The Pew Research Center for People and the Press offers a clue today into why the battle in Washington to raise the debt ceiling ended up with a deficit-reduction deal that would just cut spending with no increase in taxes. Those who wanted budget cuts paid the most attention. In the last week in July, the story accounted for 47% of the news coverage in newspapers, TV, radio and the Internet; that was appropriate at a time when 41% of all adults considered it the most riveting development according to Pew’s weekly survey of public interest in the news. But if you look more closely, you’ll find that 66% of Republicans and supporters of the Tea Party closely tracked the budget negotiations vs 34% of those who held different views or had no opinion. What’s more, about 20% of the Tea Party supporters contacted an elected official. Only 5% of those who disagreed with the group did so. Interestingly, young people — who had the most at stake in the debate — were least motivated to try to influence the outcome. Only 19% of adults between 18 and 29 followed the story closely and 1% contacted an elected official. By contrast, about 54% of people over 50 kept up with the budget debate with 16% contacting an official. Pew’s findings come from a telephone poll of about 1,000 adults (including both landline and cell customers) and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.


Congratulations, Tea Party. You got what you wanted. And good luck trying to retire at 65 with no Social Security, no Medicare and your 401(k) sucked dry by Wall Street. At least the rich get to keep their corporate jets.
Pretty much. I don’t see how any of these tea-baggers really give a shit at all, considering most of them probably don’t make 6 or 7 figures a year.
The 49% of the remaining taxpayers in America don’t want their taxes raised to support the tens of millions of fatherless welfare garbage, illegals, or their anchor babies–otherwise known as Democrat voters.
Kapeesh?
“The 49% of the remaining taxpayers in America don’t want their taxes raised to support the tens of millions of fatherless welfare garbage, illegals, or their anchor babies…”
Oh, I get it — selfish, racist pricks. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Until I realized how racist you were, I was having trouble figuring out why so many lower-middle class people were voting against their own interests in order to protect massive tax cuts for billionaires (which is also welfare, just to rich white men).
Keep fighting the good fight, Teatards!
Exactly what part of what Smarg said was “racist”? “fatherless welfare garbage”? “illegals”? “anchor babies”?
Frankly, I’m sick of it too and this country is now at a point where we can no longer fund such things.
Angry, yes, but “racist”? You would help yourself be taken more seriously if you would bother to actually read what you commented on.
I probably will pay more in taxes this year than you make. And I’m a Democrat, AKA, “Job Creator”. My family fought in the Revolutionary War.
Go back to Italy. We don’t need you Eurotrash immigrants here.
“My family fought in the Revolutionary War.”
Oh which side?
You’re playing into their hands. Divide and Conquer, you really shouldn’t be angry with the previous poster, but with the Federal Government.
You forgot the military–
$500 Billion a year and counting, that’s the Pentagon’s budget plus the wars, why are we in Libya?? Still in Iraq? I thought puppet Obama was going to get us out, yeah right!
It not just money it’s our innate rights that are being stripped every day.
The Koch brother’s are the actual founders of the tp and they are multi-billionaires….The joke is on the poor folks who don’t know that they are funding these creeps..All because of hate..
I like how the tea-baggers who suddenly complain about where our tax dollars are going didn’t seem to care when Bush blew it on Iraq.
Judy the joke is on you–whose behind the federal government, whose behind Obama? It’s not Michelle.
SS and Medicare need to be reformed in order to save them. No amount of “taxing the rich” is going to do it.
Also, according to 2010 IRS numbers, the top 5%, (ie: “The RICH,”)pay 59% of ALL Federal Income Taxes.
How much more do you want them to pay? 70%? 90%? I mean, where is the limit with you people?
The RICH pay very little taxes when it is A PERCENTAGE OF INCOME. I know this because I am rich.
On average, the middle class pays apprx 30-35% of their income in tax. Meaning on $100,000, they pay $35K…
The rich pay apprx 15%. Meaning, on a million, they pay $150K.
So yeah, they pay more in terms of total funds, but as a percentage of income, the middle class are the ones who get screwed. They don’t have loan outs or capital gains breaks helping them.
So where’s the limit? There should be no limit to fairness all around. Keep squeezing the middle class out of their buying power and the economy will never fully recover.
The middle class and evidently some rich people have been fooled by the politicians to thinking that the answer is to have the rich pay more. This is just manipulation. WAKE UP. It’s not rich against poor. Fairness all around would make ti so the tax code isn’t designed to let the rich get breaks. Simplify the whole thing. Make it actually fair and not just so complicated that you can’t take advantage of it unless you can afford outside help. Everyone pay their fair share. Flat tax does that. Maybe consumption tax. But the present system is designed by politicians to keep us fighting with ourselves and them in jobs. Don’t be a fool.
