
UPDATE: The West Memphis 3, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley were just freed in an Arkansas hearing after being in prison 18 years for the murder of three children in 1993. The three were freed after pleading guilty and drawing a sentence equal to the time they already served. The original conviction, which was derived despite any physical evidence tying the trio to the murders, became a cause celebre and the West Memphis 3 have received moral and financial support from the likes of The Hobbit director Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh, Johnny Depp, Eddie Vedder and Natalie Maines. The case has also be the subject of two Paradise Lost HBO documentaries by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky. A third installment will premiere at the Toronto Film Festival next month, followed by the New York Film Festival and a January airing on HBO.
Peter Jackson & Fran Walsh To Reveal Financial And Legal Support For ‘West Memphis 3′ Freedom Effort
EARLIER, AUGUST 18, 8:20 PM EXCLUSIVE: It’s just days before the directors lock their third documentary on the “West Memphis 3″ for premieres at the Toronto and New York Film Festivals. But Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory helmers Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky raced to Arkansas to prepare to add a new ending. They’ll bring their camera Friday morning to a hearing expected to end with the freedom of Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley Jr. and Jason Baldwin, who spent 18 years in prison on charges they brutally murdered three 8-year old boys in 1993. The first two HBO documentaries that Berlinger and Sinofsky made on the case stirred international outrage over what many feel was a miscarriage of justice and a conviction on flimsy evidence. Echols drew the death penalty and the other two received life sentences even though there was no physical evidence tying them to a crime allegedly committed when they were 18. The jury found them guilty based largely on a prosecutor’s scenario that the teens killed as part of a satanic ritual, citing their penchant for wearing dark clothes, listening to heavy metal Metallica songs, and reading Stephen King horror novels as proof of a dark state of mind.
Though it took three films, Berlinger and Sinofsky are about to achieve something similar to what Errol Morris accomplished with his 1988 documentary Thin Blue Line, which led to a death sentence being overturned for Randall Adams, who had been convicted of murdering a Dallas policeman in 1976. HBO’s broadcast of the first two Paradise Lost led to moral and financial support for the West Memphis 3 from all over the world, including the likes of Johnny Depp, Pearl Jam’s Eddie Vedder and Dixie Chicks’ singer Natalie Maines.
The filmmakers said they weren’t going to predict what will happen in the morning, but widespread reports and quotes from even the parents of the victims say the West Memphis 3 will be freed shortly. A case that seemed weak in the first film has gotten weaker with the introduction of DNA evidence that doesn’t match that of the three who were convicted. Berlinger and Sinofsky did say they will happily change their ending. “We always lamented the fact that we had to keep making sequels to this horrifying real life story,” Berlinger told me after landing in Arkansas. “It’s the West Memphis 3, and so stopping at three films seems right. We have just enough time to include what happens in the ending of the film, and it’s the most incredible feeling knowing that your work had an impact.”
Berlinger said that when he and Sinofsky were hired to document the original trial, they had only been sent a press clipping about the case by HBO exec Sheila Nevins. It seemed an open and shut case. The crime was brutal–the 8-year-olds were discovered hog-tied and mutilated in a drainage ditch–and since it closely followed the murder of a 2-year old in England by 10-year olds, the filmmakers went to Arkansas to make a movie about the psychology of young killers. “Based on the article, we wanted to tell a story of disaffected youth,” Berlinger said. “How could three kids be so rotten and do such a thing as murder three children? Then we met Damien and watched what was going on, and quickly realized we were in the midst of an incredible miscarriage of justice. It was a lethal brew. The local press found it much easier to tell a devil worshiping story than to do hard journalism, and in a Bible-thumping part of the country, prosecutors painted this picture of satanic panic. It led to the convictions.”
The first Paradise Lost created a visual record of a capital trial short on evidence but rife with allegations that police coerced damning testimony; there were also allegations of jury misconduct serious enough to have warranted a mistrial. When the documentary first aired, the reaction was mild, Berlinger said. But the Internet changed all that.
“The film got glowing reviews, but never went from the entertainment page to the editorial page,” Berlinger said. “But that was just when the Internet started being used as this primitive social media tool, and an international movement sprang up. Damien in some ways was his own worst enemy. He was kind of a narcissistic teen who enjoyed the attention because he didn’t think it was possible he could be convicted. He was an outsider who would have been normal in New York or LA, but in this fundamentalist religious community, dressing in black and listening to heavy metal made him a weirdo. He was actually a super intelligent kids who just danced to a different tune and rubbed some people the wrong way. The reason people like Vedder and Depp related to him, and the reason why Metallica lent us their music for the film [that relationship led Berlinger and Sinofsky to direct the Metallica documentary Some Kind of Monster] was they too felt like the freak, the outsider, in high school. The idea that in the right circumstance anyone like this could be on death row was appalling. There was no excuse for what went on in this case. When you sentence someone to death, it has to be beyond all reasonable doubt. This was a weak case. We thought the first film would change things, and then we made a second one, certain it would blow the doors off the case. But the wheels of justice moved so slowly while these guys were left to rot in jail.”
