TiVo’s been looking for patterns among DVR viewers who speed through certain ads — and Alex Petrilli Jr, Senior Manager of Audience Research, says that when it comes to box office sales, “the fast forward rate seems to tell a story.” In the more than 40% of all households with a DVR, viewers tend to zap ads for films they don’t plan to go out to see. That could indicate trouble ahead for Summit Entertainment’s The Three Musketeers, which opens October 21. About 20% of DVR users sped through ads for Musketeers during the week that ended September 25, TiVo says. That made the action film the week’s second-most-zapped campaign after FilmDistrict’s Drive, where 24.6% fast-forwarded through the ads. But the data should encourage executives behind DreamWorks Animation’s Puss In Boots, which opens October 28: Only 11.7% sped through its ads, making it the second-least-zapped campaign among the 15 most advertised films — behind Sony’s Courageous, which a mere 9.9% decided to ignore. Just 13.7% used the remote to avoid the ads for Paramount’s Footloose, which opens October 14, making it the week’s third-least-avoided campaign. As a result, Puss and Footloose are “trending to open pretty well” Petrilli says. The data comes from TiVo’s StopWatch ratings service, which is an anonymous daily sample of 375,000 TiVo subscribers.


Where exactly is the pattern here?
The Michael York version is the best. The Charlie Sheen version looks lame, didn’t watch it. This version looks okay but the whole “matrix” effect kind of ruins it for me. I may or may not watch it.
Well maybe it wasn’t the best version ever made, but I’ve always thought the Charlie Sheen/Disney version was totally cheesy in a good way, and if it’s ever on tv, I’ll definitely watch it. You don’t have to be Best Picture quality to be a great movie. As long as you go into it wanting to have a good time, it’ll probably happen. The movie knows what it is. Oliver Platt’s always great, and even though Tim Curry wasn’t like the real Richelieu, I enjoyed the camp. It’s family friendly (at least for older kids), but full of action, comedy, and romance.
As soon as I saw the trailer for the newest version, I was horrified. This is a title they remake every decade or so because it’s a classic story full of action and (b)romance, and I don’t have a problem with that, but why they’d think I’d want to see this retelling, I have no idea. I’d been planning on checking it out til I saw the trailer. No wonder people are skipping past it. This thing feels like another familiar title cash grab with Transformers level depth. It could’ve been so great. What a shame.
I agree, anonymous.
or it could just be the fact the movie looks awful
Agreed. More studio garbage.
Heh–ninjas in pre-revolutionary France? I could deal with the steampunk air warship, but come on…
And since I don’t plan to see this, can anyone tell me what is the deal with the parkour/skydiving Lady deWinter? Sure, she’s a skilled assassin, but really…
Agreed. Everything about it looks terrible, particularly the whole ‘Treasure Planet meets Matrix’ look. This seems to be one of those stories that studios feel has to be remade every 7-10 years, so maybe they were trying to bring something new?
This is ridiculous, and I say that as someone thoroughly convinced that Three Musketeers will bomb.
I bet Bucky Larson had the most watched ads
This movie will be a guaranteed flop. If you’ve seen even 10 seconds of the trailer, you’ll agree.
I’m not involved with the film, but what is your track record BRETT?
What noteworthy accomplishments do you have on planet earth to make your opinion worth anything?
I have no stake in the film, but I’m sick of dipsticks spouting off non-sense opinions based on a trailer.
I’m hoping this film does well, as I hope all films do well at the box office so the industry thrives and my colleagues and I can make more films, as opposed to investment dollars going toward video games and other entertainment ventures.
Wow. It’s this type of respect for an audience member that explains why much of the quality in Hollywood is in the crapper.
@not involved
A trailer is meant to make people want to see the film, and Three Musketeers’ is an absolute turn off. Sometimes, however, a bad trailer has a good film hiding behind it, desperately trying to get out. I have seen the Three Musketeers in its entirety, I also have no stake in it and want the industry to thrive and make more films. Given this is one of the worst films I can remember, where the only things of quality are the costumes and set designs, where every other aspect of note (writing, directing, casting and acting) is awful, it is should be declared dead and buried as soon as possible. In the real world Paul W.S. Anderson, Constantin FIlm, Davis Film et al should go to the wall for this one, but it’s the investors who will suffer here, along with anyone dumb enough to buy a ticket.
Do DVR users really stop for certain ads instead of skipping the whole commercial break?
I do. If something looks interesting, or its a commercial I like. Otherwise, on we go until I’m past the break.
I do but very rarely. And it’s almost always for a movie trailer so this study makes sense…
That 12 yr old for Dartanian is mis casting at it’s best
Every generations gets the Three Musketeers it deserves.
