Veteran indie film executive and producer Adam Leipzig is ramping up the blog Cultural Weekly examining the intersection of culture, creativity, money, and entertainment. Here, the question is raised whether America needs a national film commission. This has been edited down and reprinted with permission:
With the Toronto Film Festival getting underway this week, it’s worth
pointing out the crucial role that national film commissions like Canada’s National Film Board and Telefilm Canada have played in the global film marketplace. These agencies of the Canadian government not only assist filmmakers in the production of their films, but also help global marketing, distribution and promotion of Canadian films in general. The result has been a boon for Canadian filmmakers and an important source of revenue for Canada.
Like Canada, most nations recognize that films are a valuable export and that, in a competitive global marketplace, filmmakers need help in marketing and distributing films outside their own countries. In addition, with the growth of international co-productions, filmmakers need assistance from their national film commissions – who are part of an international network — to provide information to facilitate those partnerships.
Since national film commissions are pretty inexpensive to operate and can reap huge economic benefits for a country, virtually every developed nation, and many in the developing world, operate these commissions. However, there is one nation – the only one in the Western world – that does not have a national film commission. Guess who? The United States.
There are lots of reasons for this glaring omission, but let’s start with the obvious one — we have never needed a national film commission. Since Hollywood has always been (and continues to be) the dominant player in the international film market, it never needed any help. The Hollywood studios had their own international network, and didn’t see any reason to for a national film commission. In fact, it was in their interest to discourage such an effort, since it might to undermine the clout of the studios…
The best vehicle to address the challenges of the global market would be a national film commission – a public/private organization that would include representatives of both the film industry and the federal government. While it would be politically difficult to establish a strictly governmental body, a compromise solution might be a private/public partnership that would enlist the power of the United States government in the global market without limiting the freedom of the film industry.
The American film industry is one of our most important engines of economic growth and, during these tough economic times and in the face of a rapidly changing global marketplace, it does not make sense to rely on a small group of tradition-bound studios to lead the industry into the future. Only a private/public partnership that reflects a broader swath of the film community is capable of maintaining this critical source of jobs and revenue.
Although the Hollywood studios, networks, unions and other organizations might resist the idea of a national film commission, it is arguably in their long-term interest to have a more representative organization in place. Perhaps most importantly, a national film commission could have a positive impact on the creative potential of the American film community by connecting it more directly to other national film commissions and thereby to the global marketplace. Now is the time for America to take this crucial step towards the future.
– by Hoyt Hilsman, screenwriter and critic
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



One should definitely read the whole article by Hoyt Hilsman and not just this summary: http://www.culturalweekly.com/america-needs-a-national-film-commission.html
“Should There Be A U.S. Film Commission?”
No.
Nightmare Scenario #1: The Republicans decide to use the “U.S. Film Commission” to punish all those godless liberals out there in Hollywood.
Nightmare Scenario #2: Replace “Republicans” with “Democrats” and “punish those godless liberals” with whatever trendy fascism-with-a-smile cause the Dems are into that year.
Big mistake! As a Canadian producer, I can agree that it sounds great in theory. “Free” government money to offset production costs, am organization to “protect and preserve” the commerce and/or heritage of your country’s films, but the restrictions that come with that are counterproductive. Film is a business. An industry. One that has thrived on (and began) with independent, entrepreneurial spirit and objectives.
Every country that has a national film commission has policies that were created by politicians, not filmmakers. Their mandate is different. It is not consistent. It comes with obstacles, more paper/legal work just to make it work and of course, with financial limitations.
Look at the films that came out of Canada when the only “incentive” in place was a “tax shelter”. Meatballs, as just one example, achieved international financial success. Introduce “Telefilm” and welcome a made up policy that suddenly sets definitions on what a Canadian film is/must be. (We all know what the point system entails). It helps fund independent films yes, to a maximum dollar amount, with other funding & distribution restrictions. What was the last Canadian film you saw released in the US (or internationally) on more than 500 screens? With significant P&A support? That grossed $100 million worldwide?
I’m happy to debate but will simply leave it at that. It’s just a mistake.
It would never happen in today’s political climate.
And I don’t think I really need elaborate more than that.
Don’t you mean U.S. Video Commission? The studios will all abandon film in the next couple years to save money. They won’t worry about digital files, tapes and drives not playing back in 10 years without extensive migration ( = not saving money.)
Any such talk or comparisons with Canada and Europe will be dismissed as “socialist” in the United States. Just like health care, mass transit, alternative energy, etc. expect for America to remain behind.
What Mr. Hilsman does not say in his blog is that every State in the US already has a film commission. In fact, some States have several film commissions that market their region to the world market and help filmmakers with the production of their films.
