Can News Corp Escape The Hacking Scandal Unscathed?
Rupert Murdoch’s News International has offered to pay roughly $4.7M to settle the case brought against it by the family of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler. That’s a hefty amount –Murdoch is reported to have been personally involved with the negotiations– which could help or hurt the conglom as it moves through the scandal. News Corp. is trying to “be seen to be generous as it’s much more than would be awarded by a court,” said Niri Shan, the head of media law at Taylor Wessing LLP in London told Bloomberg. “The only downside is if it potentially sets an unrealistic expectation for others.” The settlement includes a 2 million-pound payment to the Dowler family and a 1 million-pound donation to charity. The settlement could be announced tomorrow morning but The Guardian said that the family has yet to sign off. Reports that Dowler’s voice mails had been hacked ignited the public outcry that forced News Corp to close the News of the World and drop its bid for full control of BSkyB. Parliament decided last week to have News Corp’s Deputy COO James Murdoch testify again, after after former employees questioned statements he made about his knowledge of the hacking at the tabloid.


NO. This should NOT curry favor with anyone. This is a big black mark on journalism (or whatever fox does), and there must be consequences. $4.7 million is a drop in the murdoch bucket, and I’m very much looking forward to any investigations on fox hacking into the phones of victims of 9/11.
Agreed. May all the criminals who were posing as journalists go to prison for breaking the law and may the victims be compensated.
There were 963 people (my best guess) whose phones were hacked. At $1M payoff per person, that’s $963 million dollars – still less than $1B. The old asshole can afford it.
And yes, he will pay off everyone involved – over, and under the table – pay legal fees and pay legal penalties – and he’ll still get away with it. And he’ll still be a billionaire at the end of the day. Money doesn’t just “talk”, people, money SHOUTS!
And guess whose fault that is – YOURS. It’s your fault for watching FOX and giving his advertisers eyeballs to charge for. It’s your fault for making FOX News Channel (not classified as a true news outlet, btw) what it is. It’s your fault for not kicking this shitball and all of his media endeavors to the curb in the first place. He makes millions off of your complacency, ignorance and apathy. And he’ll make millions more tomorrow.
He owns you. And you let him. And he knows it.
I really disagree with that sort of guilt-based politics. Individuals choosing not to watch the Simpsons or Juno, or work on the Simpsons or Juno, or even, errrr, watch Fox News if it has a better reel during a big story, is not politics. It is just worrying. We should be controlling this creep through legislation & taxation, regular actual policy, not a hodgepodge of of guilt trips.
All this stuff about hacking the phones of celebrities and murder victims is a sideshow. The big question is whether Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, etc. have been spying on members of Congress and using the dirt they’ve gotten to manipulate the U.S. government and other governments.
Example: John Kerry is a bright, rich, attractive guy who seemed to run an intentionally terrible campaign in 2004. Why was his campaign terrible? Was it because he just was a horrible campaigner, or was it that he or people on his staff were somehow messed up with Ailes, the Murdochs, etc.?
On the one hand: OK, that’s tinfoil hat kind of stuff.
But once we see that the Murdochs could hack public officials’ phones in the United Kingdom, really far-fetched fears about how our political system might really operate seem less far-fetched.
If nothing else, the Murdochs have breathed life into all sorts of horrible, ancient conspiracy theories.