The directors are crossing their fingers tonight that the trial ends with three men exonerated by tomorrow afternoon. “We don’t want to come off arrogant or like we’re patting ourselves on the back,” Berlinger said when I asked if the first two films were responsible for what is expected to happen tomorrow morning. “This outcome is due to help from a lot of people. But Damien says in Paradise Lost 3 that he literally would have been dead if not for these films; he said his appeals were exhausted, nobody was coming to his defense and there would have been no funds to investigate new evidence that helped delay delivery of his death sentence. Bruce and I feel grateful to have served as the lucky stewards of a story that just had to be told. But we also believe the films kept these guys alive. Guys like Vedder and Depp funded this case because they saw Paradise Lost and were outraged.”
Berlinger said the film was also the catalyst for Eccols meeting his wife, Lorri Davis, a Brooklyn architect who saw the first film at a MOMA screening in 1996. “She was blown away, started writing to Damien, visited him, and married him on death row,” Berlinger said. “She spent 14 years fighting for his life, and she was so instrumental in all this happening.”


The REAL “Footloose” , a tragedy happening much too often in this country.
The British case you mention took place in Liverpool, not London.
The Lone Ranger gets halted and everyone is up in arms. Here we have a story about something that matters and crickets.
That’s because sadly people won’t care until they make a feature film.
To all those who’ve had a hand in allowing the voices of the disenfranchised and wrongly accused to be heard, bravo…
the problem is they are going to have to actually plead no contest to lesser charges which is total bs because then they can’t sue the state of arkansas.
I hope that not only does HBO run this new doc, but that they also rerun the first two.
The likelihood is that they will will plead GUILTY under an “Alford plea,” a common legal device that allows a defendant to say I didn’t do it but I want to take the deal.” The state gets the conviction, the defendants get time served, and they get out.
Rather different than the actual exoneration of Randall Adams by Erroll Morris.
If asked on a job application someone who enters an Alford plea would have to answer “Yes” if asked had they been convicted of a crime.
If they plead no contest to lesser charges they can still sue for abuse suffered while in prison and they still served a longer sentence than any no contest plea would have given fhem. The state’s legal system messed up and they will pay, some lawyer will figure out how amd in this case the state deserves to pay.
SET-THEM-FREE!!!!!!!!
I grew up in Memphrika and remember reading all about this b.s. They were so ready to arrest someone.
Set these poor people free for fuck sake.
Thank you, Deadline, for leading with this story. Very important. The documentaries remain relevant. This is an instance when film perhaps lead in part lead to the freedom of these innocent men.
So if it really wasn’t them…
Then who?
I can’t believe they’re just going to throw their hands up in the air and say, “fuck it!” On paper everyone’s happy, the WM3 are free, the state gets to keep its convictions, but we still don’t know for sure who hogtied, tortured, and murdered three children.
The whole thing makes me sick. I hate this country sometimes.
If you’ve watched the docs, that toothless, Xanax-riddled stepdad seems to be the real murderer. When taking the lie-detector test, he says “the night my wife was murdered”, even though she supposedly died in her sleep.
The irony is, the film traded on exactly what it was condemning… guilt by nothing other than stereotyping. There was never any evidence that the stepdad had anything to do with it, but the filmmakers showed shots of him wearing an American flag shirt and taking his teeth out, as if to say “Look at THIS weirdo! He musta done it!”
But the stepdad wasn’t into rock n’ roll, so he’s not cool.
It’s not the filmmaker’s job to do the work of law enforcement and the legal system. Why don’t you direct your tough questions and frustrations toward the country at them?
I never said it was the filmmaker’s job to do that. Not sure what you’re babbling about…
I think most would suspect a weird stepdad with a proclivity toward waking up next to a dead spouse before they would suspect a few dorky goths.
Um, I might suspect the goths when their leader, Damien, GLOATED ON FILM about how the whole town will remember his name and how the children will have nightmares about him in the future.
I remember watching that first documentary and being utterly confused about why the filmmakers thought they were innocent. That Damien dude is one frightening, dark individual. And it was doubly creepy to see his strange power over his “fans”, including the woman who married him.
If I had to bet, I’d bet they did it.
The movies (especially the second) create a chilling conclusion that Byers was a killer, yes.
However, in 2007, new forensic evidence was presented – none of the DNA collected at the scene matched any of the WM3, but it DID match another of the stepfathers (Terry Hobbs) and one of his friends. A judge in 2008 wasn’t interested in any of this science mumbo jumbo magic, but the Arkansas Supreme Court reversed his nonsense and said there could be new hearings. Wait, wait, wait, wait… June of this year, hearings are set for December. This Alford plea gets them out now, but is also total bullshit. Admitting the state had ‘enough’ evidence to prosecute, when they should really say ‘NO’ evidence…
“In upholding Echols’ conviction in 1996, the state Supreme Court noted that two people testified Echols bragged about the killings, an eyewitness put Echols at the scene, fibers similar to the boys’ clothing were found in Echols’ home, a knife was found in a pond behind Baldwin’s home, Echols’ interest in the occult and his telling police that he understood the boys had been mutilated before officers had released such details.”
