UPDATE, 12: 00 PM: No word from Starz execs about when they might announce a digital streaming deal to replace the one with Netflix, which expires in February. “There are a lot of conversations going on,” Starz CEO Chris Albrecht told analysts today. “It’s a road that needs to be evaluated almost on a weekly basis.” The company hopes to license programs from its premium channel to a premium-priced streaming service – meaning, one that charges more than Netflix. As more companies enter the online video market “they’ll begin to segment and differentiate,” says Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei. “That’s something we would embrace.” Albrecht said that “we didn’t believe it was appropriate to have our products included in a low-cost service.” Do they really expect lots of consumers to pay high prices in this weak economy — especially with the anemic numbers cable and satellite companies are posting for premium channels? At Starz the 3Q sub figure was up vs last year’s 3Q but down slightly from this year’s 2Q. “We haven’t seen weak demand,” Maffei says. “This has been a question of marketing and focus” by the cable and satellite companies that promote the channels to subscribers. That contrasts with recent comments from some operators including Time Warner Cable and Dish Network who said that many consumers cancelled premium channels either to save money in a weak economy or to use the cash for online services such as Netflix or Hulu Plus. Meanwhile Starz told investors that marketing costs will rise in 4Q: It has promotion costs for the new series Boss, and had no new shows in last year’s 4Q.
PREVIOUS, 6:34 AM: John Malone loves complexity — that’s instantly apparent to anyone who tries to make sense of the 3Q earnings out today from the moving parts of his Liberty Media. But shares are down 1.3% in early trading for one of its pieces, the Liberty Starz Group. The operation reported revenues of $389M, down 2% from the same period last year. That’s short of the $395.53 that the Street expected. The company says that the revenue hit reflects Starz’s decision to get out of the theatrical film business. That was partially offset by an additional $7M from rate increases for the Starz channels and $5M from subscription growth. The premium channel had 19M subs at the end of September, up 9.2%, while Encore had 32.8M, up 2.5%. The company says that subs were affected by “a current lack of cooperative marketing campaigns” with some pay TV distributors. But Starz’s operating income was up 16.1%, to $101M, mostly because it no longer has to pay marketing costs for theatrical films. The earnings release says nothing about Starz’s deal with Netflix — we’ll have to see whether analysts raise the issue later this morning when the company holds its quarterly conference call with them.


Good news for Spartacus fans for sure. Hope BOSS gets stronger. Starz needs another BIG hit to cement itself as a player on TV.
I think Torchwood is or should be a goner..every fan I know has said they hated the new Torchwood.
Had thought Starz should have saved Legend of the Seeker to air in front of Torchwood etc..but oh well that is way too late now.
“The company hopes to license programs from its premium channel to a premium-priced streaming service – meaning, one that charges more than Netflix.”
Do they mean one that is surely set to fail?
Idiots … Netflix is as good as it gets for streaming.
“The company hopes to license programs from its premium channel to a premium-priced streaming service – meaning, one that charges more than Netflix.”
Did they just miss the whole fiasco with Netflix raising their prices? Do they think there will be a “premium-priced streaming service” out there any time soon?
Even though Redbox recently raised their prices and Blockbuster is raising their prices, I haven’t seen any company out there making the case that their service is more expensive than Netflix and it is worth it since they have “premium” content.
Are they thinking about moving to Roku and setting their own price?
Besides Netflix, what is left?
Netflix reaches a mass audience, is that not what Starz wants?
Dish is expanding into streaming and needs more rights than Blockbuster has.
Starz thinks that they have such “premium content” when all you get are re-runs and stale movies after a few weeks of watching. I used to pay for Starz through my provider DISH Network before I dropped the package and saved. As for Netflix, I couldn’t be happier with what was already on, but then the price increase hit, and it didn’t make sense to pay more for the same content. At that point, my employer and provider released the Blockbuster Movie Pass, which is $10 a month, and gives me more than Netflix did. With the Blockbuster Movie Pass, I get streaming to my DVR or computer, 20 channels on my lineup, plus DVD, video game and Blu-ray exchanges in-store and by mail (Netflix always charged extra for Blu-Rays)! From my experience working for DISH and using the Blockbuster Movie Pass, I know that it is a great alternative for those who’ve cancelled Netflix recently. For now, the Blockbuster Movie Pass is only available to DISH Network subscribers, but since Blockbuster listens to customers, they are working on making the service available for everyone. Starz wants a premium price for inferior programming, and that’s not something I’m subscribing to.