You know the CBO released a report stating that if you taxed “THE RICH” at 100% it would do next to nothing to help the debt.
Taxing anyone more is not the answer. Cutting govt spending is.
Democrats that don’t want to cut spending are like kids who have maxed out their credit cards. They run out and get another one and then tell their parents to pay the bill because they have more money.
It makes no sense. Keep up that line of thinking and we are headed the way of Greece.
excuse me, would you please open your history books and do a little homework before claiming that raising taxes wouldn’t be a good thing for america right now. when i was young and got into trouble with my credit card, yes, i stopped spending but i also paid more down every month so i could reduce the insane interest i was paying. capital gains is a scam. the other commenter is correct. ordinary americans pay 30-35% on their income – i.e., someone who earns 100K only takes home 65K. bankers and hedge fund managers call their income capital gains and only pay 15% – so they would, in effect take home 85K if they were on the same salary. where is the justice in that? stop being so naive.
I’m sure no one’s reading anymore but I’ll post this anyway for all those who think raising taxes on “THE RICH” will solve everything:
Official government numbers on tax collections (direct revenues) as a percentage of our total economy (GDP).
-Revenues rose to the standard 18% in 2006-8 despite Bush tax cuts
-Revenues are projected to increase to 17% in 2012 despite no anticipated increase in tax rates.
-Revenues are down in 2009, 2010 & 2011 because of the recession—not tax cuts
- 1987: Reagan top tax rate: 28% —> Revenue 18%
- 1995: Clinton top tax rate: 39.6% —> Revenue 18%
- 2007: Bush top tax rate: 35% —> Revenue 18%
These numbers are from your precious govt. Do you understand? Raising taxes in not the answer. CUTTING SPENDING IS.
If you are so rich, perhaps you would be willing to donate more money to charities or the federal government. No one is stopping you – you can pay more in taxes if you want. I find it amusing that people claim to be rich and believe in wealth redistribution never stop to think of this possible alternative. Give your money away to an organization that will make a difference, instead of a government that only proves how well they waste it.
Social Security and Medicare need to be phased out not reformed.
Clearly you are in the percentage who did not pay attention. The entire point of this is to get the financial structure back on track – do you even understand what the debate was all about? It’s about a reduction in the increase, not even a reduction in the current budgeted figures.
I am in my 40s, and more than happy to accept a lower social security payment, kick in more on medicare and fund most of my own retirement. And I don’t make alot of money. Just get our debt reduced – and yes, do it by decreasing the spend, and not adding to taxes. I’ve lived and worked in Europe, and we seem to be heading down the same unsustainable path. Time to deal with it. Now.
Yes, I understand the debate, such as it was, fully. The debt was caused by two massive wars, a handout to pharmaceutical companies via Medicare Plan D and two huge tax cuts for the rich. Entitlements should never have been part of the debate because they did not cause this massive deficit. Remember the Clinton years? We had massive surpluses, all thanks to a modest increase in revenues and wise spending.
Trust me, you will not happily want to receive less in Social Security. Think about how expensive everything is now and then imagine what it’ll be like in 20 years. Add to that the fact that wages have stagnated for most Americans while the cost of everything – especially healthcare – rises exponentially. You might not rue this day right now, but trust me, you will. We all will. Unless you somehow magically become wealthy. That’s really anyone’s only hope.
“The debt was caused by two massive wars, a handout to pharmaceutical companies via Medicare Plan D and two huge tax cuts for the rich.”
No it wasn’t. The cost of both wars COMBINED over 10 years is about 1-1.5 trillion. Obama’s annual deficit is 1.7 trillion. By the way, Obama hasn’t ended the previous wars, and only started new ones. “Tax cuts for the rich” had nothing to do with it. Revenues went UP after the tax cuts. Look it up. The gov’t takes in more in revenue after the tax cuts than before. Bush cut marginal taxes from 39 to 35%. You think that 4% created a 14.5 trillion deficit. Not even you are that stupid.
Obama has added over $4 trillion to the debt in 2.5 years. he raised spending by 1 trillion a year without paying for it. He spent another 1 trillion on a “stimulus” package that went straight to government unions and produced double digit unemployment.
“Entitlements should never have been part of the debate because they did not cause this massive deficit.”
