
The time of full-screen, slow-moving end credits on TV shows is long gone and forgotten as TV networks, in face of increased competition, are constantly looking for new ways to keep viewers from flipping the channel at the end of a program. Today, end credits roll at light speed while a teaser for the series’ next episode or the network’s show that is coming up plays. Now MTV is taking aim at production companies’ logo cards that normally run after the end credits, visually separating one show from the next. The cable network is moving all logo cards from end of show to the third break where they will appear before the episode’s fourth act.
The new policy has already been implemented on Teen Mom 2 and last week’s Real World special and is being enforced for all upcoming series, including the fifth season of Jersey Shore and new docu-series Caged. The first scripted series to comply with the new rules is new comedy I Just Want My Pants Back, which premieres on Feb. 2. Because the spots for the producers’ logo cards are specified in their contracts, MTV technically has to have their blessing for the move. There had been speculation that not all producers are happy about the new initiative, with rumors that Pants executive producers Doug Liman and Dave Bartis have opted to pull the card for their Hypnotic banner over the proposed relocation. Sources close to the series confirm that all logo cards for Pants: of MTV, Universal Cable Prods. and Hypnotic, will indeed be dropped but stress that that was the result of a mutual agreement between MTV and the producers to eliminate viewer distraction, especially for the first 2 episodes of the series, which are airing back-to-back.
But while taking the logo cards out of end credits would indeed provide a more seamless transition between two shows, it may create confusion in the new place they’re put in. The logic is that viewers instinctively flip the channel or get up to go to the bathroom or the kitchen when they see the production companies logo cards, a subconscious sign that their show is over. Wouldn’t seeing those cards earlier trigger a similar reaction, resulting in some viewers quitting the show before the final act or leave viewers wondering whether the program they’re watching is over or not? If MTV’s new policy sticks, look for other networks to adopt it for competitive reasons. And, because of the awkwardness of placing the logo cards 3/4 into the show, more producers may opt to drop them, which begs the question, has MTV found a stealth way of eliminating TV production companies logo cards altogether?
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Shocking that an advocate for writers like MTV would do something like this. #sarcasm
First world problems.
Go MTV! It’s about time some studio had the balls to eliminate these ridiculous time-wasting ego billboards.
Each card is up for usually 15-20 frames (thats less than a sec) are they that desperate?
Finally we can start to do away with these ridiculous scrolls of credits. I am not sure where it became a requirement that everyone associated with the production of a TV program or Movie had to be acknowledged in such an overtly ego-centric manner (and I am certain follow up responses will let us know). Yes, these productions take a village, but do we really think the viewers and theatre-goers really care to see who did the hair, catered the set or handled the lights? Using Spielberg, JJ Abrams, Brad Pitt, Jerry Bruckheimer et. al. in the marketing, PR a promo blitz absolutely makes sense on the front end…but imagine a world where every time you opened a can of soda you had to endure a list of every employee of Coca-Cola who may have had anything to do with the product with which you were engaging.
What harm does theater credits do? I personally like them, and if others don’t, what’s stopping them from getting up and walking out? Besides, your coca-cola comparison is off. A film is an entirely different animal compared to 1 of billions of cans of the same beverage.
in a given year, credits cost a studio hundreds of thousands of dollars for the cost of film stock, legal, layout, transcoding, qc, and duplication time. If the film is a long VFX film, long end credits may cost the distributor an additional screening per day.
Riiiiight.
Because the people who produces programs have to give credit where credit is due. It’s more than fair to acknowledge those who made a program possible, even if it’s a lowly hairstylist or a P.A. Even the names of the location where production takes places have to give acknowledged. Hey, you only have to spend 30-sixty seconds of your life to watch them. Nothing wrong about it.
In addition, one thing we viewers always look forward to are the theme tunes accompanying the closing credits. It’s so sad the US audience won’t be able to enjoy seeing end credits as much as those who watch US shows overseas.
I guess you’re one of those people who get traumatized seeing the Hannah-Barbara production card that has a “swirling star” on it or that WGBH card with the scary tune.
Soda is not art; but television and film productions are. So yes, regular Joes and Janes are interested in who did what. And for those hopefuls of wanting to get into this game, it helps them too. I want to know who wrote it, edited it, produced it. Not allowing that attribution is robbery and a complete disservice for those who had a hand in creating this piece of art and history we call entertainment.
E! has already been doing this with Sex and the City reruns for a while now. It’s disorienting to say the least.
I find The Soup even more disorienting where the producer cards are spread over the whole show. It’s just too much clutter on the screen.
A sign of the times. So stupid the way these people think that it will help with ratings. People will leave or stay depending on content of the show they are watching -NOT because of a stupid gimmick like this. Who wants to see logos like this during their shows. Don’t we get enough of this with the constant advertising as it is now>
E! has been doing this for years and as shown by the success of the Kardashians it doesn’t seem to diminish viewing habits. If anything, this is bonus for programmers who place new or struggling shows immediately following hit series.
