of this project. Kinda cracked me up about Platinum’s pitch process – experienced that. A picture and a logline. You do the rest.
I’m sorry but it still looks stupid as a “serious” movie. If it had been a comedy with the same premise, I might have been interested.
That’s my reaction, too. Hard to take it seriously.
However, this is one I might go to purely out of curiosity: How the hell are they going to pull this off while keeping a straight face?
The previews, admittedly, look better than the inane concept.
Very interesting genesis of the project. I’m not surprised it has had a troubled history.
since comic con did so well for Scott Pilgrim… oh wait…
u took the words out of my mouth..lol
I don’t know how people aren’t intrigued by Harrison Ford, Daniel Craig, westerns, or sci-fi. If the critics like it, it should do well.
I was kinda interested in this film when I heard about it but now that I have seen the trailers not so much. Really get a Wild Wild West vibe from it.
Mashups are non-creative, derivative, & mostly stupid. I love westerns & sci-fi, but wouldn’t go see this if Anne Hathaway was the lead & was nude the entire movie. (Well… maybe then…)
Otherwise, this has made me yawn every time I hear about it.
I agree, I hate the ideas of “mash-ups”, whether in movies, music, etc. They are always terrible and I have no idea why anybody likes them.
It’s a common theme in complaints about show business lately, but the idea or concept is far less important than the execution. “Cowboys and Aliens” may sound like a good idea to some idiot in a boardroom, but it is not enough to get people interested if the movie isn’t good enough.
Also, on a somewhat unrelated note, Daniel Craig is a horrible James Bond, they should get someone else, maybe Zach Galifankis or Shia Le Boeuf if they are available.
Scott Pilgrim..Jonah Hex…’nuff said, carry on
Everyone shut up. I have seen the movie and its GENIUS. Allow America to discover it…
Slow down.
So now $40 million opening weekend is a “win” for this movie? That’s half the P&A for the US alone! From the director of “Iron Man!” This thing cost a FORTUNE and has, we’d all agree, very dubious prospects. All parties involved should brace themselves for considerable career blowback, even James Bond.
I agree. With a budget of 175 million and the P & A, this movie should be opening in the 70s. You also have to consider that the majority of a summer films gross is in the first couple weeks of release. A lot of movies this summer have has soft openings. I don’t know how Hollywood stays in business.
All of the marketing material strongly suggests Harrison Ford only has a small role. My understanding is that he really is a co-star but you wouldn’t know it. The latest TV spot doesn’t show him even once. Nor does the billboard all over town (which also omits Olivia Wilde, whose ass on the print ads clearly helped Tron tremendously).
So aliens can exist today but not two hundred years ago or any serious movie with aliens is wrong because aliens dont exist? Why does the idea of cowboys fighting aliens only work comically? That seems like the cheap and less imiganitive way out
14 years, hundreds of millions of dollars, and the best title they could come up with is “Aliens vs. Cowboys”?
How many people will skip this because of the stupid title alone?
well, something original. That alone is shocking. I truly hope this does really well. Mainly because this might get people interested in innovating & originality again. enough with the remakes
It is funny people act like aliens only started existing , if they exist at all , since humans achieved space flight. That is why it seems fairly ignorant to label this a “mashup”. It sounds like it is a western. A western set in a world where aliens didn’t just pop into existence I’m the 20th century,
Very interesting history–thank you.
This sounds so much like Joss Whedon’s Firefly and Serenity. I can not believe more people are not interested.
Olivia Wilde is a POA and she’s a good actor, but this is Hollywood… there’s always another flavor next month!
Yeah! I remember in history class we spent months reading the personal journals of Civil War soldiers. I particularly remember several soldiers telling how they on Monday they shot at men in different uniforms, then the next day fought hand-to-hand with six-armed, purple aliens who landed in what was described as “metal stagecoaches”… In fact, that reminds
me of Pres Lincoln’s famous speech about “government of/by/for the people and newly-dicovered six-armed purple aliens”
/sarcasm
Could someone explain to me what “cash break participation pool” is? Why is 40 mil. opening is not enough to cover that.Thanks.
This is the do-or-die moment for Platinum. The comic was really terrible, but if this thing is a hit, I want them to make a Hero By Night movie. Hero By Night is the best property Platinum has, hands down. It’s a refreshing new take on the old super hero genre.
Platinum Studios doesn’t want to make movies. They want people to give them money and then make movies based on their library of incredibly exciting comic book ideas that they can’t be bothered to produce or publish as actual comic books.
This is such a direct take off of Joss Whedon’s Firefly and Serenity, as the above poster noted. I can’t believe that this wasn’t mentioned in the article at all. It can’t be that the writers are unaware of the connection. Why wasn’t it mentioned? Seems an odd omission. Since everyone else in Hollywood gets a mention, why not the guy who came up with the original concept?
The Cowboys & Aliens title and key art of the cowboy being overtaken by a flying saucer predate Firefly by at least a couple of years.