The signs are always the same when any studio knows it has a bomb. Executives won’t commit any opinion to email. Phone calls from them pledging to “explain everything” are promised but never come. The suits deny up and down any truth to the inevitable leaks about a troubled shoot or creative friction or bad buzz. But when the studio is financially on-the-fence like The Weinstein Co, and it acquired U.S. rights to Madonna’s first feature-length directorial effort W.E., and the subject matter is Wallis Simpson, and its debut is at the unforgiving Venice Film Festival, which has panned far bigger and more influential big names in filmdom — then not even the PR maestro Harvey Weinstein can downplay crushingly lousy reaction and reviews.
Fact is that the international press and its U.S. counterparts are having a field day killing Madonna’s movie in what can only be seen as the latest “Death In Venice”. Or maybe the more accurate way of saying this is “Death By Venice”. The Times of London claimed Madonna had made an inadvertent comedy “screamingly, inadvertently funny in parts [that] had ‘em rolling in the aisles at Venice” The Guardian review was truly vicious under the headline, “Madonna’s jaw-dropping take on the story of Wallis Simpson is a primped and simpering folly, preening and fatally mishandled”. Only the Daily Mail gave it a true thumbs-up. But my guess is that probably has more to do with that newspaper’s long and troubled history with Madonna, who in 2009 won a multimillion-dollar lawsuit again the Daily Mail and whose legal reps have been threatening the paper recently and repeatedly of more to come because of its nearly always negative coverage of her.
In fact, The Weinstein Co in June was strenuously denying the British tabloid’s article pronouncing W.E. a mess after detailing a secret NY test screening that reportedly left Harvey “thunderous and sour”. His minions claimed that the audience loved the picture and so did Weinstein, who had made Truth or Dare with Madonna and enjoyed a critical and financial success. The studio confirmed the pair had been working on W.E. for some time before that test screening, but wouldn’t confirm or deny reports that Harv was re-editing the picture to make it more commercially viable. That’s something he’s done to only mixed success in the past — earning him the nickname “Harvey Scissorhands”.
I do think The Weinstein Co was masochistic not only to send Madonna’s oeuvre to the film festival even if out of competition but also schedule it during the coming Oscar corridor. The good news is that Madonna’s movie cost less than $35M, and all of it shows on the big screen. Even Madonna’s many detractors said the film looks beautiful — even if its story is superficial. (As Bloomberg opined: “Madonna’s second stab at filmmaking is stylish but sophomoric. From a purely emotional standpoint, it’s barely more engaging than a fashion shoot, or a music video. Feelings — love, fear, betrayal, solitude — are expressed in their most elementary form. Actors get little direction.”)
The bad news is that The Weinstein Co already made a major distribution commitment to release W.E. on December 9th in NY and LA, then expand to additional markets in December, with wide release anticipated by mid-January. At the time of the announcement, Harvey gave the film a rave: “Madonna beautifully interweaves past and present in W.E. It’s a very smart film, and a stunning feature directorial debut. I’m incredibly excited about this movie and I wanted to give it a prominent release date.” It was Harv who decided not to show W.E. at the Cannes Film Festival and send it instead to Venice. This was after the film was previewed in Berlin back in February and sales agent IM Global screened clips to 200 invited guests. But it was Madonna’s agents CAA who held back the U.S. rights which went to Weinstein.
Now the terrible reviews for W.E. couldn’t be coming at a worse time for The Weinstein Co. It’s had two major box office disappointments in a row, and coming this weekend is Dimension Films’ Apollo 18. I don’t know how the studio is going to stay on track with its reorganized finances if Dimension films keep bombing like Spy Kids 4 (which opened to a weak $12M weekend from 3,295 theaters) or TWC pics underperforming like Our Idiot Brother (only $5.7M from 2,555 locations hurt by Hurricane Irene but dead last of the trio of new films).
As for Madonna’s narrative, it was co-written by her and her pal Alek Keshishian (In Bed With Madonna), produced by her and another of her pals Kris Thykier. This was only her second stab at filmmaking (after the 2008 Filth and Wisdom). No question this production was troubled: Among those who exited were producer David Parfitt (who’d been on Harv’s Shakespeare in Love, which stole the Best Picture Oscar from Steven Spielberg’s far more worthy Saving Private Ryan) and casting director Nina Gold and actor Ewan McGregor and actresses Vera Farmiga and Margo Stilley.
