Diane Haithman is contributing to Deadline’s coverage of TCA.
At this summer’s TCA, across the networks, there has been more than one panel including earnest, beautiful young women, mostly clad in teeny-tiny skirts and architecturally challenging platform heels, talking about how retro shows about gaggles of “girls” answering primarily to male bosses are actually all about female empowerment. Network execs and show producers also seem to be repeating the girl-power mantra. The main cases in point: NBC’s set-in-the-’60s The Playboy Club, ABC’s new Pan Am and the remake of the 1976-81 series Charlie’s Angels, co-executive produced by Leonard Goldberg with Drew Barrymore (veteran of the Charlie’s Angels movies) and creators/executive producers Al Gough and Miles Millar (both of Smallville). The show was unveiled at last month’s Comic-Con with the phrase: “These ain’t your mama’s angels.”
Following this morning’s Charlie’s Angels panel, I asked Millar the empowerment question: Really? He at first seemed to be addressing the issue by saying that initially, Gough’s and Miller’s wives didn’t want them to do the show. Why? Because the original angels were such role models to the producers’ spouses, Millar said reverently. “They didn’t believe we could do it [and maintain] the legacy of Charlie’s Angels.” Millar said during the panel that the idea of the new series was not to make “a cynical remake” of the original, nor to assume the same tone as the movies, about which Gough said: “[They were] superheroes for girls, post-Matrix … [the new show will] bring to the table more grounded, more real” characters with somewhat dark back stories. “You want to have something to come back to every week.” Describing the tone of the new show, Gough said: “If Jack Bauer and Carrie Bradshaw had a love child, it would be [the new] Charlie’s Angels.”
There is as yet no replacement for Robert Wagner, who was originally cast as the voice of Charlie — he has bowed out due to “scheduling issues.” “What we are looking for in the voice of Charlie is someone who brings a sort of paternal-ness, a certain amount of authority and mystery,” Gough said. They confirmed that Wagner is still a part owner of the show.
Veteran producer Goldberg was asked to talk about how the original show, which he co-produced with Aaron Spelling, spawned the less-than-empowering terms “eye candy” and “jiggle show.” He jokingly blamed both terms on competitor NBC. “We were very successful our shows, the other networks were always trying to disparage us,” he said. “A lot of publications, the New York Times included, gave us negative reviews, but as soon as the show hit, they were quick to put us on the cover of everything they could find.”







more minka kelly plz
Right. We can never have too many 30 year old women speaking with 5 year old little girl voices. *eye roll*
Based upon the comments that these Angels are “more grounded. more real”…it is possible that the show logo communicates these girls are anything but normal…unless, of course, you hang out with incredibly hot gun wielding babes!
Of course, these may be Pilates exercises…but, they look like gun toting babes to me.
This one won’t last long, folks.
Nope (and thank god based on the trailers and the screening reports). It will hang in there a bit because of Drew Barrymore, but it is otherwise DOA.
you’re damn right!
This has cancelled written all over it.
Waste of money!!!!! They would’ve did better to pick up some new material(s) than this crap.
It will also be one of the first shows to be canceled. There will be those that remember the original fondly and will be turned off by this re-boot; and there will be those younger viewers who don’t have to watch this show to get their “eye candy” as the internet is filled with eye candy and more.
Plus if Jack Bauer and Carrie Bradshaw had a child, she would air at 10pm, not 8pm. It’s obvious that the ABC exec doesn’t know Jack – or Carrie.
I wonder why a female actress might not have been a fun choice for Charlie. Maybe someone like Jacqueline Smith?
I was thinking exactly the same thing!!
Any cop show that is truly “more grounded, more real” will be 45 minutes of stakeouts followed by 15 minutes of paperwork. C’mon, we want fantasy. And make Charlie a woman.
You can put all the spin on this you want, Charlie’s Angels, Pan Am and Playboy Club are all cheesy and twisted towards women. All those pilots are out of touch and really dated.
THAT might be enough to get me watching, but I doubt it. The original was absolute crap, only girls had fantasies about it and that was girlish fantasies at that. Some guys I knew would call it, “Charlie’s Slutresses” but that was more wishful thinking than anything else.
Totally what I was thinking when I read it- female Charlie.
It will be like that episode of POLICE WOMAN, remember the one?, that one, the one where Pepper goes undercover as a hooker…
OMG I DO!!!! I had SO forgotten about that (for good reason I suppose). But LOL. I couldn’t agree more!!
Joe Frank would be an amazing voice of Charlie
Anyone who’s watched the new pilot will laugh out loud at that “more grounded, more real” comment. The show is ridiculously unrealistic, predictable, and just plain mind-numbing. It did the imposible: make me want to stop watching Mika Kelly and Rachael Taylor.
