UPDATED: The House Judiciary Committee has wrapped up its hearing about the Stop Online Piracy Act, which would enable the government to block overseas websites that traffic in copyright-infringing content. Movie studios support the measure and tech companies oppose it. Representatives from the MPAA, U.S. Library of Congress, Pfizer, MasterCard, Google, and the AFL-CIO testified.
Bill opponents complained that the witness list was overloaded with supporters. “Concerns about SOPA have been raised by Tea Partiers, progressives, computer scientists, human rights advocates, venture capitalists, law professors, independent musicians, and many more. Unfortunately, these voices were not heard at today’s hearing,” Consumer Electronic Association CEO Gary Shapiro says. Google, AOL, eBay, Facebook, Yahoo, and Twitter said in a letter to the committee yesterday that the bill poses “a serious risk to our industry’s continued track record of innovation and job creation, as well as to our nation’s cybersecurity.” Google says it would rather see lawmakers pass legislation that would trace consumer payments to copyright-infringing sites. “If we can cut off their financial ties, they won’t have a way to make money,” Google counsel Katherine Oyama said, warning that SOPA could lead to “unintended consequences” stifling free speech. “Getting the balance right is important.”
But Michael O’Leary, the MPAA’s senior EVP for global policy and external affairs, says that the measure “is about jobs” noting that movie and TV companies account for more than 2M jobs across all states with $38.9B going in 2009 to small businesses. Rogue websites overseas are “increasingly sophisticated in appearance and take on many attributes of legitimate content delivery sites, creating additional enforcement challenges and feeding consumer confusion. … Even major motion pictures newly in theaters appear on these rogue sites just days, if not hours, after their theatrical release — exploited for profits by thieves who did not work, took no risk, and invested no resources in the production of those films.” Existing measures such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) can’t stop pirates because “their purpose is to traffic in stolen content. And when they are based overseas, they can simply thumb their noses at U.S. law,” O’Leary says.


It’s clever spin for Google to make this about free speech but the reality is they are profiting from piracy. A practice which is in fact hurting every creative industry in America. This legislation should absolutely move forward.
You clearly don’t understand the technical details which make this legislation dangerous. The objection from Google, AOL, Yahoo, Ebay (and dozens of other Internet companies) has nothing to do with stopping piracy but everything to do with the vague wording. It’s like making a law that bans all drugs without regard to the fact that some drugs do great good.
It will destroy the internet. Everyone in Hollywood will make less money.
It is asinine, reckless and ignorant legislation.
This is just another example of special interests and money having more control over our government than people and votes. We need to end the era of corporate persons before humans. Your name and his statements in the article reek of a PR campaign trying to exploit the economy. Hollywood needs to modernize rather than demonizing the internet. Yea it takes more work, and requires creativity.
The honest truth? The biggest pirate out there is the RIAA. They owe Canadian artists millions, and they have no intention of paying.
This bill is as draconian as penalizing the entire Congress just because one or two politicians might be corrupt, holding them all responsible because they didn’t do anything to stop it even though they didn’t know it was going on. You don’t burn down the house just to boil an egg. Stop piracy by going after the pirates, not by destroying the rights of the myriad legitimate companies. SOPA is far too broad, too harsh, and too off the mark.
Unemploying anyone associated with Buck Larson is a good thing.
“which would enable the government to block overseas Web sites that traffic in copyright infringing content.”
Not entirely true. You need to mention “without any proof, trial, arbitration, warrant or evidence to prove that that the Web site is, in fact, infringing”. All they need to do is make an accusation and the site is taken down.
The extreme alarmism going on by opponents of the bill is reckless and dishonest. The bill will not “destroy the Internet” and it does not allow gov’t to take action based on mere “accusation.” That’s false. And yeah, Google hates it because they run ads on piracy sites.
oh thank you for clarifying that. Now we can all rest easy that DFT told us what’s what.
In the meantime U.S. servers continue to spam the world as well as hosting child pornography and race hatred websites etc. etc.
