SATURDAY PM/SUNDAY AM, 7TH UPDATE: Another strong day for Twentieth Century Fox’s prequel Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes
which scored a $19.4M Saturday (small -2% drop from Friday’s $19.7M), indicating word of mouth was good about these CGI animals and Andy Serkis. With an estimated $14.9M Sunday that makes for a 3-day weekend of $54M, lots more than the $35M which Hollywood expected. No doubt about it: origins story movies are working this summer if they’re done as well as this and X-Men: First Class which was another prequel on a Fox franchise. Nice win for former News Corp No. 2-turned-showbiz producer Peter Chernin and his film lieutenant Dylan Clark on Chernin Entertainment’s first film release. The pair said in a statement Sunday: “We’re thrilled to launch Chernin Entertainment with a film that so positively resonated with audiences. We’re proud of the artistic achievement as it is a testament to a smart script, great direction by Rupert Wyatt, stellar actor performances, the amazing visual effects created by the WETA team, and the passion and dedication of the entire crew and our partners at Twentieth Century Fox.” The other major studio new release, Universal’s The Change-Up, surprisingly ticked up (+4%) from Friday for $5.2M Saturday but that’s still a very disappointing $13.5M weekend. This truly isn’t Ryan Reynolds’ summer of stardom after the collapse of Green Lantern here and abroad. Stars are supposed to open movies to at least $20M. Overall moviegoing this weekend looks like $170M, which is up +30% from last year.
Here’s the Top 10:
1. Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes (Fox) NEW [3,648 Theaters]
Friday $19.7M, Saturday $19.4M, Weekend $54M
It’s not just surprising but kinda shocking that Time magazine declared this “2011′s Best Film So Far” and that even fanboy websites declared that “whatever expectations you’re likely to have going in, there’s a good chance this movie will surpass them”. Directed by Rupert Wyatt and written by Rick Jaffa & Amanda Silver, Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes seemed too schlocky a project for Peter Chernin to waste his time producing. Or so Hollywood thought. Its CinemaScore was an ‘A-’ and exit polls showed males making up 54% of the audience which was 59% at or over age 25. Why all the fuss over the prequel to such a dated franchise? Because Fox PR claims this is the first live-action film in the history of movies to star, and be told from the point of view of, a sentient animal — a character with human-like qualities, who can strategize, organize and ultimately lead a revolution, and with whom audiences are supposed to experience a real emotional bond. (But my commenters counter: What about Babe etc?) Fox execs point out that the studio wasn’t going to do the guys in ape suits thing again. So the film was impossible to make until James Cameron’s Avatar and Peter Jackson’s WETA Digital progressed performance capture technology to the point of the most realistic CGI ever. Given that, the claimed $93M pricetag co-financed by Fox, Dune Entertainment, and Ingenious seems absurdly modest.
Every single monkey, baboon, and ape in the movie is a product of this performance capture techonology. That earned raves from PETA and for Wyatt a Proggy Award given to animal-friendly companies, people and products. (PETA also showed up at the Ape‘ premiere in LA with signs reading, “Real Apes Love CGI,” and “Thank you, Fox for not using real Apes.”) The buzz this weekend is that Andy Serkis does an award-worthy job as the main chimp Caesar who leads the rebellion. But I don’t know why the trailers I saw mistakenly focused on James Franco who isn’t why moviegoers flocked to opening weekend. Fox was hoping for North American box office in the low-ball $30sM, so $54M is fantastic. “Phenomenal opening validating a sensational marketing effort led by Oren Aviv and Tony Sella,” a Fox exec gushed to me. Then again, tracking has been good for males and fans of the original movies, although softer for females. The fact is that the studio had a lot of ground to make up with this movie because fanboys hated the Tim Burton version from a decade ago. But this origins story scored 82% positive reviews on RottenTomatoes.
Marketing with a company called Mekanism was primarily focused online with the intent to create a global viral phenomenon and spark millions of Internet conversations about the film. There was the strategic use of digital influencers, creative content, and social media platforms to create widespread engagement for over 14 million viral video views and hundreds of millions of earned media impressions. “We’ve created excitement, driven credible word of mouth, and ensured that butts will be in seats to watch Apes Rise on opening weekend,” A Fox exec told me before Friday. WETA Digital hosted a livestream event on Facebook from WETA’s headquarters in New Zealand and gave viewers an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the work on the film. The livestream event was live on Facebook’s official fan page for Avatar as well. A free online digital comic book prequel to the movie debuted prior to release from comic series writer Daryl Gregory and artists Damian Couceiro and Tony Parker to set the stage for the movie. There was a new free 5-page digital comic book story weekly since mid-July until the final 10-page conclusion on August 3rd.
