Russell Brand usually plays the fool in his movies. But he has written a very smart blog post about addiction, his own addiction, and his friend Amy Winehouse’s addiction and death this weekend. I have said it before and I’ll say it again: the entertainment industry is not doing enough institutionally to stop enabling its addicted artists and start helping them.This is a town that has no notion of personal responsibility, much less corporate responsibility. (Witness how long it took for the moguls to realize that closing the MPTF’s intensive care facilities was not a humane idea even if it made financial sense.) In the mid-1990s, the music industry took a long hard look at its addiction problem and its role before more artists died. But that was back-burnered when National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences president Michael Greene was forced out.
The film and TV business has never taken a leadership role on this issue. No mogul has ever proclaimed that showbiz, like sports, should adopt a unified tough love policy and refuse to work with addicted artists unless they got help. But that would involve pulling the plug on recording projects or concert tours or movie productions or TV shows — no matter the expense. And ultimately Big Media must agree to drop addicted artists who refuse treatment. It’s telling that Amy Winehouse not only made millions with the song whose lyrics include “They tried to make me go to rehab but I said ‘no, no, no’ but also that she was found dead a month after a big concert tour where in Belgrade she’d stumbled around the stage. Or that Charlie Sheen has boasted about his rampant drug use and yet Hollywood just made a high-profile deal for a new sitcom starring him. It’s shameful greed.
Here are excerpts from Brand’s blog post:
When you love someone who suffers from the disease of addiction you await the phone call. There will be a phone call. The sincere hope is that the call will be from the addict themselves, telling you they’ve had enough, that they’re ready to stop, ready to try something new. Of course though, you fear the other call, the sad nocturnal chime from a friend or relative telling you it’s too late, she’s gone…
… Addiction is a serious disease; it will end with jail, mental institutions or death. I was 27 years old when through the friendship and help of [a] treatment centre, I found recovery. Through [it] I was introduced to support fellowships for alcoholics and drug addicts which are very easy to find and open to anybody with a desire to stop drinking and without which I would not be alive.
Now Amy Winehouse is dead, like many others whose unnecessary deaths have been retrospectively romanticized at 27 years old. Whether this tragedy was preventable or not is now irrelevant. It is not preventable today. We have lost a beautiful and talented woman to this disease.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Russell, Thank You for posting this VERY important message. I hope those who need help, will in fact, listen to your story and words of wisdom. Thanks for sharing!!
I’m not sure this is true, but I have read accounts where big artists will have security that keeps drug dealers away from them. I wonder if perhaps that should be true for all “big” recording stars and TV artists. Not that that will stop them, but obviously these folk are weak-kneed, believe their own press and what people say about them, want to belong to the “in” crowd, and maybe they need a caretaker.
more often then not their security are given the task of hauling them out to the cars & blocking any pics being taken. establishments keep incidents involving their clientele on the hush hush if they want to keep their jobs or stay in business & are rewarded with perks. as Mr Brand states, it’s all about the money. For celebs, they are in an industry where on a daily basis you are surrounded by “addicted” individuals, a world in which alcohol, drugs, sex & obsessive disorders are considered the norm. more often then not this tragic road to destruction takes root when an often young, inexperienced individual is catapulted to star status in the blink of eye and does not have a support system of stable, strong, no nonsense individuals who refuse to become enablers or co-dependents and who also can maintain enough influence and contact and not be sidetracked by the toadies who relentlessly try to ingratiate and wheedle their way into grabbing part of the spotlight & bucks generated by exploitation. A sense of personal responsibility, an ability for empathy, and a strong enough mindset to refuse to partake no matter the pressures, the job or the circle of people surrounding them is the best defense. but often it’s like spitting into the wind. Bravo Mr Brand….but I fear you’re spitting into the wind!!
It was very eloquent and sincere, bravo Russell for writing such thoughtful piece and bravo Nikki for sharing it.
I surely agree. It is hard to get society to work on the disease as a disease and not the drugs as problematic issue. Get engaged is the only way.