You have absolutely no grasp on reality. Entitlements are more than 80% of the entire federal budget. Entitlements are all Ponzi schemes, requiring an ever widening base of workers to support those that are retiring, or who will not work. The USA has promised its people 100-200 trillion in entitlements over the next 40 years, when there is only 50-60 trillion in $$ on the ENTIRE PLANET EARTH. Good luck taking it from the rest of the planet.
“Remember the Clinton years?”
Yes, but apparently you don’t. Clinton’s budget was what? 1.8 trillion? Obama’s is 3.8 trillion? How about we go back to Clinton era spending? Hmmmmm????? Clinton cut taxes. He cut the capital gains tax from 28 to 20. That would be a “TAX CUT FOR THE RICH”.
Your problem is not only having absolutely no grasp of the facts whatsoever, not only do you believe in the socialist fairy tale of endless entitlements paid for by magical money trees, but you actually believe that your only chance for survival is for some rich guy to give you his money. With those values, I can assure you: you will not survive.
ds,
Median family income went DOWN under the Bush tax cuts. Who says so? The Census Bureau! Job growth was weaker under the Bush Tax cuts than under any other post WWII era. Who says so? The Bureau of Labor Statistics.
You people on the right are so hate-filled and irrational, it’s like you’ve all collectively had a schizophrenic break and are no longer capable of intersecting with reality.
The wars did cause the debt, Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion, and the Bush tax cuts were piss poor job creators. YOU LOOK IT UP! Oh, and by the way, Saddam DID NOT have any weapons of mass destruction and there is no Easter Bunny.
You didn’t refute any of the facts I cited. Because you can’t.
“Median family income went DOWN under the Bush tax cuts.”
An irrelevant stat since it was skewed down by the influx of millions of new immigrants.
“Job growth was weaker under the Bush Tax cuts than under any other post WWII era.”
Unemployment under Bush was around 5% for 6 out of Bush’s 8 years. Not as good as 9.2% under Obama though.
“You people on the right are so hate-filled and irrational….”
Ad hominem tantrum means you lose the argument.
“The wars did cause the debt, Bush doubled the debt from 5 trillion to 10 trillion”
And Obama will take it from 10 trillion to 25 trillion. But you’re cool with that.
“Saddam DID NOT have any weapons of mass destruction”
Neither does Qaddafi. I’ll bet you’ll be joining all the Dem anti-war rallies in front of the White House any day now.
The two biggest costs if you will are the military industrial complex and medicare.
Look people the federal government needs to be cut by at least 50% that would be a start.
No wrong the surplus under Clinton wasn’t actually a real surplus Clinton took money from Social Security or what D.C. calls borrowing and then called it a surplus, there never was a surplus. Besides government should never have surplus, government cannot take away capital from the private sector…it should have debt either, frankly it shouldn’t exist. Government is a criminal organization only able to function through theft and violence.
The debt was caused by fiat money, who prints the money? the Federal Reserve and what is the Federal Reserve? They are legal counter fitters. Lesson over. Good luck with inflation.
in addition to all the wars etc. YES, Entitlement Programs Are a major contributing factor to Our Debt! Stop the politicians Drunken Sailor Spending And Stop the Payback to the Big Corporations and Unions And Yes, Stop the Entitlements Especially to ILLEGALS! Just stop handing Our $$$ to Illegals and That Alone will Help diminish the national debt, although it Won’t rid it all together, but it Will take a Huge Bite Out Of The National Debt.
Hyperbole much? There is a difference between making a cut and slowing the rate of growth. Social Security and Medicare will remain intact with no reforms.
You’re assuming this is over. It is not. This is only the beginning. Further cuts will be enacted when the so-called Super Congress deadlocks over their recommendations (because you know that six Republicans and six Democrats will not agree on anything.) Know what happens after that? An automatic $1.5 trillion cut that will hit entitlements. Meanwhile, the Republicans will continue to assault Medicare and SS, because they’ve been trying to axe both programs since they were put in place.
Wrong! Nobody that voted against the raising the debt ceiling is allowed in the Super Congress -completely unconstitutional by the way- and they will not be cut entitlements, but raising taxes without any input from Congress except yes or no. Plus the executive branch will be the 13th member. This is a completely change of how our federal government has been structured for 200 yrs. This is disgusting.
Social Security is a ponzi scheme that should be eliminated along with all entitlements.
if social security is a ponzi scheme that needs to be stopped, then let’s stop the ponzi scheme that is called wall st as well. at least regular americans, up until now, have got something out of the SS ponzi scheme, unlike the other one. how about that Lara?
