Hugh Grant, as Deadline revealed over the summer, backed out of replacing Charlie Sheen as the star of Two and a Half Men at the last minute. Now he is filming Cloud Atlas with Tom Hanks, Halle Berry and Jim Broadbent for the Wachowski brothers. But he has reinvented himself over here as a justice campaigner on behalf of celebrities and civilians like himself who had their phones hacked in the News Corp scandal. He has always been ambivalent about being a movie star, and has long talked about doing something different. Asked if he had been wasting his life until now, Grant told The Guardian: “That is harsh, but yes. If I had been a complete failure until the age of 51, I would definitely go along with you but I suppose I have had a few successes. But yes, you are right. I have squandered my life.”
Britain is taking him seriously on the hacking scandal. Grant was giving interviews before meeting Prime Minister David Cameron in Manchester last night. He said he wanted to hear directly from the politician too close to Rupert Murdoch’s organisation. Following the meeting, Grant said that Cameron made “the right noises but I expected him to make the right noises”. Grant alleges that Cameron must have known disgraced Murdoch editor Andy Coulson oversaw a culture of phone hacking at the News of the World before hiring him as his chief PR flack. why he accepted Coulson’s explanation that a lone rogue employee had hacked phones under his News of the World editorship. Grant even warned UK Chancellor George Osborne ahead of time that it would be a “catastrophic mistake” to hire Coulson. Grant told The Times of London that he found himself sitting next to Osborne at a dinner party and had to be calmed down by his hostess because he got so angry over it.
Grant says there’s more to be revealed about the relationship between senior politicians and the Murdoch press. He told the Independent: “The more that comes out about all this, the more we will learn about the true nature of the Prime Minister’s relationship with the Murdoch organisation. What I hear on the Cotswold grapevine [the tony Oxford area where Cameron and ex-News International CEO Rebekah Brooks both live] is that the relationship was sinisterly cosy to a deeply unhealthy and unattractive degree.”
The actor expresses doubts whether the UK government has any real appetite for media reform “or whether their instinct is to push the whole thing into the long grass and go back into the nice cosy old routine of being in bed with Murdoch”. And he thought Rupert Murdoch’s performance before politicians investigating the hacking scandal in July was “phoney”. Grant explained, “Speaking as a bad actor, it was easy to spot a bad performance … my sources tell me he was as a sharp as a tack when they saw him a week or two before.”


“Speaking as a bad actor…” Love it, can you imagine a American actor(I’m sure we would probably come up with the same names)saying that? God bless dry British wit.
Good for him. Maybe this prat should have been James Bond after all…
A cosy relationship with News Corp? Not on Hollywood’s Sunset Boulevard, surely.
This smacks of political hypocrisy. The hacking took place on New Labour’s watch, under the leadership of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Why no mention of their cosy relationship with the Murdochs? Why no mention that the Murdoch press supported Blair throughout his tenure, and only turned on Brown when it became clear he was a disastrous Prime Minister (something even Blair agrees with)?
Let’s have a little less partisanship from the increasingly irritating and self-important Hugh Grant, and more truth about where the blame really lies, please.
It was Margerat Thatcher who first realised the signigicane Murdoch’s press with the public in the 80′s and that strategy was used by Tony Blair as well back in the 90′s and then conservatives again within the last decade. Grant has been equally critical of the previous Labout party under Blair as he has been with the conservative: Watch his newsnight appereance where he openly calls out one of the Labour MP’s for having cocktails with Murdoch months beforehand. The difference here is that the *new* party (cue eye-rolls) have openly admitted to it but have led the calls for reform. Lib Dems are the only party that has disliked/ spoken out against the Murdochs and I hear that the feeling is mutual.
Riz, I take your point entirely, and you’re right. However, Grant has chosen the week of the Conservative Party conference to make these comments. Why not say something last week during the Labour conference? Why not attack those in the shadow cabinet who sucked up to the Murdochs? Hence my attack on his political hypocrisy. All politicians are vermin, in my book, but Labour are far more culpable for turning a blind-eye to the media excesses of the last 13 years, simply because they were the ones in power when it was happening. And they did nothing.
I also stand by comments about his self-importance. He’s an actor, and a fading actor at that. Why does he think that makes him worth listening to about ANY topic?
um, because his phone was hacked, and he was one of the first people to bring this story to light?
Grant has always been anti-paps and anti-tabloid for much of his professional career and the British red tops have always targetted him personally. Its the same with George Micheal. For people like them, the un-checked intrusion in their privacy makes it a very presonal issue so they have their own axe to grind.
Why he’s targetting the Conservatives more? Well they are in No.10 at the moment and anyone whose been following their media policies will see that its very much in support of News International own business aspirations in the UK, for example, downsize funding to the BBC (Murdoch’s main rival in the UK). The BSKYB deal that was all but signed before the hacking scandal broke out – concerns about media plurality be damned. As heavily involved as the previous labour party were with the Murdoch’s press, it was never as obvious as it is now. Andy Coulson being the key example here. Look up his connection with Jonathon Rees and you’ll see why David’s Camerons ‘defence’ of Coulson is particularly concerning. Especillay since Coulson had access to state secrets and was never properly vetted as people of his position should have. His office was warned, his deputy Nick Clegg was personally warned by the Guardian (who were not allowed to report this due to an ongoing murder trial involving Rees) and Cameron still pleads ignorance. Never mind the issue of Coulson still being on News Internatational payroll (which he never declared) and who up until recently were also paying all his legal fees.
I’m going off on a tangent here but Grant’s position is necessary to stop this issue from fading into dust which is the risk here. When NI abandoned the BSKYB deal they more or less implied that they’d be back once the public outrage calms down, which is what Grant is most concerned about.
What an interesting thing has developed with Hugh’s career; who would have thought of him as a caped crusader after Divine Brown?
Always liked him and knew there was a smart fellow there … somewhere. Just saw ‘Notting Hill’ again .. what an awesome performance.
Good luck Hugh!
The Murdochs court those in control of every regime including the Chinese leadership. While the hacking of celebrities may result in no more than entertaining copy, the hacking of government officials may suggest a darker agenda of control files and political extortion.
When you work with someone under difficult circumstances, you find out what they’re made of, and sex scandal aside, Grant has more integrity than anyone I’ve ever met in Hollywood. Also, he’s not a partisan: he’s very honest, sometimes painfully so, about both sides of every issue. There’s nothing he’s saying that he doesn’t thoroughly believe.
What’ with the discussion of Grant being ‘partisan’? Cameron hired the editor of the worst rag in the UK as his communications chief. That’s like hiring Harvey Levin of TMZ to be our Attorney General. For whatever Blair and other PM’s were, they weren’t so tone deaf as to hire a Murdoch lackey to come in and spearhead one of the country’s most important posts. AND to not only maintain a direct line of contact with Murdoch but to actually foster that relationship in new previously unthinkable ways.
Any cries of partisanship here are variations on the Tea Party line of crap about ‘both sides’ are bad in US politics. No, actually, the Republicans are much much worse.
At least Harvey Levin would be qualified to be Attorney General as opposed to the moron there now who hands out pardons for cash.
Isn’t Murdoch the godfather to Tony Blair’s youngest child? It seems to me Murdoch was straddling both the left and right.
Hugh has always been a smart actor , for the first half of his career preferring to play the bachelor or swinging singles man . But as a mature actor he is suited to lot more dramatic roles . It’s great to watch him !