EXCLUSIVE: I’ve learned that Google has put Hollywood on notice to keep mum as it prepares to announce its big plan to redefine YouTube with 25 or so channels that will offer professionally produced news, information and entertainment. Google plans to spend an estimated $150M for the services — top tier channels would get about $5M apiece. I’m told that the search giant wants to unveil its initial slate of channels by the end of this month. They’d go live in January. YouTube is gearing up to announce additional channels in January that would be up around April. Partners expected in the the first round include Warner Bros., Shine Group, BermanBraun, FremantleMedia, and skate boarder Tony Hawk. But Google has insisted that partners sign non-disclosure agreements — and has warned that those identified publicly before things are official might be cut out of the announcement. There’s also lots of skittishness because Google will control the promotion and ad sales for many of the channels.
So what does this mean? Google hopes that the slick productions will open doors on Madison Avenue where many major advertisers still turn their backs on YouTube’s user-generated content. If the financial model works, then Google could launch countless channels to make it the destination of choice for people who want to explore passions or interests that are too specialized for mass media including broadcast and cable TV.
Google’s investment is huge in the nickel-and-dime world of Web video, even though it wouldn’t turn many people’s heads in movies or television. Google plans to recoup its investments from ad sales, and then split revenues with the content producers. But Google’s still engaged in several simultaneous negotiations as content providers look to strike different deals. For example, major studios and networks insisted on using their own ad teams — in part to avoid conflicts with their existing TV or Web advertisers. In another major concession, Google has agreed to let content providers retain ownership rights to their productions. Although Google’s still trying to keep details of the project under wraps, CEO Larry Page told analysts in an earnings call yesterday that YouTube is well positioned to help content creators “find the right users, and get paid both through advertising and directly. And so I think that’s just a logical place for us to be in, and a logical place where you’ll see a lot of activity in general.”

Them-Tube. Bummer!
Welcome to the end of middle class jobs in the entertainment industry. These shows will be non-union with corporations using shell corporations to produce them for Google. Everyone (directors, writers, actors, and crew) will be paid pennies on the dollar.
People who think the Entertainment Industry is full of fat cats don’t realize that show business is just like the rest the US economy right now. One percent earns a huge share of the profit, while the rest fight for crumbs, and this is another strong move in that direction. This isn’t a screed to support unions, it’s a screed about the reality of the loss of America’s middle class. It’s been going on for thirty years and it gets worse every day.
Occupy Hollywood!
The number of people who can’t get anything made in this town while watching network shows like Whitney, Pan Am, The Playboy Club and Charlies Angels is very, very long.
The gatekeepers choose to do business with the same people over and over, resulting in the same failures over and over.
We’re artists. We are looking to get our ideas made without Hollywood’s ridiculous notes.
I’ll take non-union over the current situation.
You’re not wrong to make that comment. And just like writers write scripts for free and crew members volunteer their services for free, it drives down down wages for everyone. But artists have to make a living at the end of the day, too, just like everyone else and when people work for Google for free or next to nothing, they end up in poverty. Ask all those people who wrote for HuffPo for free, hoping to add to their resume, or because they were artists looking to practice their craft. In the end, the corporate owners made the money and they made nothing and droves wages further down.
And yet you will have talent coming out of the woodwork for them!
I agree this is a return to the “Studio Owned” Actors, Directors and Crew of the 30′s and 40′s
A non-exciting and inevitable event!
Exciting news. There’s got to be something better out there to keep good shows going while they find their niche audiences.
This is not news
Google’s Current TV is very DRY…Are they working on 25 more DRY channels? They need to buy talent and TV shows that work. Or pay to stream cable TV shows that work. They are incapable of creating content that can compete with traditional TV channels. 5 Million a channel, roll the dice and see if a couple of them are a hit. What a strategy.
this will turn Google TV 2.0 to a great success if we add also Android Market for expected 100s of Apps for Google TV
Ben Silverman way ahead of everyone, here… just more “targeted” programming that will eventually go away…
Netflix or Showtime seem to be on to something with bringing back arrested development (both competing) and Reno 911 (netflix)
There’s a real business model there… the shows that weren’t QUITE enough to sustain network/cable net ratings, but DID have enough viewers.. Should be interesting to see how this all pans out.
-RnsW
Exactly. Smart comment.
This could be a Sirius-style model with scores of channels on a variety of niche tastes. A lot of cancelled shows didn’t have the viewers to stay on a network but it could work online if the ad funding pans out. Or more likely, it would turn into the farm team for networks and cable and the best shows would get picked up and sent to the Show.
Can someone explain what this means?
means
Google Digital Home Soon with more announcements
YouTube Channels + Google TV 2.0 + Google+ Social + Google Music + Google+ Hangout communication
Check Logitech CEO CC in July, as i recall He Said Digital Home new strategy about Harmony Remotes + Wireless Speakers beyond PC + Audio/Video & Smart TV
..doesn`t matter what it means. Just buy as many Google shares as you can and enjoy the ride.
avg budget per minute = $1,700 to $3,000 ALL IN. deals are based on existing libraries being part of the mix.
Now we know why Warner/HBO refuses to sign with a dying Netflix. Google got them!
I foresee amazon buying netflix and b*tch slapping google. Google’s approach is similar to how drug cartels work with smuggling drugs across the border: Pack 10 cars a day with 300 kilos, some make it, some dont, but in the end the ones that do make it pay for everything and make it worth their time and effort. Google has a ton of cash saved up and should start investing in top talent to help make each channel appealing to everyone and not be a bunch of crap that is half-assed to just fill up their libraries with meaningless baloney.
Google, you are one of the biggest and most influential companies in the world. Start putting your money in the pockets of key players in Hollywood that will make each unique channel better than anything that cable has to offer. Then the advertisers will come flocking, and then you will have shown the world that you can destroy any competitor you lay your eyes on.
“…the nickel-and-dime world of web video…”? Maybe five years ago. Like the rest of the real world, tech and online progressed and left hollywood behind. I know some youtubers earning low to mid six figures a month. How’s that if-come deal working out for you?