MONDAY 12 PM: It’s now official. According to today’s actuals, DreamWorks/Universal’s Cowboys & Aliens narrowly beat Sony Pictures’ Smurfs for the weekend win $ $36,431,290 vs $35,611,637.
SATURDAY PM/SUNDAY AM, 6TH UPDATE WRITETHRU: If I hear the words “too close to call” one more time this weekend coming from a Hollywood executive looking at early weekend numbers… DreamWorks/Universal’s Cowboys & Aliens ticked up slightly from Friday to Saturday, while Sony Pictures’ The Smurfs ticked down slightly.
So it all depends on Sunday whether the Western/scifi mashup or the little blue guys get bragging (and marketing) rights as the #1 opening movie. Right now both Uni and Sony are projecting Cowboys and Smurfs tied at $36.2M for the weekend. Let’s see when the dust clears for Monday’s actuals. But a Sony exec emails me, “If we beat them or even are close Saturday, we’ve got them as our Sunday will definitely be better.”
What is crystal clear is that Smurfs is overperforming way beyond expectations while Cowboys & Aliens is way behind expectations to the point of tanking. What’s more humiliating than Hollywood execs overestimating the opening for Cowboys and having it fall short? Having their well-pedigreed motion picture with big Hollywood writers (Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman), stars (Daniel Craig & Harrison Ford), director (Jon Favreau), and producers (Steven Spielberg & Ron Howard & Brian Grazer) beaten at the box office by Smurfs. Especially with Smurfs playing in 355 fewer North American theaters than Cowboys but charging higher 3D ticket prices. Smurfs even beat Cowboys on CinemaScores: ‘A’ vs ‘B’. The other major studio release was Warner Bros’ rom-com Crazy, Stupid, Love which received ‘B+’ CinemaScore and opened to the normal $19.3M for the weekend. This is another big summer weekend with overall moviegoing $175M which is +20% from last year.
1. Cowboys & Aliens (DreamWorks/Universal) NEW [3,750 Runs]
Friday $12.9M, Saturday $13M, Estimated Weekend $36.2M
This much-hyped high concept pic from DreamWorks and Relativity and Imagine and Universal (distributing domestic only with Paramount taking foreign) couldn’t do even the predicted $45 million for the weekend, but it didn’t even get to $40M either. ”Cowboys & Aliens did not get any late night young male business — hence the reason Universal’s estimates were so far off,” a rival studio exec explained to me Friday night. I’ve been saying for months this actioner should have been done as a comedy! But that idea was only briefly discussed and quickly rejected. Problem is that the budget has been pegged by insiders at a low of $163M (because of filming rebates) and a high of $200M. That’s partly because Cowboys endured a tortured 14-year development history involving more than a dozen writers. (Just five writers received screenplay credit after the Writers Guild not surprisingly held an arbitration trying to figure out who did what.) So here’s yet another Hollywood case study of too many cooks spoiling the broth.
Awareness had been strong for the title and interest had been best with older males. But tracking had been lagging especially with women of all ages until last Thursday when it popped up. This weekend’s exit polls showed the audience was 53% male vs. 47% female, with 63% of moviegoers age 30 years and older vs. 37% who were under age 30. Good thing Universal is only on the hook for 25% financing with DreamWorks taking 50% and Relativity Media 25%. DreamWorks oversaw production, and the marketing was managed as a partnership among Universal and DreamWorks. The film itself is based on a 100-page Platinum Studios graphic novel created by Scott Mitchell Rosenberg and written by Fred Van Lente and Andrew Foley.
It’s going to be hard for anyone involved in the movie to shrug off responsibility for it underperforming because even the studio was gushing pre-release about its pedigree “because of its deep bench of heavyweight filmmakers and stars, and the most fan-engaged because of involving them directly at every step, particularly through director Jon Favreau, the big-ticket director most active in social media and direct interaction with his followers. Every step of the campaign kept many hands on the wheel, shared by Universal, DreamWorks and the filmmaking team, who all worked in close collaboration on every decision.” Oops! As for marketing, the first teaser trailer was placed on Part 1 of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows last November, followed by a Super Bowl teaser. The first full trailer made its debut on American Idol on April 14th and in theaters on April 29 with Universal’s big hit Fast Five. The TV campaign included season finales for Top 10 Nielsen shows and sports events.
The publicity campaign launched at last year’s Comic-Con even though the film had only been in production for a few weeks, Favreau used his Iron Man connection with fans to debut nearly 8 minutes of footage, including the first alien attack on the pioneer town in the film. While Harrison Ford made his first-ever appearance to a huge reception. This year’s Comic-Con featured a full-frills world premiere featuring Favreau as well as Spielberg, making his own first appearance at the Con. But it’s interesting how the movie disappointed despite favreau whoring himself out to The Hollywood Reporter (which nobody reads) and Ain’t It Cool News (which nobody believes). The director even dragged along producer Ron Howard and producer/co-writer Bob Orci to some events, showing more and more footage each time. I heard from Universal that Daniel Craig was a royal pain in the ass when it came to doing publicity, but he did enough with Harrison Ford to merit one magazine cover line, “When Bond Met Indy”. (Barf!)
The usual talk show circuit was highlighted by Jimmy Kimmel Live‘s “Cowboys & Aliens Week” promotion which had Favreau revisiting his Dinner For Five cable show and personally interviewing his lead cast members and filmmakers for a series of online segments. Favreau also helped create and star in a special skit with YouTube vlogging personality Freddie Wong, who specializes in action-packed and parody videos especially popular with boys. The film became the first ever to be a primary sponsor of a Nascar across multiple races as well as a tie-in with Coca-Cola in theater concessions via drink cups, and popcorn bags and buckets over the course of the summer in 8 of the top theater chains in North America. Other promotions with leading brands included 7-Eleven, Nestlé, Comcast, NCM/Sprint, Pemmican, and Hilton. And in addition to all that, the film made a significant Hispanic outreach across specialized media and publicity, highlighted by a closing night screening at the Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival. Well, you can’t fault anyone for lack of trying.
