The UK Supreme Court today upheld a 2009 appeals court ruling that Andrew Ainsworth, the engineer who designed the Imperial Stormtrooper helmets for George Lucas’ original Star Wars, didn’t violate British law by selling copies of the helmets. Lucasfilm had already won a $20 million judgment against Ainsworth and his Sheperton Design Studios in California back in 2006, arguing successfully that Lucas already had figured out the look of the helmets before coming to Ainsworth to design them. In the UK, Lucasfilm had to prove that the helmets were works of art to qualify for copyright protection under the law. “It was the Star Wars film that was the work of art that Mr. Lucas and his companies created,” the justices wrote. “The helmet was utilitarian, in the sense that it was an element in the process of production of the film.” Said Lucasfilm in a statement that the ruling “maintains an anomaly of British copyright law under which the creative and highly artistic works made for use in films — which are protected by the copyright laws of virtually every other country in the world — may not be entitled to copyright protection in the UK.”


That ruling is daft!!! how can the helmet and all the models not be works of art unto themselves.
BAW-HAW-HAW-HAW!!!
The force is not strong w/ Mr. Pucas.
Lucas has more money than God and he’s still against the little guy making a buck? What a dick.
God has no interest in money.
I’m all for the little guy, but I’m also for artistic copyright. Back when Lucas did STAR WARS, he wasn’t the billionaire he is today.
So let’s say the little guy creates something today and in 20 years becomes a billionaire off of that property. Should he automatically allow anyone out there to make a buck off of his creation just because they are “the little guy”?
As much as Lucas desecrates his once great films by making crappy sequels and continuing to cut new Special Editions and 3D versions, I side with Lucas on this one. Because if you change it for him, then you change it for everyone, and no one will be able to solely profit off of their creations anymore.
And the UK Supreme Court just trampled on creativity with their stupidity.
This. /|\
|
When I read the article, I was going to write what you said point for point, but you beat me to it (and wrote it better).
Imagine if it were Neill Blomkamp and someone was making money off of the District 9 prawn design that they were hired to help design. Would the Lucas bashers feel the same way in that case?
Daft, indeed. The ruling suggests that if something is a means to an end (viz, a Storm Trooper film costume) rather than an end in itself (viz. a Storm Trooper Halloween costume), it isn’t protected. The implications for merchandising are tremendous.
It isn’t just the streets that the Brits are on the wrong side of.
Karma stinks, huh George? You deserve it.
Our law is OUR law and conforms to our way of life. That is the chance that Lucasfilm took when it took it’s suit to the UK Law Lords. I suggest you wade through the 40 pages of the judgement before casting an opinion on the law of another country.
Absolutely right, W. Scott. As much as it pains people; the original US judgement could not be enforced in the UK and the suits were not covered by copyright as they were not works of art, according to the original court ruling of 2008. It went all the way to the Supreme Court, Lucas lost, that’s the end of the matter. Maybe his lawyers should have tried using the US-UK extradition agreement instead. It is meant to target terrorism but the US has steadily abused its remit to include a computer science student, hackers, software engineers and corrupt bankers. So why not a prop designer?
Law Lords? That’s rich.
Lucas will spend hundreds of thousands to deny payment of a few thousand. It’s not the money- he doesn’t need it – it’s the win, the power, the ability to lord it over the “little people”. His legal team is probably all over Ripsnorter’s suggestion this minute as an angle to win the next UK suit….and yes, there will be another one or two or three. Is there anyone out the that actually believes that Mr. Ainsworth’s selling helmets caused a $20Million LOSS to Lucas? Puh-leez…that’s just to cover his legal team fees!