By the way what Cuts were made? Please be specific? Which bureaucracy has been eliminated? Which agency has been eliminated? Whose salaries in gov. have been cut? Do tell???
The Tea Party Patriots Did What They Could Do About Debt Ceiling And Play According To The Rules Made Up As They Went, Yikeess, Now Remember Nothing About A Budget, Because Our Leader Has Not Had A Budget For Two Years, But With The Same Forked Tongue That Gave Us “Hope And Change” Sucker’s Gave-Up That “Blank Check” Again. God Bless America And Sarah Palin.
Tom, your comment never had a chance, man. You come in here waving them capital letters around and hyperventilating your text. Take a breather, pal. This smells like Fritos and death.
there are no spending cuts, you can’t bind future Congress’ to spending cuts, e.g. cuts over 10 yrs. that’s total nonsense.
they just passed a “Super Congress” committee by 12 that will be raising your taxes don’t worry you get to bailout the banksters yet again and the politicians.
who runs the gov.? Oh right the rich why would they raise taxes on themselves?? When they say rich they mean middle class, that’s you!!
The ignorance is incredible.
You have no idea what’s coming, no idea
we have $70 Trillion Defecit/Debt do you understand what that means…of course not b/c you think that you need to pay more taxes. WOW!
You have no idea what just happened in D.C. if you think that some folks who are NOT in gov. who do NOT run the gov. who have NO say in the gov.- actually much like you- wrote and passed the current bill—
If it didn’t affect me I’d be laughing at you all night and day.
If you only knew who is really running the show, it ain’t some “tea party people” that’s for sure…you are so buying into the political theater.
Why is this a surprise?
Reminds me of the WGA strike when reality tv people didn’t show up on the picket lines. Call it apathy, ignorance, or a lack of leadership, but those who had the most to gain were nowhere to be found.
actually, lot’s of reality people showed up for the start of the strike, as well as meetings in the previous year. most stopped when the WGA blinked and dropped the reality stipulation about 2 seconds into the strike.
Remind me again why ‘reality’ shows need writers?
Because they aren’t really “real”.
If there’s anything Obama and Democrats have taught the base, and particularly young voters, it’s that your voice means little to nothing.
Hardly new to this administration, but he has perfected it.
Um, it means your voice can’t just be heard in the election. Young people vote and they think they are done having to participate. The young voters only have themselves to blame.
That’s because the liberal base is outright ridiculous. They don’t think there’s anything wrong with having a $14.5 trillion debt and a $1.5 trillion deficit.
Everyone, including the overwhelming majority of the American people, think something has to be done about the debt/deficit and the liberals are the only ones who seem completely oblivious about this.
That’s why NOONE listens to them. If they had approached this from a reasonable point of view, as in: had some type of plan or even guideline as to how they were going to tackle the deficit/debt this would never have happened in the first place. The reason the radical Tea Party dominated this discussion was because the were the only ones talking about it at all, which gave them the upper hand.
Want to blame anyone, blame yourselves.
You’re kidding right? I want to blame Republicans and GWB for most of the debt and the deficit. Here’s a break down of the debt again brainiac:
3 TRILLION added to our deficit with the GWB tax cuts
300 BILLION in the unpaid for medicare part D, that tea party patriots like Eric Cantor, Orrin Hatch and Jon Boehner voted for (and the tax cuts).
200 BILLION for TARP (by GWB, thank you very much)
1.4 TRILLION for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (and counting!!)
How much has Obama added? If you think 10 Trillion you need to retake elementary math.
I don’t know about you but I screamed my head off about this debt for the last ten years. Welcome to the party, sorry it took a democrat in the white house to get you here (or a black man).
I’m not sure if I’m buying it. How the hell do they know who was watching this. And lets face it this is media- not the most honest people this days. They spin shit every way they can
The media is spinning the narrative that the Tea Party won. The didn’t win squat. 7 billion in spending cuts the first year equals 17 minutes of federal government spending. All other cuts are “proposed” and 2 years away, which means they’re not going to happen.
47% of the USA don’t pay federal taxes. 2.4 more million in spending isn’t going to help. We need to cut spending. GE reported a profit of 5.1 billion and 14.2 billion worldwide, yet paid ZERO federal taxes AND continues to outsource their workforce. THAT’S more troubling than a feckless bill that ties spending to the GDP.
Reid still vows more taxes. Obama spews “fair share”. Please…
America is producing less, consuming more and all on borrowed money.
