The Stop Online Piracy Act was wounded by a tweet on Thursday. “Need to find a better solution” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said on Twitter in response to a question about her position on the bill that would empower the federal government to block overseas sites that traffic in pirated content. Pelosi’s opposition to SOPA is significant — she’s the House’s most powerful Democrat, after all. But it isn’t surprising: Most of her district is in San Francisco, and the tech companies that dominate the city overwhelmingly oppose the bill. Companies including Google, Yahoo, Facebook, AOL, Twitter, and eBay say that it could open the way for the government to attack sites that don’t violate other people’s copyrights, possibly quashing free speech. That view crosses party lines: Republican Darrell Issa, who represents the San Diego area, responded to Pelosi’s tweet: “If even we agree…” Hollywood studios, represented by the MPAA, are leading the charge in favor of SOPA. They say that piracy of movies and other forms of entertainment endangers thousands of jobs. They add that the bill would only affect Web sites that are violating U.S. copyright laws, but can’t be prosecuted because they’re based in other countries.


By coincidence, I had lunch today with a couple of record promoters. They saw the proposed law as something that would hurt them and their artists by restricting their abilities to market themselves.
This bill is critical and involves Billions of dollars to the Creative community…we need to stand ip against Pelosi..I have heard her speak at find raisers and questioned her..She Has almost No knowledge about how this Theft hurts The Software business
Hopefully readers will look into this egregious legislation themselves, rather than relying on any impression garnered from comments by the profoundly misnamed “Truth”.
This legislation drives a stake through the heart of the net on behalf of the entertainment industry. Rather than defer to evolving business models, the shareholders of yesterday’s media corporations are attempting to literally eviscerate YOUR online freedom.
Please research this legislation yourselves… It doesn’t get much worse.
Such BS…
It’s obvious that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
“Research it”? I have READ IT.
The tech industry bought Pelosi off. It’s sad that choads like Michael Compton are so naive that they found copyright enforcement to be “censorship”.
Google is a behemoth facilitating theft.
You’ve got to be kidding me. These companies are profiting from piracy. Just because they’re trying to distort this into a free speech issue doesn’t mean the intelligent people should believe their lobbyist spin!
Yes, and because people can produce illegal copies of copyrighted books, we should also allow ‘big publishing’ to outlaw xerox machines, paper, and trees (just to be sure). After all, the Bill of Rights doesn’t count if it is in any way inconvenient to a corporations bottom line. Gee whiz… Let’s get our priorities straight. The freedom of millions more important than the profits of one of our industries? Nonsense! Nonsense I say!
^ /snark.
Hopefully everyone reading the comments attached to this article will research this awful legislation for themselves. In order to protect the profits of industry, they are attempting to eviscerate many core internet freedoms. It’s sincerely bad news, and anyone that respects individual freedom needs to contact their representative and tell them to either a) go back to the drawing board or b) stop trying to fix things that aren’t broken.
She’s so ridiculous. I wish she had the slightest clue of what happens in our business. How this woman is elected repeatedly is beyond me.
The bill’s language makes it so an entire site can be blocked regardless of whether they know what they have is pirated or not (sites like Sidereel for instance), and regardless of what else is on the site. The bill needs better wording because we all know that when given an inch, a government agency will take a yard. Censorship is not okay, and for the record I work producing broadcast television and know what piracy does and doesn’t do to the entertainment industry. But that does not mean we sacrifice our ideals of free speech in a poorly written bill.
It’s beyond you because you’re not too smart. SOPA is a disaster.
Do you even know what is in the actual bill? It says that if a Google search returns a link to copyright violations, then Google can be shut down (thats right…shut down!). If a facebook user posts a link to a copyright violation, then facebook is responsible for that too.
Movie / publishing industry way over-reached here.
Besides… it is already illegal to pirate movies!
SOPA would make the USA more like China. Good for Pelosi and Issa.
None of this SOPA talk really matters because the Obama said he will veto it anyways.
Still better that he doesn’t have to.
The proxy programs that provide 100 ip address and change at will make the bill useless
ie; you can be in CA and ten minutes later you can be in Russia
no way the 500000 authorities can chase down 500,000,000 illegal downloaders across the world esp with 100 proxies changing 24 / 7
the only to make this work is to isolate the USA from the world, ban all ip’s outside the US
and that will never happen,
we are screwed,
the internet marks the end of professional music, tv, film, software,
As phonographs marked the end of live symphony performances; as radio marked the end of newspapers; as tv marked the end of radio; as Betamax (and VHS) marked the end of movies; as CDs marked the end of records; as DVDs marked the end of VHS…
so to the Internet marks the end of everything! while you’re busy holding up the falling sky the rest of the world is busy taking advantage of the ‘whatever’ killer.
Good for Pelosi. Existing online piracy laws are more than sufficient. No need to give the government power to regulate the internet. They will have the power to make entire legit websites disappear without due process.
this bill is too broad. It needs to be better defined. Have any of you read it?
