
EXCLUSIVE: The moment has come for Universal Pictures to fish or cut bait on The Dark Tower, the ultra-ambitious adaptation of the Stephen King 7-novel series that was going to encompass a trilogy of feature films and two limited run TV series. The studio has said, No Thanks. Universal has passed on going forward with the project, dealing a huge blow in the plan for Ron Howard to direct Akiva Goldsman’s script, with Brian Grazer, Goldsman and the author producing and Javier Bardem starring as gunslinger Roland Deschain. Now, the filmmakers will have to find a new backer of what might well be the most ambitious movie project since Bob Shaye allowed Peter Jackson to shoot three installments of The Lord of the Rings back to back.
This stunning development comes after Universal in May pushed plans to start production this summer on the first film. The studio claimed to be on track for a February, postponing to reduce the budget. This temporarily dispelled rumors that Universal was putting the project in turnaround, rumors that cropped up when the studio put workers on hiatus. But it was only a temporary respite. I’m told that this time, the studio reviewed Goldsman’s script for the first film and the first leg of the TV series, and would only commit to the single film. That wasn’t good enough for the filmmakers, who had already hired comic book and Heroes and Battlestar Galactica writer/producer Mark Verheiden to co-write the TV component with Goldsman, which was to be made for NBC Universal Television (studio insiders deny that the studio was only willing to make the movie and not the series). I know the filmmakers planned to make it all part of the first shoot while they had the cast in place and the sets erected. I’d heard back in May that Warner Bros–where Goldsman’s Weed Road is based and which is fully financing two installments of Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit–was a possible landing place for the adaptation of King’s 7-novel epic that is that author’s answer to Tolkien’s LOTR novels. The Dark Tower is about the last living member of a knightly order of gunslingers, with Deschain becoming humanity’s last hope to save civilization as he hits the road to find the Dark Tower. Along the way, he encounters characters, good and bad, in a world that has an old West feel.
Why did Universal chairman Adam Fogelson and co-chairman Donna Langley decide not to go forward? They weren’t saying, at this point. Nor were the filmmakers. Universal has put big chips on the table for several tent pole films and maybe that has something to do with it. The big bets include the Peter Berg-directed Battleship with Taylor Kitsch starring, as well as the Keanu Reeves-starrer 47 Ronin with Carl Rinsch directing. If you listen to word on the street, both of these are $200 million realm with huge marketing budgets. Universal recently passed on green lighting At The Mountains of Madness, which Guillermo del Toro was to direct with Tom Cruise starring, based on HP Lovecraft horror tale. That time, the studio balked at funding a $150 million film that gave del Toro the latitude to deliver his cut with an R-rating.
Insiders said that Universal brass loved the filmmakers and the project, but couldn’t make it work with the current budget in its business model.


This is a cash cow1 KA CHING!!!! Screw Uni. Go with WARNERS. WB is so friggin hyped with the final HP boxes coming in, they’ll want to keep it going. Shaye took a shot with jackson and LOR when the others said no…and cried their way home. Go with this WARNERS. King, Howard, Javier? You can’t lose. Just make d sure the script is really good. Solid. How can you miss with King? by screwing his grand masterpiece up at the script stage. And don’t go cheap WB!
Seriously. Howard? Wrong. Goldman? Wrong. Bardem? Wrong. Needs to go to series on HBO with Darabont as executive producer, and much better casting.
Does anyone know if Adam or Donna have actually read the books?
Have Adam or Donna not read these books? They so lend themselves to both media!
I wonder how many commenters actually read the series… ranks just behind LOTR. give Guerrillmo del Toro the reigns and lets get this thing going!
I may be a young man and do not know of such things, but since when has Stephen King not been the most bankable source material on the planet? A quick scroll down IMDB will show you a 3-4 to 1 hit to flop ratio (i.e. made money back), and oh, the residuals. Is there a holiday weekend when Stand by Me, The Green Mile, or The Shawshank Redemption aren’t playing on TV?
The first movie should cost $10-$20M to make. Anything else will be above the line fees. The last thing this script needs is a $10M actor. Put in an unknown.
This series was first printed 35 years ago and to say it’s not on par with LOTR means you haven’t read it. It’s a much richer, sophisticated narrative than LOTR. It is a different type of epic story, based on the iconic, solitary American cowboy and not on snarks, grumkins, and epic battles. The wizardry is easily as fascinating as Harry Potter. It does not skew younger, but skews to the people who went to see True Grit. And there’s a whole series of comic books the young kids can read in case they find the 225 page novel to cumbersome.
It is an absolute slam dunk and I will volunteer to write it on spec, but it doesn’t need to be this epic risk tied to front end fees. The later books will take some money to bring to life, but once people see the first one (this is Stephen King’s Magnus Opus after all), they’ll keep coming.
And it doesn’t have to be Rated R all the way through. That’s just silly talk. It could easily be pulled off as PG-13 with a little implied story telling.
–The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.
$10-20 million? Seriously? Try $150M to start…
150 mil? For a western with a handfull if scenes in NYC?
Yeah those caves, open desert and ghost towns sure pile up the production costs.
Infalted above the line salaries would be the only serios production cost on it.
150 mil? You didnt do the budget for Uni on Scott Pilgrim did you?
Smart move by Universal. It may sound great on paper, but is way too creatively ambitious and financially risky. Everyone does realize, don’t they, that’d they’d have to make some major changes with the ending of the book(s), which would only have alienated the fans.
I think the real problem is is that Universal is unsure whether or not the translation of the story to screen would be a hit or not. And if not sure, why take the risk. Universal knows people will go see Battleship because of the actors in it because they know there won’t be any story. Its not gonna make much money but it will make enough. I don’t agree with the philosophy either, but this is how I see it.
figured given Universals history of winding up not okaying good projects only to see some other studio reap the rewards would wind up killing the dark tower. though the upside is some one else can take a crack at it like hbo where the dark tower is more suited. or worse even fox.
