In some of the most startling testimony yet in the British government’s investigation into press ethics and phone hacking, former News of the World deputy features editor Paul McMullan declared Tuesday that departed editor Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks were well aware of and actively encouraged illegal voicemail interception. To a direct question of whether Coulson and Brooks knew phone voicemails were being intercepted, McMullan replied, “Yes.” Coulson and Brooks have repeatedly declared either their ignorance or denied that the activity was taking place. Defending the practice, McMullan said ”I don’t think anyone realized that anyone was committing a crime at the start” and asserted that “Phone hacking is a perfectly acceptable tool given the sacrifices we make, if all we are trying to do is get to the truth.”
In a weird way McMullan’s testimony came across as bracingly blunt in the face of unending serial denials of such activity by others. He also said hacking was “widespread” across Fleet Street and insisted the NOTW was “the least bad of the offenders.” He maintained at one point that ”the hacking of [murder victim] Milly Dowler’s phone was no bad thing for a well-meaning journalist to do.” He did not condone the actual hacking but claimed that the police looking for Milly were full of “Inspector Clouseaus” and that “we were doing our best to find the little girl. The police were utterly incompetent.” He also said the British people did not need an inquiry to tell it what to put in its newspapers, that the News of the World’s 5 million readers were the ultimate “judge and jury” its content. He also belittled the concept of respecting or protecting personal privacy. ”Privacy is evil,” he said. “Privacy is the space bad people need to do bad things in.”


Coulson and Brooks are toxic. That’s why their marriage with the Murdoch’s was made in hell. If only we could still banish people……
Do you think Murdoch would have hired them in the first place if they were NOT toxic?
God bless unerring arrogance.
“Phone hacking is a perfectly acceptable tool given the sacrifices we make, if all we are trying to do is get to the truth.”
A flaw with his logic… if it’s perfectly acceptable, you wouldn’t have to be on the stand defending yourself. It’s not acceptable, that’s the problem, that’s one of the big reasons that paper doesn’t exist anymore. And if privacy is evil, then why aren’t you airing dirty laundry on your former boss Rupert Murdoch? Why weren’t you hacking into his phone? Because your full of shit, that’s why.
A classic mind control double bind. Thanks for breaking it down. These people are so sick…
Seems to have stated the obvious. Any editor worth his or her salt is going to want to know the source of a story. First rule of journalism – especially in today’s litigious society.
‘Ignorance of the law is no defense’
Has this guy been granted immunity from prosecution – if not, how can he NOT be sent to jail for ADMITTING to criminal activity?
I wonder how English law enforcement feels about being labeled as so hopelessly inept they needed tabloid ‘journalists’ to do their work for them – or do all the supposed bribes Murdoch doled out to them oblige them to keep their mouths shut?
And as specious as the claim is that the NOTW had to wiretap to help solve a crime – how does that justify hacking the phones of celebrities like Hugh Grant?
It really is amazing the hubris of these people – they were so certain of never being held accountable for their crimes they didn’t even bother to come up with a halfway decent alibi.
REBOOT = taking something still going (or recently active), abandoning the take and starting fresh. (Edward Norton Hulk was a reboot of the aborted Eric Bana francise.)
REMAKE = taking something old and dormant and redoing/updating it.
This site way over uses “reboot.”
“Privacy is the space bad people need to do bad things in.” Spoken like a truly amoral but nevertheless judgemental businessman.
Aren’t there more serious issues for the UK government to be dealing with right now? Instead of harping on tabloid magazines….I know the chief of the UK department announced today that the prime minister Cameron has to slash government budget by 2 percent, because the UK is one of the world’s largest deficits, so why isn’t this UK government doing anything about their debt and economy? But wasting time and tax money on jerking around with stupid actors and tabloid magazines! One day they will come to find out that Denial is more than a river in Egypt! Tit and tat over tabloid magazines during a time when Europe is sinking is unproductive , this system needs to be ousted, they’re not managing things well…..they’re so pretentious, that as they’re sinking, they only worry about how they look going down! Drop this whole stupid tabloid speculation and look at your ship……:) GOD wins!
