A Texas state court issued a simple denial today of Time Warner Cable’s motion to dismiss the case that pits it against Viacom so it could be heard by a U.S. District Court in New York City. Viacom argued that the cable company wanted to muddy the issues in two distinct cases: The one in Texas involves Time Warner Cable’s claim that CMT isn’t delivering the kind of programming it promised in a 2004 carriage agreement. The other case, in New York, is about whether Time Warner Cable’s programming agreements with Viacom include the right to stream shows to customers’ iPads. In the CMT case, Time Warner Cable says that it agreed to carry a channel largely devoted to country music. But the music on CMT, it says, ”has been replaced almost entirely by movies and television series, which for the most part bear no relationship to country music.” Viacom counters that “overall programming approach and brand filtering has remained consistent.” Country music fans, it says, now prefer “a greater variety of programming” including non-music shows that have the “same types of values and stories” embodied by country music.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6 

The same argument about programming could be made about most cable nets these days. None of them with the exception of a few, are programming based on their original design. They have all morphed into one another leaving only their original name to tell you what channel you are watching and they are all block programming hours of the same series. four hours of this and two hours of this and five hours of this… It is total crap….
I fully support the cable companies in this effort.
None of the specialty channels are what they claim. I’ve also never known any cable tv channel to actually ask what the customers of it want.
What they do instead is, show something, then if it succeeds, start airing more.
Therefore in cmt’s case. They might have more viewers. But they are uncle to prove that it is actually country music fans that are watching.
AMC was one if the first channels to put the “lie” to their name first being loose with the “American movie classics” it was showing to ordering original programming and I don’t think they could care less though they should change their name. CMT actually tried to rebrand their CMT to mean something else other than country music television at one point if I’m not mistaken.
AMC hurt their brand when they tried to air Pearl Harbor as a “classic.” Some of the most godawful movie dialogue ever written.
A&E is the one in need of rescue the most. It’s laughable. They used to do the kinds of movies and miniseries you gotta go to PBS or HBO to find nowadays. I don’t suppose a judge could order them to make another Horatio Hornblower as part of a settlement? The best books in the series were the next to be adapted. Philistines.
If someone could explain to me the historical import of Ice Road Truckers and why it’s on the History Channel, I’d be much obliged.
And the live-action garbage on Cartoon Channel. I’ll never get past that.
Live-action programs on Cartoon Network are fine by me, especially if they do get to air Japanese tokusatsu shows like Masked Rider, etc. as long as those same programs still targets kids and teens.
How about what’s happened to the SyFy channel? Wrestling and Ghost Hunting? I turn to BBC America for my sci-fi fix.
Viacom’s statement is pure BS, their programming has gone down hill for the last 2 years.
Syfy programming has also gotten much worse in the last few years. Very poor movies, about the same level as Killer Tomatoes and JUNK series.