1. The Smurfs – 3D (Sony) NEW [3,395 Runs]
Friday $13.4M, Saturday $12.7M, Estimated Weekend $36.2M
Sure, it’s easy to look down your nose at The Smurfs, but the studio tells me it was brought in out of turnaround from Paramount by no less than Sony Pictures Entertainment Chairman/CEO Michael Lynton. Animation was overseen by Bob Osher and Hannah Minghella (who is now president of production for Sony’s Columbia Pictures) while live action was shepherded by Doug Belgrad. Marketing was taken in hand by Jeff Blake and Marc Weinstock. Hollywood never expected Smurfs to have such a phenomenal Friday except Sony. ”The studio has always had confidence in the franchise,” an exec gushed to me. Exit polls showed that 35% of this weekend’s audience was general moviegoers while 65% was kids with parents. Of the family sample, 40% were parents of children under age 12 and 25% were children under 12. The overall breakdown showed the film skewed female with 64% of the audience moms and/or their daughters. The general age breakdown showed 45% was under 25 and 55% was 25+. Overall, 3D accounted for 45% of all ticket sales.
The cartoon first launched in Europe in 1958 so the pic was tracking well overseas after Global Smurfs Day was organized by Sony in Brussels, Athens, The Hague, Dublin, Mexico City, Panama City, Warsaw, Moscow, Johannesburg, London, and NYC (which celebrated Smurfs Week including lighting the Empire State Building Smurf blue in a special event with UNICEF). There was even a small town in Spain where the village volunteered to paint their entire town Smurf blue. And Smurfs fans set a new Guinness world record for the largest gathering of people dressed as the little blue guys within a 24-hour period in multiple venues. “That, plus a huge opening in Spain, makes for a pretty Smurfy opening with worldwide prospects for France, Belgium, and Germany opening next week,” a Sony exec says.
Look, I don’t get the appeal of garden gnomes or troll dolls or Smurfs for that matter. They creep me out, frankly. But the little blue guys were first drawn by Belgian artist Pierre “Peyo” Culliford for a comic book. The “Schtroumpfs,” as they were initially called, have lasted 50 years and generated comics, books, television series, films, videogames, live shows, and figurines. The Smurfs movie also took a long time to come to the Big Screen. In 1980, the late (and great) Brandon Tartikoff developed the Hanna-Barbera show on NBC for Saturday mornings. It ran 8 years. In 1997, producer Jordan Kerner sent the first of a series of letters to Lafig, the licensing agent for the Smurfs brand, as a first step to making a movie. And in 2002, after seeing Kerner’s adaptation of E.B. White’s Charlotte’s Web, Peyo’s heirs gave the OK. Starring Neil Patrick Harris, Jayma Mays, Sofia Vergara, and Hank Azaria, the roon/live action hybrid was directed by Raja Gosnell. Screenplay credits went to J. David Stem & David N. Weiss and Jay Scherick & David Ronn with story by J. David Stem & David N. Weiss.
Sony focused its marketing first and foremost on introducing this brand to a whole new generation of kids who were not familiar with it. “The campaign used a two-pronged approach: one track targeted kids and children while the other hit the baby boomers who grew up with the hit NBC series and had a nostalgic connection to this brand from their youth,” a Sony exec says. NBCUniversal, as the longtime home of the Smurfs’ TV show, aired Sony’s custom animation and custom promos including Smurfs-branded spots, vignettes, in-show integrations, logo animations, sneak peeks, and digital extensions during the past two weeks. One showed the Smurfs taking over an NBCUniversal control room. There also were Nickelodeon sneak peaks during the Saturday Morning Animation Block hosted by Neil Patrick Harris.
In the consumer marketing arena, 3rd party partners included McDonald’s planned the year’s largest global campaign in over 30,000 restaurants. Post cereal, which created the original Smurf Berry Crunch in 1983, is back again with a limited edition blue and white breakfast cereal and collectible box featuring two sides: one with 3D movie graphics and the other with the classic Smurf cartoon art. Gourmet Trading Company put the Smurfs into the nation’s grocery store produce aisles as the company featured the Smurfs on its packages of blueberries.
3. Captain America – 3D (Marvel/Disney/Paramount) Week 2 [3,715 Runs]
Friday $7.8M, Saturday $9.9M, Weekend $24.9M (-62%), Estimated Cume $116.7M
Ten days in North American release, Marvel/Disney’s latest superhero Captain America: The First Avenger is still running slightly behind Thor which took in $119.5M by this time vs $117.5M for the Chris Evans adventure. Paramount is gleeful over its 6th consecutive release over $100M in the U.S., claiming no studio has ever had more than 4. This weekend, pic opened strong in Latin America and Asia (but not Japan and China). International numbers around noon.
4. Harry Potter/Hallows Pt 2 - 3D (Warner Bros) Week 3 [4,145 Runs]
Friday $6.6M, Saturday $8.5M, Weekend $21.9M, Cume $318.4M
Yes, the Harry Potter franchise finale keeps dropping (-54% this 3rd domestic weekend in release) and now appears front-loaded. But what a load!
5. Crazy, Stupid, Love (Warner Bros) NEW [3,020 Runs]
Friday $7M, Weekend $19.3M
Another summer weekend, another summer rom-com — this time from Warner Bros. Better reviewed than most, Crazy, Stupid, Love should have “a large multiple and legs,” according to the studio, adding, “Watch for excellent mid-week business as well.” The better-than-average casting of Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone and Steve Carell and Julianne Moore signaled this wasn’t the usual lamefest with dopey dialogue. And the marketing smartly played off that. “We sought to highlight the films originality, and position it as a funny and deeply felt and refreshing look at how relationships make people crazy,” a Warner Bros insider tells me. Branding the title and giving it meaning was also key. Studio married “caught” moments from the film with bold colors and repetitive copy saying “This is crazy”, “This is stupid”, “This is love.” The campaign kicked off with trailers in April and May and played all through the summer. The very aggressive TV campaign started in May with season finales. “We used longer length spots in the beginning to convey the multiple story lines, and used a heavy amount of reviews as soon as we had them to define the film as something out of the ordinary.” In terms of publicity, the cast appeared together on the MTV Movie Awards. To build word of mouth, the studio held over 200 screenings in over 60 markets and hosted tastemaker events in key cities designed to tap into that elusive circle of trendsetters especially online. Fans were asked at each screening to tweet if they liked the movie and fan the film on Facebook. Two weeks before release, Warner Bros pushed out 3 online content pieces on Apple. And in keeping with the strategy of pushing out as much content as possible, the final push included an original video shot with Steve Carrell for Funny or Die which appeared this week of release.