Funny, even Joe Biden thinks it is not such a good idea. searching Joe Biden SOPA and up comes his recent speech on Nov 1 as to why it is bad.
Also, yesterdays full page ad objecting to provisions within SOPA in the NYT from Yahoo,Ebay, Zynga,Facebook, mozilla, et al;
and, on a personal note, as a non american, I kind of object to every website in the world being viewed as a US domestic web site, which this bill entrenches.
Only thieves and scumbags will benefit if this bill is defeated. I’m guessing the people on this board who want the bill defeated are probably the same scumbags from Guam who are posting illegal content to filmforfree.com and all the rest.
Kill movies to save the internet? Fuck the internet, and thanks internet for making porn available to my 6 year old on his Ipad at school.
Maybe your six year old shouldn’t have his own iPad! Just a suggestion.
The schools give them out now, grandpa.
If you don’t want your kid searching for porn then why did you gave your 6 year old an iPad for school? I’m not saying that he/she does, but based on your accusation of the internet how else would they know how to?
You are aware that parental settings exist on these devices and even on devices that grant access to the internet, right? I’m guessing you didn’t because you are someone who gives a 6 year old an iPad. BTW, how is he/she coming along with their multiplication tables? I bet that iPad is really coming in handy for that.
Gimme a break. Why don’t we legalize crack-cocaine?
It should be up to the parents to educate and steer the child away from, yadda, yadda, yadda…
If prostitution is illegal, so should porn. How is it okay to pay someone for (mostly) humiliating sexual acts, and filming those acts and beaming it to everyone in the world…
…how is that okay, but paying someone for a sexual act done in private illegal. It doesn’t make any sense.
Everyone’s cool with porn until a family member is in the “business”.
You want to talk about being adults, then we should all grow up and stop degrading women.
Whoa wait.. your 6 year old has an iPad?
This bill is bull, just the government trying to finally have a greater form of control over internet content.
It’s not only thieves that will benefit from defeating this bill. It’s everyone in the USA. Morally, it’s a free speech issue, but more than that – it’s a losing battle.
Big media needs to understand that the internet is here, and it’s open, and it’s never going to go away. For every highly-paid programmer working for the US government and trying to restrict a person’s online ability, there are hundreds of others going against them, finding new work-arounds, and still doing whatever the hell they want online. Piracy will find a way. It always will. Innovation in the digital age ALWAYS moves towards openness, instant access, and zero cost. A law like this will not effect piracy in the slightest because the illegal sites don’t give a flying fuck about the law and will find a way. What this law will do is restrict the freedoms of users and legitimate, law abiding businesses, wasting millions and millions of tax dollars along the way.
As to your six year old looking at porn on an iPad, that’s on you. Don’t buy your six year old an iPad. The world is not your babysitter.
@Alan
Than why would you buy your 6 year old an Ipad? Blame others for your lack of parenting. Nice…
Right we would be stupid to support the internet…because you know, the internet didn’t create any jobs or innovations in the last decade…oh and BTW the reason why you have the ability to express your toilet barnacle of an opinion is because we have the internet and it allows for user generated content.
And maybe, just maybe you shouldn’t be buying your 6 year old an Ipad to be surfing the porn sites at school. Just a thought, but I’d rather not have the internet censored so that your parenting failures are not made ever apparent.
We get it, you want a police state where corporations believe they have a right to send their own corporate security over to your house to search it. Crazy? Apple is already there. Remember when they tried to search the reporters house?
We get it, youre a Hollywood lobbyist.
This piece of legislation is ridiculous, not to mention draconian and arrogant. While I support the overall purpose of the bill, Hollywood has lost a lot of money to piracy after all. The current wording is to broad. Our system is supposed to be based on checks and balances yet their our none in this bill. And heaven forbid we got a dodgy chief executive (remember Nixon) or AJ what stops them blocking a site as they find the material objectionable? While this bill doesn’t currently allow that, its a slippery slope and its name; the Peoples Republic of China!
I think Jefferson said it best: ‘Those who are willing to surrender essential liberties for a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security.’