I predict that The Weinstein Co will wind up just dumping W.E. into North American theaters, put little marketing push behind it after the first weekend, and instead focus on the real Oscar possibles that the studio has this year. It’s more the rule than the exception for Harv to throw his Fall films against the wall, see which stick with critics and awards voting members, and then abandon those that don’t. Last year he whittled down his contenders early and wound up with many acting nominations and the Best Picture Oscar for The King’s Speech. This year potentially, he’s got Academy Award contenders in the black-and-white silent film The Artist that he bought right before the Cannes Film Festival and became a rave on the Croisette. He’s got Iron Lady with Meryl Streep playing British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and also bought at Cannes. And the John Hillcoat-directed The Wettest County in the World expected to be platformed for Oscar and released in early 2012. The Weinstein Co also will push Michelle Williams for her turn as Marilyn Monroe in My Week With Marilyn. And so on. Here is Madonna talking about her film at the 68° Mostra del Cinema di Venezia:
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







Oh come on. Unlss you’re in the business and have a stake in the film, who gives a rats tuchas about Madona or what she does or doesn’t do. Don’t we all have better things to do. Geez, you’d thing this was the Nobel for science for finding a cure for cancer.
Why not focus our time on people doing real things for humanity instead of entertainment. What a waste of brain power.
As terrible an actress as Madonna is (save for “Truth or Dare”), she’s indirectly responsible for the Oscars Stephen Sondheim, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim rice now posess.
THAT’S RIGHT! SHE DID GIVE OSCARS TO THOSE BOYS NOW, DIDN’T SHE?
They bloody well better not. They will have made an abject mockery of themselves and all the great filmmakers they have backed so far. WHY would they have even backed this film? Did they think that ANYONE…ANYONE would want to see it? If the answer to that question is a yes, then I have to rethink the value of the Weinstein bros. judgement.
rethink it….rethink it twice….and remember…she’s NOT ACTING…SHE’S DIRECTING!
Don’t downsize this cuz it’s not a Madonna record….
You people REALLY need to LEARN YOUR A B C’S!
I have no readied judgement for Madonna, only an observation. Every interview I see her in she appears to be so guarded, so many walls up which come off as false, and fake, like there’s not even a person behind it. I can’t even listen to what she’s saying I’m so distracted by how superfluous she is.
maybe cuz the press n the audience seem to misconstrue whatever madonna says or talks about…twists it around….and don’t really get her….if you’re intelligent…then you’d understand her and get what i’m talking about.
Bloody well hope my fellow Brits take Madonna down.
Harv,
Please start making great movies again. Giving unknowns a chance.
Industry,
Recently gave three scripts to a studio head and said pick the pro writer. Guess what, did this 10 times. He guessed right, once. One our of 10.
Thank you.
giving unknowns a chance? Madonna isn’t an unknown….if anyone is an unknown…it’s the person that TRIED to review W.E. and basically everybody else on here…including you and me…
Quit being a spiteful bloody bastard and WATCH THE MOVIE
instead of wishing your fellow Brits take Madonna down.
No wonder you have those looks on your faces! Lighten up!
This is what happens when a vanity project is made by “friends.” Critics have always underestimated Madonna. She is immune to it. The trouble is she doesn’t take film craft seriously enough. She confuses instinct with technique. Madonna should be directing music videos instead where she can hone her skills. I won’t pass judgment on a film I haven’t seen but it doesn’t sound promising.
If you get lucky as a pop singer, it is not an invitation to become an actress. If you fail miserably as an actress, it is not an invitation to become a director. The velvet rope in this case should be a barrier to entry.
Seems to me, the reason there are many Maddona haters is that she makes it easy to be so. There’s nothing wrong with being rich and successful, but one can have humility. I don’t know her so I can’t speak on a personal level, but what she allows us to see is all we have from which to judge. She seems to me to be affecting her entire existence. Including her phony British accent!
I was in Londen and read a piece in a reputable British paper (yes there are a couple), that pitted Maddona and Gwenneth Paltrow as they both were about to appear on the stage in separate plays on the West End. It made Gwenneth seem like a a rich brat that never had to struggle, receiving a Broadway debut with her mother as an 18th birthday present. On the other hand, Madge was given kudos for coming up from the dregs of a Detroit ghetto in a broken home and so on. Certainly not to minimize the hardship that Maddona has gone through, as it does seem to have been horrible, but in the final analysis, Gwenneth received great reviews and Madge was trashed across the board.
All that to say that Maddona has been given the benefit of the doubt in most cases involving leaving the artistic confines of being a rock star, so that is certainly not to blame. Many artist try their hand at a cross over from what the public is used to and move on to varying degrees of success, or go quietly away. But, Maddona comes “barreling in” in a media frenzy that we all know has been largely coordinated by her peeps and conducts interviews in a manner in which I can only describe as smug. I’m sure it’s some sort of defence mechanism, but it’s still not fun to watch.
