In May, John Malone’s Liberty offered to buy all of Barnes & Noble for $1B. But the offer stalled and the book retailer said Thursday that the takeover talks had been ditched in light of the $204M investment agreement. Under the terms of the deal, Liberty Media bought preferred stock convertible into about 12 million Barnes & Noble shares at $17 apiece, giving it about a 17% stake in the company. The preferred shares will pay an annual dividend of 7.75%. Liberty will also get two seats on the company’s board of directors, which is being expanded to 11 members. It has nominated Greg Maffei, its president and CEO, and Mark Carleton, a senior vice president, to take the seats.
Barnes & Noble put itself up for sale last year in response to
pressure from billionaire shareholder Ron Burkle, but the company didn’t strike a deal. Burkle, who has since stepped back and cut his stake, said Thursday in a statement that he had “grave concerns about the pricing and process.” Meanwhile, Barnes & Noble has continued to struggle along with other traditional book sellers — longtime rival Borders Group recently went out of business — facing tough competition from online retailers like Amazon.com and discounters like Wal-Mart. Leonard Riggio, chairman of Barnes & Noble, said the capital injection from Liberty will go toward expanding the company’s digital business.
Maffei said Liberty Media is “excited about Barnes & Noble’s prospects as the leading bookseller in the U.S. and its growth opportunities in the digital world.” A likely sales platform would be home-shopping network QVC, which Liberty runs through its Liberty Capital Group. Barnes & Noble shares were up 41 cents, or 3.4 percent, to $12.50 in after-hours trading. The stock lost 90 cents, or 6.9%, as part of a broad decline during the regular session. Shares in Liberty Media, which is based in Englewood, Colo., were unchanged in extended trading, ending down $4.92, or 6.8%, at $67.65.


As a Borders employee who will loose a job soon, B&N is bound to be in the same position as us in a few years. And the one thing I’ve learned here is that the big box stores such as Barnes & Noble are doomed due to the indifference of people brought up on a diet of reality shows that serve no purpose and 140 characters on their Twitter page. B&N has got the right idea – the digital universe – but as Stephen King has said that “people tire of new toys” rather quickly. But then again, maybe I’m bitter.
One of the reason you are losing your job and Borders is going under is due to their horrible customer service that pissed off a lot of customers like me that drove them online to Amazon and/or to B&N.
Borders would have one price on their website and refuse to match it in-store saying “Oh that’s a completely different company” whereas retailers like Best Buy and Target and Home Depot will match their online prices making customers like me call BS on Borders and never wanting to shop there again.
Blockbuster also has horrible customer service – which will ultimately be, and mostly is now, their downfall. With Yelp and the internet in general, businesses need to learn customer service is key. We as customers don’t have to put up with anyone’s BS policies anymore b/c we can just go online and usually find it for cheaper anyways.
I think the real problem is that the people who actually have money to buy books have jobs, and employers are working the employees who still have jobs to the bone.
Part of the cost of the book is the cost of the book, but, for me, the cost of the time to read the book is much bigger than the cost of the book. I can sneak bits of Web reading into my work day; I can’t really sneak any reading of physical books into my work day.
I’d gladly give up, say, $30 for an hour of genuine free time today. If reading a good 300-page book would take me a total of 10 high-quality hours of free time, that’s the equivalent of about $300 in free time. Maybe really way more than $300 in time, because the way my life is structured, I can’t really pay anyone $30 for an hour of free time.
The result: I have giant stacks of wonderful unread books at home.
So, at least when it comes to me, the real competition isn’t Amazon.com; it’s the giant, unread stacks of books.
Book readers are hotter than ever, it’s not just a new toy; I use mine every day, who actually reads paper anymore? B&N will survive because they have a good digital direction. The Nook sells. Borders like Blockbuster was a Johnny come lately to the digital party, they screwed up. Digital is the future. For books, film, and TV.
Take your head out of the sand, e-book readers are the future for everything.
It will be interesting to see how the mega media people will try to control this one. They have destroyed small book sellers, they have eliminated the mid-list novel and made it impossible for anyone new to climb out of the slush pile. Result: boring, predictable material created for the best sellers list which they somewhat control in store floor space.
If Amazon is smart they will continue creating platforms for new writers, new filmmakers to display their work.
Concerning the demise of physical book’s, to all the “Borgafied Sheeple” out there I say; “If I have to explain, you would’nt understand”. Sad but true. What the fuck is next, the Orgasmotron from Woody Allen’s ‘Sleeper’ ? I can just here it now,- some douchebag saying “Ya man, this is the wave of the future man, who need’s that old fashioned sex bullshit man, too messy and time consuming man ,and I’m to busy with my tacky little life already man. Jesus Christ, what’s happening to society.