6. Friends With Benefits (Screen Gems/Sony) Week 2 [2,926 Runs]
Friday $3.2M, Saturday $3.4M, Weekend $9.3M (-48%), Cume $38.2M
7. Horrible Bosses (New Line/Warner Bros) Week 4 [2,510 Runs]
Friday $2.2M, Saturday $2.8M, Weekend $7.1M, Cume $96.2M
8. Transformers 3 – 3D (Paramount) Week 5 [2,604 Runs]
Friday $1.7M, Saturday $2.3M, Weekend $5.9M, Estimated Cume $337.8M
9. Zookeeper (Sony) Week 4 [2,418 Runs]
Friday $1.3M, Saturday $1.6M, Weekend $4.2M, Estimated Cume $68.7M
10. Cars 2 – 3D (Pixar/Disney) Week 6 [1,763 Runs]
Friday $671K, Saturday $921K, Weekend $2.3M, Estimated Cume $182M
SATURDAY AM, 4TH UPDATE: (Mea Culpa: Not a good idea for me to stay up all night doing box office. I get tired and transpose figures. Here are the corrected numbers.) According to Universal’s North American box office stats, Cowboys & Aliens opened only #2 Friday with $12.994M, beaten by the $13.291M debut of Sony Pictures’ The Smurfs. But Universal is still claiming its Western/scifi mashup should come in #1 for the weekend at $36.78M, ahead of the little blue guys toon’s $36.02M. Or is that only wishful thinking at this point? Smurfs is really overperforming while Cowboys & Aliens is way behind expectations to the point of tanking.
FRIDAY PM/SATURDAY AM, 2ND UPDATE: Talk about humiliation! By late night Friday, it became clear that not only was the Western/scifi mashup from DreamWorks and Relativity and Imagine and Universal (distributing domestic only with Paramount taking foreign) not doing the predicted $45 million for the weekend, but that it was running neck-and-neck with Sony Pictures’ little blue guys toon for first place. So both Cowboys & Aliens and The Smurfs are looking around $13M for Friday. And we won’t know who is truly No. 1 well into Saturday morning. “Cowboys & Aliens did not get any late night young male business — hence the reason Universal’s estimates were so far off,” a rival studio exec explained to me Friday night. But Sony execs went to bed expecting Smurfs to be #1 which should translate into a “way overperforming’ $37M. Some rival studios are even predicting that Cowboys could fall short with only mid-$30sM. Smurfs beat Cowboys on CinemaScores ‘A’ vs ‘B’. Refined numbers and full analysis in the morning.
FRIDAY 5 PM UPDATE: Now I’m told that DreamWorks/Imagine/Universal’s mashup Cowboys & Aliens is picking up steam at the box office tonight and could open with $17M grosses for Friday and a $45M weekend. “It’s hitting a good pace,” a Universal exec just told me. Maybe there’s more room there because the weekend number is still on the low end of what the studio was expecting. Sony Pictures’ Smurfs is looking even stronger for $12M today for a $32M weekend which is respectable for its target audience of very young moviegoers. And Warner Bros’ Crazy, Stupid, Love is still looking like $6M today for probably a $19M first weekend in line with other recent rom-coms. Stay tuned for more updates and full analysis tonight.
FRIDAY 12 PM: It’s still very early so I’m not prepared yet to definitively say that DreamWorks/Imagine/Universal’s mashup Cowboys & Aliens is dramatically underperforming because older audiences come out later. But sources are telling me that today’s seeming $15M debut may add up to at most a $40M weekend which is below the studio’s own lowball projections of $45+M. Sony Pictures’ Smurfs is looking like $10M today for $29M weekend which is respectable for its target audience of very young moviegoers. And Warner Bros’ Crazy, Stupid, Love is looking like $6M today for probably a $18M first weekend.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Wow, so Cowboys & Aliens is an even bigger bomb than Green Lantern. Perhaps we should pretend it didn’t cost more than $200 million to make.
This is what happens when Kurtzman Orci does not have a brand name like Mission Impossible, Transformers or Star Trek to trace.
No surprise that their two non-franchise pilots this season at FOX were not picked up.
Any reason why you’re hanging it solely on Kurtzman and Orci? There were about a bazillion other creative hands in this.
Hey, please don’t be hating on Orci and Kurtzman. Yes, they are wildly successful. And, yes, they may be pleasant victims of being in the right place at the right time. They are not, however, devoid of mad talent or skills. Plus, they are nice people, which ought to count for a scintilla of something in this maddening and oft-times mean and bilious biz. Just sayin…..
LOL @ Captain America. That movie is extremely boring. Probably the most boring movie I have seen all summer. I guess it fell to no. 3?
It looks like Captain America fell to No.3.
Captain America was boring as hell. Probably the most boring movie I have seen all year.
I have met them a few times at comic con,in hotel lobbys and the con itself,always friendly and genuine- a rare thing these days.
I have seen Cowboys and aliens and thought it was good and will probably see it again with mates soon.
I noticed with all the accolades you heaped on Orci and Kurtzman the one thing you didn’t say was that they produced GOOD STORIES.
Being “nice” means nothing to an audience.
These two have failed to write even one tv or movie script that’s been any good.
And Industrial Light & Magic has more to do with what you call their “success” than they do!
I must admit though when you said they have “skills” (without citing any examples, I noticed) that did make me laugh more than any of Orci/Kurtzman’s crummy jokes in Bayformers.
Remember, I told you so a year ago, as soon as I saw their names attached to this project, that it was DOA. Without a pre-established property for them to glom onto ALL their movies would wind up failing like The Island did.
