Final Harry Potter Already Wrecking Foreign/Domestic Records
EXCLUSIVE: With history’s most successful movie franchise coming to an end with the Friday release of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2, it’s a good time to ask: How much loot was conjured up en masse? And the answer is startling. You can find about $21 billion by adding up gross sales the series has generated since 1998 from films, videos, video games, licensed merchandise, and books. (See detailed breakdown below.) Time Warner has already seen an estimated $1 billion in profit from the films and its work as custodian of a global entertainment brand. The tally should continue to grow, probably by a lot, with the release tomorrow of Warner Bros’ Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows – Part 2 — although Hollywood accounting has a way of making profits vanish. (Here‘s how the black magic worked for Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix in a studio accounting statement obtained by Deadline’s Mike Fleming. Though the film grossed $938.2 million worldwide, the document conveys that the film is still $167+ million in the red)
Things have turned out so well that it’s easy to forget what a huge risk Warner seemed to be taking more than a decade ago when it bought the Potter rights. The studio didn’t know how the series would end. And J.K. Rowling, who wrote the series, was a wild card. Many wondered whether U.S. audiences would warm to the all-British movie cast that Rowling required. “The casting of the kids was the biggest place where it could have gone wrong,” Warner Bros Pictures Group President Jeff Robinov tells me. Some Warner executives also chafed at Rowling’s demands that there be no Potter-related fast food offerings and that Warner show restraint in product licensing. “I can only say now to all the parents out there, if the action figures are horrible, just tell the kids that I said don’t buy them. Sorry, Warners,” Rowling told a 60 Minutes interview.
Virtually everybody agrees now that Rowling was right to keep the franchise faithful to her vision. And Warner was right to embrace that vision down to small details in licensed merchandise. “We had a guideline that was perhaps frustrating to our colleagues in Consumer Products but has held well for us as a company which was to look to create artifacts, not souvenirs,” DC Entertainment President Diane Nelson tells me. She oversaw the Potter franchise from the beginning. Marketing plans also adapted as fans became older and the Potter saga grew darker. “We held on to fans as they aged in a way that’s never been seen before,” Nelson says to me.
Here’s how all of the Potter business decisions have turned out so far:
Movies. The first seven films accounted for nearly $6.4 billion in ticket sales, with 68% of the total coming from overseas, according to Box Office Mojo. The only other franchise that comes close is James Bond: Its 23 films beat Potter if ticket prices are adjusted for inflation.
Home Video. Consumers have spent nearly $3.9 billion globally — with 44% of that coming from the U.S. — to buy 302 million videos of the first six Potter films, Warner says. IHS Screen Digest says that Warner probably collected about $1.5 billion just from domestic video sales, which would more than cover the studio’s estimated $1.4 billion production budget for all eight films.
TV rights. Add $1 billion to the tally, with about half coming from the U.S. Although Disney passed on the film rights to Rowling’s novels, ABC saw the light and bought most of the domestic broadcast and cable rights. Overseas broadcast partners include UK’s Sky, France’s TF1, Italy’s Mediaset, Australia’s Nine Network, Canada’s CBC, and Mexico’s Channel 5.
Video Games. Fans have spent about $1.5 billion buying 42 million Potter-related games.
Licensed merchandise. This may be the biggest annuity: Consumers have already spent more than $7 billion globally on Potter-related games, clothing, trading cards, candies and other goods – and continue to shell out an estimated $1 billion a year. The big question is whether spending will diminish now that the movie series has ended. Warner hopes to keep the business fresh by creating what it calls immersive environments. “The film franchise is coming to an end, but the brand isn’t,” says Nelson. She says that the company will be “big supporters” of Rowling’s new Pottermore Web site. The studio plans to turn London’s Leavesden studio, where the Potter films were shot, into a tourist attraction. It has also been encouraged by the response to “The Wizarding World Of Harry Potter” at Universal’s Islands of Adventure in Orlando. The theme park attraction opened last year, the result of a 10 year licensing deal NBCUniversal signed with Warner. More than that 7 million people have ridden the “Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey” ride, and the park reports that its attendance in the first quarter was up 68% vs the same period last year. Visitors to the destination’s Hog’s Head pub have bought more than 2 million Butterbeers.
