Google is working on a strategy to offer paid cable TV services to consumers, the Wall Street Journal reports, as part of a previously announced project to build a super-high-speed fiber optic service in metropolitan Kansas City. The strategy would involve combinging Internet, video and phone services similar to cable and telecom companies, and Google has had exploratory talks with Disney, Time Warner and Discovery Communications about delivering TV channels over the video service. In September, Google hired former cable TV executive Jeremy Stern, who is leading those discussions. Google’s actions could accelerate the competition for a share of the more than $150 billion per year that traditional TV in the U.S. receives from advertisers and consumers paying monthly fees. Already the biggest seller of Web ads, Google wants some of those TV dollars.
Telephone and satellite companies long ago began competing against cable systems with bundled communications and TV channel options. Amazon is bulking up its content along with Dish, and Netflix remains formidable despite disastrous missteps. Apple also is a solid competitor through iTunes and, potentially, Apple TV in addition to the already phenomenally popular iPad that shows no signs of slowing. Comcast and other cable companies are moving to solidify their hold by creating their own apps and securing Internet rights to content. But with this latest plan, Google could undercut its competitors where it could really hurt — their subscription fees.
Kansas City was among 1,100 communities that lobbied to be the first test market for Google Fiber — which as the name implies would use fiber optic cables that have vastly more data capacity than coaxial cable or telephone lines, the Kansas City Star notes in response to the Journal report. That project holds the promise of 1 gigabit per second uploads and downloads. Google is sharing few details of its plans for Kansas City on either side of the Missouri River, which separates the larger city on the Missouri side from its Kansas neighbor. Google has only said its Internet service would be priced similarly to much slower traditional delivery, and that it would likely be available in some parts of Kansas City, Kan., in “early 2012.”


Direct to web programming will lead to mass utilization of all forms of socialized, visual media. The social-tv paradigm shift will undoubtedly catch many entertainment industry behemoths off guard. The Soc-TV industry has very low barriers to entry, which will quickly spur innovation and competition. While the obvious winners will be the smartest and swiftest content providers of Soc-TV, many of the most noticeable benefits will flow directly to those consuming the myriad of entertainment options that will soon become synonymous with Soc-TV.
Old media will become little more than utilities after they undoubtedly begin buying up “last-mile” cable providers in a somewhat futile effort to augment cash flow. A group of college kids with just a little bit of capital and an abundance of talent could stream the next hit TV show straight to the web, socialize it, and reap million in ad dollars. Times are a changin’…
Wow soc tv are you wrong. Bad content doesn’t sell and monopolies are very difficult to break. Like your fantasies though.
The problem is…it’s not easy to make a ‘hit’ TV show. A few kids in a dorm could do it once. But making a ‘hit’ is a damn hard walk down a dark road. That’s why it takes a bazillion failures to get that one hit. Unless no one wants to get paid unless what they make is a ‘hit’. I’m sure the studios would love a deal like that too.
I’d be happy if this provides competition and lowers my ridiculous cable bill.
I’d be happy if I could finally have another choice for cable TV. The only cable provider in my area is the atrocious Comcast.