Hot Trailer: ‘New Year’s Eve’

COMMENTS (32)

• Pretty sure this is one of the signs of the Apocalypse.

  Comment by dee123 — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 9:17pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I literally thought about posting the same words, hahah. really though, this would be depressing if it mattered at all

    Comment by lane — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:04pm PDT  Reply to this post

• snore…how come this “all-star cast” crap reminds me more of an Irwin Allen disaster flick?

  Comment by wrd — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 9:58pm PDT  Reply to this post

• It looks worst than Valentines Day, and I never thought anything could be as bad as that

  Comment by Krystal — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 9:59pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Looks like it’ll make millions. And make millions of people happy. Can’t wait to see it.

  Comment by UCLA — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:18pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I was going to call you out as a fool, but then I realized that you’re just a bruin.

    Comment by Shhhhh — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 4:22pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Formulaic as hell. Will do numbers no doubt.

  Comment by brick — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:18pm PDT  Reply to this post

• I lost respect for every single actor in this film, except Ashton Kootcher who I had none for in the first place.

  Comment by Jessey — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:23pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • You’re a mind reader….couldn’t have written it better myself!

    Comment by Truthteller — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 9:17am PDT  Reply to this post

• how dare they.

  Comment by Anonymous — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:45pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Where’s Tay-Tay??????

  Comment by Jarlerguy — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 10:54pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Sorry, Garry, but “Valentine’s Day” did not need a follow-up film. NYE looks like a cheap mash-up of “Love Actually” meets “When Harry Met Sally”. Richard Curtis did a much more masterful job with the ensemble love story concept (Love Actually).

  What’s next, Garry? “Memorial Day”?

  Comment by gary — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 11:25pm PDT  Reply to this post

• gary–
  oy…
  not good.

  Comment by janet — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 11:45pm PDT  Reply to this post

• According to IMDB and Wikipedia, Carla Gugino, Sienna Miller, Sara Paxton, Greg Kinnear, Cam Gigandet, Shaquille O’Neal, Meg Ryan, John Stamos, Julie Andrews, Frankie Muniz, John Lithgow and Ice Cube are all in this film as well but have not been shown in the trailers or the photos so far.

  Comment by Bruce Redwood — Wednesday September 28, 2011 @ 11:57pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • IMDB isn’t exactly known for their accuracy. Actually, the they’re probably better known for their lack of it.

    Comment by Amy — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:47am PDT  Reply to this post

    • OK, neither am I with that extra “the”. Clearly I haven’t had enough coffee yet.

      Comment by Amy — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:48am PDT  Reply to this post

• Insert a gay couple and I’ll watch it. With about 100 actors in it that shouldn’t be too hard.

  Comment by JM — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 1:16am PDT  Reply to this post

  • Doesn’t Zac Efron count?

    Comment by SNap — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 5:30pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Middle America will eat this up like candy.

  Comment by schadenfreude — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 5:01am PDT  Reply to this post

• So this is basically a sellout franchise for name actors who haven’t had a hit in awhile. They can be in this most bland generic film possible and claim a hit on their resume, thereby keeping them in “demand”. Look at the list: Duhamel, Parker, Efron, Kutcher, Swank…all likeable with poor box office but all have hardworking publicists.

  Comment by cher — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 7:22am PDT  Reply to this post

• i cant wait to see this

  Comment by nick dangelo — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 7:48am PDT  Reply to this post

• Lifetime should start thinking about releasing their movies theatrically.

  Comment by yougottabekiddin — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:14am PDT  Reply to this post

• There is nothing good here.

  I just dry heaved from the insipidness.

  Comment by monique — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:15am PDT  Reply to this post

• I actually didn’t mind Valentine’s Day. I’ll probably watch this on Netflix.

  Comment by Justin Poppiti — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:18am PDT  Reply to this post

• A.W.F.U.L. Seriously, there are no words. I mean, that little goofy girl from the bee movie lifting her shirt up (un-sexy btw) and saying “mom, this is not a training bra” and then horse faced carrie Bradshaw saying “and this is not girls gone wild”? I mean really? Does it honestly get any worse? Oh yeah, it does–we have to watch that dopey Josh duhamel run around in a dopey tuxedo and scarf for 90 minutes! Oy is right.

  Comment by Redd — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:21am PDT  Reply to this post

• I can’t either!

  Comment by The Devil — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:25am PDT  Reply to this post

• next up for Garry – YOM KIPUUR: ATONE, OR DIE LAUGHING!

  Comment by bobweaver — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 8:51am PDT  Reply to this post

• Here we go again. They should also add in some eye-candy like along with all the over the hill stars.

  Comment by Lind — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 9:37am PDT  Reply to this post

• there’s crap… and then there’s CRAP… and then there’s stuff like this. A whole new cinemascore rating called: “You will never get those two hours back.”

  Comment by eyesalreadybleeding — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 10:31am PDT  Reply to this post

• ouch.

  Comment by IMHO — Thursday September 29, 2011 @ 4:12pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Wait till George C. Scott sees this trailer.

  Comment by Jerkstore Jimmy — Friday September 30, 2011 @ 11:59am PDT  Reply to this post