
STUNNER! Legendary Pictures Postpones January Start Of ‘Paradise Lost’
EXCLUSIVE: Legendary Pictures’ Paradise Lost isn’t the only film being readied on the Warner Bros lot to face a budget crisis. Arthur & Lancelot, the David Dobkin script that Warner Bros paid $2 million to acquire last summer, won’t get made unless the budget drops dramatically. I’m told that even though Warner Bros dated the film for a March 15, 2013 release and cast Game of Thrones’ Kit Harington to play Arthur and The Killing‘s Joel Kinnaman to play Lancelot, the back and forth on budget has gotten to the point that the studio has invited Dobkin to set the picture up elsewhere if he can. I’ve heard that what started as a $90 million (other sources said Warners would make it for $110 million) contemporary style re-imagining of the Sword And The Stone tale has a budget the studio fears could reach $130 million. The studio feels that is just too much for a movie with two unproven leads. After the year’s wild box office swings and last weekend’s paltry performance, who can blame Warner Bros for being cautious?
It is obviously a Warner Bros goal to tell the story of Arthur, Lancelot and the Knights of the Roundtable, because the Dobkin spec supplanted two others that the studio had in development. The studio is keen to see through Dobkin’s version of the film (the spec deal allowed Dobkin to take it elsewhere if he and Warner Bros disagreed), but I’ve heard that if Arthur & Lancelot doesn’t figure it out, Ritchie might once again be trying to pull the sword out of the stone. His Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows opens Friday and is expected to shake the box office out of its recent doldrums. Warner Bros recently gave Ritchie and his new producing partner Lionel Wigram The Man From U.N.C.L.E., after halting the version that Steven Soderbergh was working on because the studio didn’t like the budget and the casting after George Clooney dropped out.
This budget crisis news follows last night’s news that Legendary’s Paradise Lost has been halted from starting production in January because the large amount of green screen visual effects in the epic battle of good and evil swelled the $120 million budget by 10%-15%. Legendary, which has Bradley Cooper and Benjamin Walker starring, is now looking at May or later to start production in Australia on the Alex Proyas-directed film, which Warner Bros will distribute.
2011 has been a year of studios moving warily on green lights even at the risk of alienating cornerstone producers, directors and stars. Disney halted the Johnny Depp-Armie Hammer-starrer The Lone Ranger until director Gore Verbinski and producer Jerry Bruckheimer figured out how to take a budget upwards of $250 million down to $215 million. Universal jettisoning an ambitious adaptation of Stephen King’s The Dark Tower series that Ron Howard was to direct with Javier Bardem starring, with three feature films and two TV series runs planned. More shocking was Universal’s decision to unplug At the Mountains of Madness, the Guillermo del Toro-directed adaptation of the HP Lovecraft tale that had Tom Cruise poised to star, because Universal would not make a $150 million horror film without a guarantee from the director that it would be PG-13 and not R rated.
Other Knights Of The Roundtable projects previously considered by WB was a remake of the 1981 John Boorman pic Excalibur that had Bryan Singer attached; there was a version that Sherlock Holmes helmer Guy Ritchie was working on with Trainspotting scribe John Hodge. There is also a Harry Potter-style take being produced by Donald DeLine that isn’t really impacted by any of this. Warner Bros would not comment on the Arthur & Lancelot situation.


I’m shocked. Warner Bros. decided NOT to make a big budget, period drama, with David Dobkin directing and no stars? Someone needs to go back and watch the amazing action sequences in Shanghai Knights!!
Yeah, I have to say both of these look like creative excesses more so than anything. You can launch new stars with big tentpoles, but it helps to have an already-star in there to help out. Still the key, of course, always, ALWAYS, is to actually have good material (i.e. a good script) to start with. Otherwise whoever you cast doesn’t really matter.
I hope everyone is following this pattern of producers setting up projects they can’t handle and fucking over below the line when they “reassess their budget options” Can’t we as an industry plan within our reach?
These are ALL dead myths with no application to today’s circumstances. These are all greybeard myths for a WHITE audience, and that’s less than 1/7 of the earth’s population. Fire the studio heads en masse, start from scratch, look for the new tentpoles. FAST, otherwise these studios will become libraries.
