Diane Haithman is contributing to Deadline’s TCA coverage.
At today’s TCA panel for Person of Interest, a new CBS crime thriller series from the producing team of J.J. Abrams, Bryan Burk, Jonathan Nolan, David Semel and Greg Semel, star Taraji P. Henson said she took the role in the series because “you can’t go wrong with J. J. Abrams.” But it seems that you can — 2010’s one-season failure Undercovers for NBC being a case in point. Co-executive producer Nolan answered a question about that this way: “One of the things I love about J.J. is that he’s not precious. He creates material, he likes to work, he likes to put kick-ass TV shows out there. The nature of the TV format is, it’s a big risk, it’s not like a movie … it’s kind of a one-shot gig. TV, as I’m discovering, is a marathon. Personally, I think J.J.’s record in TV and movies is unsurpassed.”
But that was said at the end of the session. Before that, the panel — via satellite from New York and also including stars Michael Emerson (veteran of Abrams’ hit Lost) and Jim Caviezel (Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ) — collectively raved about how excited they were to be attached to the latest Abrams effort. Nolan joked that he had such confidence in the show, about trying to track a mystery figure before he commits a crime, that he was willing to give it a title that critics could easily have their way with — as in Person of Disinterest or Show of No Interest. A person of interest, he said, can mean a suspect, victim or witness. “A lot of what our show is about is uncertainty,” he said.
The show deals with surveillance and secrets, and panel members joked that Abrams had inserted a device in their microphones that would make them go dead whenever a plot twist or secret about the show was to be revealed (indeed, there were some silent pauses when questions got too pointed). Nolan, making his foray into TV, said the new show is tapping into the same brooding darkness he brought to The Dark Knight Batman installment. “I love crime procedurals, I love cop shows, [but] I was interested in writing something a little more dangerous,” he said. “I’ve always been drawn to that aspect of Batman … maybe we are tapping into some of that.”
Emerson said he hoped his role in this show as software expert Finch will allow him to grow beyond the type of character he portrayed in Lost – a success he never expected. “My part on Lost was just another guest spot as far as I knew. … Every character actor’s secret dream is that they’ll hit it out of the ball park and they’ll be asked to stay … that kind of happened on Lost – I was never allowed to go home from the Hawaiian island,” he said. He added that in the new role he hopes to do “an odd turn” once in awhile: “I would like it to have a limp or an accent.”
Caviezel said he took the role because his character, in search of the mystery figure, is “searching for a purpose … I think, like it hit me, it’s going to hit other people there’s something besides all the technology in the story.” As an aside, Caviezel addressed the experience of being part of Gibson’s hotly controversial Christ movie. “It was a little more controversial than I thought it would be,” he admitted, joking. “For a while there, I thought we might have been more popular than the Beatles. It was one of the things that I did and I just kept moving on.” When asked specifically about his relationship with Gibson, he said: “He certainly directed it, but I always look when I’m going to do anything at the material. … I’m a basic, simple, small-town guy.”


Wow…is he still mad that John Lennon had once said that The Beatles were bigger than Jesus? Way to one-up a guy 45 years after he’s made a remark and 31 years after his death, genius…
Uh, Kryp, it was a joke. A joke he can tell since he “played” Jesus. …you don’t get a lot of what other people are laughing at, do you?
I think you mean Greg Plageman — he and David Semel are not related.
You had me at “J.J. Abrams” and lost me at “CBS.”
…and I’m just the opposite.
I’ve seen damn little from Abrams that I thought was terribly interesting. In general, I find him far more form than function.
Super 8 is probably the best thing he’s done in a good while & that manages to be as little him or Spielberg as it is both of them.
Funny… All I heard over and over is how Mr. Nolan thought he was too good to address anyone’s notes. Finally, the studio had to threaten him with an “or else” to get him to do the work. If a guy thinks he’s slumming in tv it usually shows. And in this case IT SHOWS.
When reality TV programs command audiences as big (or bigger) than scripted TV programs, how valuable are those producers/executives’ notes, really? You don’t see documentaries edging out the narrative films Mr. Nolan makes at the box office…
dude, you’re so right! I mean, Nolan’s only done MEMENTO, THE PRESTIGE, BATMAN BEGINS, and THE DARK KNIGHT! what could he possibly know?! I’m sure it would be sooooo hard for him to work in features if he wanted. please! if he’s doing TV, it’s because he’s feeling the genre. and judging by the excitement for the show so far, it’s gonna own. got me pumped.
Yeah, I mean he totally wrote Memento… Oh no wait, that was his brother. But he wrote a short story — of course that was “after” the movie. Fact. Then he came up with the Prestige all on his own… Oh no, that was a book he adapted — then big bro came in and re-wrote it so they shared credit. But Batman Begins — that was all him… Oh no that’s right, Jonathan Nolan did not work on that film at all and received no credit. Okay — but Dark Knight… Now we’re talking… I mean sure, Chris Nolan and David Goyer came up with the story. And so what if Chris Nolan wrote the script to the point where he got separated “and” screenplay credit I’m sure it was mostly Jonathan.
Look — not hating — or discounting — but the man has yet to prove he’s capable on his own merits. Let’s see if he can do that here before we shower him with love.
I mean honestly — if he was so involved with all these other projects, we all know how Hollywood works. He’d have his own multi-picture deal with his own films in the theaters. Hasn’t happened yet. So until I see that, he’s still just big bro’s tagalong.
not hating! yeah right! when POI is a success, you’ll say that it was because of JJ Abrams.
look dude, film is a collaborative medium. no single auteur is solely responsible for the success or failure of any project, not even Chris Nolan. hundreds of people work their asses off on all his films.
as far as what the Nolan brothers’ work dynamic is, who knows? certainly not you. anyways, who cares, because it works. it works like a mofo.
so why don’t you get writing and stop hating?
Wait–have you SEEN the pilot? I thought it was really good when I saw it at comicon. I think you may be projecting here, because never once did I feel that the writer was scornful of television.
I mean, isn’t his wife a writer on, like, White Collar or something?
I hope this works. Caviezel seems like one of the genuinely good guys but he’s had a tough go of it since “Passion,” and Emerson was one of the very best things about “Lost.”
One interesting thing — in other interviews Caviezel has been much more gracious when talking about Mel, but I’m sure the poor guy is sick of getting asked about him.
the pilot sucks. first five minutes are good then it’s the same old crap.
The pilot’s worse than bad. It’s boring.
Wait, do they mean Kick-Ass like the movie? Monumental hype leading to a equally monumental flop? Then yes, Kick-Ass it will be.
it looks terrible.
oh, and this isnt a commentary on the actual KA movie itself. I liked it; but box office-wise it didn’t live up to all the hype.