Starz might want to look into it. They have been trying to secure some break out shows to compete with the other premium channels and have found some success with Spartacus and Pillars of the Earth. Camelot was a flop, but they seem to be interested in the Fantasy genre and Dark Tower serve well as an alternative to HBO’s Game of Thrones. Fox Broadcasting needs to stay away from this, they kill shows prematurely, but their cable channel FX has a solid track record and would make a good home for Dark Tower.
I am going with the studio on this one. There is no guarantee that a theatrical release/tv series combo would work. They should do what everyone else does – write a great script for the first movie, and if it is successful, make it a franchise. To ask a studio to gamble hundreds of millions of dollars on the present Dark Tower concept is throwing money away.
i’m glad they didn’t put it through. king once said he didn’t want to make the dark tower into a movie because he said it wouldn’t be done right. what the hell happened to make king change his mind? not only would this adventure in movie making be brutally expensive, it would also be difficult to film if they plan on encompassing all the locations needed to make it true to the books. no movie (or gods forbid, tv series) rework of the books could ever do them justice and i fear that king may be losing his sanity…
They have forgotten the faces of their fathers.
Stand Tall, Brave and True.
“The Missing” wasn’t exactly light family fare, nor was “Backdraft”. Howard’s perfectly capable of going dark when he wants to.
To that end, “The Dark Tower” series isn’t exactly “Hellraiser” or even “Nightmare on Elm Street”, in terms of it’s darkness. Many of the comments here make it seem like a practical impossibility for Howard to come close to what’s required, when what’s actually required isn’t so much “darkness” as it is “scope”, which Howard can handle with aplomb.
I’ve also not seen anyone here suggest a filmmaker that they feel could rise to the material. Any takers?
Nolan. Jackson. Aronofsky. Cuaron. Del Toro. Danny Boyle. Bigelow.
Would love to see Danny Boyle have a go. He’s awesome.
Say thankya.
This is just like Gore Verbinski’s Bioshock film project that he wanted to be rated R with a huge blockbuster budget that no studio were willing to back. Anyways this will be multiple films and 2 tv series when its not proven if the first film will even be a hit. That sounds incredible risky with possibly $200million budget each movie with rated R and its not a comedy. Well Universal needs to get back in the game cause their movies are getting killed in the box office.
ron howard is a really good filmmaker. PH and friday night lights are two awesome and acclaimed series on tv, and also
So he has all the possibility to do it right. It’s just stupid and unfair to think that he won’t do a good job. Why? A beautiful mind won an Oscar!!
I hope WB picks it up, it is such a shame not to have this project on tv. Universal always make stupid decisions, and will always have a lot of flops. NBC is becoming the new cw.
Please WB PICK IT UP!!!!!!
Frank Darabont would be a better choice for director, He is the only one who has turned Kings novels to movie gold (Shawshank, Green Mile).
I would have loved to see this made into a movie franchise. To this day, one of the best series i’ve ever read (minus a plot line here or there) and still my favorite series ending of all time. However, i’m not sure Ron Howard could have pulled this off. Bardem as Roland tho…AMAZING!
But seriously universal, you pass on this, yet go for a movie based on a milton bradly board game? has hollywood run out of books they wanna rip off? YOU SUNK MY FAITH IN YOU!!!
Re: At the Mountains of Madness: in fairness to Universal it wasn’t the budget they balked at–it was giving that budget to an R-rated film. I’m a huge Lovecraft fan and I’ve read ATMOM numerous times. There is no reason at all it couldn’t have been a PG-13 flick, but Del Toro wouldn’t budge on his R-rating. That proposed R-rating on Del Toro’s part makes me believe he planned on adding lots of gore that wasn’t in the story. Also, 150 million sounds pretty extreme for that film anyway, even if it was PG-13. The story simply doesn’t require that sort of budget. Yeah, there are some aliens, but it’s not like we’re fighting epic space battles. And it was a novella, by the way. It was maybe a tenth the length of Lord of the Rings with maybe a tenth of the cast. I just don’t see what all that money was supposed to be spent on.
I would say have a director who knows westerns, medieval, or sci-fi (or perhaps done a combination of those) tackle this, as it encompasses all of those genres (over the course of the entire series). Also, I think Lions Gate has the testicular fortitude to greenlight this, but I would replace Javier Bardem with Jeffery Dean Morgan.
Javier Bardem as the gunslinger?? WTF??
Disney and DreamWorks should pick it up together. ABC already has a strong history of airing King product. DW and Imagine just collaborated on Cowboys and Aliens. It could work. The films could be released under the DreamWorks/Touchstone banner, and Disney could get DW to share costs. I really think this makes sense.
Ron Howard, despite his Oscar, was never an “A” Hollywood director. His films are very generic looking –he is the Hollywood director equivelant to white bread. BLAND! I guarantee you, if a quality director were attached to this it would have been green-lit –well, at least the first film would have!
FYI Battleship’s budget went NORTH of $200m quite a while ago.
They’ll get the same deal everywhere they go. One film, if it does well, they’ll talk about the rest. No one is willing to risk “Lord of the Rings” money on Stephen King (or Howard/Grazer). Sorry, but King is not Tolkien.
When Stephen King ran out of the “old” stories from his trunk, you know the ones that made his name as a author. Also the ones that were good reads. He was in his experiment with exotic/toxic substances period. Ever since then his books became rambling, maudlin and incomprehensible. The first Tower books were OK, but then became repititious and boring. Can understand why Universal decided to give it a pass. Harry Potter it is not and never will be.