Prime Minister David Cameron’s spokesman says the government supports a Labour party motion — to be debated in Parliament tomorrow — that urges News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch to abandon his $14 billion plan to acquire BSkyB, the Associated Press reports. The resolution wouldn’t require Murdoch to change course or force the government’s Competition Commission to reject a deal giving Murdoch the 60% of BSkyB that he doesn’t already own. But it would be a powerful expression of opinion. “We have said that the purchase of BSkyB should not proceed until after criminal inquiries are complete,” Labour leader Ed Miliband says. “The simplest way to achieve this is for Rupert Murdoch to recognise the feelings of the public and the will of the House of Commons and withdraw this bid.”
The government’s announcement follows news that Murdoch, Deputy COO James Murdoch, and News International CEO Rebekah Brooks have been asked to testify at a parliamentary hearing about the News Of The World phone hacking scandal. That could take place next week.
Also, former PM Gordon Brown told the BBC that two other Murdoch-owned newspapers, The Sun and The Sunday Times, had hired “known criminals” to spy on him for a 2006 report that disclosed his infant son had cystic fibrosis. “If I, with all the protection and all the defenses and all the security that a chancellor of the Exchequer or a prime minister has, am so vulnerable to unscrupulous tactics, unlawful tactics, methods that have been used in the way we have found, what about the ordinary citizen?” Brown said.


This will only work if the word “forever” is included in the UK decision…kicking the can down the road until the heat dies down on the politicians should not be the end game.
The time and opportunity is now to get goons like Murdoch under some sort of control. Let’s hope the Brits begin this process with earnest.
Just how did Murdoch’s UK papers gets the rights to use terrorist tools by contacting the police, paying $500 and getting them to ping the hacker victim’s phones to identify their location? Doesn’t there need to be a court order for that? Isn’t this incredibly over the top illegal for a tabloid to do that?
Will their testimonies be televised? With every question, they should present evidence. Rebecca Brooks is in this DEEP. And she can probably implicate Murdoch. The last time the police tried to get her to testify, she threatened to destroy their personal lives.
If Cameron wants any chance at re-election he has no choice. This stinker will be hung around his neck either way via his hiring of already compromised Andy Coulson.
As we are observing, Murdoch is conniving to hold on to his prize, BSkyB as well as Rebekah Brooks and Les Hinton. He’s a snake so watching him slither is par for the course.
Oh please Gordon Brown! We know when Brown lies is when his lips are moving…..hired known criminals….LOL….one pathetic lie after another, evil really knows no boundaries…..Europe is facing a worsening debt crisis, and I believe yesterday a British man had his eyes poked out by a bird…..GOD IS WATCHING!
WILLINGLY withdraw his bid? Surely they jest! Murdoch and his crooks have no decency or morals; they will never willingly do anything to undermine their profits.
The UK Government (sans Murdoch pet, David Cameron) need to ARREST the whole cadre of criminals. Of course the police is also in good ole Rupert’s pocket so that might not work.
This whole episode is a huge embarrassment for the people of the UK. Their government and their police force are OWNED by Murdoch. What a shame!
I’m beginning to believe multiple people were blindsided at News Corp.
But by who/m, exactly?
I can assure you, all of the major revelations/OPINIONS have been released. There are a myriad of details — “facts” — that remain, but have no direct relevance at this stage. I know I’ll be watching…
But all Murdoch has to do is to get his operatives to listen in on a few conversations, and they’ll clear all of this up quickly enough.
One can only hope this all ends with the Brits putting Rupert in jail, because if they don’t he’ll probably give up on England and spend even more time then he already has on corrupting the fabric of our society in the United States.
Thanks to Deadline Hollywood for the great reporting on this story.
If anyone goes to jail for this it won’t be upper level management and certainly not someone at Rupert Murdoch’s level. The underlings will take the fall the fall for this fiasco.
You don’t have to buy his papers or watch his TV channels. The fact is we all do. You have to change if you want News International to change.
Has there been any investigations into similar illegal spying and hacking of phones of U.S. politicians, celebrities, parents of fallen soldiers and families of murdered children on this side of the Atlantic? Does this scandal not warrant an investigation into the practices of Fox News and Murdoch’s other U.S. media organizations?
It’s time that government leaders in Britain and the U.S. finally grow some cojones and smash News Corp. into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the four winds.
Once and for all.
Murdoch is the one behind all this. If he didn’t directly order the illegal phone taps, he was at least complicit as the one who orders all the editors to do his bidding. Everyone knows this is true. He’s personally destroyed journalism as an honorable profession.
I agree… he owns USA media entities. They need their practices exposed and investigated. Fox News anyone? They are ignoring or distorting the story.
Hold on everyone…what about the Obama administration doing the same damn thing! wiretapping,hacking into unsuspecting citizens private lives… heard of the Thomas Drake case?? it was on 60 minutes…Our own current Government implimented a system under NSA, called “Thin Tread”… simply put, without warrants, it spied on /hacked into thousands of private citizens personal lives everywhere. what’s the difference people?
The difference is that the government doesn’t spy on people, then splash it over the front pages of the biggest selling newspapers in the country – as has been done here in the UK.
As a fellow Scot and having known what it is like to have your personal medical details broadcast to others without your consent, I fully empathise with Gordon Brown. His son Fraser is exactly that – his son. Simple as that. It was not wee Fraser that was the PM, he has not chosen the high profile career/life of his parents, so I can fully understand why GB is so upset about the revelations of cystic fybrosis made by the newspapers without the consent of the parents or Fraser himself. It’s really not a difficult concept – the idea of the right to privacy.