If you make the Transformers movies a hit… there will be consequences.
LOL!!!!! Too good, too good….and so so true
This film is Dead on Arrival. For a year now, audiences have been watching the trailers open-mouthed wondering what got that movie produced.
No kidding, I thought this movie opened and closed already.
What! This article… doesn’t make any sense. Drive has made $30mil so far… great viewer/critic response… what exactly are you trying to prove here? Do you have a point?? (If so you are citing the wrong evidence… or your data analysis needs to be a bit more comprehensive.)
Yes Three Musketeers should flop but still. That article had nothing to do with that… though tomorrow will be a full moon because I got pineapples at the supermarket today.
They know if we cf through commercials? Why can’t they get a more accurate amount of viewers who watch a show then
Great point, that’s what I was thinking too. The ratings system seems so outdated. Most people have DVRs, far more I would assume than have Nielson boxes, so why not use that information instead. I would think it would be a much more accurate way to determine who is watching, especial in terms of time-shifting.
Now cliche’ matrix moves and effects, aarmored flying boats (pure bullshit and done better in World of Warcraft – hint hint) … what’s not to like?
Fascinating application of technology if that trend holds up.
I love how every ‘Three Musketeers’ movie features…four of them.
That said, I am interested in this and will be going to a theater near you…or me.
I think it’s too early too dismiss this purely based on the ad-skipping statistics…perhaps people have seen the full trailer enough in theaters lately (it’s been pretty widely distributed).
Did you read the book? It’s good and explains this concept quite well.
Could it just be because once you’ve watched the trailer once, you don’t need to watch it again, hence the fast forwarding?
I indeed fast forwarded the trailers for Drive, after I had seen it a couple of times, but I still went to see the film — which is great by the way (and also very violent).
I love the Charlie Sheen version it’s such a cheesy mess, though Oliver Platt & Tim Curry make it a guilty pleasure.
I wish I’d read your post before doing my own before. It looks like I’m just rephrasing myself under a different screen name. Oops. I mentioned the exact things you did including the cheesiness and those specific actors up above in response to someone who didn’t like the movie, then scrolled down to read this comment. Glad I’m not the only one who loves me some Oliver Platt!
Has it occurred to anyone that in the case of Footloose people might be watching the trailers and saying to their friends/family “Look at this shit. Can you believe they’ve remade this?”
And with The Three Musketeers, “Look at this shit. It looks the same fast forwarded as it does normal speed.”
This movie looks like it’s cut from the same cloth as Wild Wild West, Jonah Hex, and Priest. No please.
This should have been an out and out comedy. Seriously.
Or maybe that’s what we’ll get, considering Paul W.S Anderson is doing his usual ‘I’m casting my wife again because nobody else will.’
And no husband likes sleeping on the couch because his wife is upset for not casting her, right, Paul?
Anderson is actually a decently talented director, (Though not when it comes to casting) he just needs some great material instead of junk like this.
PS: Event Horizon kicked ass.
No, Robert, Anderson is not a decent director at all. Event Horizon is middling (I’ll give it a pass because I’m feeling generous) but that’s still one-for-nine against. Simply put, he’s just the luckiest guy in town. His one talent is tapping into the mindset of the videogame crowd, which no other director has so far managed to do. It doesn’t mean the films aren’t all atrocious though. Three Musketeers should finally be his professional undoing. Not long until we find out, anyway…
I guess only those who have a DVR in household are allowed to see this movie in theatres. On Stranger Tides and Alice in Wonderland both were total junk but it made a lot of $$. Even the worn-out performance of Depp playing Sparrow in both movies didn’t scare the people that wanted to spend their hard earned cash for a so called “family entertainment movie.” Probably they are all were TIVo subsribers.
Hmm…interesting. I had no idea they are able to monitor (and create STATISTICS, graphs and the rest) someone’s habits on fast forwarding.
I think its silly and the result have very little truth in it, but some bureaucrats fight with all their might to keep themselves relevant.
If you are on the habit of skipping commercial, you skip them all.
Now on the movie itself..the story has been used one too many times.
If the movie is good or not it wont make a difference. How many people are eager to pay for something that is not even original anymore?
The monitoring thing kind of worries me.
Everyone shut up about how this film will bomb. Let the box office speak for itself. Paul Anderson has been laughing all the way to the bank with his recent films. No one cares that you don’t like it. It still made an asston of money.
@observer: before you try to be an expert at anything you should try to read a book. The Three Musketeers is the story of D’artagnan meeting three musketeers. That’s why there are four as you aptly observed.
The latest three musketeers move looks awful.