With kindly regards,
Alexandra J. Stockholm
Touching and spot-on comment from Mr. Brand. Thanks for posting it. And bless all those who struggle and who will struggle.
This was a touching and thoughtful post to read by Brand, but it’s unlikely the entertainment industry would ever be the kind of place to support anyone who is dealing with troubles like addiction. As soon as you aren’t bankable, you’re pariah. If anything, it’s an environment designed in a way that makes addiction worse.
Also, don’t the record companies have insurance policies against their artists? That’s disincentive enough to help them.
Grow up Nikki, you said it right “personal responsibility. The word “town” is not in the phrase “personal responsibility”. It’s just that…Personal! Or as Russell put it “…a desire to stop”.
You know darn well that no one and no institution can stop a dedicated substance abuser. Don’t try to blame the industry. Sure, they have some fault and indirectly encourage destructive behavior by spotlighting it. But ultimately, we are all responsible for our own actions.
Amy’s death is sad, and sadly self inflicted.
Honey, it takes a village. Get with the program.
The industry has the power to not reward self-abuse. The industry can also be supportive in getting their cash cow help and if it doesn’t work, kick them to the curb. In this way the addict might reach rock bottom. It doesn’t work the other way, ya know-Amy is dead. So many are dead.
I have to agree with RayR – It does NOT take a village. Not in the case of addicts. The very gospel of recovery therapy states unequivocally that deciding to stop has to come from the addict. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Sadly, the village cannot do that for you. The cold hard truth that Mr. Brand refuses to acknowledge is that Ms. Winehouse’s problems are not the result of an industry but of an upbringing, a childhood and genetics. I’m certain Mr. Brand was an addict before he became famous. So – again, sadly – there is nothing we can do about it, other than take self-righteous stances against it.
@Farber, you may want to actually read Brand’s post.
I don’t think half the people commenting even took the time to read it. They’re merely responding to the headline.
But, not rewarding the abuse won’t end it. Even if you drop a drug addict from his recording contract, personal responsibility is still the epicenter of treatment and healing.
We reward abuse as much as we award “rehab” with celebs. Whatever will get their name in the paper will do:
“Look at, (insert celeb), they are out drinking again”
-and-
“Look at, (insert celeb), they are now sober”
What do you want from the town? To give bonuses and cars to those who go to drug rehab? What about those who are responsible enough to either say no or to make decisions about if they should do drugs or not. It is almost as if the responsible ones are now at fault.
Amy is dead and no ‘change’ in the industry will bring her back, it will only make her more famous. Move on.
Agree
Sorry, but there is NEVER going to be a way for Hollywood to require professional behavior from stars. They can’t even require it from each other. Agents, “managers,” business managers… they depend on a rotating door of The Next Big Thing and one way they get people to stay for a little while to leech off them is to “make them happy.”
Hollywood made cocaine popular. They made recovery just passing drama.
I’ve been friends with a few movie stars for almost 20 years (before and after their peaks) and NEVER have I ever found a single agent ever who makes sure their talent gets straight. They spend most of their time making sure there are no repercussions for their client’s bad behavior. Only when something goes public is there a half-hearted attempt to “help” someone get clean, which is usually a press release sent to E! and not to the person himself “wishing them luck though their difficult time.”
People in Hollywood by and large think they are anointed and exempt from the rules, or even morality. I’ve seen it, and I have picked people up after they crash burn and go broke. A “post famer” is more of a human being, moreso than a wannabe.
When agencies and studios get their executives to behave humanly or even just humanely, then they can worry about their stars. But none of that will ever happen. Ever.
These folks with their BS, of COURSE any employer has a huge amount of leverage over an employee with a problem, more than a spouse or family or anyone else. Do Hollywood employers have employee assistance programs that many other employers have??? Apparently not. Charlie Sheen was obviously surrounded by enablers. His boss, who was obviously aware of the gravity of his situation, even thought it was funny to joke ON TV about his potential death. Now Sheen’s on to a new set of enablers. Nikki’s right, if CBS had fired him if he didn’t get help maybe that would have helped him to get to his rock bottom and turn things around. But noooo, more money to be made. All these excuses for corporate callousness. You’d think the $$$$$ these people made for these jerks would buy a little compassion.