I notice the Orci/Kurtzman fans never want to talk about that one.
When will the studios stop wasting money on these two?
I hang the failure on Kurtzman Orci because they wrote and produced this film. They are the only screenwriters and producers on the film. In interviews they talk about being on set every day. They would have taken the most credit if it had been a hit so they must take the most responsibility when it is a flop.
The idea that an opening weekend between $40-$46 million on this film is a hit given its enormous cost is laughable. The studios simply lowered the already low expectations and then said the film is doing better than we thought. It is still a flop!
@susan: I appreciate your unbridled candor and your POV even if we differ on the Orci/Kurtzman issue. Thanks for chiming in with a thoughtful perspective.
— bobby the saint
how can it be a flop if nothing else beat it?
This weekend’s b.o shows what the audience went to see,alot of my mates havnt seen anything since potter or transformers 3,so I guess thats the reason why the numbers are not as high.
Setting aside the horrible $36 million dollar bomb that was the opening of Cowboys and Aliens, there is simply no way these two movies will tie tomorrow. Sunday is a family day at the movies and families will go out to see the kid friendly Smurfs. When “actuals” come in Monday Smurfs will be #1 so why, why WHY would DH report this nonsense about a tie? DH is not the Hollywood Reporter. DH is a great site. Why buy into the lie and sell the studio spin?
The answer lies in the rare collective fates of three studios sharing a single film. Universal and Dreamworks share domestic and Paramount has foreign. They realized they could not credibly claim #1 so they claimed a tie thus changing the story from complete failure to a “tight race”.
The PR spin now becomes “the race is too close to call” instead of Cowboys and Aliens bombs, grossing almost twenty million less than this summer’s other disaster Green Lantern.
The sad, sad SAD thing is that the entertainment press actually went with the story. I am very surprised Deadline Hollywood did. DH usually sniffs the crap when they hear it and points it out to their readers while the other media sheep go along with whatever they are told to say by the studios and the flacks.
As a result websites around the world will now report a complete lie — that “it was a tie at the box office” instead of a $200 million dollar film flopped at the box office.
This is the work and the power of three studios PR departments not to mention the individual publicists of the long list of filmmakers involved in Cowboys.
I just wish DH, a great source of accurate information in a sea of crap, had called the studios out on this ridiculous spin.
Cowboys & Aliens (Uni) $36,200,000 – 3,750 – $9,653 – $36,200,000
The Smurfs (Sony) $36,200,000 – 3,395 – $10,663 – $36,200,000
C&A is in 350 more theatres and still less than $1,000 per screen average than Smurfs.
You know everyone at Sony is wishing they had grabbed just another
100 screens!
@ Bobby and Lmee: I highly doubt Captain America is the most boring movie you’ve seen this year. What other movies have you seen? Alas, 68 percent is a hudge drop. Damn.
I completely agree with Bobby and Lmee…Captain America was EXTREMELY boring. I knew Capain America would be behind Thor again this weekend…despite all the comments from the fanboys.
With that being said, Evans did a good job, but the story was BLAH…could have been so much more exciting than it was. I was so excited to see it at the midnight show and was so disappointed with the movie once it was over. Worst movie this year that I’ve seen…absolutely, but what makes it worse is that we were anticipating its release. What a waste.
What movies have you seen this year?
I just made a post, and I neglected to add Captain America as yet another example of a movie that both sucked and blew at the same time, along with Thor, and Green Lantern. Captain America was slow, plodding, formulaic, predictable, slower than a glaciar, not even believable for someone used to suspending disbelief, etc. Is it my imagination or has Hollywood lost the ability to make a really great movie? Is it all Transformers-like CGI that Hollywood is interested in nowadays? Whatever happened to “telling a good story, well”, which is what made Hollywood the global leader in movies? Did someone spike the Perrier in L.A.??? John Karavitis
While Captain America wasn’t great or even really good, it certainly didn’t suck.
It’s so bad I heard the FBI is interviewing everyone involved…
A posse’s also been formed to haul the filmmakers to movie jail.
Wrong. Even the FBI has washed it hands of it! LOL!
John V. Karavitis
I’m actually stunned it made THAT much, to be honest. Even if it had positive reviews instead of disappointing ones, I thought for sure it would open to $20-something million.
I would’ve gone to see this movie if it had better eye-candy. I’m not particularly interested in Lady jaw or the old wreck of a Han Solo.
Universal must be saying “uh oh” right about now with the
$200 Million
BATTLESHIP just around the corner.
Alien invasions are really played out imo.
And there’s how many more coming out and in production?
As much as I love alien invasion flicks, I kind of yawned when I saw BATTLESHIP, the theme is getting played out.
as someone who went to see that truly pick from column a and match up with column b type movie such as Cowboys vs. Aliens (we’ve had aliens vs. predators, predators 1 and 2, aliens 1-4)and had to sit through the previews, let me tell you, my eyebrows rose when I saw Aliens vs. US NAVY (aka who sunk my 1 BATTLESHIP) that’s to open 2012. Wow. What vision. I mean, I want sci fi so badly on the big screen, but this crappola? Come on. Then there was the obligatory preview for a movie coming this September(?) about Contagion and all I could think of was the gov’t jamming us with constant messages of “have you received your flu shot this year? – Are they timing these things to tell us something? The aliens really are coming and don’t expect the US military to be helpful? I already knew that thanks. Get my flu shot for a bird flu virus that’s mutated by the time the vaccine is ready? Yeah, sure, I’ll stand in line and get punctured for that one right away. oy!
this should’ve been a straight to video release.
Good thing Uni sold the international rights to the now Disney distributed Dreamworks.
And I’d like to pretend that it didn’t take 14 years to develop. I mean, did the space program take that long to put someone on the moon? If it takes them 14 years, can I get a job writing crappy scripts, because I can do it way faster than that?
