
For its entire existence, the CW has been battling criticism that its target young (and primarily female) demographic is way too narrow to support a broadcast network. The drumbeat grew louder as TV audiences started migrating online, with younger viewers leading the charge, further eroding the CW’s modest ratings. In a first step to try to stop the bleeding, the network last year started bundling its on-air ad sales with those for the streaming its shows on the CW’s Web site with a full commercial load. The move alleviated the problem a bit but didn’t change the reality that the CW was a network that was losing money and was going dark for extended periods of time including the entire summer. Part of the problem is the fact that the CW airs serialized young-skewing dramas. They don’t repeat well, leading to stretches of dismal ratings for the network with no originals and generating virtually no syndication value for the CW co-owners CBS and Warner Bros. whose TV studios produce all of the network’s scripted series.
Within the last couple of weeks, the network was part of two major online distribution deals that take major steps towards resolving both issues. First came the 4-year pact CW’s co-parent companies CBS and Warner Bros. signed with Netflix for streaming previous seasons of the network’s current series. The deal, which analysts estimate could bring CBS and Warner Bros. as much as $1 billion, would help make up for lost syndication revenue because of the serialized nature of the shows. Additionally, the pact doesn’t prevent the studios from pursuing cable syndication deals in the future (not that such deals appear likely.) Then came the Friday’s deal with Hulu, this time made by the CW itself. It will have the episodes o
f network’s current seasons stream on the Fox-NBC-ABC-owned online hub — right away for subscribers with limited commercials and free for everyone 8 days after the episode’s original airing on the CW with full commercial load. (cwtv.com will continues to stream the episodes starting 3 days after their premiere.) The revenue from that deal is nowhere near the one with Netflix but an insider described it as “meaningful”. It will go mostly towards programming and marketing at the network, including investing in original summer fare, the CW president Mark Pedowitz said. The deal is interesting because CBS has been a longtime Hulu holdout (though the network recently signed a deal for Hulu’s subscription-only service in Japan.) Pedowitz hopes to use Hulu as “a massive marketing platform” to reach viewers that the network hadn’t before, and “hopefully bring people to the stations and help make (the CW series) more live events than Live+7.” The CW shows get a disproportionally large ratings bump in Live+7 with the highest average percentage increases among all broadcast networks, but live viewing is valued more by advertisers. The two deals won’t make the CW profitable but, as analysts noted, they’re putting the network on a path to profitability.
The broadcast network business was built on close-ended procedurals that repeat well to allow nets to maintain stable ratings levels throughout the year and producing studios to sell those shows in broadcast and especially cable syndication for top dollar. Then streaming services like Netflix came along where serialized dramas whose syndication value is almost non-existent are far more attractive. Lionsgate TV paved the way with its Netflix syndication deal for Mad Men earlier this year, and now CBS and Warner Bros. have taken it to the next level with the entire portfolio of the CW’s current series. But if those series seem to work better online than they do on broadcast, wouldn’t it make more sense if they were produced directly for digital distribution, eliminating the great expenses associated with managing a broadcast network? Pedowitz dismisses such a notion. “You need the broad platform that makes the shows interesting to companies like Netflix and Hulu,” he said, adding that it is because the CW shows have the title recognition and production values associated with a network series that they are so attractive to the digital services. At TCA in August, Pedowitz stressed that adding more close-ended procedurals was one of his development goals for this season. The deal with Netflix, which puts a premium on serialized shows, hasn’t changed that, he said. “We will have a healthy programming mix of shows. “We’re still a broadcast network, we still want to have shows that repeat well.”
Like the characters in most of its shows, the CW is coming of age. But instead of fighting its niche appeal, the network is finally embracing it. And after struggling for years with the fact that a large portion of its audiences prefer to watch its series online (remember the network’s 2008 decision to strop free streaming Gossip Girl in an effort to try to force viewers to watch it on TV?), the network seems to have finally come to terms with it. As they say, if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


I watch most of The CW shows, because it skews younger people (I’m 19 years old). Pedowitz may fix the damage made by Ostroff.
I tried getting Gossip Girl for Bravo but they wouldnt accept my offer of $2 per episode. Too bad. It would’ve made a great companion piece for Real Housewives of NYC. Who’s the biggest UES bitch: Blair Waldorf or Jill Zarin? Watch what happens live every night There’s a Real Housewives show on only by Bravo!
Maybe CW should split back to the WB and UPN and go back to making comedies that stereotype black people, that seemed to be reasonably successfull for a few years.
The CW is a joining of CBS and Warners, not Warners and UPN.
Hmmm was correct. It was WB and UPN that made The CW… UPN is owned by CBS, The WB is owned by Warners…. so uhhh, I guess both of you are technically right lol
The real problem for this network is that they need to start branching out their programming to other demographics and NOT just solely focus on the female one. They need to start producing programs that can be viewed by other audiences instead of just the female demographic. They need to cut down on the many repeats of their shows and ease off on the reality fare and then MAYBE they might have a shot.
