With independent board members privately rebelling and institutional investors publicly complaining about inadequate corporate governance in the wake of the UK phone-hacking scandal, News Corp’s board of directors is scheduled to meet Tuesday in Los Angeles ahead of the company’s fiscal year-end earnings release the next day. Now the media giant’s Wall Street Journal is reporting that Elisabeth Murdoch and the media giant have shelved plans for her to join the board for now. The 42-year-old daughter of News Corp
Chairman/CEO Rupert Murdoch was expected to join the board as part of her return to the company through News Corp’s acquisition of the Shine Group, the television-production company she runs. Rupert had even said in a news release in February that he expected her to join the board when the £415 million ($680 million) Shine acquisition was completed in April. News Corp independent director Viet Dinh said in a statement Friday that Elisabeth ”felt it would be inappropriate” to join the company board at its annual meeting later this year and the company’s independent directors agreed.
The timing is awkward because of shareholder concerns about News Corp corporate governance because of the UK phone-hacking scandal which has tarnished Rupert and son James and several top execs. The Murdoch family maintains a 40% voting stake that gives it effective control of the media giant. Three Murdochs — 80-year-old Rupert, 38-year-old James, and 39-year-old Lachlan — already serve on the company board. In all, seven of the company’s 16 board seats are held by Murdochs and News Corp executives. Meanwhile, the Shine acquisition is the subject of a shareholder lawsuit alleging that News Corp gave Elisabeth a sweetheart deal. Dinh said the board and Elisabeth Murdoch hope her decision to hold off joining the board ”reaffirms that News Corp aspires to the highest standards of corporate governance and will continue to act in the best interests of all stakeholders.” Elizabeth is not the only Murdoch scion under extra scrutiny: James has had to fend off calls from some BSkyB shareholders for him to surrender his chairmanship of British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC, which is 39% owned by News Corp.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


“…highest standards of corporate governance…” WHAT A JOKE! The board of directors is under the stranglehold of Rupert Murdoch, and everyone – inside and outside the company – knows that. It’s packed with Murdochs and their cronies and puppets.
I sure hope the British phone scandal widens even more and smears James all over, taking him out. And if there’s a god, the FBI will uncover some great big embarrasments on Fox News and get Roger Ailes to answer questions in front of a senate subcommittee.
Why? Elizabeth seems to be the one Murdoch untouched by the scandal. I think there is a brother down in Aussie Land who through in the towel, Elizabeth spoke out against the “wiry red headed editor” saying how she fu@ked up. She seems to have a good head on her shoulder and can sit on Rupert’s saying NO Bad Idea-or
or Good Idea. Why should the corporation do without her guidance. Not accepting seems to validate there will be no change in the moral compass of the company. Bad Idea.
Robbie Goldstein
Shes untouched for now. She’s a Murdoch, so I’m sure shes another lying low life
On the other hand, she’s up for membership in the International Female Boxing Association.
Let the Sibling in- fighting escalate! Can’t imagine how pissed off Elisabeth is about this, no matter what she has said publicly. Her mission is to save Newscorp from her idiot brothers and now James is messing that up!
I hope they wind up taking this whole crowd to prison.
News Corp’s board needs to disassociate with the Murdoch name. Loyalty to the point of share price. Off with their head.
Has anyone noticed how each of the characters in this seedy series of revelations is spectacularly evil looking?
They’re coming for you, Piers…
Somehow the woman always gets screwed.
The Murdoch family has used media power to their own ends for decades, regardless of the harm it has cost others. Are we supposed to feel bad for the rich girl?
since when does any of murdock or his family who own the company lock stock and barrel suddenly decide they are not going through with something due the timing looking bad and wanting to keep a high standard when that went out the window with the scandal. for surely if Rupert pushes it she will wind up on the board yet