The main problem with this logic is the assumption that the average viewer of “The Kardashians” knows how to read.
Talk about taking you out of a story. What’s next? Showing scenes for next week’s episode before the end of the current one? This is completely nuts, and is what happens when you take creative folks completely out of the decision making.
This is already happening on MuchMusic in Canada whenever they air scripted shows like Gossip Girl or Vampire Diaries. People just keep getting dumber and coming up with dumber ideas that don’t even make sense….who wants to know what’s happening next week when they don’t even know how this week ended up yet – especially with serialized shows like those? It’s been happening for months now. Just stupid.
While we are at it can we get rid of the network logos that are constantly on the bottom of the screens DURING programs? Transparent or not…they are still annoying! We know what channel we are watching as 20% of the commercials that air remind us!!!!
@Chris Believe it or not, Bravo already does this for their housewives series. They will play a quick promo for next week’s episode before the final act of the current episode. They probably do it for all their shows but I only watch the Housewives. It’s my guilty pleasure
While we’re at it, how about we also remove the producing credits that the network executives get at MTV. A ridiculous credit roll after the actual credit roll. These people aren’t producers. They’re network execs. I somehow doubt that will happen.
The producers already get credit at the top of the shows, is it really necessary to see a three second graphic of their production company logo accompanied by a high pitched sting?
Networks are doing this to try to force viewers who have recorded the shows to actually watch part of the commercial break. Producer cards are a visual cue which signals the viewer to stop fast forwarding. They are also doing away with show title bumpers in and out of segments. If they jump from commercial to action with these visual cues, then they think the viewer will at least watch part of the commercial.
Sit Ubu Sit. Good dog.
Interesting. I have said for a long time I didn’t understand why movie and television people believe every single person has to be mentioned in the credits. In the work I did for 36 years I almost never got credit for anything I did except perhaps a little more pay from my boss at appraisal time. I always figured the guilds must be responsible for the credits requirements in movies and television.
I actually like knowing who did certain things on a movie. And years later we can still know the name of the person who did that wonderful costume design on a film because of those requirements.
I also figure the production companies must have their huge logos splashed on the screen because they are taking the biggest risk of all, but I don’t know if that’s true.
When all is said and done, I kinda doubt people change channels because of the credits or logos at the end–it’s because they want to see what else is on.
“I have said for a long time I didn’t understand why movie and television people believe every single person has to be mentioned in the credits. In the work I did for 36 years I almost never got credit for anything I did except perhaps a little more pay from my boss at appraisal time.”
Well, that’s the thing. Since the crews on films and television are usually independent contractors hustling between jobs and never knowing when they’ll get paid next, they don’t get the “little more pay” you got every year for your job in accounts payable or HR or whatever you were doing for 36 years.
But, just to play devil’s advocate: Which jobs on a film set does deem important enough to get a credit?
Does should be *do you. Sorry.
*Applause*
Why not put it at the front like is done for feature films?
I have a great idea! How about dropping a couple of commercials! The producers would have a chance to really have a plot and the viewer wouldn’t be watching almost as many minutes of commercials as programming.
Television programming chairs seem to be filled with fools.
I know as a viewer that “dropping a couple of commercials” to ad more programming, sounds great. However; if it were not for the revenue those commercials bring in there would;d be no funds for said new programming.
Entertainment is a business, money for development needs to come from somewhere.
How about we just get rid of MTV in the first place. Let’s be honest here people. Does anyone really want their MTV anymore except for Jersey Shore and Teen Mom? Those shows would actually do a lot better on another network. Any network. MTV is just irrelevant.
I know I would get confused and think the show is over especially with the programs of today. I prefer to watch reruns of the Mary Tyler Moore show over some of the programs on TV today.
I actually watch credits – primarily for legal reasons – and it’s pretty damn cool when your cousin (whose not in the biz) emails you to tell you he saw your name in the credits. Apparently, some people outside the business read credits.
The logo cards are a production company’s way to brand their product, it’s not just a vanity thing. Every product has it’s manufacturer’s name on it someplace.
Agree with the commenter above that network executives shouldn’t be taking producer credits. You’re a vp of development or current…. Not an executive producer. It’s insulting to the producers who actually make the shows.
Film credits are important and necessary. I remember when the credits first started rolling at a jarring lightning speed and recently before the last act. Now a program ends and another starts. It is not as seamless as it sounds and definitely not engaging. Beginnings and endings are important and should be clear.
It might work better if the credits rolled near at the end in a ticker-tape style at the bottom of the screen.
Really? What are the people in Hollywoodland doing all day?
Yeah, why should the people who do actually all th work get theirc redits? Eliminate the network exc credits. They rarely actually work on the show, unless it adding their $.02 where its not wanted or needed.