2. The Smurfs - 3D (Sony) Week 2 [3,395 Theaters]
Friday $6M, Saturday $8.2M, Weekend $21M (-41%), Cume $76.2M
It’s embarrassing for me just to be writing about The Smurfs. But after just 10 days of release, the film has generated $128.9M worldwide with an overseas cume to date of $52.7M. One of the big surprises of Summer 2011, last weekend’s exceptionally strong debut in North America was followed by enormous strength in several key countries including Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, Belgium, France and Germany, among others. This worldwide number is especially impressive when you consider the film has only debuted in about 3 dozen territories. In North America this weekend, The Smurfs saw big mid-week sales that led box office from Monday through Thursday. Strong ticket sales continued into the weekend and went up +37% on Saturday.
3. Cowboys & Aliens (DreamWorks/Universal) Week 2 [3,754 Theaters]
Friday $4.7M, Saturday $6.4M, Weekend $15.7M (-57%), Cume $67.3M
Not an embarrassing drop, but it didn’t have far to fall either. The big question is whether Cowboys & Aliens can make up the deficit overseas where Daniel Craig is a bigger star but also Westerns don’t do well traditionally. For an astute dissection of what went wrong, read this pre-release post by Deadline’s Mike Fleming, Can ‘Cowboys & Aliens’ Lasso Youth?. He answers the questions about why this well-pedigreed pic, despite the godfathering presence of Steven Spielberg and Imagine’s Ron Howard and Brian Grazer and direction by Jon Favreau, went into the tank. He details the tortured development history involving more than a dozen writers over 14 years. He analyzes the problems of a confused mash-up of two genres that usually don’t cross paths. And he reveals that with a cash break participation pool in the 35% range and no 3D conversion to justify higher ticket prices this movie may have been doomed from the start.
4. The Change-Up (Universal) NEW [2,913 Theaters]
Friday $4.7M, Saturday $5M, Weekend $13.5M
Universal started out the summer very high on this raunchy R-rated comedy with a $52M budget (Relativity was a financing partner) especially because The Change-Up was from the director of Wedding Crashers and the writers of The Hangover. Still it was surprising that David Dobkin would waste his time on such a tired body-switching premise, but this film won’t have the enormous playability or multiples of this summer’s other raunchy R-rated laughers. CinemaScore was a ‘B’ with an audience that was 59% Female vs. 41% male and 50% at or older than age 30 vs. 50% under
30. All along tracking had been strongest with females, with younger females demonstrating the strongest interest. “It’s disappointing. We’re kind of confounded by it,” a Uni exec told me Friday night. “This movie played like the best R-rated comedies we have.” But reviews hammered this pic and trailers looked lame. Marketing was sub-par as if red-band online trailers, one that opened the campaign and one that closed it, would put people in seats. Maybe audiences were tired after so many of Summer 2011′s R-rated comedies.
The TV campaign began early with a spot on the finale for The Family Guy in late May, followed by a run on the NBA Finals in early June and then cable, cable, and more cable channels as well as the TV talk shows. The supposedly “likeable” pairing of Ryan Reynolds and Jason Bateman was a key strategy in publicity, and they did many of their promotional appearances together. Universal fanned out with an extensive word-of-mouth campaign and 350 screenings across the country. But none of it worked.
5. Captain America - 3D (Marvel/Disney/Paramount) Week 3 [3,620 Theaters]
Friday $3.7M, Saturday $5.5M, Weekend $13M, Cume $143.1M
6. Harry Potter/Hallows Pt 2 – 3D (Warner Bros) Week 4 [3,175 Theaters]
Friday $3.3M, Saturday $5.1M, Weekend $12.1M, Cume $342.8M
7. Crazy, Stupid, Love (Warner Bros) Week 2 [3,020 Theaters]
Friday $3.7M, Saturday $4.9M, Weekend $12.1M (-37%), Cume $42.1M
8. Friends With Benefits (Sony) Week 3 [2,398 Theaters]
Friday $1.4M, Saturday $1.9M, Weekend $4.7M, Cume $48.5M
9. Horrible Bosses (New Line/Warner Bros) Week 5 [2,025 Theaters]
Friday $1.3M, Saturday $1.9M, Weekend $4.6M, Cume $105.1M
10. Transformers 3 – 3D (Paramount) Week 6 [1,854 Theaters]
Friday $850K, Saturday $1.3M, Weekend $3M, Cume $344.1M
SATURDAY AM, 4TH UPDATE: Twentieth Century Fox’s prequel Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes is leaping to an easy box office lead in 3,648 North American theaters. Hollywood initially thought the origins story with digital animals, Andy Serkis, and James Franco would follow the same trajectory as last weekend’s Cowboys & Aliens which went on to a $36.4M Friday-Saturday-Sunday. But, remember, that pic got Smurf-ed. The far better reviewed Apes is faring stronger with a very healthy $19.7M Friday (including a low-key $1.254M midnights in only 1,124 locations) for a projected $50M weekend or even higher.
