Viacom and Google/YouTube were back in court Tuesday arguing over last year’s federal district court ruling that relieved YouTube and its parent Google of massive copyright infringement charges, Bloomberg reported. Viacom told a panel of three judges in the court of appeals in Manhattan that the lower court should have let a jury hear the case in which YouTube was accused of allowing users to upload videos of Viacom shows South Park and The Daily Show With Jon Stewart” and other shows as well as movies from Paramount Pictures. Viacom’s attorney said YouTube willfully ignored copyright violations by users posting video clips without authorization. That unauthorized content, Viacom argued, fueled the company’s rapid growth and Google eventually bought YouTube for $1.65 billion. YouTube pointed out that Viacom also had been a suitor and it was only after negotiations broke down and Google made the winning bid that Viacom sent the legally required takedown notices for infringing videos. YouTube’s lawyer told the appellate court panel it removed infringing videos as soon as it was notified by copyright owners. On that basis, U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton ruled last year that YouTube was protected from liability under the “safe harbor” provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
The judges appeared skeptical of sending the case back to a jury for trial, PaidContent said, because of the difficulty of ascertaining whether many thousands of clips were infringing and how much to award in damages. YouTube’s attorney urged the appellate panel not to disturb the the lower court ruling, and the panel appeared receptive to his position that it was not YouTube’s job to monitor infringements but the responsibility of copyright holders. British soccer organization Football Association Premier League Ltd. and some music publishers who had followed Viacom in suing YouTube also appealed the lower-court ruling. The judges said they would rule later.


Poor Viacom….just a reminder how bad these guys are hurting for paychecks……
CEO amassed $84.5 million in stock, salary and other benefits during Viacom’s fiscal year, which ended on Sept. 30. Included in the giant sum is a one-time stock award — $31.7 million — which is dependent on financial goals over the next five years and was part of his new agreement signed in April. The company’s three top executives — Dauman, chairman Sumner Redstone and COO Thomas Dooley — were paid $165 million in stock and other compensation.
Lawsuit after lawsuit. Of course NONE of these companies are making any money on the internet right? So why spend all that money on litigation over clips that have been removed?
It seems pretty simple. YouTube has no control over what people post and it would be financial impossible to review each and every video that is uploaded. People that post the videos should be held responsible, not the company that hosts them.
It is funny to me that Viacom is freaking out over video from 2 of their library of thousands of shows. Millions of videos on YouTube technically violate copyright laws and company’s look the other way.
Viacom needs to get with the program, start it’s own channel, and let people watch clips and entire episodes through YouTube without trying to charge them for it. Business as usual does not apply to the internet. If they don’t change their ways of doing business they are not going to survive.
“Viacom needs to get with the program, start it’s own channel, and let people watch clips and entire episodes through YouTube without trying to charge them for it.”
Give away your product for free is your advice?
Hilarious.
Youtube has gotten much better with takedowns and filtering but the fact remains it was an enterprise built on piracy. The leaked internal emails from the original youtube creators explicitly demonstrate their attitude towards copyright.
It’s sad that Viacom was the company that ended up locking horns with Youtube. Their misadventures with guerrilla marketing has complicated what would otherwise have been a much stronger case.
I really don’t see what the big deal is with CLIPS from shows or movies. When someone posts a funny/scary/whatev clip from YouTube onto say, Facebook, it prompts me to want to watch the entire thing. Without clips, viewers miss out on content they would otherwise not be aware of. I’m more likely to spend money if I know it is of interest from the get-go.