Bottom line … GO AWAY MADONNA!
The Madonna defenses…I don’t get it. If people say she is rude and nasty, which a person who’s daughter danced with Lourdes said the same, it is not because they are jealous, it is because she is rude and nasty. Also if her films are bad and she quit drying up funds that could be spent on people with real talent it is because people are tired of bad films. There’s so much going on in the industry alone not to mention the larger world- don’t waste energy defending and championing Madonna. Such comments reflect a clear lack of critical thinking skills and ability to discern. Save praise for when it is deserved
The reason this is a bomb is summed up in the first question during her panel. You have someone who would never even think about giving up her status for love… which is the very the theme of her film. If the filmmaker doesn’t understand the material then how can the film stand on it’s own and convey any semblance of truth.
For the life of me, I can’t seem to find a online trailer for W.E? Rather odd indeed
Reality I screened the film in Venice, it’s not as the press mentions… Look, if a film isn’t working, you edit it. Harvey is great at this. turned many films that were bleh into something special. So press, get over yourself and have a bit of faith. TWC will work magic, as long as Madonna cooperates.
modonna is getting a lot of heat. the oven is turned up to a high degree with this one. but you gotta give it to her for completing a film knowing fully what an extreme endeavour it really is. she was married to guy richie after all. but on the other hand this is somewhat expected. sort of helplessly watching a train wreck happen… because i tell ya you don’t see guy richie singing songs do you? “you’re modonna for a reason. you’re an icon. you do the singing. and same with justin timberlake! there’s only one marky mark. he left his pants behind!” mel says it best
Points for that headline, gotta say.
On the other hand, the media has raised Madonna-bashing to an Olympic sport. They live for it. They crave it. She must provide them with an opportunity every so often to sharpen their teeth or they get the DTs.
The new movie may, in fact, be genuinely awful, who knows? But you can’t trust the media to give Madonna a fair shake when it comes to filmmaking. (And the Weinsteins certainly know that.)
Wow Chad, from the sound of ALL your comments, it’s pretty obvious you’re part of some PR team…lame.
tell that to those that have won one. I assume you are not one? an Oscar is an Oscar. period.
What people are getting at here is not the concept that attempting something outside of your chosen career is egotistical, rather it’s totally admirable. But if after numerous attempts, all of which have ended in the absolute panning of everything in the genre you touch, not just for you but for those around you, you continue to try to insist to the professionals that they are wrong for panning your work and that you really are a competent filmmaker then yes, that has gigantic ego, poor common sense, and a lack of respect for the professionals who work around you written all over it. She can make amateur films all she wants, but people shouldn’t have to lose millions of dollars so Madonna can have her little hobby.
These are some interesting comments if not downright hateful, possibly slanderous and at once complimentary. She has a respectable (so to speak) body of work and it adept at re=inventing herself. What makes you think she isn’t a better writer and director than that nitwit Adam Sandler just to name one boring nobody who attempts moviemaking. Actually I think a movie about Wallis Simpson and set in Europe sounds interesting and I will go see it rather than some of these stupifying animation films and sound byte guy boom boom movies…good heavens. There are all kinds of people out here seeking good artistic movies not sound effects and graphics with guffaws and gutteral humor.
Fan or not, (and I don’t consider myself one of her work particularly), Madonna is a rare breed of individual in that her ambition knows no limit. She has done whatever it took to be on top and gain the ability to make her own rules, uncompromisingly. She had a genuine, personal interest in the subject matter and used her own resources to make as good a creative work as possible, and now she comes out the the world. And here is a good quote for you:
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles… The credit belongs to the man in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who at his worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who never know victory nor defeat.” -Theodore Roosevelt.
She made a film (and paid for it herself), okay so it’s not THE HOURS, so elfin’ what? What have YOU done?
Stop being a hater and go back to work.
Agreed. Excellent post and quote.
“Even Madonna’s many detractors said the film looks beautiful — even if its story is superficial.”
Looks like the film is an authentic extension of the person.
I like Madonna and worked on a video of hers. She is a talented, ambitious woman who keeps reinventing herself. I give her kudos for that.
This is hysterical and not a surprise at all, if any of you have been unfortunate enough to see Madonna “act” on stage you will understand that she has not an ounce of ability so, I am not fazed that she can’t direct either. Ambition is a great thing, but when it belongs to the deluded it is pathetic.
even michael jordan had the good sense to return to basketball when he realized how foolish he looked playing baseball.
I love it, petty, pathetic individuals with sad little lives who cling to the celebrity culture and read or watch any piece of drivel they can blindly support and defend their favorites, regardless of how inept their argument only to and whine and attack anyone who doesn’t agree with them. Typical hypocrites!