Ray Richmond contributes to Deadline’s TV Coverage.
UPDATE 1:30 PM: During the HRTS’ State of the Industry panel, Lionsgate TV Group president Kevin Beggs was again asked about his company’s decision to develop a series with troubled actor Charlie Sheen. He maintained that being in business with the king of misbehavior is “not as big a risk as you might think. He’s been on a show for eight years, and the (production) model we’re employing compresses the time period way down (from a typical network sitcom production).” Beggs concluded, “There’s risk in everything you do, but we think that we’re going to insulate ourselves as best we can,” after noting earlier, “If Charlie isn’t a good fit with Anger Management, we don’t know what we’re doing.”
PREVIOUS 12:45 PM:Lionsgate TV Group President Kevin Beggs told Deadline a few minutes ago that there is as yet no target network or showrunner in place for the announced Charlie Sheen-attached TV series project based on the 2003 Jack Nicholson-Adam Sandler feature Anger Management. It’s being produced jointly by Lionsgate TV and Debmar-Mercury, producer of the TBS sitcoms House of Payne and Meet the Browns. Beggs, who serves as HRTS president, confirmed while rushing in to participate on an HRTS Luncheon panel at the Beverly Hilton that the series will “follow the model pioneered by (Debmar-Mercury co-heads) Mort Marcus and Ira Bernstein. They’re really the innovators of this.” That likely means a similar format to the pair of TBS sitcoms that calls for an initial short order of 10 episodes or so followed by a huge 90-episode pickup — essentially, the fastest way to 100 syndication-ready episodes as possible).
While Beggs declined even to speculate about a possible network home for Anger Management or a short list of potential showrunners — saying “We’re just starting this process” — he was quick to defend the hiring of a loose cannon lime Sheen. “Charlie’s the consummate professional” he said. “His work speaks for itself obviously. He’s got a charismatic, larger-than-life personality and isn’t afraid to speak out loud. But he’s very focused on getting back to work and finding the right vehicle, and we think we’ve found it.” And no concerns about Sheen’s getting insured for another show? Beggs: “No.”


Maybe NBC should cast Charlie Sheen to replace Eddie Cibrian on The Playboy Club? At least, Charlie is a good actor and it would get huge ratings.
No way. Eddie Cibrian is so hot he can’t be replaced. But Charlie’s new project is going to rock!
Let’s face it, when you’re hard up to find a good dealer, it’s time to sign a deal with Sheen.
My feeling is this is more of a cable series and TBS would be out of the question (the whole Time Warner Connection). I guess the show could go to Comedy Central or Spike, but I feel like this ends up as an FX show, and they really go full bore pushing the limits of profane. Could be a good tandem piece with a show like Archer. Plus, doesn’t FX air Two and a Half Men in syndication?
What I find interesting is that if you asked me six months ago if Sheen should get another shot at a TV show, I would have followed the public sentiment and said “no way”. But now, a few months removed from all the crazy, it seems like a good and decent move. His life seems to have settled down a bit and we aren’t hearing the daily stories about hookers, porn stars and drugs like we were before. Is it possible Sheen was playing into the whole “bad boy” thing and milking it for all it was worth, and now is moving onto the next phase of his career?
Could it be, Charlie Sheen has played us all?
Bet that 2 MILLION per episode won’t be approached unless this show hits it big with seven years in syndication…and, even then will Charlie get 2 MILLION on average per show….doubt it will ever air…doubt it will be a hit if it does…doubt it will ever be big in syndication.
Winning…doubtful.
i’m sure most actors would be happy to be working, alothough paid Winning without Chuck is worth its weight in gold
I can only assume Kevin Beggs is deeply confused about the meaning of the word “consummate.”
He’s a tool…I doubt it.
And remember that Charlie Sheen is still drug addict. It’s not like he went to rehab and cured. Even when his 2 million job depended on him he still couldn’t stop using. And now he is out of the leash for 5 months. And he probably uses every day.
Good luck to those stupid producers…. I wonder how many days will come by before Sheen will stop show up at work or will show up high. And really do people even know where to watch TBS? People will watch first episode just to see how bad it is. And the next week no one will show up. Because obviously.
Charlie Sheen was crazy lunatic who took himself seriously. And THAT WAS FUNNY. And the only reason why public was so obsessed with Sheen is because everyone waited if they would have the guts to fire him. And they did. And now no one really cares about him.
And you need a very good writers to write many-many funny jokes. And you need money for that. And you need money for Sheen’s paycheck. And I wonder where they plan to find all those money since it is small network and no one watches it. How high will be ratings? 300 000 or 400 000 viewers?
“If Charlie isn’t a good fit with Anger Management, we don’t know what we’re doing.”
pretty bold comment… it could come back to haunt him
That’s a production model only a studio exec could love. Say what you will about the quality of network sitcoms… well, that’s actually the point. Writing staffs tend to be out of scripts by Christmas, and the back nine is a hand-to-mouth race against physical collapse. Then you get a few months to recharge your batteries writing a spec screenplay that will never sell and the whole process repeats.
On these 90-show orders writers don’t ever get a break until all 90 are done. I don’t mean to suggest anyone should feel sorry for them, but there is no question that in those circumstances you learn to pace yourself and the show’s quality takes a hit (that can-never-be-cancelled part doesn’t exactly inspire anyone to reach for the stars either, btw.)
Tyler Perry gets away with making shows this way because his stuff is awful under the best of circumstances so there’s no quality to suffer. Sheen’s show, however, will have to be especially funny to win over the doubters, yet this method won’t exactly foster it.
The general public forgets things as soon as there’s a few month rest period between lunacies. (Barring murder.)
But if this is a cable show (with a limited original order) he can’t generate the Big $ that TAAHM earned him.
What does a Top rated show like MAD MEN earn audience-wise compared to TAAHM?
But good for him for getting the 2nd chance. It could give him the opportunity (if he’s smart) to lay low, do the work and generate broadcast interest again.
Hopefully this time he’s learned a lesson and someone puts the reins on him to remind him of what he has to lose.
Everyone loves a comeback.
But they also love to remind you you’ve kicked the golden goose in the arse and got your foot covered in shite.
Opening numbers should be sizeable (for cable).
Hopefully it works well enough to hold on to people.
No way will FX touch this. They have too much class. And what showrunner in his right mind would sign on to this disaster in the making? You couldn’t pay me enough. Seriously.
Very astute, Mattheww, but no worries. This will go 10 and everyone will be on their merry way. By that time Major League 3 will be getting started…….NOT!
Charlie is a good actor and it would be a waste if his talent won’t be showcase. i love watching him in two and a half men, i make it a point to watch every episode of it. i even browse for shows at online tv tvhook.com that he is part of. i sure hope to see more shows that has charlie in it.