And that’s without the hype and pedigree of DreamWorks/Universal’s Cowboys & Aliens which fell -64% from last Friday to 3rd place this week but at half the budget ($93M, or so Fox claims). Sony Pictures’ The Smurfs held -55% for 2nd place.
But this weekend’s other major studio release, Universal’s The Change-Up, is bottoming in 4th place with $4.7M Friday and just an estimated $13.4M for the weekend from 2,913 venues. This truly isn’t Ryan Reynolds’ summer of stardom after the collapse of Green Lantern here and abroad. It’s a disastrous start considering that stars like Reynolds are supposed to open movies to at least $20M.
For more estimates listed by title, see box office results here...Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Fox wins again! The other major studios can’t touch them!
TOTALLY! I hear there might be titty in Prometheus. WHOA!
Watch out Lionsgate!
AWWWW YEAH $150 million dollar Ridley Scott Alien-kinda movie not called Alien with a titty! HOLLA!
Watch out Paramount that’s almost as much as SUPER 8!
Oh, i KNOWZ!
Super 808 is/was awesome. People are still talking about it! CONSTANTLY!
Just saw Apes today. Its definitely one of the best of the summer. I hope people go and see it.
Finally a good movie without all the distracting and overpriced 3D.
Ok, Fox Employee. Fox wins again? Someone is forgetting Monte Carlo, Mr Popper’s Penguins . . and even X-Men to a certain extent. Not to mention Water for Elephants. Let’s get real here . . . A movie targeted at young males with WETA effects as marketing point should be doing a lot better
Mr. Poppers — 55mil prod budget — 135 mil WW
Xmen — 160 mil prod budget — 350 mil WW
Monte Carlo — 20 mil — 22 dom 5 WW
Water 4 Els — 38 mil — 115 mil WW
If your gonna surpass p and a before you get to dvd, on demand and cable rights, cant really look at them like like let downs. Maybe X coulda been higher, but they did as well as they expected and no, I dont work for fox.
Also, the article says that Apes doesn’t have the “hype or pedigree” of Cowboys and Aliens But this isn’t some out-of-nowhere movie. It’s a prequel to a very successful series of movies. It’s not like it doesn’t have any pre-awareness of hype.
If only I knew what it was for sure, a sequel, prequel, reboot, remake. Which time line does it fit into? Different sources seem to have a different take on it all.
Loved the original Apocalypse series.
Hated Tim Burton’s time travel remake
Don’t like the idea of them messing with the original
Don’t really care what they do with Tim Burton’s
So basically I’ll probably wait to see it on DVD as I do on most films I’m uncertain about.
How can that fit into the original apes films when they seem to be rewriting history rather than adding to it.
lol. what did you do, go through and list like every fox movie that came out so far this year? all the ones you listed actually made profit.
they seem pretty gutsy. I agree. bb
I hear from a friend who saw an advance screening that the change up is funny from beginning to end — something that I didn’t get from the preview. I’ll be catching it tomorrow.
I tried to send a response before (longer version), but I’m not sure it worked, so this is a shorter version.
The below statement made:
“But I don’t know why the trailers I saw mistakenly focused on James Franco who isn’t why moviegoers flocked to opening weekend”, is insulting to James Franco talents (an Oscar nominee for 127 Hours and in my opinion should have gotten something for Milk, Howl,Pineapple Express and James Dean), how the HELL do you know that the people didn’t go to see him too, he does after all have something called fans.
I know I did. Just because website’s like these expected this movie to fail big time so they could blame James Franco (seriously, move on from his Oscar hosting and get a life) and it backfired big time, they are jealous and gutted but they still have to find some angle to hate.
He’s in the trailer because when you watch the movie you will understand why and the bigger star but now it’s Andy’s turn to shine.
It took Andy and James to make magic that’s why the movie works so well. I don’t care what anyone says, James it’s extremely talented actor and he deserves more respect for his part in this movie.
