EXCLUSIVE: On Wednesday of last week, ICM President and heir apparent Chris Silbermann confided to senior staff that he was leaving with several key ICM
execs including Ted Chervin and Rick Levy and starting his own Hollywood TV agency. In no time the buzz was all over the tenpercentery. That also meant it reached the ears of the founder of private equity investment firm Rizvi Traverse Management which since 2005 has owned a sizeable stake in the full-service ICM. On Thursday morning, Suhail Rizvi personally confronted Silbermann and asked if the ICM No. 2 exec was leaving or not. Silbermann denied everything, claiming that he’d never said it, that it was just a rumor, and that he was going nowhere — for now. But the fact is that, for months, my insiders say Chris Silbermann, the former Broder Webb Chervin Silbermann Agency partner, has been loudly and regularly threatening to leave ICM unless he gets what he wants. And what he wants is the removal of his boss, ICM Chairman and CEO Jeff Berg. And Berg, in turn, has been fighting back. Both agency chiefs have been seeking their own financing to buy out the other and take over the agency and reduce Rizvi’s stake.
The infighting has torn apart ICM internally to the point where Silbermann regularly calls secret meetings and pointedly doesn’t invite Berg. While Berg calls secret meetings with Rizvi and pointedly doesn’t invite Silbermann. At one point, Silbermann became enveloped in a paranoid panic, convinced that his ouster from ICM was imminent and orchestrated by Berg and Rizvi when it wasn’t. In fact Berg has tried repeatedly to find a way for them all to continue to work together and appealed to Rizvi to calm the situation. As for Rizvi, I’m told he’s unwilling to take sides in the endless series of disputes, preferring that both men stay at the agency and keep focused on their business which continues to enrich Rizvi more than many think possible. (Don’t forget that ICM’s publishing and music touring business makes a mint, even if both its movie and TV business is under pressure by formidable rivals.) And so the situation remains at a standstill, albeit an exceedingly uneasy one. I don’t think it’s an exaggeration for me to state that ICM is on the verge of implosion. Unless a truce is reached. Sure, there have been on and off ceasefires. But the problem is that none stick.
I’ve known about this warring for months (as far back as April) but hesitated to make it public because a) I hoped the two guys would work things out, and b) it’s so damaging to a Hollywood agency — and an article about it even more so. Clients especially hate hearing about discord inside their tenpercenteries. And no doubt rival agencies will use the news of ICM’s internal strife to try to poach the most profitable talent. I only posted this now because other showbiz media are finally sniffing around this story. So I have no choice but to run with what I know.
There’s a reason Jeff Berg is known as Iceberg: he’s a strategic thinker but not a congenial leader. Many find him a pain in the ass, frankly, which is why he remains so isolated within the agency. Silbermann is his polar opposite, all hot and bothered and preferring the company of his so-called “homeys” consisting of an endless entourage of Broder cronies and impressionable young agents and club-hopping assistants. While Berg has kept the battling with Silbermann behind closed doors (no wonder he considered a CIA career early on), Silbermann has refused to keep his own frustration and unhappiness with Berg to himself. Instead he’s voiced it — and not just to other ICM senior agents but also at investment banks and even in barrooms from Beverly Hills to Telluride to Toronto. “But no one will take Chris Silbermann seriously. Like when he says he’s the kind of leader who should be running a Fortune 500 company. He’s a delusional television agent gone rogue,” a source close to the Berg camp tells me. Inside the Silbermann camp sources tell me even more succinctly: “Fuck Jeff Berg. It’s time for him to go and for Chris to take over. This should be a TV agency because the movie side is losing money.”
While ICM’s movie department has struggled publicly for some time, ICM’s TV department placed last behind WME, CAA, and UTA in the numbers of major agency packages on new series ordered by the broadcast networks for the 2011/2012 season. Interestingly, Silbermann at one point threatened to eliminate ICM’s movie lit department altogether to hurt Berg and those Berg allies whom Silbermann wants to exit. (ICM’s film and TV talent divisions already are merged.) Which helps to explain the recent steady stream of ICM motion picture lit agents exiting to UTA.