I just read that it had a monstrously large budget and took 14 YEARS of re-writes, etc., to get this thing on the silver screen. Whew! I for one am looking forward to seeing it, but really question the casting of Daniel Craig (“James Bond”, and a Brit, to boot) as one of the lead characters. The trailer on YouTube made it seem like it’s a solid movie, so, I’m reserving judgment until I actually see it. But I do agree that the last handful of action/comic movies, Thor, Green Lantern, etc., were just TERRIBLE, and, again, with questionable, nay, POOR, casting choices. John Karavitis
This movie’s high price tag is its main problem in more way than one.
The business plan of coming up with outrageous titles first and some (any) movie to go along with them second has been around probably as long as movies themselves, and at least since Val Lewton let Jacques Tourneur make whatever movies he wanted as long as they were called “Cat People” and “I Walked with a Zombie.” More recently the home video boom gave us Troma and Empire Films, and things like “Decapitator” and “Class of Nuke ‘Em High.”
That a few of the movies ended up being good is nice, but beside the point; the whole model springs from the premise that since there’s no money for decent production value or advertising, the film’s title is the only arrow in their quiver.
On the one hand, it’s easy to see why the practice now appeals to the majors: In an age of information and media overload, you need an outrageous title to break through the clutter.
The problem is that unless you luck into a Tournier, most these movies aren’t going to be good. In fact most of them are going to narratively inert and preposterous in ways you can sense intuitively from the first time you hear, say, “Snakes on a Plane” or “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.”
Val Lewton and Troma both knew they only needed a relative handful of suckers to make a tidy little profit. Blockbusters are another story, and this strategy in the end is a at least as risky — and far more craven — than making good films and hoping for the best.
Oh, stuff it. Cowboys and Aliens was a good, well acted bit of much needed escapism. Not a single person turned in a weak performance, Olivia Wilde was ravishing, Harrison Ford was at his best, and Daniel Craig was a great anti-hero.
I’m DEFINATELY buying this one on blu ray….
Dan Craig looking more and more like “Gollem” from Lord of the Rings everyday.
Actually, Craig should have played one of the “Smurfs”. No need for multi $$$$$ SFX.
This will make Olivia Wilde a giant movie star in the same way that Batman and Robin made George Clooney a movie star even though that movie also did terrible at the box office.
Agreed. She just has loads of charm that appear on screen. She’s great in interviews.
eh? where did that come from? would you be like, her number one fan? I will say this – she was the only small saving grace of tron. God now *That* film was a cinematic abortion. literally. the deathly birth fluids soaked into the carpet at the cinema. we all ran out screaming.
Nikki…
The difference between this and Green Lantern lies in the first dollar gross going out the door with Steven Spielberg, Favreu, Imagine (Ron Howard and Brian Grazer) and the actors. It represents a total of thirty five percent of first dollar gross. It is also worth noting that the film is owned by three different companies so whatever comes in has a 35% gross bite taken out and then is shared by those companies. This is a picture that needed to do $500m to cover its gross players, $185 million budget, $110m worldwide marketing costs and the three companies involved.
Bottom line: Disaster. A larger bomb financially than Green Lantern.
Interesting point, John.
If you wouldn’t mind elaborating, I’m curious to know how the 35% get divided between them?
Any idea?
Thanks.
Just pay me 5% and we’ll call it even.
When it does $600 million worldwide, give me a shout! Until then, keep your opinions to yourself. Green Lantern is going to be lucky to get to $175 million worldwide. I don’t care about who gets what. NO WAY it’s better off financially than Cowboys and Aliens. Case in point, go check out Armageddon’s numbers. Opened to $36 million and went on to do $200 million and over $600 million worldwide. Cowboys and Aliens will make that much, and probably more raw dollar wise.
are you an idiot?
Armageddon? Are you kidding? Hey, why not cite Titanic, which had a $28 million opening weekend and went on to make $600 million domestic? You can’t, just as it’s pointless to mention Armageddon and compare it to Cowboys & Aliens. Because the distribution models and box office dynamics of the late 90′s have no place in 2011. Have you not been watching how the business has evolved over the last 15 years?
t was Perfect Storm that cemented Clooney as a movie star. He was already the breakout star of ER. Wilde entered House late and her character isn’t all that popular, her return didn’t increase ratings. She’ll probably be a big star but it’ll have more to do with the fact that she is in a bunch of movies coming out in the next couple years. She’s gotten mixed reviews for this movie.
Cowboys and Aliens looks AWFUL!
The Smurfs looks awful. I can’t believe it’s doing well!
I’m not. It’s a kids movie and kids don’t care about awful.
but their parents should. my kid has been begging me to see it thanks to all the billboards around town, but there’s no way in hell I’ll do it.
Awful?????? with Daniel Craig….look- you stick to your Tom Cruise crap and leave the real actors to the rest of us.
Whatever else Daniel Craig may be, he is no cowboy. He is the number one reason I am staying away from this film. Normally, I would support even a bad western-set film, as they are so hard to find these days, but not this time.
I don`t know why they went for Craig after RDJ bailed out. How do you go from mega-charisma and likable charmer like RDJ to boring, one note, obnoxious, perpetually constipated Craig is beyond me. Why didn`t they heed Chris Rock`s Oscar-hosting advice? If you can`t get a real star-power, don`t pick some Z-rated leftover.
Craig will never be the boxoffice draw because he has sedating screen presence, one facial expression and unlikable perosnality. The Clint played stone-faced characters but still came off likable unlike Craig. I`m sure he`s different in real life but that just doesn`t come through on the big screen and in interviews. Next Steve McQueen he ain`t no matter how hard his PR tries to make him one.
I actually found it pretty enjoyable. The pace was a little slower than I’d have liked at times, but I liked it nonetheless. It’s definitely a niche film, though. It plays a lot more like an old Western than a modern movie, so I can certainly see how it has a muted response in the market.
Yeah, the main problem is that the movie got the tone wrong. It doesn’t have to be a comedy, but you can’t have a fun, tongue-in-cheek title like “Cowboys and Aliens” and pair it with somber dead-serious nonsense like what we saw in the trailers. People assume the filmmakers aren’t in on the joke.
I 100% agree that the tone was wrong–this movie couldn’t decide what it wanted to be even after 14 (!) years in development. I went in with zero expectations, and they were met. I won’t be recommending this friends, which is a shame because I like Daniel Craig.