I’m sure this was addressed in those 3 films of 270mins of glorious oscar worthy writing, filming & editing, but wouldn’t it better if the 3 films were used to actually find the killers?
Yeah, and add to that the fact that NONE of the WM3 had any plausible alibi for the time the murders were committed.
But they were into Metallica, so they couldn’t have done it.
Oh, and THIS…
“The big break came when Misskelley unexpectedly confessed and implicated Baldwin and Echols.
“Then they tied them up, tied their hands up,” Misskelley said in a statement to police, parts of which were tape recorded. After describing sodomizing and other violence, he went on: “And I saw it and turned around and looked, and then I took off running. I went home, then they called me and asked me, ‘How come I didn’t stay? I told them, I just couldn’t.’”
But I’m sure they’re innocent. Eddie Vedder thinks so.
Because Police have never interrogated people for long hours until they force them to agree to something that they did not do.
Oh wait, hundreds of people have had convictions reversed for that exact reason. People break down under the stress of extensive interrogations.
The thing is, they may very well be guilty. The only evidence that existed pointed to them, including testimony that Eccols bragged about the murders at school.
But the prosecution decided it would be too tough to re-prosecute a twenty-year old trial, so this is the result.
Let’s hope Metallica and Eddie Vedder didn’t just set multiple child murderers free…
I know hardly anything about the case, but I do know one thing. Metallica and Eddie Vedder didn’t set anyone free. A state or federal justice system has decided to set some people free. And I haven’t seen much of that going on during my lifetime, unless and until there was overwhelming evidence a mistake had been made (and sometimes not even then).
I guarantee you that the State of Arkansas is pretty damn well convinced that they didn’t do it, otherwise they never would have seen the light of day again. Land of the Free, Home of the Brave, Right to Trial, Innocent Until Proven Guilty, and so on … but once the US legal system gets its hands on you or decides you’re the one who did it, it never ever lets go until it’s absolutely forced to by its own rules.
I commend Deadline for covering this development. It veers from usual industry news but this is one of the true catastrophes at the hands of the American justice system. The fact that these young men will NOT be reimbursed a dollar for spending nearly two decades in prison and on death row angers me as a citizen.
Their plea deal seems to cover up any admission or fault by the courts. And compare the time this has taken to set them free, with two award winning documentaries and big celebrity support, compared to the ongoing Amanda Knox appeal overseas. Discrimination is not only about race in this country. Long hair and heavy metal are enough to throw away the key! The U.S. demands these men an apology. May Hollywood step up to tell their story and pay them handsomely for their tribulations.
Again:
“In upholding Echols’ conviction in 1996, the state Supreme Court noted that two people testified Echols bragged about the killings, an eyewitness put Echols at the scene, fibers similar to the boys’ clothing were found in Echols’ home, a knife was found in a pond behind Baldwin’s home, Echols’ interest in the occult and his telling police that he understood the boys had been mutilated before officers had released such details.”
Maybe the rush to reimbursement is a bit inappropriate.
And what about those little boys who were murdered? If those Hollywood celebs are so sure that the West Memphis 3 didn’t commit the murders, how about they finance the search to find the real killers.
Once again, Liberal Hollywood misses the point.
Freeing 3 likely innocent people, one of whom will be killed, is “missing the point?” Why is saving living people less important than finding out who killed dead ones? There’s very little that can be done to solve an old case. It’s easy to prove by DNA someone didn’t do anything.
Grant –
Well, okay, what bugs me about that is this – were those people who testified that he’d bragged about it reliable? What did he say? Did he explicitly state that he’d hogtied and butchered the little boys? Or could they have misinterpreted what he was saying because of pre-existing bias against “that weird goth kid”? People can lie. People can change their stories. If you’re going to sentence someone to death, you should have an abundance of hard, physical evidence. Irrefutable. Not a bunch of easily influenced testimonies from people who probably didn’t like the guy in the first place. And as for the person who “put Echols at the scene”, how do they know for sure, without ANY shadow of a doubt, that it was him? How far away from him were they? People can see things, they can THINK it’s someone, when it’s really not.
Another thing, the knife. Was there any of the kids’ DNA on that knife? The pond water would not have washed off all of the DNA evidence on that knife – the only thing that would have done it is bleach. And what kind of knife was it, anyways?
I remember that in the Paradise Lost 1, it dragged my attention when I saw Terry Hobbs’ face at the court hearing (about 40 mins from the beginning of the documentary), in my opinion it was written on his face that he was scared, like someone who is afraid that the truth will come out.
I do believe that WM3 are innocent. It is hard even imagine what they were feeling all these years behind bars. I wish them more luck in the future!!!