James did enough (Andy specialises in his field and James is the Bio Pic guy to go to as well as other things).
Currently, there is a lot of hate for James Franco and I don’t know why? However, again this movie has showcased his talents (a future great) but yes, again, this was Andy’s movie but in all a team success.
I hope this movie gets Andy his well deserved Oscar but more importantly, I’m so glad it’s shamed the haters about James Franco.
I look forward to the next movie James Franco stars in (and ignore the haters, just pure jealously)and I hope this current billiant movie makes a billion (it’s the best blockbuster out-there)
This is the 3rd time, I’m typing this and why is my comments keep getting removed??????????
“But I don’t know why the trailers I saw mistakenly focused on James Franco who isn’t why moviegoers flocked to opening weekend. Fox was hoping for North American box office in the low-ball $30sM, so $54M is fantastic”, I will make this quicker – James Franco is an Oscar nominee with credits such as 127 Hours, Howl, Pineapple Express, James Dean and Milk but to name a few and importantly has fans (nothing to do with the Oscars – again people get over it, he has hardly made any mistakes in his long successful career).
Just because, the movie did so well and majority of websites expected this to flop (feel the shame now), so they could blame him again, it has backfired and I hope this makes a billion or more.
I don’t no why he’s currently being hated but he has fans and if you watch the movie you can understand why he’s in the trailer and a talented actor.
He shared equal time with Andy and although Andy stole the show, James was pretty solid too (they both brought magic and well done to all involved). James is known for bio pics whilst this is Andy’s time to shine and I sincerely hope Andy wins an Oscar for this.
I hope this feedback get’s to stay on deadline (it’s either my computer playing up or deadline not liking the truth – but I thought they were bigger than this).
James Franco is going nowhere and a future great.
That seems pretty weak…
Yeah, but the movie’s actually good. Once the word gets out, people will buy tickets.
There’s no way this movie is good. None.
Well apparently there is a way because it is good. The best thing about it is that it’s actually the most believable sci-fi plot I’ve seen in a very long time. That may seem hard to believe, but if you saw the film you’d get it. The idea that a biotech company would develop a virus to deliver a neurogenesis agent that could cure alzheimer’s but also make people smarter, and that they would first test it on chimps, isn’t exactly in the realm of “No way that could never happen!!!” It also helps that the movie spends the first hour and change making you care about the characters, including (and especially) the chimp.
It’s 93% top critics on RT. And BTW, if I were to shill here (which I never would) it would be for NBC/Uni.
There’s no way it can be good? Where do you get this god-like certainty?
The poster is talking about THE CHANGE UP
NOT
RISE
Looks good for around a 40 million weekend cume.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes is by far the best of all of the films. It answers the question “How” it all began.
More importantly, Andy Serkis, Weta and advanced technology create a believable mind set to fully assume the perspective from the Apes point of view…and, mostly through emotion.
This is another no brainer for the Academy VFX Oscar…truly extraordinary.
We can only hope that the Academy will reopen its position that motion capture acting for a cg character is not qualified to be recognized.
I had very low expectations for this film, but it turned out to be a good film. As for the visual effects, they were great, but there were a number of scenes where they looked really unpolished. I think the motion capture stuff will be enough to get this film nominated for visual effects, but I don’t think it deserves to win. But, overall, it’s still a good looking film.
Hey Smithy,
The effects weren’t perfect, but neither were they in the first Lord of the Rings which won the Oscar. When a film raises the bar this high, it is quite difficult to expect perfection in all the complex shots.
Which film to date would you give the Oscar for visual effects?
Of course the effects weren’t perfect in LotR, but they were groundbreaking 10 years ago and they were the best at the time. Apes improved upon the mo-cap technology, but I don’t think it raised the bar that high. I think the work here deserves to get nominated. But because there were a number of shots that looked mediocre, I really think that the Oscar should go to a film with the best visual effects overall. Of the films I’ve seen so far, I’d say that the effects in the last Potter film had the most solid effects. The dragon looked phenomenal and so did the giants and statues in the battle. There were also impressive work on CG environments. I thought Transformers 3 was just an okay film, but I’d have to admit that the effects were quite good. I’d say the effects in that film are probably just as good as (if not slightly better than) the effects in Apes.
To this day, most people are still shocked that the Golden Compass won the visual effects Oscar over the first Transformers. The work in Transformers has been excellent, but unless the Academy changes its obvious feelings towards Transformers, I would look for a nomination, but no win. The Potter film may justifiably win the Oscar, but that will be the Academy’s way of recognizing the franchise which has yet to win a visual effects Oscar, and the work in all the Potter films has ranged from good to outstanding. So, if you are correct…it is okay with me, too.
