The U.S. Supreme Court denied an appeal by NBUniversal to review a lower court ruling that reinstated a complaint alleging that the company’s NBC network stole the idea for its Syfy series Ghost Hunters. Parapsychologist Larry Montz and publicist Daena Smoller had claimed in a 2006 suit that between 1996 and 2003 they had pitched the idea of paranormal investigators using technology to investigate claims of haunted properties to entertainment companies including NBC and its subsidiary, then called the SciFi Channel. They lost in district court on the issue of copyright, but the case was reinstated on appeal on grounds of implied breach of contract. NBCUniversal, with the backing of the MPAA, argued to the Supreme Court that federal copyright law trumped state contract law. The high court on Monday declined to review the appeals court ruling, which allows the suit by Montz against NBCUniversal, Pilgrim Films & Television (which produces Ghost Hunters) and other defendants to proceed.


Now, maybe, this will give someone the courage to come forward and claim true authorship of MANSQUITO.
Good! Get that injunction so they are forced to pull this god awful show, and it’s gazillion spinoffs, off the air.
I like the MPAA involvement claiming copyright law should be the highest law in the land.
Cash, if you don’t like it then change the channel. The reason there are a gazillion spinoffs is because millions actually watch them!!!! Just because you do not like something doesn’t mean everyone else can’t. If the show didn’t get the ratings, then it would not have been on the air as long as it has. It’s called Capitalism! Let the market decide.
Wrong. It’s ratings are garbage compared to the scripted shows it has replaced, but SyFy keeps pushing it because it’s cheap to produce. This has lead to less work for writers and crew members who would have otherwise been employed.
how do you know writers aren’t being employed in reality shows?
I hope the court will employ a K2 meter while it formulates its opinion. Or maybe it could unscrew a flashlight.
This would be like Jason and Grant suing all the other Ghost Hunter style shows now on every other network. This lawsuit is ridiculous. There are no new ideas, people. And there is a difference between pitching an idea and actually going out and shooting a concept pilot — which is what Jason and Grant did. These people are trying to make money off of the work of others. Say what you will about the show, but you can’t deny those two guys are working their asses off.
Can someone explain to me the difference between this, and last year’s lawsuit against another NBCU division: USA in which a NY judge ruled against Hayden Christensen and his brother and declared that you can’t copyright an idea?
Not much difference, I think. The Christensen’s lawsuit was also for implied breach of contract and is still being appealed as far I know.
It would seem to me that if a pitch included treatments, episode outlines, character bios and even scene ideas that were found to be used in the project then that is more than just complaining about someone taking another person’s idea. Especially when financial gain is implied between two parties who are in the business of buying, selling and using the ideas for tv or movie projects.
What does this mean in English?