All State Film Commissioners belong to an international organization of film commissioners. There are also several trade shows and events every year where producers and distributors can meet the film commissioners. All of these film commissions are given a budget by their governmental body to market their regions to the global market. Most States have financial incentives to give to productions to offset production costs in order to entice a film to their region.
A national film commission would turn into a huge fiasco because the competition between state film commissions is already intense. I can see it now. Every State will be upset if this national film office gives any one State more attention than another.
Instead, the US government should provide tax breaks to filmmakers and make it as easy as possible for foreign filmmakers to enter our country to shoot a film. The MPAA and every film commission in the US already lobbies for these types of incentives for filmmakers.
The last thing we need is another government body getting into our business.
This is the problem. With 50 state film commissions, we compete with each other when we should be competing internationally. We need one single government body to replace the 50 competing ones. Get a clue.
Even in Canada, each province has it’s own Film Commission. It is separate from TeleFilm.
s
Film guy, I can not disagree more. So what if the states are competing against each other? That is what America is all about.
What we do need in CA are tax credits so that we can compete with states that have them.
I used to work for a major Canadian distributor and the Canadian producers all agree with the Canadian who posted that a national film commission is a bad idea.
I disagree, I get the feeling it would be like GM, the banks etc… I just do not get a very good feeling about this. And as we have just seen with Gibson guitars the govt deciding who gets to stay open and who does not, I really do NOT want the govt having any say what so ever in what it is I would want to say as a filmmaker. The less the govt has its hands in the better.
What? Have the fascist commie U.S. government take over Hollywood? That’s socialist!
No.
I’ve dealt with the Canadian film bureaucracies, and know that it’s not about films, but about maintaining and promoting certain cliques and keeping everyone else out.
A classic example was a program I encountered in the 1990s that was supposed to promote “new” Canadian writers. How did one qualify as a “new” Canadian writer? Well, to qualify as “new” you had to have had at least two screenplays produced into feature films that were released theatrically.
So in order to be “new” to the industry, you had to be deeply entrenched in one the industry’s little cliques. That sums it up perfectly.
The studios are narrow minded and closed off enough, but bureaucracies are exponentially worse, because they literally have absolutely no incentive to find anything novel or new that might sell.
Lets keep the government outta our biz. They love to beat it up any chance that they get. Why would we ever invite them into the party. Let the government worry about health care, roads, and military issues. Don’t let them into movies. Its just poor thinking.
Again, like the comment above, having 50 state film offices pushing 50 different incentives is inefficient, wasteful and counterproductive. We should have one film office and one national film incentive.
No, “film guy,” you are wrong. Every state has the ability to set their own incentives – it is not wasteful and counterproductive. Every state has different tax structures set by their legislatures – are you suggesting that we abolish the power of state legislatures to set their own tax codes? the state film commissions are charged with advertising their tax structures and locations (which also vary greatly from state to state). And, by the way, competition between states is GOOD for our business.
There is no reason to have a national film commission in America. This is a silly idea.
Here’s the thing. In Canada, near EVERY film here is funded by TeleFilm. Big, small, medium, whatever. Why? Because none of them (excluding the social island of Quebec) make money. TeleFilm is a cultural grant, not a profit driven financier. And this ‘free money’ leads to a producing style that is all about getting that money, not making commercial films.
Imagine if the US Government gave a cultural grant to Green Lantern…
Stop whining and enjoy living in the most active, profitable, successful film industry in the world.
s
NO. Really? Has no one been watching the shit drama going on with NPR for YEARS?
We do not need or want a national film commission. Didn’t anyone watch the debate last night? Get the government out of our business. I’ve worked in worldwide film/television distribuiton for years. We already have international relationships and don’t need a film commission to help us out. Let the marketplace determine relationships.
One word, NO!
The USGOVT is not any EU govt or even Canada, it will end up another crony political fiefdom that will HURT the industry and make HW even more small and insular that it already is.
These national commissions are causing problems over there.
first run films are already getting hammered by other forms of entertainment like video games, and the fact their studio product lately just sucks. Get the GOVT involved and they will be funding projects that NO in the general public wants to see.
It will be the NEA all over again.
This idea Sounds great when Obama and this HW friendly people are in office, the way poll numbers are looking, in 2 years the political climate in DC will be much different.
Film like art is a 1st Amendment Issue, do you really want the govt involved in that? The GOVT having the power to FUND a project. The whole idea smells BAD.
why? no way will tax money will be used to help liberals in hollywood.
I’d like to know how to combat corrupt film commissions like NC – they have more of a film Mafia than a commission. The whole board is one giant conflict of interest!!