2.4 Trillion more in spending. Million shows my age…
i think actually the tea baggers taught us…why can’t we (dems) learn to get more emotional and have a voice–this study shows those who spoke up were heard.
Or… maybe no one listens to you because you throw around the term “tea baggers” and expect to be taken seriously…
@sd – Just maybe some of us will work hard and save our money with the goal of helping ourselves retire instead of the all to common idea that it is the Governments responsibility to pay for our retirement!
Maybe now with this distraction out of the way we can start to prosecute the Fast and Furious gun runner criminals.
good luck with your wall st retirement plan. if it’s a 401k type plan do you really think it’s going to be there, or be enough when you need it? better off putting it under your pillow and hoping the tooth fairy will help you out.
Of course they did. They’re the most clued-in to how the real science of economics works, as they do not believe in the fantasy world of pot-o-gold toting government Leprechauns and magical no-cost-healthcare unicorns that the Left does.
Thank you Tea Party Republicans for finally doing what we elected you to do. Thank you for being honest and having the conviction to hold true to your promises. If we have to live on a budget so should our government. Blank check has been Voided.
So those “dumb”, “Ignorant”, “racist” Tea Partiers actually paid closer attention and got involved in their government. Well who do they think they are? Citizens or something?
If you are a Progressive it is time to start voting for the most left wing candidates in your primary in the way the Teabaggers did.
Left of Kucinich even.
Then even if we are a minority in Congress the folks elected will obstruct and blackmail our government into getting what we really want:
Single payer healthcare, legalized pot and a forced gay marriage for Eric Cantor.
Left of Kucinich? Um, I don’t think Karl Marx is a registered candidate.
When are we democrats going to figure it out? Most of the radical right make peanuts. Let them gut the entire safety net, they are the ones we will end up stepping over on the street in ten years. I guess I just don’t care any more, I’ll keep making money and the rest of the country can enjoy reaping what it has sown.
Really? Wanting better management of a system that has given us debt in the trillions is radical?
Right wing debt meet right wing apologist.
Until the right is willing to talk about military spending they have no credibility.
Anyway, I make close to mid six figures, I got mine, so fuck the rest. Shit, I think I just became a Republican.
Welcome to the club. I’ll be delighted to teach you the secret handshake.
Thank you, if you mean the one finger handshake, I already know it!
Bush II got me two national catastrophes, two unfunded wars, $6 trillion in deficits, a world financial meltdown, and all I got was no Social Security and a 401(k) full of ashes, thanks to his (and his Republican Congress) spending like a drunken sailor.
It’s too bad the Democrats have to act like responsible adults and clean up after him and catch the flak. Republicans tell us that government doesn’t work, and they’ve spent the last thirty years doing their best to prove it. If it’s in their best interest to destroy our country, they put their party first, which means they’re violating their oath of office, if not committing outright treason.
You know your President has some massive issues when you’re blaming the previous administration 3 years into your term.
It wasn’t W’s fault! It was Clinton! And Bush I! And Reagan! And Carter! And the world’s flatness led to the decline!
Hillary,
I love how people like you frantically, desperately want to pretend like the 8 years of Bush/Cheney and the 6 years of Republican rule in Congress under them didn’t happen and didn’t do anything to damage the country and the world. You and your entire sociopathic party are a disgrace to humanity!
I can’t help but laugh at the Tea Party. They are truly everything that is wrong with this country and part of the reason the U.S is treated like a joke now. Then again, when a bunch of inept mongols from backwoods backgrounds and social status group together, how can you take them seriously? And yes, I do believe the bulk of the Tea Party is stupid. I think the whole movement is a few smart, rich people playing the stupid and uneducated. Why else would low class trash want to cut benefits that aid them?
Say what you want about liberalism. I don’t care. However, the hateful vitriol of the far right is far more of a threat to this country than “socialism” ever will be. I wonder if more shootings caused by sociopathic right-wing extremist will show the errors of just how dangerous some of this hateful rhetoric people are preaching is.
Interesting how you refer to the “hateful vitriol of the far right,” “sociopathic right-wing extremist(s)” and “this hateful rhetoric” in the same post in which you refer to those who disagree with you as “inept mongols from backwoods backgrounds.” Then, just in case no one caught on to what you were saying, you call them “stupid,” and “low class trash.”
Thank you for showing everyone your true nature. Just keep trying to stir up fear and hatred of any and all who disagree with you, and to whom you feel inferior. You’re only a few steps away from many other “progressives” who convinced their fellow citizens that euthenasia and genocide of “inferiors” was a good idea.