Regarding Rise of the Apes visual effects…it should win for two reasons. The work is outstanding and driven by acting…and, the bulk of the Academy voters are actors.
And, finally, the Academy in its ultimate wisdom has determined that the mo cap acting for a CG character is not worthy of a nomination…so, Rise may get some Andy sympathy votes as well.
For me, it is quite an accomplishment for an audience to logically understand they are watching CG characters…yet, somehow through Andy and Weta…these characters become real through emotional connection to the audience.
That being said, I do agree Potter ius worthy, too.
1100 theaters and no 3-D? How is that weak?
I’m sensing a monkey sized bomb here.
50 million opening weekend on a 93 million budget AND it has an 80% fresh rating on RT. Do you even know what you talk about or do you just troll with random comments?
This is Deadline. Troll-like comments are the norm here. It would have shocked me if someone DIDN’T claim that $50 million was a bomb.
Expectations were $30 to $50 million. So, obviously, the film is hitting the high end of those expectations. I doubt anyone at FOX is upset by these numbers. Also, given that this is the last blockbuster film of the summer, and that it’s getting such good reviews and WOM, it may have some strong legs.
Hey idiot, it wasn’t reporting at $50 million when the comment was made. DUH. The dude left a comment before numbers were in. The only troll here is you.
live/work in new york and have not seen a single ad for Apes (not joking). GL, HP7.2, and Cowboys ads still around everywhere but nothing for Apes – almost seems like fox isn’t fully committing. maybe + reviews will push it through.
Friday’s WSJ gave it a long, great review. (Oh, who owns the WSJ?) And they point out Charlton Heston has a TV cameo of some kind. (I haven’t seen the movie, but I’m guessing Heston must be an astronaut going into space in this one, setting up the original?)
So the built-in audience must be fans of the original, fans of ape rebellions, fans of motion capture hijinks. Will that demo be enough?
A clip of Heston from THE AGONY & THE ECSTASY is seen playing on a television. That is all.
There are a lot of subtle (and not-so-subtle) nods to the original series, but this movie plays as a standalone. Though, it’s basically a film adaptation of the verbal story told in CONQUEST.
It is a very well made sci-fi actioner (something we don’t see much of these days). I am a huge fan of the original series (well, ok, maybe not the last one) and I was not disappointed.
Though, I still wish they would have stuck with Scott Frank’s CAESAR screenplay….
Last I heard this is still $100 million budget movie. Its reviews are good for this series, but lets see how its second week drop off is before celebrating. The Tim Burton reboot had one of the biggest second week drop off Ive ever seen.
This is very true; the summer of 2001 became known for its massive opening box office weekends, and massive second weekend drop-offs.
I hope Captain America is still doing well.
Burton’s version was, alas, completely overblown, uninvolving and fairly dull (this despite all its action). Audience may or may not like this new one, but it’s still a story that is A) much more well told; and B) actually emotionally involving. Yeah, the human characters fade into the background, but I think the work that Weta/Serkis and the director did with the character of Caesar was pretty impressive.
Chenin rocks!
I would LOVE to get my hands on that budget!
I’m happy if this franchise has more life because I loved all the original films 30+ years ago.
What other shows does Fox have that demand a reboot / sequel / prequel etc.? Little screen to big screen meets
The Shield feature is a must. Free Ronnie Gardocki!
First off, I adore The Shield. Absolutely love it. But I don’t need a movie spin-off just as I don’t need a big-screen version of Arrested Development, Deadwood, Friday Night Lights, Entourage, etc. Yes, Sex & The City blew up at the box office. But that seems more like the exception than the rule.
The Smurfs has beaten C&A every day this week. Placing 1st at the BO. despite the Opening weekend race to the top.
I actually want to see Planet of the Apes. The original films were fun and campy. The first remake with Wahlberg was absolute trash.
I hope this does well; especially without all the 3D nonsense. Andy Serkis is an amazing actor. I think it is a shame that his talents are for the most part are only being used this way. He should be in films as himself..
He did appear in his everyday human form as Alley, an assistant to Nikola Tesla in “The Prestige.” He was quite good. Check out the movie if you haven’t seen it because it’s another one of Christopher Nolan’s brain-twisting wonders.
Serkis also stars in and is very entertaining in a nifty horror comedy called The Cottage from Britain. It’s gory and over the top but very funny, in my opinion, and worth checking out on DVD, esp. if you like that kind of thing.
