Ridley Scott To Direct New Version Of Seminal Sci-Fi Film ‘Blade Runner’
LOS ANGELES, CA, AUGUST 18, 2011—Three-time Oscar-nominated director Ridley Scott is set to helm a follow up to his own ground-breaking 1982 science fiction classic “Blade Runner” for Warner Bros-based financing and production company Alcon Entertainment (“The Blind Side,” “The Book of Eli”).
Alcon co-founders and co-Chief Executive Officers Broderick Johnson and Andrew Kosove will produce with Bud Yorkin and Cynthia Sikes Yorkin, along with Ridley Scott. Frank Giustra and Tim Gamble, CEO’s of Thunderbird Films, will serve as executive producers.
The filmmakers have not yet revealed whether the theatrical project will be a prequel or sequel to the renowned original.
Alcon and Yorkin recently announced that they are partnering to produce “Blade Runner” theatrical sequels and prequels, in addition to all television and interactive productions.
The original film, which has been singled out as the greatest science-fiction film of all time by a majority of genre publications, was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” The film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry in 1993 and is frequently taught in university courses. In 2007, it was named the 2nd most visually influential film of all time by the Visual Effects Society.
State Kosove and Johnson: “It would be a gross understatement to say that we are elated Ridley Scott will shepherd this iconic story into a new, exciting direction. We are huge fans of Ridley’s and of the original ‘Blade Runner.’ This is once in a lifetime project for us.”
Scott is represented by David Wirtschafter at WME and David Nochinson at Ziffren Brittenham.
Released by Warner Bros. almost 30 years ago, “Blade Runner” was adapted by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples from Philip K. Dick’s groundbreaking novel “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” and directed by Scott following his landmark “Alien.” The film was nominated for two Academy Awards (Best Visual Effects, and Best Art Direction). Following the filming of “Blade Runner,” the first of Philip K. Dick’s works to be adapted into a film, many other of Dick’s works were likewise adapted, including “Total Recall,” “A Scanner Darkly,” “Minority Report,” “Paycheck,” and the recent “The Adjustment Bureau,” among others.



Philip K. Dick is dead, alas.
Let’s all queue up and kick God’s ass!
Seriously, how do these guys manage the audacity to think they can come up with a decent scripted sequel to one of the all-time great science fiction novels, over the dead body of the original author?
I am not inclined to receive this news favorably.
That’s an odd sentiment considering how liberally “Do Androids Dream…” was adapted for “Blade Runner.”
Philip Dick was dead when the first one hit theaters. And he hated the original script for it.
I think we can take Horselover Fat’s comment “not inclined to receive this news favorably” literally. I suspect that there will be a group of people not inclined toward the concept itself, without any regard to the merit of the efforts or the value of the results. On the other hand, other folks who are not predisposed to disliking the idea, can consider it from a qualitative standpoint, without regard to artificial limitations.
Quite so. Nicely put.
While I’m thrilled with this news, I’m worried that the magic of the original Blade Runner might be lost. Much of the original movie’s appeal is the result of its visionary production design. If Ridley decides to turn to the “digital studio”, it could end up looking like one of those Zac Snyder abominations.
Well, this will be interesting.
A de-aged Harrison Ford (a-la: Jeff Bridges in Tron2) could make this a very compelling film. Ridley Scott is always full of surprises. He wouldn’t mess with his SF legacy unless he honestly felt he had a shot a Godfather 2 quality sequel.
Please don’t de-age Harrison Ford. Rubber-faced Jeff Bridges was the worst part of Tron: Legacy and I wish they’d just let him play the role au naturel. CG quality isn’t there yet.
How about this could become his Godfather 3, given it’s 30 years since the original ?
And of course, the great irony is that it was a gigantic flop in 1982, and was the beginning of the end for The Ladd Company.
STOP IT! STOP IT! STOP IT! STOP THE MADNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I hope they put Jar Jar Binks in the prequels!
Yea bring Jar Jar Binks in for the film. Then we can all take part in ritualistic mass suicide.
Big shoes to fill even if it’s the same filmmaker. That’s a sacrosanct property…. Hopefully Prometheus will prove he’s got his SciFi eye back… cuz Kingdom of Heaven, A Good Year, and Robin Hood were CRAP. Which brings me to the next point: PLEASE-GOD-OH-GOD DON’T CAST RUSSELL CROWE!!!