‘mongols’ are an asiatic people, I think you meant to hate on whitey.
What a sad and embarrassing little contradiction Timothy is…
Are you refering to Timothy McVie and trying to prove Timothy’s point?
The Tea Party knows that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are against Christ, so like Planned Parenthood they have to go. We are the greatest, most powerful, most Christian country ever in the history of the world, and God will take good care of us until His Son returns to set the world on fire.
Lol! Brilliant satire, whether intentional or not:)
Research Planned Parenthood started by a eugenicist–
You’re actually supporting a major racist organization and you don’t even know it.
@Done – Really, I though the right was a bunch of Jet Owning Fat Cats? You go ahead and make more money, and vote for higher taxes as I’m sure that the peanut making TEA Partier’s will be happy to enjoy the “entitlements” that you will be paying for!
Racists have a lot in common with Narcissists. Racists love to watch themselves. Yeah, just to be clear. The Tea Party is full of racists who vote other racists like Joe Walsh and Doug “Lame” Lamborn into office.
And that cracker Marco Rubio!
Wait a tick….
@Hamranhamranhansenhanran – From 1945 to 2010 the Democrats have held a majority in Congress ( both chambers ) for 23 sessions as compared to 6 for the Republicans. And under Bush II 1 split and 2 of each majority. And both wars were voted on and approved with bipartisan support ( unlike Libya )!
@Timothy – What “shootings caused by sociopathic right-wing extremist” are you speaking of of? Think before you answer that! Crazy people are CRAZY! They come from all parts of the political spectrum. For every one from the right there is one from the left so stop being part of the problem with your Extremist blah blah, TEA party is full of stupid people, bull! Is that not hateful vitriol ? Hypocritical rhetoric doesn’t exactly make you look to “smart”!
Very well put!
I called Visa today to get my credit line increased.
They said that I was maxed out, my payment is due tomorrow and, because I have clearly become an over-spending credit risk, they couldn’t grant me a credit line extension.
I said “I know my payment is due tomorrow, but I’m going to default on it unless you give me more money.”
Hmmm…
If you’re not rich, why sit in the rich man’s pocket?
That’s what I dont get about some folks. The rich don’t make decisions on what benefits the poor – they make decisions on what benefits THEMSELVES. Just like the poor should make decisions on what benefits THEMSELVES.
instead, you get the poor eating up bullshit that “if you tax the rich more, you’ll never work!” or “You wouldn’t like to be taxed as much if you were rich” or “Government services are TOO MUCH” lmao. Sounds like Stockholm Syndrome to me.
ah well.
@Hope and Change is not a Strategy
Slow down and try to make some sense. W Bush came into office with a budget surplus. By the time he was finished the World Trade Center was gone, the budget was SIX TRILLION DOLLARS more in the red, and the country was in the worst economic shape since the Great Depression. (I just Thank God he didn’t privatize Social Security when he tried, or all our retirement savings would have been gone in the stock market.)
Some of us remember Reagan (who tripled the deficit and enacted the greatest tax increases) and other Republican paragons of fiscal, as well as personal, irresponsibility.
Which CBO report says that? That is 100% bs. Since the 80′s the top 5% of wealth has received the greatest percentage of tax decreases in history. The tea partiers all tow the same line: “I’m a threated white taxpayer and I’m sick of supportinv the world.” When in fact they have maintained or increased their wealth on the backs of the rest of the world. Stop being so persecuted and pay what everyone else pays! The loudest voices are also the delusional upper middle class who thinks they’re wealthy.
The reality is that “Teabaggers” are more well informed than the average democrat voter, who is too self-absorbed and has little interest in “boring” issues like the budget debate.
Do I agree with the Tea Party on this particular issue? Yes and no; I think that anyone with a functioning brain realizes that spending has been excessive and that it needs to be put in check for the fiscal health of the nation. However, tax increases are sometimes necessary as well, and it is ridiculous to completely take them off the table.
Basically, this is a complex, nuanced issue, one that both the majority of the “Teabaggers”, as well as the brainless leftist sheeple who typically comment on this site, are ill-equipped to tackle.
So how does the Tea Party feel about the outsourcing of jobs, as GE did? How do they feel about the huge gap between the 5% that have the majority of the wealth and everyone else? How do they feel about the loss of the middle class? The only message I hear is “don’t raise taxes” and “no more debt”. Is there more to it? Rick seems to be the first person who (sorry if I’m wrong) sympathize with the tea party who mentioned the outsourcing and the corporations that do not pay taxes.