And Robert Wagner, who was originally cast as the voice of Charlie has bowed out due to “scheduling issues.” Really? He couldn’t tape his voice from any studio in the world for an hour a week? Is ANYONE too busy for that?
just what we need..three skinny charisma-free “Angels”…gone by November…
Amen!
it’s hysterical that they’re trying to spin these shows as reflective of woman empowerment. but thanks for asking the question, DHD. i also adore the “my wife loved it so…” argument. cause, as we know know, all women think alike. i just didn’t know they all thought like the wives of rich screenwriters.
Thank you for this. My wife loved it! I pay for her car, house, pool, maid, masseuse, plastic surgeon, pilates instructor and nanny with this money before I leave her for a young Asian woman. She better say she likes it!
Why does Charlie’s Angels have to be “more grounded and real”? The original was about 3 women that would go undercover at a private country club as a golf pro, a maid and a cocktail waitress to solve a 45 min mystery of a kidnapped heiress while today’s show, starring men, have them them stop terrorists from shipping nuclear bombs within one day (24), helping solving cop cases because they write fictional novels (Castle) and solving a case based one someone hand gestures at a dinner party (The Mentalist).
The new Angels should have just as much fictional levity as their predecessors and male contemporaries.
For all the naysayers…the show will be a hit. A big hit. Look to Hawaii 5-0 for how audiences can/will accept a reasonable reboot and shows like Castle where weekly mysteries are solved without having a large looming mythical “Lost” narrative.
The formula worked for the original, for Alias, for Nikita, for Covert Affairs, etc. The audience is there and will tune in on Thursdays.
Hawaii 5-0 is not a big hit. The numbers that show was getting were way worse than CSI: Miami a season before. The thing is CBS can’t admit they missed the boat with that one, so they will ride that train until the wheels fall off. All in hopes of making Alex O’Loughlin a star. The show is on the air, but NCIS is a hit. This is not a hit.
In short, here’s the difference. In Hawaii 5-0 the actors can, well, act. In Charlie’s Angels … they have Minka Kelly.
“In Hawaii 5-0 the actors can, well, act.”
Well, one really shouldn’t forget Alex O’Loughlin’s inability to generate even *one* genuine emotion in any scene in any episode of that series so far. But then again, he’s the one actor on the program who’s anything less than good.
JJ you’re my hero! There is this perception that the taste of the audience changes dramatically from one generation to the next which is true to a degree but to a large extent is nonsense.
There is still a huuuuge appetite for escapist, closed-ended, traditional genre programming and more producers and networks need to realize that.
Great post, JJ. Charlie’s will also fit into ABC’s female-centric direction (Housewives, Grey’s, Private Practice). The question is for how long?
Personally, I don’t like
a) The idea they were all criminals
b) The black one was the crooked cop a la “Training Day”
c) Bosley being all “young and hot”
Those who say “Charlie” should be a woman, enough with your PC retconning. “Bosley” is now a Latin guy, so shut up.
And the secret of H50′s success is that it fits into CBS’ established brand, i.e. it is essentially NCIS:Honolulu.
Screw PC, I want a female Charlie because it would be different and a modern upgrade beyond making the girls naughty.
Yeah, there are so many story lines involving a mystery man boss of a group of gorgeous women that have not all ready been done to death. A woman Boss, maybe even a former Angel, offers a POV that could open new story lines.
You want PC? How about a female Charlie and young shirtless male angels?
Young shirtless male angels? Now THAT I will watch!! But move the show to 10pm so it can be a little more risque.
That’s what people said about Hawaii 5-0 last year. It’s still around.
You can usually figure what the majority of the posters on this site say the reality is it will be the opposite. If it’s on a Disney owned network and it makes money, it will stay on the air.
YV has taken a giant step backwards, back in the 1960s and 1970s. The most chauvanistic of these “new” programs – Pan-Am and the Playboy Club – are likely to go the way of their real-life predecessors. Pan-Am is long dead as an airline and there haven’t been any Playboy Clubs for years.
Charlie’s Angels was the very definition of T&A programming in its day. Its subsequent iterations (reboot and two movies) failed to advance the story or characters beyond a single-dimension.
The argument could be made that television should be completely mindless and escapist, but really, do we REALLY need this show brought back? I think not. And it will likely die a quick death.
Next up – Police Woman, McMillan & Wife, and any other other network property lying around gathering dust. I, for one, can’t wait for Petticoat Junction: The Next Generation!
If Charlie were a woman, Jaclyn Smith would be an excellent choice. I’m partial to a male Charlie, though. The paternal dynamic has always worked well.