September 28, 2011, Los Angeles, CA – The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) today released the 16th annual Where We Are On TV report, a comprehensive review of scripted LGBT primetime characters in the 2011-2012 television season. After a significant increase last year, the number of regular lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) characters on broadcast networks experienced a decrease while the overall LGBT character count remains steady on cable television.
Complete results and report are available here: www.glaad.org/tvreport11. GLAAD uses these results with networks and industry leaders to discuss the state of LGBT images and discuss ways to include more diverse LGBT images.
“While the number of LGBT characters is down, some of the most popular shows with critics and viewers, such as Glee, True Blood and The Good Wife, weave storylines about gay and lesbian characters into the fabric of the show,” said GLAAD Acting President Mike Thompson. “Whether it’s the growing household of Mitchell and Cameron on Modern Family or the recent wedding of Callie and Arizona on Grey’s Anatomy, Americans expect to see the diversity of our country represented in their favorite programs and that includes gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people.”
The report shows that LGBT characters still account for 2.9% of scripted series regulars in the 2011-2012 broadcast television schedule, up from 1.1% in 2007 and 2.6% in 2008, but down from 3% in 2009 and 3.9% in 2010. The number of scripted LGBT series regulars found on mainstream cable networks has also fallen slightly, from 40 in 2007, 32 in 2008, 25 in 2009, 35 in 2010 to 29 in the upcoming season. GLAAD counted 25 additional recurring characters on cable.
Fox is now the most inclusive broadcast television network based on these criteria, with 6.8% of regular characters being gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. In 2007, the Where We Are on TV report found zero LGBT series regulars on the network.
From research and information provided by the five broadcast networks, ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and The CW, GLAAD’s “Where We Are On TV” study reviewed 91 scripted television programs scheduled to air this upcoming season, and it counted a total of 647 series regular characters, 19 of which are LGBT. In addition, GLAAD counted 14 recurring LGBT characters on scripted primetime broadcast television this season.
In the upcoming 2011-2012 season:
· Fox leads the other broadcast networks with 8 LGBT characters out of 117 total series regular characters; this is the highest number of LGBT characters of any broadcast network for the 2010-2011 season.
· ABC is not in the lead for the first time in six years, and the network has significantly dropped in its percentage of regular LGBT characters, from 7.2% in 2010 to 3.4% for the upcoming season.
· NBC is in decline for the third year in a row, and it will feature three (1.9%) regular LGBT characters out of 154.
· The CW has also taken a step back, and it will feature only one LGBT series regular character out of 67 (1.5%).
· CBS remains in last place for the fourth year in a row. Out of 134 series regular characters, only one will be LGBT (0.7%), but the network will include several LGBT recurring characters.
On mainstream cable networks, the number of announced LGBT series regular characters has declined to 28, but will feature an increased number of recurring characters for a total of 54 LGBT characters, a figure similar to last year’s count.
· For the second year in a row, HBO features the greatest number of LGBT characters on cable with 11; seven of these are series regulars.
· Also making a significant contribution to the count are Showtime with ten characters, ABC Family, FX and TeenNick with four characters each, and TNT and BBC America with three.
· For the second year in a row, HBO’s True Blood is one of the most LGBT-inclusive programs on television with six characters and is tied this year with the Showtime series Shameless.
Characters on LGBT-focused networks like Logo have traditionally not been included in the yearly character count for GLAAD’s Where We Are on TV report since their primary focus is already on LGBT programming.
This also marks the seventh year that GLAAD has analyzed the race/ethnicity and gender demographics of all 647 series regular characters expected to appear on primetime broadcast television in the upcoming season. Male characters continue to outweigh female characters 56.7% (367) to 43.3% (280) in overall numbers, and 78.2% (506) of all series regular characters are white. Compared to last year, African American representation has decreased from 12.1% to 9.9% (64) while Latino/a representation has increased from 4.9% to 5.6% (36). GLAAD also counted 29 Asian-Pacific Islander characters (4.5%).