Brain-twisting wonders? Are you serious? The Prestige was an insult to magic. The Illusionist was a far better film.
According to the reviews, this movie has very little action in it but the trailer makes it appear like it is an action movie. I wonder if people are going to be disappointed when they actually see the movie and it is mostly an ape-human family drama. This could lead to a steep drop off.
A ton of action… sparse action… who gives a shit? The only question that matters is IS THE MOVIE EXCITING, and apparently it is. If memory serves the Tim Burton “reimagining” of the 1968 original was pretty much wall-to-wall action and it sucked major bananas.
This one may suck too, but I’ve been hearing differently (and so have you).
There is in your face action, then there is cerebral action. Of course for those who are not much more than a shaved ape themselves then cerebral action is totally wasted on them.
Well said. Cerebral action can be (and usually is) far more exciting than the often idiotic kinetic variety.
Don’t get me wrong, the rough and tumble stuff can be exhilarating also — but only when it is used to punctuate a larger and well-written story.
Its better than the originals…
That’s a very, very low bar. The first Apes movie is okay but they quickly become verging on self-pardoy.
First PLANET OF THE APES is “okay” — are you kidding me? APES was one of the all-time great science fiction movies and a bonafide landmark in American film. What recent sci/fier even comes close?
Okay…
Olivia Wilde was a hype job. Too bad she is a nice person but not a movie star Nothing wrong with being a TV star. Shame. At least she had a shot.
Cowboys & Aliens did not underperform because of the film’s eye candy. She did as well as the other actors.
She may not be the cause of the lackluster performance, but she didn’t bring in a big audience. She is being hyped all over like she’s a box office draw, and clearly she isn’t.
You took the words right out of my mouth Milla,I like Olivia Wilde but she is not a “movie star” she doesn’t have the likability that actresses like Sandra Bullock and Angelina Jolie have, women cannot relate to her and men like her for obvious reasons but they won’t go out of their way to see a movie just because she’s in it. Her PR people are just like Blake Lively’s PR people, they overhype their product but their product cannot deliver, neither will ever be able to open a movie on their star power alone.
She hasn’t ever had to open a movie on her own. Until she does, this conversation is way premature.
no she isn’t
Olivia WIlde was overhyped. End of story.
She hasnt been the lead of a movie. cant be too hyped as just a suporter.
J-lo is a good example of overhyped. tons of leads that bombed.
Wilde hasnt had a shot at a true star-making turn. Dont know if she’ll nail it, but certainly hasnt had it yet.
She’s one of the three leads in C&A. It could have been a star making turn. Critics were luke warm on her performance. Angelina became a star off of Girl Interrupted and she wasn’t the lead. Sandra Bullock became a star playing the girl in Speed. Plenty of people have demonstrated their star potential in supporting roles.
J-Lo started getting a lot of attention after staring in Selena. In Wilde’s case she’s been getting a lot of attention without ever doing anything remarkable. She wasn’t the star of Tron, she joined House after it had already become popular and she’s not the star. The ratings for House didn’t get a bump when she returned after shooting C&A. There just isn’t any evidence that she is popular with the public.
Wilde could become a star but she isn’t now. The media should stop talking about her like she’s the next big thing until she demonstrates that she is something more than a very pretty face.
She’s not a lead in C & A, she’s the insert hot chick here. its a bad script, not much there to make a big impact.
those other roles you mentioned were much better written, much more key to the story and much more front and center.
She needs to take on some indie roles that require her to do some heavy lifting and arent just slighltly above the stock hot chick role in studio films.
everything is overhyped
no it isn’t
the only thing that needs a CHANGE UP is the Universal regime. that movie sucked.
Looking forward to seeing how they try to pin this one on Shmuger.
OMG YOURE SO FREAKING WITTY HOW U USED THE MOVIE TITLE IN YOUR NEGATIVE CRITICISM MY YOU ARE SO ORIGINAL
Calm down, Universal boy. Back away from the ledge…
using all caps and speaking text-ese is even LESS original. But thanks for playing.
OUCH for The Change Up! I was expecting a break out based on positive trailer reactions.
there’s been way too many R-rated comedies. People are on burnout, and ChangeUp is late to the party. Those numbers arent’ surprising at all.
And besides the burnout factor, how much comedy can you milk from the tired “switch” concept?
Please explain how people are “on burnout” over R-Rated comedies?
That feels like an unfair statement.
Comedies are comedies, Dramas are dramas. The rating factor shouldn’t play into it, should it?