Books. Readers have snapped up 450 million Potter books in 68 languages. Publishing company Scholastic says it has had 150 million books in print in the U.S. and has collected nearly $1.2 billion in revenue from the series from 1999 through 2010.

Could not happen to a nicer guy then David Heyman who is one of the nicest producers this town has to offer, To think he and Neil Moritz were partners once. What a legendary combo that would have been. Shame that Robinov gets lucky again.
I’d say they probably needed to go solo to make it work so well for both of them. And that’s an understatement!
wow, so close to break even. very sad.
I’m sure Harry has “lost” WB gazillions. I did one big hit movie for them, and it’s so far in the red it will never make a dime.
I guess the question is now that Warner doesn’t have Harry to fall back on (at least at the cinemas) what will it do?
More important than all the galleons is that JKR got tens of millions of kids excited about reading.
Serious question (with SPOILER ALERT if you haven’t read the final book):
I know J.K. Rowling doesn’t need another cent, but has Warner Bros. considered offering her a blank check to write more Potter novels? Which of course WB would adapt to films. Clearly fans would jump at the chance to follow adult Harry and his children, in novels and films.
Rowling has made it pretty clear that – for now – she has no intention of writing anymore HP books. That might change several years from now, but hopefully not for the sake of money. The series would lose its spirit.
Rowling is already worth over 1 BILLION DOLLARS. What – oh what – can Warners offer a billionaire to induce them to write?? MORE MONEY?? You have to realize – Rowling isn’t like Rupert Murdoch, who eats, lives, and breathes for money.
No one on the planet has anything they could offer this incredible woman to get her to write another Potter novel. HOWEVER, if Warners was realllly interested, they could produce some of the more than 30 never-authorized sequels cranked out by Russian novelists! Seriously – the series kept going over there, plagiarsm & all.
Excellent article. The HP franchise is no small potatoes and it’s productive and revealing for us to closely consider the creative production and marketing that heightened the success of HP to such an extraordinary degree. Encourage and welcome more insightful from Deadline on the HP phenomenon.
Agreed, Fox. Not only on the HP phenomenon but more insight articles like this in general. They would make Deadline even more excellent than it already is.
Spoilier. I’m sure there will be more HP movies. JK is smart…. If you’ve seen the latest (which is fantastic) you know there will be more. (Or hope)
Well… I have heard her say in several interviews that she has written about the children (when coming up with the epilogue scene at the very end of DH) and was continuing to come up with stories about them. And she has never said that she will “never” write about the children. She has said that she will never write about Harry’s parents’ generation while they were at Hogwarts. Now, I know that she was working on Pottermore lately, but she has also been known to tell people, for a few YEARS now, that she is writing. Was it Pottermore that she was writing for? Is it the Harry Potter Encyclopedia that she promised us years ago? It could be either of those things. OR… Its a new series based on the trio’s children. And if so, it will probably be based on Albus Severus and his age group because of the prominance she put him in the epilogue. We (true Potter fans) are dying to read more about this family and world. Not because it’s making JK Rowling or WB rich. She has already said she’s giving all proceeds from the encyclopedia to charity. She doesn’t need or want any more money. But she loves Harry and this series as if it were her child and, being a mother and author myself, I can completely understand if she CAN’T stop writing about them. And, hopefully, she will choose to publish them one day. It may be (and probably will be) many years before we see this series – it took her 7 years to write and publish “The Sorcerer’s Stone”! But, here’s to hoping! And writing my own stories to pass the time…
remember when warner claimed hp5 lost money despite grossing $900 mil? gimme a break.