EXCLUSIVE: Backers are ready to take a victory lap for their two-year Movies On Demand marketing campaign for cable built around the slogan: ”The Video Store Just Moved In.” But the evidence that they’re starting to circulate fails to demonstrate that they attracted lots of new rentals following their TV, print, and online sales pitches, which began last year with a $30M commitment. They point to figures from Rentrak that show cable subs viewed VOD more than 6.4B times in the first 10 months of this year, up 10.3% vs the same period last year. The problem? That figure isn’t just movie rentals — it also includes movies shown for free as well as TV shows. They also note that newcomers to VOD movies — people who hadn’t ordered one in at least three months — paid an average of $7.71 a week this past summer. That’s up 67% from the spring, and it’s “a massive increase since early 2010, when they weren’t spending at all” for VOD movies, says Char Beales, who oversees the Movies on Demand campaign. While she’s probably right, it doesn’t mean much because the group doesn’t tell us how many people began to rent movies. The campaign is supported by Fox, Lionsgate, Sony, Summit, Universal, and Warner Bros, as well as Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Cox.
They launched the Movies On Demand effort as studios saw companies led by Netflix and Redbox renting DVDs for as little as $1 a night — and stopped viewing cable as a threat to disc sales and rentals. This year about 80% of cable VOD movies were available the same day discs hit the stores. Last year cable’s day-and-date figure was 60%, and just four years ago it was 4%. Meanwhile thousands of video stores closed. Rentals at bricks-and-mortar stores dropped 28.1% to $1.25B in the first nine months of this year according to the video industry’s DEG: The Digital Entertainment Group. Even so, Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt said in October that movie VOD transactions at his company fell in 3Q because “some of the movies were weaker than they were a year ago.”


VOD hasn’t made a dent yet. I’ve seen some of the figures from the MSOs.
The technology is still in it’s infant stages, and the menus need to be redesigned from scratch.
It’s too convoluted for the casual impulse buyer.
-RnsW
VOD is too expensive and the options are not very good. Not where we are anyway. I’ll stick to the old fashioned Blu Ray format.
VOD would be more successful if they turned the volume down on their channel.
YES!!!
When they wake up and realize that people will irrationally drive to the store to spend $1.20 at Redbox… and invariably pay two nights to make it twice that… and ignore the cost of gas… And continue to treat that as a $1.20 rental vs. their $4.99 VOD….
Maybe, just maybe…. They’ll figure it out.
If they want to kill the disc — and the kiosk-owning middlemen — it’s trivial to do so. Just set the price at $2.99 for new releases. Done.
I’ve only used VOD twice, and I was drinking and thought “what the hell”.
First: I have to say “What campaign?” I have not noticed any increase in advertising for VOD in the past two or three years.
Second: Who the hell do they think is going to pay anywhere from 4.99 to 9.99 for a “new” VOD title when you can get a Redbox for one dollar and the average cost per rental for Netflix (for me at least) is less than two dollars?
Third: Like Poppy said before why is the volume so loud on the VOD channel when you are trying to find a title? Sometimes I stop looking for something to rent ’cause the volume for the channel is too loud. In fact the sound is like ten times louder than regualr TV commercials.
Fourth: With Time Warner charges so much money for their monthly service, about $170.00 per month, who the hell has extra money for VOD?
I totally agree on your fourth point. Time Warner charges way too much money for their monthly service, that you’d think VOD would be free or included with the cable subscription. I know that in our household, although we browse the VOD offerings of Time Warner, we usually end up choosing to rent from Amazon or other services if the same movie is available. Usually it’s $1 cheaper. And even if it’s the same cost, we’d still rent from Amazon just to avoid paying more money to Time Warner.
I’m curious (no, really) whether the Rentrak stats break down how much of the VOD sales went to porn/adult content vs. “non-porn” content…
This campaign is helping to move movies on demand on cable into the mainstream. That’s not an quick, easy or inexpensive proposition. It’s going to take more time and MSO commitment. It’s also not a panacea – there are other effective MOD marketing tools out there that compliment this campaign that should also be implemented by MSO’s. It’s a combination of all of these efforts that will make a difference in the long run as to who ends up with the most market share.
My store is less than 2 miles away and someone goes by there 3-5 times a week. Only kept a redbox rental more than one night once.
Nowhere close to the same. Plus I got so many free red box rentals over time my actual avg cost per rental is probably 60 cents.
That is what vod needs to do… Issue free codes for vod rentals go get people familsr with the process and offerings. Would yield much better results than a hack marketing campaign with a bad tag line