If it’s funny, people will see it. If it isn’t, they won’t. The rating shouldn’t matter at all.
No?
I think the point is that after the successes of The Hangover 2, Bad Teacher, and Horrible Bosses, there’s no real hunger in the market to see another r-rated comedy this summer. Getting there first counts (look at Thor).
the rating of the movie shouldn’t matter – but I knew Change Up was in trouble when the ads were really touting the R Rating – implying that the gross-out humor was the reason to see it and that it really pushed the envelope. The sex/gross-out should be the least of the reasons to see it
I think people are just sick of Ryan Reynold’s face, especially after The Green Lantern. Would Hollywood please stop shoving this spray tanned douche down our throats?!
^^ jealous
Ryan Reynolds is the male Olivia Wilde… or something.
Neither is compelling on the screen but both keep getting jobs. Move on Hollywood try somebody else.
burn out on r-rated?
try terrible reviews, nothing funny in the trailer and oh — a body switching concept done to death.
bad movie with a bad concept. rating has nothing to do it.
Yeah that’s pretty much what I’ve been saying all weekend: When the unparallelled SICKNESS OF THE COMEDY is your biggest selling point then the movie itself is in deep doo doo.
I did see the movie, Jason and Ryan have great chemistry and the movie was funny, but I agree about the end of a summer of really raunchy films.
You’re forgetting the main reason it flopped, it’s getting bad reviews compared to Horrible Bosses and Bridesmaids. At least Bad Teacher got middling reviews. This is getting trounced left and right.
Any chance the almost unprecedented grossness of the comedy is what is scaring people away? All I know is, my wife and I are supposed to be seeing it tonight and I am practically breaking out in HIVES just thinking about it.
Not sure this is the right kind of anticipation for a summer comedy.
dont be so uptight, grandma
Ha! Well, sorry, but I just can’t help it… and judging by the first day’s box office, it looks like there are a LOT of uptight grandma’s out there, doesn’t it Steve?
This guy has a wife so obviously he’s not a grandma. Don’t be an idiot.
Everyone should just go see BELLFLOWER this weekend. Its the best movie of the year. The rest is who cares…
Is Olivia Wilde in BELLFLOWER? Is it about Olivia Wilde? Did Olivia Wilde see BELLFLOWER and like it? Will Olivia Wilde goe see it with me? Does Olivia Wilde want me to see BELLFLOWER and then tell her about it? What is the point of seeing a movie if there is no Olivia Wilde connection?
Olivia Wilde is box office poison
Change-Up and Cowboys both bombed because of Wilde, really? As opposed to just no one caring about her and her starring in two bad films (presuming Change-Up is bad–haven’t seen it)?
For Cowboys and Aliens yes, Olivia was hired to bring in young crowd…they stayed away from it in droves with only the older crowd showing up, so she failed them…next time hire Miley Cyrus
I think it’s an unfair assessment to consider Olivia’s career dismal after just two summer movies. These were two generic supporting female roles that could have been performed by any other pretty face. She needs to land a gig that can exhibit her acting prowess; a memorable or leading lady role. Go watch that Weird Yankovic trailer spoof on Funny or Die. That couple seconds of footage shows her potential.
(Not her publicist or part of her entourage for that matter. I just think she’s hot and funny; which is a good combo in my book.)
We’ve already got a target in which to vent our hate in Katherine Heigl. Why spew all the venom over Olivia? The noisy popcorn spectacle stuff is no way to judge potential. Everybody’s a frickin’ expert on here?
Her rottentomatoes profile is a big mess. Like the NYT she’s just a string of bad movies away from being Kate Hudson. I’d say she’s closer than she realizes. She had better cling for dear life to House.
Kate Hudson has a few successful rom-coms to date. Its not as if she is headlining a tentpole. And moreover, Kate Hudson is genuinely talented, with a very good shortfilm directorial career. Wilde, who knows or cares.
Kate Hudson had exactly one good film perfomance in Almost Famous. She got her raves and awards, unfortunately for her not the Oscar because that was her first and last shot, now she’s done.
She may have inherited Goldie’s body but she’s got Bill Hudson’s talent. Not unlike her equally untalented brother Oliver.
She has proven to be a terrible actress even her make up commercials are dumb. Over.
Name ONE female box office star other than a borderline Cam Diaz – Wilde will never be a legend but she had ZERO to do with C&A bombing. The 3458 other alien flicks recently released handled that.
For what it’s worth, I liked the Tim Burton version. I will give this a try.