As for the Olivia Wilde comments going on down thread? She had nothing to offer this film except waterproof eyeliner and bad costumes. It wasn’t all her fault, since the role was… not great.
Cowboys and Aliens is probably the best movie I have seen in 2011. Many of the more successful movies earned it purely by adding 3D and boosting their grosses by inflating the price. Harry Potter was the worst 3D flick of the year. The 3D was a pure after thought, a way to make more money. The Smurfs made a good chunk of money off their overpriced 3D sales, probably more than they originally estimated.
No one should be surprised by C & E’s terrible performance.
Nope, in fact people should be surprised it’s even doing $40M!
The movie looks horrible.
What is surprising, however, is that you spell ‘Aliens’ with an ‘E’.
Ha, good point, anonymous. Brain fart…
Still too early to really say. “CAA,” could have a very healthy Saturday still with those “older audiences,” you mentioned. Could still post around that 45 mark.
Really not a good idea to refer to this movie as “CAA”
CAA now that’s funny.
Olivia Wilde is a huge movie star and talent in the making. The next Angelina Jolie.
I agree with you James. Olivia has charm. The camera just loves her. She’s a great actress.
LOL-ing at you.
She may become a huge movie star if only 50 year old men went to see the movies. I couldn’t care less for another over-hyped actress, who by way of TV accustomed people to her face.
cough January Jones cough
Camera loves her until it pans down to her cankles…………..ughh…………..she’s no AJ………
based on what? Being in flop movies?
She’s hot….but I would never call her a great actress. Much better than Megan Fox tho.
this reeks of astroturf commenting. which is bad really. rather the last thing olivia wilde needs is bright green astroturf commenting
yes im sure she’s here ruminating over every comment
I am soooooooo sick of hearing actresses called “The next Angelina Jolie.” I like Olivia Wilde, but let’s get real here – she ain’t no Angelina Jolie and she never will be. Wilde and whole slew of other young actresses who say they want to be the next Angelina Jolie or who girl-crush Jolie are merely pretenders because the reason Angelina Jolie is who she is is because of her take no prisoners attitude in her early career. Jolie was just as wild and daring off screen as she was on it. Her aura grew out of her candidness about her personal life, overcoming a lot of issues with drugs and her father and coming out of it the other end finding herself in helping other people. She lived hard and worked harder. These girls coming up today may be beautiful and charming but that’s about it. There’s no real substance to any of them because they haven’t struggled and fought themselves as well as the outside world. I’m waiting for the day one of these young actresses says or does something original. Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery but it’s also as tiresome as fuck all.
I agree with your post, Stacy. But lest we forget, in Hollywood anything is possible. Hell, for all anyone knows I could be the next Angelina Jolie — and I’m a heterosexual male non-actor.
you sound like a weirdo.
Since when has Angelina Jolie ever been anything? Why do people think shes hot ,or can act? lips look like a baboons ass, and wash or damn hair ever now and then! Mr. and Mrs. Smith was the only time she even look ok, but I’ve never seen anything from her to make a big deal about
Ha-ha-ha
You just made my day. I sit and laugh. I never though I would meet actual Olivia Wilde fan. I never though she has any. At least she has two as we see from the comments.
And please, please would finally they give Blake Lively and Olivia Wilde LEAD role in a movie. The one where they would not play supporting furniture. So that they would finally flop hard and we would stop seeing theme everywhere. Because they are not stars. Give them lead role (like in a romantic comedy next to lead actor. Or some drama) and we would see how they will flop.
Because obviously – who would go to Olivia Wilde movie or Blake Lively movie? How would they promote it?
Ugh, thinking about Blake Lively in The Town still makes me cringe.
Olivia Wilde looks and sounds just like that possum thing in Rango.
People , please stop hyping Olivia Wilde . She has as much acting range as the former ” IT GIRL ” , Phoebe Cates.
She’s a bore with no warmth whatseover.
Isn’t this the woman who made that political attack commercial to insult, antagonize, and ridicule so many Americans? I recall her ranting and shouting about Sarah Palin which will result in her “Alienating” millions of conservatives (who, by the way are the biggest cowboy and gun rights supporters) How’s that working out for you at the Box Office? Way to go…; )
Yeah but Sarah Palin is still a blight
I really liked C&A. Much better than Captain America.
I didn’t see C & A. Alas, I find it hard to believe that it’s much better than Captain America.
I hated Cowboys & Aliens. While Captain America wasn’t anything to write home about, it was a storytelling masterpiece compared to C & A.
MC… Obviously you aren’t a fan of Westerns. This movie was a classic “Cowboy” movie. It had all the elements of the classic Westerns of the 50′s & 60′s… like the “Colonel” who was a former Civil War Officer and Cattle-baron. He had the required spoiled-brat son that antagonizes the local population and needs to be broken out by Daddy. It had EVERY Western cliche you could think of. All of which were handled PERFECTLY! This was a classical archetype Western which just happened to have Aliens in it. The way they handled the addition of Aliens was well done.
Haha, that is such b.s. Most people think C & A is horrible.
Come on, everyone knew it would underperform with all this previous real blockbusters coming out.
Cowboys and Aliens most certainly should have been a light hearted action adventure. The trailers killed it, all moody and serious. And Harrison Ford has been a Replicant since 1997. He sleepwalks through roles without an ounce of humanity.
That’s unfair. Replicants had lots of humanity. It’s one reason why that other Harrison Ford movie is so good.
Actually, I think he’s pretty good in this flick. So is Craig. It was fun to see them both on screen together.
The problem is in the concept. I give the folks in charge credit for going out on a limb, but it didn’t work. The cowboy parts are good, but the alien parts look like they were spliced in from another film. Walking out of the sneak preview I was at last night, everyone was saying “what the fuck was that?”
Agreed, it should’ve starred somebody like Owen Wilson instead of Daniel Craig. The title COWBOYS & ALIENS does not bring to mind a dark, moody tone. Less 3:10 TO YUMA, more Dean Martin & Jerry Lewis in PARDNERS.
