
BREAKING: Attorneys for the estate of iconic science fiction author Philip K. Dick have filed suit in US District Court in California against Media Rights Capital over what it alleges is an attempt to get out of payments for the rights to use Dick’s short story as the basis for the Matt Damon thriller The Adjustment Bureau. The complaint alleges that MRC is using the argument that the material is in the public domain. The heart of the complaint is this: When writer/director George Nolfi optioned the material from the estate in 2001, he agreed to pay $25,000 against a $1 million-$1.85 million purchase price, depending on the film’s budget, as well as 2.5% of net profits.
MRC, which bought the project in 2009 and executed the purchase of the material, paid the estate $1.4 million. The estate believes it is owed more than $500,000 that should have been paid when the film reached break even. Instead, The suit alleges that MRC has breached the contract and tried to slip out of these obligations by challenging the copyright status of the underlying material. Turns out the short story was first published on a science fiction magazine in July, 1954, but the estate claims it was done without the knowledge of the author. The first authorized publication of the material, the estate claims, came in 1973 in a collection of Dick’s stories. The complaint claims MRC concealed it would challenge the copyright until after the film was released. The estate wants MRC to live up to the terms agreed to in the original deal agreed to by Nolfi and his partner, Michael Hackett.
Justin. M. Goldstein, the attorney from Carlsmith Ball LLP who is pressing the case for The Philip K. Dick Testamentary Trust, issued this statement: “Philip K. Dick’s trust and heirs were partners every step of the way in lending time, support and cooperation during the development, production, marketing and release of The Adjustment Bureau. Almost immediately after the movie was released and the money started to roll in, the filmmakers and Media Rights Capital attempted to cut the Trust out entirely, and grab every last dollar for themselves. To try to justify this greedy move, they claim that contracts and copyright filings which they, their lawyers, and agents reviewed and approved — and which the U.S. Copyright Office blessed not once but twice — are now wrong. On behalf of the millions of fans worldwide of this visionary science fiction author, it truly saddens us that the matter had to reach this point.”
MRC could not immediately be reached for comment. Deadline will add a statement if and when it comes in.


No surprise to hard core Finke readers… Modi and Asif are two of the biggest cheats around.
So Media Rights Capital produced a movies that made them millions and millions of dollars and they’ve built a good relationship with the estate of the writer of the original short story, an estate which contains many other valuable properties that can be made into hit movies, and they’re willing to throw away that relationship just to save $500k?
Not just throwing away that relationship. If you are a rights holder, this story should give you pause before working with MRC. There are many relationships tainted by a move as lame as this.
A total Madoff move, short sighted and insulting to creative.
i blame Nolfi…not a good guy…no one has a nice thing to say about him..
He is an amazing, talented and caring person. Stop hating and get your own life loser.
Am I missing something here? This doesn’t sound like enough years for public domain.
This does not surprise me. MRC is notorious for not paying their bills. The list is long of writers, producers, actors, etc., who have chased MRC for monies that were owed and overdue. Modi has assembled the cheapest and most dishonest group of hucksters in the business.
I thought literary works only fall into public domain 50-70 years after the author’s death. Philip K. Dick died in 1982.
Have a well-financed team of lawyers and Happy Birthday stays in copyright forever. Don’t and the works of a writer only dead for 29 years gets thrown open to everybody.
Still, enough complaining. Time to get cracking on my The Man In The High Castle project…
Don, it depends when they’re published. If they’re published before 1978 it’s usually 95 years after the death of the creator but it also gets a little more complicated.
Dick estate, as Ellison says, make sure MRC pulls back a bloody stump from your pocket.
I think that the underlying message here is that maybe people who want to produce science fiction movies that aren’t sequels should be spending more time going through pulp science fiction magazines.
Dick is a good writer, but, really, when I was a kid reading science fiction and fantasy, he was thought of as just another good, well-known writer, not a neglected. If he’s now viewed as the Franz Kafka of science fiction, then maybe there are some other Franz Kafkas lurking in Weird Tales, the Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, etc.
Example: People have already made at least one successful movie out of the stories of Thomas Disch (The Brave Little Toaster). Why not more? How on earth was it possible that he could die in a state of severe financial distress just a couple years ago, given that he had so many great, optionable stories in existence? What about Ray Bradbury, Theodore Sturgeon, James Blish, Samuel Delany, etc.? And, if people want to do more straightforward movies, where’s the Anne McCaffrey dragon movie? What better answer to, “I want a soap opera-ish movie that’s sort of like one of those vampire or zombie movies, but different,” than by doing a dragon movie?
MRC is a bunch of frauds.
Has no one learned from Netflix’s mistake? MRC can either pay up now or piss of the estate that gave them a hit film. Does MRC want the rights to the Adjustment Bureau sequels and TV spin off? Or do they wanna bitch about chump change?
And really, no creative will want to work with slimy MRC if they’re seen as intellectual property pirates. Ugh.