Speaking of UTA, there was even an idea at one point taking shape within the Berg camp for ICM to merge with United Talent and bring in that agency’s managers to stop the warring with Silbermann. If that happened, the thought was to make UTA co-owner Jeremy Zimmer vice-chairman of ICM. But UTA has talked and talked to a litany of potential agency suitors yet refuses to get married to anyone for now. Meanwhile, I heard that Silbermann was so infuriated with this attempt to dilute his power at ICM that he vowed to stop any merger from ever becoming a reality. And, to shore up what he worried was a weakening position, Silbermann managed to bring into his camp longtime Berg confidant Rick Levy, ICM’s Chief Business Development Officer & General Counsel.
Now a little history is in order. ICM has had an up and down trajectory since it was formed in 1975 when Marvin Josephson’s IFA bought out Freddie Fields’ and David Begelman’s CMA. It’s also been a notoriously impossible place to manage. Back around Christmas 2005, I was tipped that Berg wanted to close a big merger to stop the bleeding at the agency which had hit tough times yet again. Movie agents and clients were being poached, and the TV division was not keeping up with the formidable competition. He needed to combine with a boutique TV or movie agency or both. So, flush with his month-old $100M Rizvi infusion, Berg was looking closely at Broder Webb Chervin Silbermann Agency as well as Endeavor Agency. But, like everything in Hollywood that involves ego and money, deals like these aren’t made overnight. They’re complicated because they combine different agency cultures as well as partners and personnel. The merger with Endeavor never happened. (Ari Emanuel later took over the huge William Morris Agency.) ICM’s engulf of Broder took four intensive months to get done: it was code-named, it was stealthy, and it was clinched at Camp Allen.
For 10 years off and on, Berg and Broder had danced that slow minuet that accompanies any agency talk of merging. Broder had been king of the small tube representation for seemingly eons; it was the Tiffany of TV agencies, a true cash cow. In 2005, Berg began zeroing in on Broder’s Chris Silbermann. They were both Berkeley grads, both English majors, and both active alums. Silbermann was very involved with the College of Letters and Sciences board which Berg had founded and ran in the late 1980s. The connections made the deal “easier. It cut through volumes,” Berg told me at the time. “We didn’t have to go through any posturing.” The final negotiations over operational issues took place between Berg and Silbermann by the Duck Pond during the mid-July Camp Allen investment confab in Sun Valley, Idaho. Host Allen & Co brokered the deal, while CAA president Richard Lovett and William Morris CEO Jim Wiatt passed by the pair’s confabs and wondered what was going on…
For a long while, Berg and Silbermann couldn’t have been closer. Each spoke very well of the other — and meant it. True, Berg out of loyalty to his longtime senior talent agent Ed Limato voiced reluctance to exit him when Silbermann insisted it had to be done to improve ICM’s corporate culture and effect generational change inside the agency. But Berg supported Silbermann through the ensuing legal unpleasantness with Limato. Silbermann clearly was eager to flex his new muscle as president of the combined agency not just inside but also outside ICM. Suddenly rumors began to circulate that Berg was retiring when he wasn’t. Was it Silbermann’s doing?
My insiders date the start of the two men’s friction to when Silbermann sought after the merger to help rebuild ICM’s dissolving motion picture business, especially by having regular contact with its higher profile movie actors and actresses and trying to sign more. Berg’s camp says that’s when Silbermann began to think of himself as a movie bigwig. And Chris didn’t have the bonafides for that the way Jeff does. Meanwhile, Silbermann’s camp says TV is ICM’s financial future and movies are just a glamorous loss leader. But a big full-service agency needs both.
