EXCLUSIVE: Sony moved Roland Emmerich’s Singularity from May 17th, 2013, to Nov 1, 2013. So now Paramount is grabbing that primo pre-Memorial Weekend date of May 17, 2013 for its much anticipated writer/director J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek sequel (which is really No. 12 among the Captain Kirk/Mr Spock star fleet movies). No title yet. But this one is being co-written by Abrams with Lost‘s Damon Lindelof, plus Alex Kurtzman & Roberto Orci. But JJ is going to be making the movie in 3D. The first of Abram’s rebooted franchise opened May 8, 2009 for a $79M weekend and ultimate did $258M in North America and $130M international at the box office. The pic is being produced by all those writers and Bryan Burk, who is JJ’s Bad Robot production partner. It is anticipated that David Ellison’s Skydance will be co-financing the film with Paramount. All key cast members will be returning, like Chris Pine and Zach Quinto and Zoe Saldana.
Paramount took a real risk rebooting what many thoiught was a tired franchise played out but the studio wound up with another potent franchise. That’s because Abrams’ reboot widened well beyond Star Trek‘s rabid but older fanbase and attracted a new and younger audience. (Paramount marketed the movie as “not your father’s Star Trek”.) And the critical reviews were 96% positive. The goal of the new pic was to finally attract more filmgoers overseas since the franchise had never done $100M international before.
As for the sequel, Abrams had to finish Super 8 so there was no way he could make the June 29, 2012 release date that Paramount initially had carved out for the film. (The studio gave that slot to its other sequel G.I. Joe: Retaliation.) Abrams had been hunkering down with writers Orci, Kurtzman, and Lindelof to work on the Star Trek script. The studio exercised its option on the cast and they would be ready when Abrams was.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.





Again with the stupid 3D!!!!
They’ve been pushing this since the 1950′s without it catching on!
When will somebody realize all the inconveniences caused by the glasses.
First get rid of the glasses than will talk about 3D!
2009′s “Star Trek” (quotation marks intentional) had a horrible script and an over-indulgent director, topped off with a butchered starship Enterprise design. Nothing about it made me want to watch it ever again or own it. Let it die. Along with 3D.
Paramount didn’t take a big risk….a number of stockholders sued Paramount b/c they ruined the franchise with too many ban movies and TV spin offs…they won the lawsuit and were forced to make the movie as part of the legal settlent…happily the movie was a big hit!
Chris & Truth-o-Meter – no, Trek never travelled. The $130m made by JJ’s Trek was more than double (yes, DOUBLE) the total international gross of any previous Trek (the two highest grossers previously were First Contact’s $57.5m and Motion Picture’s $56.5m. Of the others only Generations & Insurrection even managed to crack $40m!)
That is precisely why the reboot was risky, because it was high budget which meant it needed to either work outside the US for the first time or go gang-busters in the US. It did both.
Got a small nit to pick, Nikki. Trek flicks 7-10 were NextGen movies – Picard, Data, Riker…. None had Spock, and they killed off Kirk in 7.
Loved Abrams’ Trek flick, am looking forward to the next one.
JJ Abrams destroyed Star Trek. It took a thought-provoking science fiction franchise and turned it into a mindless action flick franchise.
I do not really care about how many dollars Paramount made from Star Trek XI. The fact is that it is one of the worst movies ever produced: the plot is nonsense, with terrible holes, science is violated roughly at every turn, the bad guy is totally flat, the crew is forced onto us, and any sort of philosophical debates that existed in previous movies and series is gone.
Based on this, I do not expect the new movie to be any better. It will be a movie that does nothing to promote rational thinking; but it will certainly make Paramount people richer.
You obviously haven’t seen much of the rest of Star Trek or you’d know bad science and plot holes aren’t remotely missing from the rest of the franchise either.
The other aspects are viable for discussion – but plot holes, bad science and silliness? You’d be better trying to sell that on someone whose never seen the franchise before.
I will wait for the 2D movie and wont pay extra for the 3d verison
The good news is that Chris Pine will be OLDER and actually look like a starship captain in this one.
Here’s hoping the art direction is more consistent in this one (a.k.a. shining new bridge, yet set-dressed pump station as engineering; scruffy water processing plant as Starfleet HQ, yet gleaming new NCC-1701 in orbit; Kirk’s father’s uniform more futuristic than his son’s generation).
To people nit-picking about lens flares, please hang yourselves. K thx.
