EXCLUSIVE: Sources tell me that, with this round of movie openings, it’s become clear who’s on top and who’s not as far as North American market share for the year 2011. While officially the period doesn’t end until January 2nd, 2012, the major Hollywood studios already know who has bragging rights:

1. Paramount - projected $1.9B
With Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol and The Adventures Of Tintin about to open wide, the studio should reach $1.9B domestic. Right now the studio is about $100 million ahead of Warner Bros which usually takes the coveted title. And WB released about half a dozen more movies than Paramount did this year. Granted, Paramount mostly distributed rather than owned most of the film fare that put it in first place. But No. 1 is still No. 1.

2. Warner Bros – projected $1.8B
For the first time in three straight years, the studio won’t be #1 in domestic market share. On the other hand Warner Bros has ranked either one or two domestically for eight of the last 11 years. The underperformance of Sherlock Holmes 2 means WB won’t catch Paramount.

3. Sony Pictures - projected $1.3B
The studio still has The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo opening this week.
The studio still has Steven Spielberg’s War Horse opening next Sunday but The Muppets is running out of gas.
The studio has run out of pics and, with the exception of Bridesmaids and Fast And Furious, will be glad to see 2011 end.
Despite having Alvin And The Chipmunks 3 and We Bought A Zoo still to come, Fox is in last place. Another studio glad to see 2011 in the rear-view mirror.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.





Many years ago my friends and I went to movies often solely based an what studio put them out. Now I couldn’t identify one studio be genre, stars. etc. homogenous, commodification, bland “re visioning” (with a few exceptions) of much better previous efforts, endless contrived sequeals – a total lack of corporate identity
It honestly is sad in many ways.
this is so true. by trying to appeal to everybody they end up appealing to nobody. most “blockbuster” movies now feel generic and the same.
Really? I’ve never heard of going to see movies on that basis in my life. (Unless it’s Disney/Pixar, Dreamworks animation or Miramax/Weinstein Bros…)
What about Summit with “Breaking Dawn’s” landslide?
MAJOR Hollywood Studios Market Share
Emma Watts is in way over her head and news to go. Donna couldn’t pick the winner in an one horse race. Congrats to Paramount and WB still the cream of the crop.
But they need SOPA to save jobs because their profits are skirting the breadline!
a) “skirting the breadline” makes no sense
b) this story isn’t about SOPA
c) Piracy is theft
d) per b, you appear to be a troll for Big Tech. it’s not your fight anymore. let it go and don’t clutter up every internet comment board going forward, please. it’s a law enforcement issue.
e) thanks
Fox learns about life without Avatar.
However they made Apes, so in way they don’t deserve their last place…
What the hell is Rich Ross doing? Dick Cook was making over a billion 10+ years ago. Looking at 2012 and beyond, Rich “I hire my friends” Ross greenlights maybe 2 small films a year, with the rest being Marvel, Pixar/Disney Animation, Dreamworks live-action, and small pickups, which he has no real say in.
Can’t wait for Iger’s replacement to fire the incompetent boob, if Iger doesn’t do it first.
If you read press releases when Cook was let go he stated Disney wanted to go in a different direction, they also stated the would cut back on the pictures being made under the “Disney” brand and the Touchstone brand.
Think about it the bought Marvel, they bought Pixar, they have a deal with Dreamworks, why does Disney need to make movies in the first place, IMO he was just put there to “look over” things. At least he won’t be making any EXPENSIVE bombs like Cook (G Force)
Rich Ross came from one of Disney’s most profitable division Disney Channel with Disney its all about the MONEY, not the amount of pictures made.
Not bad for Sony considering they did not have any major Tent-Pole releases this year.
Guess this’ll teach Disney to stop buying up hackneyed old properties, thinking it’s a great business move, and instead focus on creativity and innovation and, oh I don’t know, its OWN characters?
Right?
nah…
I suspect Fox is one of the most profitable studios on the list — and Paramount one of the least — but ROI rankings have never traditionally held as much weight as the market share/gross totals.
Universal needs a revamp.
Are these branding companies now? Studios have been contracting financially for three years now on their spreadsheets and contracting audience numbers since 1996, how, why are boards continuing to accept these numbers from executives, is there too much coziness or are boards simply outwitted by the management spin on things?
Hollywood: you have to do something about declining audiences, high ticket prices and poor offerings from your creative teams.
The Help and Bridesmaids were big winners. Cost little, made a lot, were creative and commercial, nominated for awards, were female stories… and as a result Hollywood won’t make more of them.
Good movies make money. Why are good movies no longer a priority for studios?
Tentpole films have been done to death and are hackneyed and tired. I understand trying to bring in teen boys but why at the exclusion of the rest of the audience? Of great movie making?
Why can’t studios do both?
Buddy – Paramount prints money (I.e. Profits) with their micro-budget slate. Each PARANORMAL ACTIVITY has been the most profitable film of that year, the first being the most profitable film of all time (next to, I think, DEEP THROAT). With low-cost/high-yielding projects coming from the Insurge lable like PA and BIEBER, PAR has earned their spot at #1. (Yes, major release like TRANSFORMERS and MI:4 helped.)