Hot Trailer: ‘G.I. Joe: Retaliation’

COMMENTS (17)

• There’s not much of Channing Tatum in there. Does he have a limited role? Get killed off? Or did someone at Paramount tell the trailer shop to cut him out of much of it?

  Comment by Magilla — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 7:12pm PST  Reply to this post

  • You see Duke’s dead body in the trailer. The Rock takes his tags off him and says “We’re all that’s left”. So yes, Channing gets killed off. They didn’t even save that for a surprise bonus in the movie.

    Comment by WyldeMan — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 10:04pm PST  Reply to this post

    • Duke’s dead body is never seen. You see Channing diving into a well taking cover in the water and bullets zing past him. The Rock just takes tags off some random Joe. Probably Duke shows up in the third act as a twist.

      Comment by andrew — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 10:53am PST  Reply to this post

      • Think again that was the Rock in the well. Not sure about Tatum though.

        Comment by Ms Lucy — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 3:54pm PST  Reply to this post

• Best.Trailer.Ever

  Comment by movie machine — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 7:28pm PST  Reply to this post

• It looks a lot better than the original, frankly. I’ll watch it, but that’s no real yardstick. I’m an easy sell.

  Comment by John — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 7:59pm PST  Reply to this post

• Palicki is hot. Bruce saves the day???

  Comment by voilin — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 8:14pm PST  Reply to this post

• Flint! F yea, finally!

  Comment by Finally — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 10:07pm PST  Reply to this post

• Actively awful. No Rachel Nichols, no desire to see it. With Bruce Willis as Bruce Willis. No thanks, Chu. Stick with The LXD, a far, farther better undertaking

  Comment by PaulH — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 10:14pm PST  Reply to this post

• WTF? Is this Ghost Protocol Redux?

  Comment by Tom Cruise — Tuesday December 20, 2011 @ 10:21pm PST  Reply to this post

  • Yes, yes it is.

    Comment by chris — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 5:48am PST  Reply to this post

• Obviously they couldn’t leave out Ray Park and Byung-hun Lee. But bringing back Channing Tatum, undoubtedly the worst part of the first movie? Pretty sure it was Chu’s call, having Tatum back in the sequel is a slap in the face to all of the other (and better) actors from the first movie that did not get asked to return, especially Sienna Miller and Rachel Nichols, who were two of the brighter spots from the first movie.

  I see Bruce Willis performing the same perfunctory role as Dennis Quaid from the first one, which pretty much means squat. I’d be surprised if his role amounted more than just a cameo.

  Comment by Irvin — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 1:30am PST  Reply to this post

• Supermodel ninjas. Why didn’t I think of that.

  Comment by Roger — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 2:10am PST  Reply to this post

• first one was awful this one looks better but ill likely keep away from it… at least joseph gordon levitt isnt doing another terrible preformance as cobra commander

  Comment by RG3 — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 6:45am PST  Reply to this post

• Does anyone know if this will be in IMAX? or 3D? I hope IMAX but hopefully NOT 3D!!!

  Comment by Brandon — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 6:55am PST  Reply to this post

• No Sgt. Slaughter=No interest

  Comment by Chuck Collins — Wednesday December 21, 2011 @ 10:06am PST  Reply to this post

• I feel that Channing Tatums character was good for both the GI Joes movies…it’s true, it would have been nice if they didn’t kill him off, but I guess Channing Tatum, will never be type cast…he will always leave his audience, followers and fans wanting more…I know I do….

  Comment by Michell Phillips-Payne — Sunday April 7, 2013 @ 1:28pm PDT  Reply to this post