Daniel Craig is like those judges` pets on talent shows that don`t connect with the audience and constantly end up in the bottom three.
Ford was awesome in Bruno! Totally snubbed by Oscar that year…
Olivia’s flacks are out in full force I see
More interested in Crazy Stupid Love lowish numbers considering Gosling Carrell and especially Stone were everywhere pushing the movie
“Olivia’s flacks are out in full force I see”
I agree. It’s actually kind of endearing to see all her PR cronies posting on any article about her.
And that makes Olivia`s PR cronies her only fandom.
I think her performance here was fine. Much better than her performance in Tron 3D. Considering her performance in House I expected more in Tron.
Perhaps Gosling is the kind of actor who appeals to insiders rather than the masses. Much like Jake Gyllenhaal appeals to a tiny inner circle, but the outer world audience doesn’t give a damn about him? This is a problem since Hollywood needs more viable leading men.
I think Gosling has a genuine mass audience from The Notebook, though, unlike Gyllenhaal who seems to be a complete product of the Hollywood nepotism system.
I have to disagree. He could have started coasting after “Half Nelson” but instead he keeps on doing different things. Unlike Joseph Gordon-Levitt who was great and then he was in Inception and now he doesn’t try anymore. And as for Jake, I have yet to see him give a great performance. Even Gosling’s role in The Notebook is stronger than any acting Jake has done.
I thought Jake was pretty damn good in Brokeback Mountain, though he was clearly overshadowed by the late Heath Ledger.
“I have yet to see him give a great performance.”
Donnie Darko? Brokeback Mountain? The Good Girl?
ACK! The Good Girl – sooooooooooooooooooooooooo overrated!! Especially Aniston’s performance. Yeah, it was her best, but that isn’t saying much at all.
B- , I disagree about Joseph Gordon-Levitt. He has taken many risks in his film career, Plus, he will be co-starring in the Abe Lincoln bio-pic.
Hesher was good, I thought Levitt was captivating.
Spot on! None of Ryan Gosling’s movies to date have made any money, or received general release. Blue valentine went to pay per view, despite all the Cannes hype.
I think “Blue Valentine” got lost in the fray of the ratings war between MPAA and Weinstein and wasn’t able to fully capitalize from the awards season buzz. By the time that was all resolved, the season was over and it became known as “that movie that had all the sex in it”, which trivialized its true content. It was very unfortunate.
I also think Gosling’s tendancy towards art house type pics have prevented him from becoming a household name, or having a shot at posting big BO numbers. However, I do respect his choices and think it has served him well in that he has the respect of his peers.
I predict with this year’s release of “Drive” and “Ides of March” that he will become a household name. “Drive”, if promoted correctly, can help him get buzz amongst the young male demographic, and “Ides” will get him exposure with the 35+ crowd. I think this is Gosling’s year for mainstream breakout.
He became a household name 7 years ago. What rock are you living under? People know him very well. He is just dull, that’s all.
To LOLZ – For someone to be a “household name”, EVERYONE in said house should know his name on sight. If you think men in middle American know this guy, then you’re completely uninformed. Women know who he is from “Notebook”, but unless you’re a cinephile, his name has no meaning to the average male outside of Hollywood or New York. No doubt from your response that you live in one of these two cities, which is why you’re so out of touch with reality. Your mentality is a typical example of why Hollywood is failing to consistently market successful films in America. You have no idea what’s going on outside your bubble.
True, because unlike the other leading men who usually have box office hits *cough*Kutcher,Shia*cough* he can actually act.
IKR???? How come no1 talks of that flop?! Cause it IS a flop. Carrel, Gosling, Stone..busting out balls for so long, promoting it to no end amd in the end.. it’s no better than Timberlake’s movie?? LOL!
^^^ jealous
You are wrong. “Crazy, Stupid, Love” opened slightly better than “Friends with Benefits.”
Personally speaking, I don’t think Hollywood takes into account the average family entertainment budget when scheduling releases. With all of the family fare out there during summer time, you end up taking the kids to see the blockbuster type movies as a family outing which is VERY expensive. That leaves very little money in the household budget for Mom and Dad date nights to see movies like “Crazy, Stupid, Love”.
If Hollywood would release these types of movies in the winter and spring (fall gets taken up with football, trust me) then these types of comedies might post better numbers. Just a thought.
I just get the feeling that Cowboys & Aliens will start off promising and then turn into a mess in the end. I still haven’t gotten rid of the bad taste of Iron Man 2
Hello, I think Paramount will be the Big Winner here in this
Media Distribution Helter Skelter. Yes, This New Cinema Goddess,
Olivia Wilde will be a Mega Star. Maybe if You gave them free Hod Dogs and Popcorn & a Drink. You will get that 45M Mark. If Not it
will be a LONG WEEKEND.
Doc JP Sinda
“Olivia Wilde”
is a name that works nicely
to start a haiku.
Well played.
ditto, sam R. To which I say:
Great Olivia !!!!
A haiku beats her acting
Sweet face — little more!
Maybe her art is
railing at those who might
otherwise buy tickets
YES C&A totally should have been a comedy. I’ve said it all along.
Definitely, I assumed it was the first time I heard about it.
It shouldn’t have been made at all.
Genre-mixing, like interracial marriages, is toxic and usually leads to terrible things. It’s just unnatural.
LOL. Nothing like a little race-baiting to sauce up the comments section.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
That’s not race-baiting. That’s full blow racism.
Not. Funny.
When people hear western sci-fi / comedy, they think “Wild Wild West”. When people hear western sci-fi / based on a comic or graphic novel, they think “Jonah Hex”. Westerns have been a hard sell for years. “True Grit” was a recent exception. It’s too bad, this movie looks good. I’ll check it out either way.
Despite what some are saying here, it is a great movie. It is a Archetypical Western with the added fun of Aliens. Go see it and decide for yourself. Unfortunately on the Internet there are always more H8trs than fans posting.
Cowboys and Aliens is a dumb idea to begin with. It is always a bad sign when they say “From the director who brought you Iron Man”. Like that is something to be proud of.