That is a massive bomb for Universal. Massive. They spent so much money marketing this film – as one executive told me “we are going to manufacture and buy a hit”…. guess not.
Now that Jason Bateman has starred in yet another bomb, can Hollywood please stop casting him in everything or does he have the same photos of studio execs as Jennifer Aniston does?
Bateman’s terrific — arguably the best and most appealing comic actor of his generation (with Vince Vaughn running him a close second). And I’m not sure I’d agree with you and your doom-and-glooming there, Basil, considering that HORRIBLE BOSSES is shaping up to be a fair size hit for the guy.
I was with you until you called vince vaughn the best. He is easily at the bottom of my list. So annoying.
But agreed about Horrible Bosses. That was a big $100mil hit!
I put Bateman over Vaughn, Geek.
I love Bateman. What a hoot it might have been to have cast Bateman and Reynolds in “Cowboys & Aliens.” Now that’s a change-up I could root for.
I have enjoyed many of foxs recent movies including x men, water for elephants, and this apes movie I saw earlier today.
These three movies have more to them and my taste than other I have recently seen and appeal to people with brains, that are tastefully done
Saw Apes today. Loved it. Won’t even say it was because of low expectations. It’s just flat-out great. It gets better as it goes along, which is unheard of in most summer films.
I second what was said above – I haven’t seen one billboard for this. Strange (and unfortunate, since it’s better than anything that’s been released this summer). Hope the word of mouth does the work. It deserves it.
I just hope studios aren’t blaming THE CHANGE UP’s low numbers on the fact that it’s rated R. In my opinion, that has nothing to do with it. It’s bombing cause it looks like a movie we’ve already seen a million times. People don’t care enough about the rating. If it were an original, funny looking rated R movie with the same stars, director, writers, etc, it’d do better. Reynolds or Bateman also shouldn’t get the blame for this one. Universal thought about the marketing of it from the very beginning. Being able to say, “The Director of Wedding Crashers” and “The Writers of the Hangover.” That’s why they gave this crap a greenlight. Poop decision on their part. Marketing gimmicks alone can’t open a movie. Actors alone can’t open a movie (save Will Smith). It’s the material. Most people throughout the country, and world, when picking a movie, simply ask themselves, “do I want to see that?” That’s it. People don’t care if it was written by the Hangover guys or directed by the wedding crasher guy simply because it’s NOT the Hangover and it’s NOT Wedding Crashers.
The same logic works for why the actors on the show “Friends,” for example, can’t get a new show going to save their lives. People don’t care that Matthew Perry is on a new show, because on that new show, he’s not playing “Chandler,” and that new show is not called “Friends.” Unless Matthew Perry is playing Chandler on Friends, he’s got just as good a chance of his show succeeding than anyone else. It’ll come down to, simply, “does it look good” …and for legs, “Is it good?”
I agree with your comments and will use “Mr. Sunshine” as support.
I’m not a Perry fan but “Mr. Sunshine” was a really solid show.
So you might (unfortunately) be correct.
How long does a star of a huge hit series need to be “gone” before they’re allowed to be “accepted” again?
It seems that in the last 20 or so years very few (comedy-wise) have had hits.
I know Patricia Heaton (“Everybody Loves Raymond”/”The Middle”) and Ed O’Neill (“Married With Children”/”Modern Family”) are names you can use but O’Neill went 12 years in between hits.
Other sit-com stars? Not so much success afterward.
And Ted, I am not blaming the movie’s failure on its R-rating, per se, but rather on its off-the-chart grossness. I mean, I’m supposed to be seeing it with three friends of mine tomorrow and I’m scared, man, SCARED — with knots in my stomach like I haven’t felt since I going to see the first ALIEN back in ’79.
All I can think is, “OhmyGodohmygodohmyGod, what the hell am gonna be SEEING up there?”
And I don’t think I’m supposed to be feeling that way about a comedy.
if you’re scared, then why are you going to go, guy?!
it’s designed to make you laugh, and if you’re not going into the theater with the intention of laughing, save two hours, 20 bucks (if you get skittles and a soda), and stay home.
better yet– why don’t you READ A BOOK?
Actually I just begged off about fifteen minutes ago, so GOOD ADVICE JEFF! Whether or not I will be reading a book tonight or streaming something poop-free on Netflix is a decision I will make in a few hours. But the headline is, I’m not gonna be shelling out $11.50 to go watch flying shit! Hallelujah!!!
Thank you for writing my post for me – stars don’t make people come to the theaters – they are a big part but the movie is everything. Did folks flock to see Franco or the Apes? Easiest question ever.