It’s certainly very intriguing though.
This is TRON 2 all over again…
The only folks who know Bladerunner are film geeks… it’s true. Mark my words!!!!
There should’ve been a followup years ago and I’m estatic that Ridley is back on board. If anyone should do it should be him.
Idiotic. The original Blade runner was a classic for a reason, it was well ahead of its time. Nothing they can do will bring the wow factor of the first one. This is just a cash grab.
“Cowboys and Replicants” ?
“Replicants and Aliens” ?
Replicants and Republicans!
Shia LaBeouf would make a good Rick Deckard.
I hope Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Daryl Hannah, Sean Young, Joanna Cassidy and Edward James Olmos will have cameos as a tribute to the original classic 1982 film.
Oh god please no. I dislike Shia so much.
Speechless… Bring it!
The sequel may face the same fate as this line from the original – “Wake up. Time to die.”
What other bright ideas do you guys at Alcon have? Zac Efron as Ford’s Deckard?
Taylor Lautner’s camp is currently in talks.
(Are the Taylor Lautner jokes dead yet?)
No. He still gets movies greenlit. /sigh
A Harrison Ford cameo as the real human from whom the replicant Deckard was based on would be cool.
Another great film pulled out of the mothballs just ’cause any new ideas scare them. How depressing.
One of the best line’s in the film was im provised on the spot by Rutger Hauer; “All these moment’s will be lost in time,- like tear’s in rain. If the new script can’t match the energy of the original movie then, well, for lack of a better suggestion, wipe your butt with it.
As intriguing as this is, doesn’t it strike you as one of those things that’s just going to go away?
‘Blade Runner’ didn’t just cut a path through cinema language, it changed fashion and interior design for years following. The entire cyberpunk movement practically began with Blade Runner. The 40′s noir retro movement (yes, shoulder pads of the 80s) sprung from Blade Runner. The film was as much a coffee table book on forward thinking aesthetics as it was an epic of myth making. Stepping back in to such material and hoping to strike those chords once more may not be possible. If this turns out to be a very good yarn with great art direction, we may have to be happy with that. Not many films can achieve what Blade Runner achieved and many have tried.
IT WILL BE INTERESTED TO SEE HOW CLOSED THE NEW BLADE RUNNER WILL BE TO THE FIRST ONE. I AM HOPPING THAT IT WILL TAKEN SEVERAL YEARS AFTER THE FIRST ONE. IT WILL BE INTERESTED TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED TO THE TWO CHARACTER AFTER THE END OF THE FILM. GOOD LUCK TO THE FUTURE AND I WOULD LIKE IT WOULD BE NEW FILM BUT THAT ASKING TO TOO MUCH. YOUR TRULY CHARLES DAVID HASKELL
I’m all for it if Scott is. One of my favorite films of all time. Please don’t dumb it down, though, and tarnish the concept. Keep the focus on the characters and show us the awesomeness of your set design. Despite all these years, I don’t think the effects are going to look all that much more impressive from the original, except to the really discerning eye. Scott knows all this, of course, but it’s messing with a masterpiece and we’re all a bit apprehensive.
Here’s my 2 cents – with the atmosphere in hollywood clouded by over-hyped remakes and sluggish, renamed rehashes of familiar material, I feel that we, as an audience, are half-lucky. With Blade runner garnering so much critical acclaim and fandom since its release, the question of whether or not should another Blade runner movie be made, but when would the studios decide to cash in on it. This was always going to happen, more than likely with or without Mr. Scott. So at least he is at the helm.
If the ship is already in the air, fighting the storm, at least we know that the pilot has done this before.
Have faith, for this is out of our hands now.
They should adopt the current Bourne franchise approach by making a stand-alone, spin-off film from Blade Runner (1982) which expands the universe of the original film and follows a new (human) hero protagonist. Perhaps it will pave the way for Harrison Ford to return as Rick Deckard down the road. They should make the meaning of life one of the film’s themes again and hopefully Vangelis will return to do the soundtrack.
finally someone mentions vangelis…thank you…the soundtrack is half of that movie