It is something to be proud of when the movie is very well liked and grossed $300 million domestically.
People complain all the time about never having anything new. And when we get something that offers something different we shit on it by saying it looks dumb. The movie certainly didn’t deliver but at least its not like everything else out there.
Sure it is new, but it is new based on a comic book. All of Hollywood’s new original ideas are coming from second and third tier comic books. I would appreciate Cowboys and Aliens more if it really was an original idea. Isn’t it strange too that everything Spielberg is doing as of late is basically the same movie, tv show etc over and over again.
Everything about this just screams dull/bland/brown/bland and dull
It looks duller than Wild Wild West and at least that had the Will Smith song which was OK in some way I think
Could they have not just made a western with Ford and Craig or an high-octane, slick action picture? Too obvious I suppose
if you were granted “one” moratorium from a Higher Movie Power… would you pick no more superhero movies or no more alien invasion movies?
hmm…
No more alien movies. I’m really looking forward to seeing the Avengers.
No more superhero movies please. Alien invasion movies may not all be good, but at least there are many different directions you can go with them. The Thing From Another World, ET, Close Encounters, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing… more recently Signs, District 9, Cloverfield. Not all good movies, but at least filmmakers have found more than one way to approach them.
Superhero movies on the other hand are tired and by-the-numbers. Every one of them has the exact same story act, the same casting, similar look and tone… the few that have tried to do something new either lacked execution (Watchmen) or are too ambitious and collapse in the 3rd act (The Dark Knight.)
Amen to that. Superhero movies are so corny. This summer’s superhero movies could probably supply enough corn to last a decade.
There was nothing wrong with the third act of Dark Knight.
To be honest, i just wish there were no more ” Teen vampire romances based on worldwide smash hit best seller or a book that was copied from Stephenie mayer’s awful ‘Twilight’ series.
Here… Here!!! Yes… no more nice vampire/teen angst movies! Vampires are evil blood sucking monsters… not your dream date!
Harrison Ford really can’t choose/find a decent film to appear in FOR TOFFEE. Even Morning Glory, which I have seen is shite. It starts off OK and just gets shit, shit and shitter – its guess what, dull and bland and not funny
Iron Man 2 was a horrible film – dull and bland
My own theory about Harrison Ford is that he’s chosen terrible films ever since his divorce from screenwriter Melissa Mathison. I think she was his Holy Grail, helping him chose projects, and probably helping him develop scripts to their potential. Disagree? Check the track record. Behind every great man is a great woman – and she was his.
That’s an interesting point, and I’m sure she has a lot better input than Calista Skeletor Flockhart.
But I think the biggest factor is the change in directors. Let’s face it, most of the new guys are studio shills and a lot of the old guys (Spielberg, Scott, Lucas, ect..) ain’t what they use to be.
That’s a very interesting theory. I guess Ally McBeal couldn’t tell for that “Indiana Jones 4″ was garbage.
Should have gave it a different title. The comics were great but when people see the title most don’t take it seriously.
it was surprisingly good.
Cowboys & Aliens is just another big tentpole based on a nerdboy’s graphic novel concept, that was supposed to be a fan boy’s wet dream. And of course, it flopped just like all the others have. People don’t see Craig for anything but Bond. Ford is old news. And Olivia is NOT a future mega star no matter how much Hollywood tries to force her on us. She’s pretty. The end. But none of these things are enough to carry a $200M budget. Unless you’re a fanboy, this film had nothing to offer. And movies made for fanboys, with the exception of WELL KNOWN properties with PROVEN MASS APPEAL (Batman, Spiderman, etc) simply do not succeed. At what point will these execs learn?!
Fanboy films would work if they stopped making them big budget things! They could do 100m w.w. on 30m but they usually cost around 90m and a film like that has no chance of the same multiplier (x3 1/3 would be 300m)
I have to admit I have rolled my eyes when Nikki often mentions that Universal needs new blood, but I am coming around to her POV. This is NOT a fanboy pick. The story was MANUFACTURED, not written, the graphic novel sales were RIGGED, not organic (and they got caught). This was dead on arrival from the start.
Favs, if you’re reading this… you should’ve gone 3D. Should. Have. Gone. 3D.
Anyway, you’re still money baby.
I think Daniel Craig might’ve been the wrong choice. Every shot I’ve seen from CAA with him, he’s giving the “Bond Stone-faced killer look”, which takes me right out of the world of the film.
I saw C&A 12:01 A.M this morning to a half full mostly college crowd.
Daniel Craig, Harrison Ford, Clancy Brown, Keith Carradine and Adam Beach all showed solid but not exemplary acting skills, Sam Rockwell’s character and scenes should have been cut(and I like Sam), and Olivia Wilde bored me with her perfectly symmetrical and expressionless face and lightweight acting skills. Angelina Jolie she isn’t.
Oh, and laughable barely describes the overly derivative aliens, something that Hollywood seems to have created a production line for.
Overall, a fricking mess of direction, script and production, and a complete waste of the drawing power of Ford and Craig, albeit fans of Olivia will be excited.
Olivia for some reason decided to jettison millions of fans with her unnecessary extreme political diatribes. Not a very smart cookie, and certainly one with too much hateful baggage to have the mass appeal studios need
I for one would be interested in reading a more detailed analysis of Ms. Wilde’s alleged “lightweight acting skills”. Perhaps the fault lies more in the role(s) and the director than in the actress (can I say “actress” nowadays, or are they all “ACT-ors”?). I admit that I am dazzled by her looks, the force of her personality, and her “attitude” (her “joie de vivre”), but I believe that her acting is decent, and that she integrates well with her co-stars. What do you want her to do to improve her acting chops? Or, if I may be so bold, are you knocking Ms. Wilde because she is beautiful? Truly and seriously curious. John V. Karavitis
Captain America could take it all the way again. I know people who hate the Superhero genre who just went on a lark and freaking love it. That’s the real early 80′s Amblin Spielberg inspired movie of the year imo.
As for C&A…its just too sad to think about because it didn’t have to turn out the way it did. It’s not terribly bad, but it sure as shit ain’t good either. A true loss of an opportunity.