Ok, there is a lot of hyperbole on both sides. This bill will not destroy the internet. This bill will also not stop piracy, it will simply make it more difficult, and that’s about it.
Because of the wording, however, some content which is fully legal may fall upon the wrong side of the fence (music artists who have been released and now release content on their own via websites may create issues with rights sold overseas and vice-versa).
Concerns, however, involve legitimate uses of media for known recognized purposes. Google has the most to lose from this via Youtube. What do I mean from this? Forms of expression such as parody, fair use clippings, and user created media may also be subject to removal and result in potential penalties. (Have a cute video of your kids dancing to a song? Prepare to face the wrath..) Facebook and others are equally concerned.
The issues with film piracy are fully addressed under law and can be prosecuted under the DMCA, and they have been – with fair success. The issue here is to go beyond DMCA, and beyond digital streaming.
The bill as presented makes this claim: ” protecting America’s military, police, and the public by deterring counterfeiting through increasing penalties for counterfeiting goods or services intended for the military, law enforcement, or critical infrastructure applications, illegal medicines, or goods that cause serious bodily harm or death.” (Wiki)
What’s wrong with that? Well, under this guideline, states like California, Oregon, etc. that have legalized Marijuana may now find themselves under the thumb of the US government; websites shuttered and fines up to $500,000 for offering to profit from a federally prohibited substance. (illegal medicine). “counterfeiting goods or services intended for the military, law enforcement, or critical infrastructure applications” has been viewed by some as a direct stab at those who offer universal survey maps; estimated time to service maps for 911 and other procedures.. have you seen websites that offer “time to wait at the ER” ? That kind of information could be considered protected information and selling it for a profit would suddenly be illegal, putting an end to those businesses.
The legislation at hand is broad with a great number of problems that may or may not be solvable. Right now, as it sits, the issues that would be created do very little to provide direct protection for the movie and film industry beyond the currently in place DMCA. Instead, it offers a blanket designed to assure people who think that it offers more… and make them feel good while offering potentially damaging results to areas that aren’t even remotely considered by those who will back this legislation.
The American Library Association points out that it has to voice opposition because a great deal of information – even that which no longer holds copyright – could be viewed as in breach if it is transferred digitally or otherwise through their services at libraries nationwide.. wait, you checked out the local land survey from your library.. why, you may have just violated SOPA.
The end impact for the film, movie and music industry is minimal; apple’s $24.99 amnesty for music pirates will be more successful then legislation. But the end impact for the way people will use the internet.. and what the government can go after will happen in areas people aren’t even considering at the moment.
I swear to God when on earth is the MPAA going to stop with this bullshit. Crying over largely imaginary lost millions. I have yet to see any reliable numbers that prove piracy really does make any serious dents in studio revenues domestically. Avatar was supposedly the most pirated movie ever and yet it also the all time box office champ. If this piracy problem is even remotely as big as the MPAA says it is, the DMCA is already in place. This new worthless piece of shit will do nothing to stop the problem if there really is one.
And enough of this crying about lost studio jobs. Please! the studios would destroy all the unions and hire slaves from the third world to work at 10 cents an hour if they could.
I could go on by why bother. I’m sure someone hear will trot out Hollywood’s version of the Big Lie and say how infringement is killing all the innocent blue collar show biz people.
Tell you what, if Hollywood REALLY cares about people, how about bringing copyright back down to only 25 years? That’s what this is really all about. Hollywood won’t be satisfied til you pay royalties for singing in the fucking shower. And they’ll talk the government and the judicial branch into tying up all the intellectual property til the end of time to do it. Stop the insanity. Vote down this bill.
I have heard that proxy’s, ip address changer programs can bypass that bill
anyone know about that ?
if something is not done soon
tv, movie studios will close, I heard it from friends at Warner Bros, who are way up the food chain,
back in the day before the internet, if you stole something they would have you beaten up
now what can they do ????? there are over 100 million stealing everyday,
revenue is down by 10% and on the way to 90% in about 5 years,