Right. Myths that have endured and touched people for centuries or longer are now, for reasons that pass understanding, suddenly no longer relevant. Makes sense to me.
Could it also be that someone at WB finally got around to looking at Change Up? I think they bought the script from Dobkin just before this hot steaming mess was released.
Who can blame them? They’ve only made a bazillion dollars on Batman & Harry Potter. Count every penny!
this movie is an absolute HUGE mistake, even at 90 mill. warners is about to dodge huge bullet.
What bland anonymous looking actors. I miss the 80′s and 90′s, when Hollywood somehow found new actors who really looked like stars. Back when the “Beautiful People” really were beautiful.
What is wrong with the movies now is that they keep choosing actors for folks who demand People Magazine Plastic Celebrity (not actor). But Plastic Celebrity in Plastic Figurine Movie is why the majority of folks like me don’t waste a penny on movies anymore. Too bad WB can’t learn this. I’ll go to see quality actors, no matter what genre the movie is. And, guess what, the best young actors are now on the quality cable TV shows.
As to your sweeping generalization, you have obviously have never gotten to know these two actors–and they are real actors, which is the only reason I was enthused about this movie. Harrington is just 24, and unproven. I can’t say re his big screen future, but he is formally educated in British theater, as many of the great actors are, and does a wonderful job in HBO’s Game of Thrones–and he is very gorgeous and has a huge fan base. And shame on your ignorant slam re Swedish dramatic theater educated, award-winning–and proven movie big money-maker in Europe–Kinnaman. He is an EXCELLENT talent, Swedish Oscar and theater best actor award-winning, and also very fine looking, voted Sweden’s sexiest man this year. No one who has seen this quick athletic actor perform would EVER call him, or his acting, ‘bland’–including Johnny Depp’s agent, who now also represents him.
It is too bad WB keeps selecting the same old same old based first on the People Magazine plastic celebrity watchers (eg., nonathletic Ryan Reynolds, Green Lantern). They are missing gems in actors these two. In fact I think WB won’t be stupid enough to let either of them go, despite the issues with this movie, which is NOT either young actor’s fault. They’ve brought up Kinnaman’s name for almost every big role lately, he’ll eventually get his chance. They swooped in to nab him for this. In the meantime just this year this ‘bland actor’ has gotten raves for his AMC lead actor role in The Killing, done four American movies (Girl with Dragon Tattoo, Safe House, Lola vs., and The Darkest Hour), and then two Swedish ones for good measure over the summer (Snabba Cash II and Johan Falk). Too bad WB has now likely screwed up his schedule for 2012. Our loss.
Stay pressed pr intern. Both are boring anonymous nobodies, which is why everyone is glad this thing died. Looks are the true glass ceiling of Hollywood. To reach extraordinary heights requires extraordinary looks, and these basic guys don’t have it. But they can still be working actors. They’ll just never be A-list or the Big Thing. But supporting roles in cable shows will always be there for them.
Who the hell wants to see another “take” on the sword and the stone tale for heaven’s sake? This budgets are getting out of hand without offering any quality in storytelling.
With HP over and Batman coming to a close whats next for WBros?
They need to “re-imagine” their own imaginations, I tell ya.
Warners — and I assume a smart person like Sue Kroll weighs in on these decisions — did just dodge a major bullet. Even in phenomenal, longshot success, this movie gets to about 150 domestic, which simply isn’t enough to justify the massive marketing cost to launch something like this. And I bet some HUGE actors passed on doing this before they went to the no-namers.
Dobkin’s utterly overrated anyway.
Remember Ridley and Russel’s ROBIN HOOD?
Me, neither.
Because I, like most moviegoers, had ZERO interest in seeing a “re-imagining” of a movie I’ve seen in five other incarnations.
What about that bleak KING ARTHUR with Clive Barker and Kiera Knightley from 2004? $51.8 mil domestic!!
Drop it, WB; you’ll be glad you did.
Arthur…
MY GOD…. who cares.
It’s never been done well because the story isn’t that great. Horses, swords, who cares. Put it modern day or do something interesting