For the second year in a row, GLAAD has included people with disabilities (PWD) in its overall study of diversity on the broadcast networks. A total of five series regular characters will be PWD, making them just 0.8% of all regular characters, which is one character short of last year’s count. This research was conducted in conjunction with the Tri-Union I AM PWD (Inclusion in the Arts & Media of People With Disabilities) campaign of Actors’ Equity Association, AFTRA and SAG (IAMPWD.org).
Of the 19 announced LGBT regular characters in the 2011-2012 primetime broadcast season, five are people of color (26%), and none will be people with disabilities. Not one LGBT character announced for the new broadcast season will be black or transgender.
“GLAAD continues to call for networks to not only include LGBT characters, but to also ensure that the images reflect the gender and ethnic diversity that makes up our community,” Thompson continued. “There are zero LGBT African American or transgender characters on broadcast network TV, but storylines like those of True Blood’s spirit-channeling fry cook Lafayette and Degrassi’s transgender teen Adam on cable demonstrate how more diverse representations make for popular, original, and compelling television.”
This research serves as a benchmark for GLAAD’s advocacy efforts which call for fair, accurate and diverse LGBT representations across media platforms. The storylines and characters in the Where We Are On TV report will later be reviewed for GLAAD’s Network Responsibility Index (NRI), released after the May 2012 sweeps, which grades networks on overall LGBT impressions.



I don’t think Gladd will be fully satisfied until every daytime, children’s and prime time show is 100 percent gay.
Even if you are right about that (and I don’t think you are), that’s very clearly not the case now or any time soon, so in the mean time their position that LBGT characters should be represented in proportion to the population seems reasonable.
Unless, of course, that you assume that gay characters having representation on TV is a bad thing, in which case why not just say that?
*Ding* You got it.
I’m gonna start lobbying for straight men on TV. We’re an oppressed minority.
Really? I mean … really?
Look, I can understand this sentiment, but consider this: homophobia is alive and well throughout much of America. Employment discrimination and housing discrimination are very common, and kids who come out to their parents often have a very, very tough time of it. So insofar as GLAAD’s goal is to end homophobia rather than to have accurate proportions of LGBT people, their behavior thus far seems reasonable.
i agree, TV should be 100 per cent gay. At least that way TV would have interesting, smart, attractive, evolved and creative characters. But, unfortunately that isn’t the case. I guess more straight guys from Jersey Shore for American.
FAAAAAAAAAAA-BYOU-LUUUUSSSSSS!!!
Why exactly “should LGBT characters (necessarily) be represented in proportion to the population”? Just for the sake of accuracy?
GLAAD reports the ethnic composition/breakdown of characters on TV, and I doubt that many or most ethnic minority groups are represented in proportion to their segment of the actual population. But why stop there? How about obese people? People with down syndrome? Albinos? Or equal male:female 1:1?
If anything, shows like Glee over-represent LGBT (or, mostly LGB), i.e. there are more gay characters per fictional capita than in our real world, arguably. Seems almost hypocritical to laud shows that purposefully skew the cast composition towards LGB merely because they’re LGB, but then chastise others for having a predominantly straight cast.
I have nothing against Glee or LGBT or LGBT on air; I just think it’s petty to think that shows should have LGBT-proportionally accurate casts for the sake of accuracy when there are plenty of other groups underrepresented as well. It’s almost counterintuitive, to strive for equality but emphasize/promote the representation of one group.
It might be true that there are more LGBT characters per fictional character total on TV. I don’t know. Part of that is probably because there’s an above stastically average LGBT presence in Los Angeles. But is that really bad?
The measurement is statistically accurate diversity on television. But really, that’s just a way of expressing or showing progress on the true goal. GLAAD is trying to combat homophobia. The fact is, everyone in America knows a white person. Does everyone in America have a positive image of a black person? Or hispanic person? Or LGBT? The goal is really to present positive images of these minorities on TV because an unfortunate amount of viewers don’t actually know anyone like that in real life.
I think the goal should be, above all, to fight ignorance.
Now if only those programs actually featured characters instead of stereotypes. GLAADs a bunch of brown- nosers and has-beens.