Berg has always maintained a low profile in Hollywood even though he is the eminence grise of Hollywood agency CEOs. But Silbermann wanted fame and he wanted it quickly. In addition to the agency’s in-house publicity, he hired an outside flackery which ostensibly promotes ICM but really was tasked with giving Chris a higher profile. Rumors ramped up that ICM was at war with Rizvi, so Silbermann and Berg claimed to be “in early talks” to restructure the agency’s ownership so that it becomes more of a partnership. They said that what was being explored is for Rizvi to stay in, but the executive management team would accelerate giving more equity to ICM’s agents as a “motivating” tool. The suggestion was that ICM could go to the capital markets for a buyout transaction as part of a bigger overall restructuring plan. In fact, the two fighting ICM toppers have sought and still are looking for financial backers to KO the other. Oy vey. Guys, can’t you just get along already?
So the war continues unabated. And I’ll have even more detail in coming days.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


This looks like a big uh oh.
One of the smaller agencies should find the capital to take advantage of this situation. It would change the landscape entirely in the tenpercentery business.
I had the same thought. I imagine that agencies like Gersh will start taking actions.
Would be interesting to see that happen. A Paradigm/ICM marriage could be fun to see. Who knows if that either company would see that as beneficial though.. The Gersh/Paradigm/APA’s of the world might rather be small and steady than big and clunky.
Be careful what you wish for. Endeavor was a “samll” agency before it invaded WMA and put more than 100 agents out of work. Some very good agents. Not to mention the assistants and others who all went on unemployment.
Wow. Just wow.
How many times has that type of announcement and ICM been associated together? 5? 7?
Every agency has it’s problems. This is blown WAY out of proportion. The fact that this is being publicized is ridiculous. ICM’s still has one of the strongest and most loyal client rosters in the business. Don’t believe all the hype. Seriously.
Did your boss tell you to write that?
this is not being blown out of proportion, in the least. in fact, ICM has been under the M&A microscope of Paradigm, at the highest levels, for some time.
Paradigm and ICM have been having high level merger / buyout discussion for some time
Business models dictate that one agency which is bleeding money and has been since inception (Paradigm) is not exactly going to boost their business by buying another loss-generating operation (ICM)
Oh, awesome. As a working but low-level lit client, this fills me with some serious dread.
ICM & UTA should merge…why have 4 major agencies these days? Berg and Silbermann are redundant and not leaders…get rid of both of them…
This merger would be great for the business!
Good point. There isn’t enough business in the town to justify so many agencies and agents. Moreover, since the William Morris and Endeavor merger, there are really only two players on the field – WME & CAA. Maybe an ICM/UTA merge could create one agency that’s relevant.
Merging = bad idea for so many obvious reasons.
Why would UTA want to merge? UTA’s television team is make constant forward motion, and they are already taking agents and clients from ICM. Leave the bloated overhead in Century City.
ICM should merge but why would UTA bother? They are making their own strides and if they merge, should find someone else. Frankly they have a nimble smartness to them that makes them continue to be a factor. With ICM it’s like a box-ah chocklates – you just never know whatcha gonna git…
It doesn’t matter that other news outlets were poking around this story, it’s irresponsible and incorrect to publish this extremely damaging information. Unless you are an investor in Rizvi Traverse, I don’t see how this is relevant. It will only make it more difficult for ICM management to resolve their issues while other agencies poach their clients. It’s unfair to the agents who do right by their clients (of which there are at ICM).
You hesitated to make it public yourself. The reasons you didn’t publish before are still present, despite others poking around. Being the first to break the story does not justify betraying the reasons you did not publish before.
Actually, yeah it does. If you knew someone was about to scoop you, you’d do the same thing. Let me belabor it a bit… Her job is as journalist and her duty is to the truth in the biz. Sure, she can sit on it and play nice but ultimately people come here for the real story.
If she doesn’t have it then she’s out of work… this is why the trades generally suck, because they are so beholden to those ad dollars that they’ll only dare to piss off the people they can afford to.
and truth be told… if the Berg & Silbermann were going to work it out on their own then they would have by now. So either this is the impetus for them to suck it up and really play nice or it’s the beginning of a nasty war.