I read Russell’s post earlier. I’ve been a fan for years. He’s always been incredibly insightful.
But about the industry taking responsibility, I don’t see why they would. Don’t recording artists make more money dead than alive? How much money did they make off of Michael Jackson a year before his death, and then how about a year after? I would assume Ms. Winehouse’s sales have also gone up in the last 24 hours.
Exactly. There are big insurance policies held by the companies….and you’re right, they’re worth more dead than alive. Ray Charles is generating about $100Mil a year dead….sad.
Amy Winehouse had a drug addiction before stardom. You can’t blame Hollywood. All in all, I send my deepest regards to her family and friends for their loss. It is very sad.
Actually that’s not true, she was pretty anti-drugs in high school. Her father says her ex Blake introduced her to both herion and crack.
Thank you. I’ve been waiting for someone to say that over the past few days. The “industry card” isn’t relevant to her tragic demise.
Actually she did not have a drug problem before her fame it was the gap between her critically acclaimed first album FRANK and follow-up BACK TO BLACK where the drug use began. During this period she also met Blake but the press didn’t really care much about her until she became a visible drug addict then she was in the London Tabloids every single day.
The Industry did have some blame but also her weakness and need for love, so ultimately only she can own her demise.
Everyone watches a car crash or stares at a crime scene, it’s human nature and yes Nikki’s idea is novel but there is not a way that an ndustry can intervene. Would everyone in Wall street have to be drug tested on a monthly basis? I mean where does it start and where does it end, these are individual choices which lead to tragic losses.
All the industry fold can do (managers, agents and friends) is maybe have their clients best interests at the fore-front which is the biggest challenge. Did Britney’s, Michael Jackson’s orAmy Winehouse’s management teams have their best interests in mind when they signed them up for multi-million $$$ tours… I think not.
Russell Brands manager forced him into rehab when he was on heroine and said he would not work with Russell until he was clean and that was the wake up call needed. Maybe managers and agents should stop thinking about their 10-15% and think a healthy client will lead to a better working client.
Just a thought.
just a thought? bullshit. the industry didn’t call her out or force her to get high. why on earth are we making her a martyr when we all knew this would happen with her?
Reminds me of when WMA paid for a senior agent’s legal fees after a nasty DUI but never suggested sending him for treatment.
Recovery. Brand wanted it. Winehouse didn’t. That’s all.
Well said.
It’s a simple truth.
It’s too bad that Winehouse became an addict. But the world is full of sick people and we can only try to save the ones who want to be saved. But some people can’t be saved. It has nothing to do with this town enabling them. They are addicts – some of them die, some of them recover and channel their addictive personalities and win Oscars or Emmys or Grammy or Tonys.
It was the 40th anniversary of Jim Morrison’s death a few weeks ago, and people are still endlessly fascinated with the man. Same with Joplin, same with Hendrix. I may be wrong, but I’m not so sure it’ll be the same in 2051 with Amy Winehouse.
Not sure that Brand making a “laugh riot” movie out of someone smuggling heroin up his butt, Get Me to the Greek, is a great way to start. God, what hypocrisy.
Jack has problems separating entertainment and parody from reality.
I’d like to point out to Jack that earning a living is not being hypocritical. It’s called survival. I’m sure if you got what Russell Brand made for Get Me To The Greek, you’d shove a poppy plantation up your ass !!!
beautifully stated.
We should always try and help those in need. Showing someone and their family that you can be a good positive influence is so important. We should not look the other way.
Charlie Sheen is such a kind and likable person. If you want to be his drinking buddy please don’t. If you want to help him do positive things that would help h please show him.
He is talented and just needs to stay in therapy and live a healthy life and spend time with his family who he can trust who truly love him.
Try and help somebody everyday even in the smallest way.