This case directly relates to the Murdoch family, who not only own celebrity-chasing tabloids but hundreds (thousands?) of media outlets around the world. Here in the US the Murdochs owns FOX (including FOX TV networks and cable outlets and the Fox movie studio), Direct TV and the Wall Street Journal (among others). In the UK, Murdoch owns even more of the media.
If the UK is in bad shape, you can be sure disinformation spread in Murdochs media enterprises is in part responsible.
If a stop can be put to Murdoch and his ilk on WHATEVER kind of legitimate grounds, you can be sure it will have wider ramifications, and your hopes for a better UK will almost certainly come to pass.
I’m guessing….you work for Murdoch. Nice try.
McMullan says it’s perfectly acceptable to hack phones to get the truth.
Who does he think he is? A judge?
There’s never the truth in those rags, but cheap sensations and low ethics.
Is it OK to hack phones for cheap sensations and low ethics?
This man needs a cell to think what is truth, and what is right.
And tabloids and low-end papers need limits to protect people’s lives. If the rags cross the line, throw the responsible into jail.
Isn’t it scary to know some journalists might be sociopaths.
They ALL did it over there. Are we to believe that they don’t all do it here?
American journalist culture is slightly less sociopathic and vicious.
You SERIOUSLY believe that?
I admire his candour and nothing else. It’s this kind of monstrous arrogance from the tabloid press that sees lives and reputations ruined. But boy how they get indignant when they get put under the microscope. Utter scum.
How EXACTLY is what the Murdochs did with information different than what Madoff did with investments? Madoff pleaded guilty and will die in prison. What should happen to Rupe and his kids?
*Insert illegal activity of choice here* was “Perfectly Acceptable” – Or So *Insert name and/or job title of perp here* testifies.
First, I really can’t believe any U.S. news organization other than, say, the National Enquirer would dream of doing something like this on an organized basis. I can believe a techie reporter might figure out how to get into a voicemail system or Facebook account for the sheer joy of doing so, but I think the reporter would have a hard time getting any of the information gained from the hacking into a story. The reporter couldn’t tell the editor the information came from hacking, and the editor would think the reporter had made it all up.
Second, I think what McMullan and others are missing isn’t really whether reporters hacked into the voicemail systems of celebrities, or even of murder victims, for sleazy tabloid purposes. The question is whether the Murdoch organization is using detectives and hacked information to blackmail politicians, regulators and business executives.
Examples: why did John Kerry run such a terrible presidential campaign? Why did Obama have such a hard time getting legislation passed during the first two years of his presidency? How did Bush get the go ahead to start a war against Iraq so easily? If we knew more about the Murdoch detectives, would we understand more about why various Democrats in Congress have voted the way they have?
It depends on what one may do with the information. Is it to gain an edge in competitive reporting or hold embarrassing information on politicians and celebrities in a political control file?
“Phone hacking is a perfectly acceptable tool given the sacrifices we make, if all we are trying to do is get to the truth.”
ROTLMAO! Sacrifices? And what sacrifices, may I inquire, are those? Do these “sacrifices” include invading someone else’s privacy?
”I don’t think anyone realized that anyone was committing a crime at the start”
Boy, the Comedy Store should hire this guy; he’s hilarious!
”Privacy is evil,” he said. “Privacy is the space bad people need to do bad things in.”
Of course they always say this . . . until their own skeletons fall out of the closet.
I know everyone wants to crucify Murdoch – but look, he says they all did it. The left wing papers are just as bad!
The idea that privacy is merely a space for bad people to do bad things is as ugly as it is fallacious. Why not share the news of your new cancer with the world? Why not the trouble in your marriage? People have a right to privacy. A journalist, of all people, should understand this. Scoffing at this notion the way Paul MacMullen does should send shivers down our spines. This is a man who will stop at nothing working for a corporation with respect for nothing but its own interests. Wonder why they never did a story on that? Don’t want to invade on evil’s privacy perhaps?