She’s not a journalist. Gave up that title a long time ago. At best she’s an opinionist who dispenses news once in a while. All of Nikki’s articles are commentary fueled by her own personal slant regardless of the facts. Take the scathing reporting of box office this past weekend re: Immortals. No matter how good the news for the film, she found a way to deride it.
Now here… Well, I agree with you that this is newsworthy and she has a right to scoop her competitors. It just turns my stomach when the Kool-Aid drinkers try to defend Nikki’s “journalistic” rights and ethics.
Meh…she’s great at her job. Better than you are at yours…better than i am at mine. wine on her message board as you might but information wise, her capacity individually and as a site is unparalleled. that she has an opinion is no more transparent than any other publication, she just doesn’t cover it up as much and isn’t scared to use her own voice on every posting. this notion of ‘true journalism’ is absurd, perhaps thats the point your making, but i think she’s already made that point anyways.
Reporters = “reporting” and stating the facts JUST as they “are”. They ONLY report. They do not journal.
Journalists = “journaling” and chronicling (over time) the ups AND THE DOWNS that “were” and that “might” be (going on behind what is already being reported or is about to be reported by straight reporters).
That’s the difference!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nikki is a journalist. (Nikki is NOT a reporter.)
And NIKKI IS A DAMN GOOD JOURNALIST.
I just wish her boss would let her out of her cage more often!!!! I miss the old days!
You’re still the BABE.
Let’s do lunch …
Meh…take your sour grapes and make some Thunderbird with ‘em! Nikke and her staff are by far the consummate Hollywood reporting pool. Want to know the latest, read Deadline. Nikke broke this story on Sunday, others reported it Monday. Are they reporting it because Nikke broke the story or because they just learned about this? In the news world it’s who reports it first…the rest are all behind.
As for the story, don’t know Silbermann but as a Cal alumni, it saddens me that he orchestrated the removal of Ed Limato. If this is true, the jerk is classless and needs to be knocked down a peg or two. Clearly someone who’s been reading and believing his own publicity. Berg..you best act sooner than later.
Daniel: It’s “not fair” to publish this news? What planet are you on? Don’t you know we have a free press?
The most disturbing part of this article? That anyone still uses “homeys” in 2011.
@carolyn…This is the most salient comment so far.
As someone who actually works there and sees everything that’s going on, this sure is news to me. Thanks for adding a few Duraflames to what some hope is an impending inferno, but this article is just an example of great journalism, in the discussion it’s going to generate, and the emotions it’s going to stir. These claims are not remotely close to the actual reality of ICM, where like any of the Big 4, we’re too busy moving at lightspeed, using our resources to try and kill it for our clients and find jobs than to squabble around so much internally.
I hope you brush daily. That much kool-aid will ruin your teeth.
My client has never received better care and attention from agents-including former representation at WME – than that which is given at ICM with successful results. Hands down a personal, attentive, terrific staff. And, no, I don’t work at ICM.
wow, this is so far out i feel it might be a plant by caa!
Rick “Prick” Levy is one of the biggest weasel’s in the business. Once Berg’s “boy” and now he’s slithering into SIlberman’s camp…he must have a thing for bald nerds.
Penske sure pays a lot of money for Nikki to take sloppy dictation from Jeff Berg and Ari Emanuel.
…and it’s only Monday
This smells like Jeremy Zimmer’s doing from a mile away. Everyone knows he has desperately been trying to devalue ICM by overpaying their agents who have no business to lure them to UTA, i.e. Scott Schachter, Chris Hart, Josh Hornstock, Steven Fisher. It’s a good thing Zimmer doesn’t have any clients of his own, so that he has all day long to talk to Nikki.
That sounds like an awful lot of work coming from Jeremy Zimmer. Do you really think he’s enough in the game to spend time scheming?
Chris Silbermann has put his neck out there ever since the merger and gets absolutely no credit for changing the culture of the agency for the better. He gets the short end of the stick in every conversation about ICM and it’s simply not fair for anyone who actually knows the day-to-day happenings at the agency. ICM has been trying to form a partnership for years, and Berg has been the one in the way of progress.