I don’t see CBS allowing the CW to reach out for other demos, as it would then be competing with CBS. If anything CW should try for trashy teen-oriented reality shows like Jersey Shore, which is dirt cheap to produce and wouldn’t step on CBS’s ratings at all.
You’re dead-on.
they are ‘free’ tv version of ‘we’ tv, only backwards?
I’m in The CW’s key demographic. I do not watch their shows live, however, because I hate commercials and do not have a DVR. I was hoping they would either make their content available on Comcast On Demand or for full streaming on Netflix, because I much prefer watching on TV to watching on a computer.
I am very happy about the Netflix deal, such that I might even re-subscribe to Netflix streaming for the past seasons of Supernatural, The Vampire Diaries, and Nikita. The other cool thing is that it is a 4 year deal. Nothing more frustrating than Netflix pulling streaming content just as you’re starting a TV series.
The nice thing about the Hulu deal is I think Hulu runs much better than The CW’s website in terms of streaming. I do not have Hulu Plus nor do I plan on subscribing to it because I’m patient enough to wait 8 days for the same content.
All networks need to address the migration on viewership to on-line mediums and CW should be on the bleeding edge. I don’t know why they don’t have on-line shorts for each and every one of their dramas.
The only problem with these deals is that they don’t address the affiliates. Who earn nothing from Internet sales, home market sales, C3, overseas broadcast or syndication packages. Not a penny.
If, if they can develop summer and stronger regular Eason shows yes, but easier said then done
CW has broadened this year with Ringer as an example. it’s not just for 17 yr old girls
The WB tried for summer shows remember Summerland and Young Americans? But it seemingly didn’t work out to well. Ostroff wasn’t horrible but she was bad. The strength of the WB was it was the family network GG, 7H, Everwood, heck even Charmed. It was a mix of family shows and teen fare. She decimated it credibility about good dramas. Meaning the only good thing to come from the network in yrs is TVD, and she didn’t see the rise of ABC Family coming which is their main competitor. How is the CW suppose to compete with ABC Family when the cable network runs shows throughout the year number one, takes better risk with programming i.e Huge, and is led way better. Mark is captaining a drowning ship that couldn’t get it together because two warring companies own the boat. BTW CBS needs to put its programming on Hulu it has the worst streaming site I have ever used. The website is so inconsistent it is horrible to use.
I think part of the problem is the quality of the shows. Ringer, Hart of Dixie, etc, are not very good shows. They’re not bad, just so-so. There are a lot of comments about Ringer in particular from people who were willing to give the show a try and just don’t think it’s very good. Sadly it’ll probably get written off as the type of show or demographic being the problem, not the shows themselves. Life Unexpected, a show that had a great premise, but the writing just quickly took it off the rails.
Admittedly other networks seem to have better luck at sustaining even bigger crapfests as successes. (Example: Secret Life of the American Teenager)
Pedowitz’s comments are unsettling. The last thing television needs is more procedurals.
Amen! I hate procedurals! I am a big fan of CW shows and I will be quite sad if I see that procedurals overtake the network.
I tried to watch some CW shows on their website (which re-directed from Hulu). It was an awful experience. There was no ability to pause/restart without having to sit through the same commercial over and over again. Furthermore, I couldn’t navigate to another section of the program without having to re-watch a chunk of the show.
I finally gave up and started buying the shows commercial-free on iTunes.
I can’t believe that CW’s web developers are that incompetent. I can only assume their poor-quality web-player was crippled on purpose as it drives users to pay for the content elsewhere. Perhaps they are using a Hulu web-player as that is where the site re-directs from? A dismal experience whatever the reason.
The HD iTunes downloads were, of course, great. But at $2.99 a pop it starts to add up.
That kind of buffoonery is only done on purpose.
@anonymous: MTV is now getting in on the teen girls boat, but i see where you are coming from?
I don’t think that the CW’s “modest” ratings (if you call shows that don’t get more than four million viewers “modest”) have some to do with its affiliates. Many markets ranked above #75 in the Nielsen market ratings are affiliates of The CW Plus, a group of cable-only outlets that it inherited from The WB’s former “100+ Station Group” (though a few CW Plus stations are carried on digital subchannels of Big Four stations), so the problem lies more of the fact that in some smaller markets, viewers can’t see CW programming unless they subscribe to a cable, satellite or telco provider. Though subversing this, one of the CW’s predecessors, The WB, supposedly did better in the ratings when WGN America ran the network nationally from 1995-99, even though WGN is carried outside of Chicago on cable and satellite only. When they relied on the over-the-air affiliate/cable-only station model after WGN stopped airing WB shows, the ratings dropped somewhat to the levels that The CW inherted.
The last I checked, most CW+ stations are simulcasted on digital sub-channels. Also keep in mind that the CW+ stations make up only 14% of HHs in the U.S. (around 110 markets), so whatever rating those stations are doing probably won’t make or break the U.S. rating.
The CW must have some first-run programming next Summer.
I don’t think it can afford to go all-reruns from late-May until mid-September.
Going all-reruns for almost four months makes it difficult to get the network’s viewers back in the Fall.