I never thought I would say this, but Russell Brand just posted an incredibly important and amazingly thought-proviking message. Thank you Russell. RIP Amy.
Indeed, what hypocrisy.
On a bit of a side note – I’m a bit tired of celebrities being loosely portrayed as “victims.”
Celebrities must learn like everyone else to take responsibility for their addictions, as Brand did.
Let’s face it, sometimes talented/smart people to stupid things.
IT IS NOT THE INDUSTRY’S RESPONSIBILITY.
That’s a good one Brand, and am sure you miss her,Life is one very short trip either addiction or not addiction everyone have got a debt to pay death.
It’s everyone’s fault for Winehouse’s death except her own I suppose. Not trying to make light of addiction, but we shouldn’t be apologizing for people who willingly destroy themselves. They made a choice.
Really Nikki, your sounding like someone’s jewish grandmother. When has the entertainment industry ever really cared about anyone other then their bank accounts. So long as it doesn’t hurt the profit margins, I think they prefer that their talent dies young and milk their legacy for years onward.It sure hasn’t hurt the estates of Marilyn Monroe and James Dean.
Jack…couldn’t have said it better.What a phony.Ever party with him?…It’s as simple as personal responsibility.While sad, It’s NOT our problem…what’s next? We’re responsible for child abuse, domestic violence, abortions and on and on.Please! What did he do to help her…He’s a joke and untalented at that.
Brand is an untalented hack hypocrite. He makes jokes about drugs in his movies. Russell, do you have any goddam idea how many more people see your shitty drug references in your shitty movies than will ever read your stupid blog post? A LOT more. I know your movies are mostly always box office failures, but nobody reads your blog.
Fuck Russell Hypocrite Brand. If you cared about Amy you would have written her a letter while she was alive. Now it’s too late you moron.
I knew Amy Winehouse. I loved Amy Winehouse. She had more talent in her pinky than Brand does in his entire body.
I’m sure the letter would’ve done the trick.
Sorry for your loss.
Why should the industry be at fault? Her addiction, her choice.
I mostly agree with what R. Brand has to say (and I despise him as an actor), but Amy Winehouse was an adult who made adult decisions. Sometimes it’s one’s person’s fault and one person’s only. But it’s sad she is gone. So much talent, so sad….
Honestly Nikki you are very correct. Unlike Sports where your career will be over like a heartbeat if drugs are found near you talkless of in your body, the tv, film and music sectors take a different look. Some view as a medium which lets the artist bring out his or her best, some see as a way to please the client (who obviously is making the record company or studio millions of dollars and like all businesses, investments must be taken care of for the revenues they will fetch in the future), but at the end it contributes to the demise of the artist solely because lets face it artists (music industry especially) are worth even more dead than alive( as i type Amy Winehouse’s two albums have broken top 10 of major charts both side of the Atlantic. ( 30 Rock made a joke about where jack Donaghy wanted “2pac” jemma, ie. to make the public believe she was dead, so she would be more famous)
But these execs should take a long and hard look and make sure to scold their artists against the use of these drugs, because at the end of the day whether we like it or not, we look to these people for inspiration, if not us our young children. The excuse wil be ” If Amy is doing it, then it is okay to” or when Chris Brown hit Rihanna, there was a running gag of ” i will Chris Brown you”.
Basically, at the end, i hope that this death of Amy can make these execs or powers that be that they need to caution their artists to good work practices for the sake of the young ones at least and for the artists’ sake.
AND IT’S NOT OVER YET. STAY TUNED FOR THE AMY WINEHOUSE BIOPIC COMING TO A THEATER NEAR YOU.
Jack the fact that you just mentioned “get him to the Greek” is foolish. C’mon doesn’t the “character” in the film become sober in the end? Leave make believe out of the real world. Fact is most of these addicts have friends and family around and they know what’s going on. It’s not hollywoods responsibility to do anything. It’s in the publics eye, did any of us try and start a “get clean Facebook page” for any of these celebs? No. It’s a sad end, hopefully we learn from this.
“They tried to make me go to rehab, I said “No, no, no.”
End quote.