We’re starting to see some interesting filings at the FCC as it prepares to revamp media ownership rules — and that includes a letter sent today by a strange-bedfellows coalition of Dish Network; Time Warner Cable; activist group Free Press; the Newspaper Guild; and the American Cable Association which represents small and mid-sized operators. They’re united by a concern about TV stations that “cannot lawfully merge under the FCC’s local television rules (but) are nonetheless consolidating their core operations, staff and news production.” The group says that in cities including Denver, Peoria, and Syracuse, “TV stations have consolidated their newsrooms and newsgathering by merging their facilities and laying off dozens of journalists, crew members and other staff. The resulting news product is essentially a re-run of stories produced by another station, which reduces content diversity in terms of viewpoints, substance and issue coverage.” The writers also complain about cases where TV stations cooperatively sell ads — and negotiate retransmission consent agreements. That troubles pay TV providers and “it is a prevalent practice with at least 36 pairs of separately-owned Big 4 affiliated stations in 33 different markets, actually engaging in coordinated negotiations through use of a single (retransmission consent) bargaining representative.” The group wants the FCC to “take account of how the reduction in local broadcast competition harms local communities and markets, and to ensure that the neither the substance nor the goals of the media ownership rules are thwarted.”
The National Association of Broadcasters issued a quick response: “Evidence shows that when a strong local TV station shares resources with another broadcaster, the result is the creation of more local news, weather and sports,” spokesman Dennis Wharton says. “The simple reality is that newsgathering and public affairs programming costs money, and that viewers benefit by more choice from a TV station that is free to the public. If the goal of Free Press is to eliminate competition that local broadcasters provide to pay TV conglomerates like Time Warner Cable and DISH, perhaps it should change its name to Pay Press.”
The FCC is also hearing from others who want more consolidation: It disclosed today that the Newspaper Association of America was in last week to lobby for “the need for relief” from rules limiting the ability of a company to own a newspaper and TV stations in the same market. The group that normally likes to talk up the newspaper business provided several charts showing how steeply ad sales are falling. It included a forecast from MagnaGlobal that says newspapers will have 8.2% of the ad market in 2016, down from 12.6% in 2011.


Since when does consolidation create competition? When elephants wrestle in the jungle, the monkeys get squished.
Without consolidation you’re going to completely lose local news in some markets. What is better, consolidated news gathering or no news at all?
I find it interesting that the FCC “Grandfathered” Stations owned by Newspapers that went on the air in the Late 1940′s-Early 1950′s owned by newspapers! The most Notable being Tribune’s Chicago (Tribune) and NYC (Daily News) stations.
This rule about ownership should have been abolished 10-15 years ago!
Does anybody even watch local news anymore? I pretty much quit when they started reporting the results of DWTS and American Idol as news.
Ironic that cable and satellite see no problem with the near monopolies they have but when a few broadcasters consolidate, it’s a big problem! There are a handful of national multi-channel video distributors but over 1,700 TV stations…most of which are not involved in LMAs, JSAs or SSAs.
Cable and satellite were built on the backs of local TV stations…for which not a dime was paid. Broadcasters should have been given a percentage of the equity in cable and satellite companies. That’s the least Congress could have done after forcing broadcasters to give away their signals for free to a group of people who used those signals to get their noses under the tent and have forgotten what made them viable (providing local signals that were given to them by the government for free).
There are very few examples of the government electing to gut the copyright laws specifically to help one group of businesses succeed at the cost of another group. This is the worst example and now to hear cable and satellite wringing their hands about the problems with consolidation is laughable.
here, here…perfectly said…many thanks
Somebody should tell the NAB that comedy is not its long suit.
Ah
Dish, Time Warner and the Cable Assn are all about the restransmission fees and could care less about journalism and the market effect on employees. Until they’re non profit organizations they’re opinion is worthless is nothing more than an attempt to drive down costs and enhance their profit margins.
Yesterday, I watched the 5 o’clock newscast and the 6 o’clock newscast from the same station. The 6 o’clock was basically a mirror image of the 5 o’clock, and I recognized the “human interest” stories from the yahoo main page I was perusing earlier. So that’s hearing the same story 3 times over. On top of that, the “local” stories were exactly the same as the other stations at that hour (yes, I got bored and switched to get a new perspective, but alas it was the same).
This is why I rarely watch the news anymore. It’s all recycled.
I can’t believe the NAB flak is saying mergers of newsrooms provide more local news, when money by irresponsible broadcast owners, is all that counts. Then Hitler got pretty far by telling the populous lies, until they finally believed them. We ought to paste Dennis Wharton to the front of a Syracuse, New York television station until he surrendered his lies, that garbage news fulfills the pubic’s need to know important issues of the day. Is there any limit what one will do for money? The NAB’s nothing more than a lobbyist, keeping the corrupt system going for the rich owners who want to get richer–and damn responsibility. Did Dennis ever work in a newsroom? Take away competition: It’s 5pm on a Friday afternoon and the mayor is about to deliver an important statement concerning the well-being of the city. The news director elects to avoid sending a reporter, saving overtime and knowing nobody else will cover it because he’s running a merger’d newsroom, so there’s no longer any competition. Wake up NAB and see what you are doing to your country. You are making a nation you’ll not like anymore than your ill-informed public.
Seriously?! These guys are complaining about consolidation?! When I negotiated retrans deals the first time, there were 184 cable systems that I had to negotiate with. This time, there are 9 and I’m in the same DMA. Maybe those remaining operators who seem to be so concerned about the future of local news could hire a few of those people that have been laid off…… oh wait, they don’t actually have any employees in local markets any more, do they?
man… they complain but hardly lift a finger to help what may be the only remaining locally owned stand alone full service commercial tv station. Why do I think the above commentators are pissing in the wind?