Corporate communications are going to have an interesting Monday.
This piece feels a bit like a hit piece on Silbermann. As if Nikki’s sources were mostly on the Berg side.
She writes:
“At one point, Silbermann became enveloped in a paranoid panic, convinced that his ouster from ICM was imminent and orchestrated by Berg and Rizvi when it wasn’t. In fact Berg has tried repeatedly to find a way for them all to continue to work together and appealed to Rizvi to calm the situation.”
And then while Berg is noted for being chilly, while Silbermann gets described as “all hot and bothered and preferring the company of his so-called “homeys” consisting of an endless entourage of Broder cronies and impressionable young agents and club-hopping assistants.”
And so on… No doubt it’s a big story but it seems it was purposefully leaked by the Berg people at this time to do damage to Silbermann, regardless of how it affects the agency overall.
I have no horse in the race, but it reads that way to me. Interesting to watch.
” …preferring the company of his so-called “homeys” consisting of an endless entourage of Broder cronies and impressionable young agents and club-hopping assistants.”
You mean this is NOT accurate? I guess you’ve never worked there.
Ed Limato is Laughing his ass off right now
As others noted yeah it does matter. Sitting on a story is one thing but when it is going to come out anyways it is not just about being first but wanting as accurate portrayal as possible as to what is going on.
Given the point of this website this seems highly relevant. As an outsider it means little to me but I can certainly see the relevance to the core audience of this site.
If the people working at icm feel all their clients are walking they should be pushing quickly for a resolution to this messy 3rd grade turf war
How does luring away agents who have no business devalue icm?
Because:
1. They do have clients (2 of the talent guys were active department heads at ICM prior to leaving); and
2. They are the future leaders of the company and the industry.
You don’t want to lose emerging stars to the competition. It damages the current roster, but also the future strength of the agency for years to come. You can’t replace these types with recently promoted trainees. It’s a business of relationships and those take a decade to establish.
It’s really not that difficult to see this, unless you are delusional “homies”.
the drowning of a bunch of loveless petulant agents grasping for power can bring a tear or two to the watchful eye.
Someone should occupy ICM. The agency culture is just a reflection of our larger one. Too many one percenters battling it out for more while the others pay.
Well done!
Why is everyone so surprised at this? This agency is getting their butts kicked all over town and not just by the CAA’s or WME’s of the business. When was the last time someone at the agency actually read a script and stood up for it in their Monday morning meetings? When was the last time ICM packaged and financed a pic? They seem to enjoy their fat salaries and bonuses and continue to “phone” it in. If I’m putting a project together and want someone to genuinely work with me, ICM is the last place that I’d think about.
Chris Silbermann is a superstar. The purchase of BWCS saved ICM & Berg. Everyone in town knows that. Berg lives in a different time, misses his private elevator and would love nothing more than to have nothing to do with any of his colleagues on a daily basis.
How does that equate to leadership? Chris is a polar opposite!
Chris is a total team player, and would love nothing more than to have a collaborative and collegial environment. It’s what made BWCS so successful from day one, and It’s what he has nurtured at ICM. Berg appears to fight it and resent it. He likes the company to be on edge and polarized.
Chris wants nothing more than to see ICM thrive and doesn’t & can’t enjoy this kind of contention. He knows it’s unproductive and unsettling for all involved inside and out.
Comment by PS Realist
Um, BWCS was “successful from day one” because of the B, as in Broder. Silbermann and Chervin didn’t even join the agency for ten years.
BUT, big shot, they both brought the company into the 21st Century. And the company continued to prosper and grow.
And it wasn’t just B, but W,K & U too……
First of all, thanks for calling me big shot. I don’t get that very often. And second, absolutely W,K and U had a lot of do with their success. All I’m saying is even you didn’t mention S. Because S wasn’t there from “day one.”