I’m a Republican but 3 cheers for Pelosi. It’s time to stop of the tyranny of the copyright lobby. This is all about censorship and it must stop! The real thieves are the MPAA and their ilk. They must be stopped.
This bill is a terrible, terrible idea.
The issues on the table whether or not piracy is bad — it is bad. The issue is whether this bill is the right solution to that badness.
And it is not.
By the way… this part, paraphrased from the MPAA:
“They add that the bill would only affect Web sites that are violating U.S. copyright laws, but can’t be prosecuted because they’re based in other countries”
… is absolute bullshit. The bill is vague, poorly worded, open to horrible interpretations. It can, and will, affect U.S. website — and not just pirating sites. It will affect free speech, commerce, and many things we just take for granted these days. The sloppiness of the bill will without doubt mean it is misused fare beyond its intent.
If you want a good summary of what’s at stake, check out James Fallows’ summary at The Atlantic:
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/censoring-the-internet-its-not-just-for-china-any-more/248612/
There’s a little movie to explain the issue, and everything.
Again, piracy is one issue. This bill is another. And this bill is horrible. A bipartisan movement is rising against it.
Trust me, when the ACLU and the Tea Party join forces against something, you know something horrible is going down.
They already have. Bachman is publicly against it too.
How much money did MPAA waste on this?
Pirating movies is already illegal!
I thought prosecuting people from other countries for pirating and copyright violations was what Interpol was for…?
These bills (PROTECT IP & SOPA) are incredibly dumb. Really? So now we can’t sing anybody else song and post it online. That’s not copyright infringing other people works. IT IS TRANSFORMING THE ORIGINAL WORK INTO SOMETHING ELSE. And posting said video to Youtube hurts everyone else, because it shuts Youtube down?!?! Does that sound right to anybody else? WRONG! WRONG! SO VERY WRONG!
If you really wanna know something about Pelosi, watch last week’s 60 Minutes episode…
I’m a card carrying Democrat and I hope nothing but the worst for this woman’s career in Washington.
Wow. For the first time ever I agree with something Nancy Pelosi believes. Amazement ensues.
BTW you SOPA supporters should really get a clue. The internet is bigger than pirated copies of Tower Heist and Justine Bieber 3D.
Amazing. For once I find myself agreeing with Madame Pelosi. Whatever our individual or corporate financial interests may be it is imperative that we ALL stand firm against any further government intrusion into the internet. The world wide web has done just fine in most free countries because the governments have kept their greedy paws off it.
As noble sounding as the cause may be (i.e. fighting piracy– which certainly needs to be addressed) it opens the door to all kinds of government abuse. Those who feared the Patriot Act need to fear this kind of legislation even more. What good is your physical freedom if your intellectual freedom is stifled by government intervention?
She is right. There must be a better way. Surely with all the brains and resources available in the industry a technological way to prevent piracy needs to be developed.
Never, ever let the nose of the camel in the tent–particularly when it masquerades as the government trying to “protect” something.
Open the door to censoring one type of site, it’s a small step to the next and the next… until you say the wrong thing about the wrong person on your blog…
Exactly.
The intent of SOPA is good, but the solution the bill proposes is broken at best, and potentially a threat to free speech and legitimate websites at its worst.
I don’t know why this focuses only Pelosi since both Issa and Ron Paul (who is running for president) also oppose it, among others. This bill has no chance of passing.
I, too, am curious why this article focused on Pelosi. It really doesn’t make any sense. Opposition is coming from all along the political spectrum.
Piracy is a problem, but The Great Firewall of America is NOT the solution.
Piracy is only a problem because the pirates are smarter than the people producing the products. If you want to stop piracy lower your outrageous prices on DVDs and BDs. It shouldn’t cost more than 10 dollars for either brand new. If you lowered the pricing of the movie, then maybe people won’t feel the need to steal it. If something is cheap it would be less hassle to download it legitimately then to risk infecting your computer to get it by other means.
Also cable prices are outrageous. Why can I get super high-speed internet for cheaper than I can get the basic cable package?
My main point is if you want to stop someone stealing you stuff, make it cheaper and they won’t bother. I know it doesn’t cost that much to make. Do yourself and the rest of the country and favor and lower your prices.
Lowering prices of DVD or BR hasn’t achieved anything. I saw DVD prices drop from 40€ to now 5€. Guess what? Almost no one buys DVD now.
The old music complaint was I don’t want to buy crappy album for just one good song. Well, you have plenty of legal options to buy just one song now and for less than what you used to pay per song on a whole album. But has that stopped the piracy? No. And it won’t.
Piracy is about what’s possible. If you can have something for free, no strings attached, it’s hard to make a case you should pay for anything, no matter the price.
Here’s an option instead of those media companies complaining about losing jobs, don’t pay your actors 15mill a movie, maybe if companies agreed not to pay them so much you could hire hundreds more. But that will never happen
Well, if something is not done about online piracy, then perhaps the only thing to watch will be youtube videos of your friends summer vacation. If the profit are stripped from the industry that provides entertainment, what will keep the producers of content making movies?
Good ole Nancy Bela Pelosi