No, that made sense … I mean you’d have to be an idiot to think otherwise. For whom would a pretty engineering bridge be? And that “scruffy water processing plant” wasn’t Star Fleet HQ, you’re talking about the Starship LAUNCHPAD.
“(which is really No. 12 among the Captain Kirk/Mr Spock star fleet movies)”
It is? Only if you count all the Next Generation movies that didn’t actually include either character… There were 6 movies with the original cast, plus Generations if you want to count it for Shatner’s presence.
Anyway, given the new cast and the “new timeline” explanation within the story, it makes more sense to start the numbering fresh
CANt wait !!!
3D is terribly unappealing to me. I just saw Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas (not good, except for NPH who always represents) but what made it worse was watching the 2D version with all of the campy 3D shots still included. It completely ruined the movie. In fact we could have renamed it ‘the 3D movie’ it was so focused on that crap. So unless they make a 2D edit, or avoid 3D all together, I won’t go to see another 3D movie in theatres.
4 years is just a little too long to wait for this sequel. No doubt the film will be huge, but it would have been better to get it out next summer.
I’ve already got it put into my Google calendar.
I’m ready. And yes…it’s about time. Not looking forward to the 3D bit but hey…it’s Star Trek.
What are the chances that this will be a “Star Dreck”?
JJ Thanks for keeping this one in Los Angeles!!
Regarding the dissing of Kurtzman & Orci (whom I’ve never met before) but the word “hack” is most often used by 3 different groups of people.
1) Disgruntled agents or managers who were either fired or burnt by a client. Or little bitter assistants who won’t amount to shit.
2) Most of the time the term “hack” is used by wannabe writers who have not been able to make it as a working writing and feel slighted and insecure living in their crappy North Hollywood apartment while they continue working at Coffee Bean and writing a bad Modern Family spec hoping to be signed by APA.
3) Then there are those who have never worked inside the studio system or even in Hollywood and don’t know what it’s like to be overextended and dealing with too many opinions they must listen to. Also being the flavor of the month is an impossible task to keep up. These guys are pros.
Truth is, most people can’t accomplish shit in this biz. Maybe you hate their work but they are by no means hacks. They are doing what YOU wish you could be doing. So keep your venomous comments to yourself and write better specs. APA is waiting for y’all. A match made in heaven.
No No No to 3D. You will just ruin the experience. I don’t want to have to sit with 3D glasses on my face to watch my faviorte show. Please, no 3D.
I don’t know what is more funny, the fact that they’re going to push this out in 3D when 3D is so big yawn yesterday, or the idea that someone actually thinks a Star Trek film should revolve around a Derivative pop star.
Those Tribbles are going to look awesome in 3-D, just BAM smashing into your face with their furry cuteness.
As a Star Trek fan from day one (yes I’m THAT old) I can’t wait for the next film. And as for the 3D – I also can’t wait for that. It’s so good now I wouldn’t make a movie if I couldn’t use it. Did ANY of you who say you hate 3D even see Avatar? I have a 3D TV and even on it’s relatively small screen Avatar is unbelievably good. 3D now ain’t your fathers 3D and I am glad of it. Love the format.
More then happy to wait for the DVD.
3D? Good god, Mr. Abrams, the handwriting has been on the wall for over a year now that most of us are sick of 3D-everything, especially the inflated movie ticket price for crap. There’s no reason to make Star Trek 3D.
I am so tired of 3D movies. I hate paying extra to see live action movies in 3D that just don’t translate well in that medium. (Captain America, transformers) just to name a few. I was really looking forward to this one. I hope they offer a non-3D viewing option.
I was blown away by the accuracy of the casting, and the genius of the script writers to create an alternate reality to allow a blank canvas for many sequels to this film!!
I through introduction from my dad have been a huge fan of star trek for as long as I remember….. It was revolutionary when Roddenberry created the series in the 60′s, brought up to speed with the introduction of the next generation, and now the 2009 film has brought a whole new audience to this long loved franchise!!!!!
Everything about the 2009 film was genius and unlike other ventures stayed true to the original series!!!
In star trek II, it was never explained how Kirk beat the kobiashi maru, was highly clever how they covered that in this film……
I don’t care how long I have to wait, ill be first in line to see the sequel may 17th next year!!!!
I’am so sick and tired of people making these comparisons of the first JJ star trek with star wars. I never made those kinds of conections and only star wars fanatics would percieve such things. There was nothing familiar in that movie from star wars save for the pace of the action and nothing more. I know star wars fans are homesick for new star wars movies and what not but its time to face facts that star wars doesnt have near the longevity of star trek. The fat lady has sung for star wars.